Writing Professor Claims His Students Can’t Read
“There is a measurable, generational collapse in sustained reading and writing, and the academy is responding to it with improvisation and exhaustion rather than the structural overhaul it requires.”
I bet every single one of these students can recite all of the left’s social justice talking points.
From the Chronicle of Higher Education:
My Students Can’t Read
Six weeks into the term, I assigned my rhetoric and writing students a 20-page article. It was the same length I had assigned for five years and the same length I had read without complaint as an undergraduate a decade ago. Not one student finished it.
When I asked why, a student answered honestly: It was too long, and she kept losing track of what the paper was about. This was not a remedial class: These were students who had cleared the admissions process and written essays good enough to get them here. Yet a routine academic reading assignment had defeated them.
Every generation of professors has complained that their students cannot read. The lament is usually overblown, but data have caught up to anecdote, and what I am seeing in my classroom is no longer a hunch. There is a measurable, generational collapse in sustained reading and writing, and the academy is responding to it with improvisation and exhaustion rather than the structural overhaul it requires.
In February 2024, Adam Kotsko, who teaches in the Shimer Great Books School at North Central College, wrote in Slate that students who once handled 30 pages of reading per class meeting now seem “intimidated by anything over 10 pages and seem to walk away from readings of as little as 20 pages with no real understanding.” Crucially, he added that this is “not a matter of laziness on the part of the students” but of underlying skills they were never given a chance to build.
The Chronicle of Higher Education’s 2024 investigation found the same pattern across institutions as different as the Stevens Institute of Technology and Wellesley College, where the average SAT exceeds 1400. Nicholaus Gutierrez, an assistant professor at Wellesley, told The Chronicle that the baseline for what students consider a reasonable amount of work has dropped so noticeably that he has cut his readings accordingly; a 750-word essay now strikes many students as long. At Stevens, the science and technology studies associate professor Theresa MacPhail described following the mantra of “meet your students where they are” for so long that she has begun to feel “like a cruise director organizing games of shuffleboard.”
Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.






Comments
Nothing new. Robert Heinlein wrote about this sort of thing in his essay “The Happy Days Ahead”, written sometime in the 1970s and collected in the omnibus edition of Expanded Universe in 1980.
“…and written essays good enough to get them here.”
Were these essays written while at an examination or at home in front of a computer?
The essays are usually part of the application package and are written offsite and unsupervised. Yeah, there’s likely AI and plaigerism involved.
Absolutely I believe this. Johnny can’t read. It is an exhaustively verified fact. Our current educational system has no time for reading, writing and arithmetic compared to the urgent need to turn all of everyone’s children into America-hating communists.
Or sexually-confused basket cases.
Leave a Comment