Surprise! California Dems Surge in Post-Election Day Mail In Ballots
“We’ve seen this now probably for about a decade out there. It’s those votes that get tabulated after election day, they tend to be almost always or heavily, heavily Democratic.”
It certainly appears that Democrats are trying to steal the races for California governor and Los Angeles mayor. Does saying that make me an election denier and conspiracy theorist? Guess what. I don’t care. It’s the truth.
On election night, Republican Steve Hilton was in the lead for governor. Now it’s Democrat Xavier Becerra.
FOX News reports:
Former HHS Secretary Xavier Becerra advances to California governor general election, AP projects
California Democratic gubernatorial candidate Xavier Becerra advanced to the state’s general election Friday night, according to an Associated Press race call.
The AP called the race for Becerra at 7:50 p.m. EDT, sending the former U.S. health secretary and ex-California attorney general into the November contest to succeed term-limited Gov. Gavin Newsom.
Becerra and Republican Steve Hilton appeared headed for a November showdown. AP vote totals showed Becerra with 26.7% of the vote and Hilton with 26.4%, while Democrat Tom Steyer finished third with 21.0%.
In a statement following the race call, Becerra touted the result as a victory for working Californians and said his campaign would carry its message into the fall election.
On election night, Spencer Pratt was way ahead of far-left candidate Nithya Raman. She even cried about it on TV. Now? She’s supposedly ‘gaining ground’ on Pratt with each new vote count.
From CBS News:
Pratt’s lead over Raman continues to shrink in LA mayor’s race as candidates battle to face Bass in November
After opening with a sizable lead for second place in the Los Angeles mayor’s race, reality TV personality Spencer Pratt has seen his advantage over Councilmember Nithya Raman steadily erode as incumbent Karen Bass waits to learn her November runoff opponent.
In California, only the top two vote-getters will move on to the November election.
On Thursday, with 64% of the vote counted, Bass widened her lead over Pratt to nearly six percentage points, holding 35% to Pratt’s 29% and Raman’s 23%.
The race for second place tightened even more on Friday with Raman gaining ground to 24.9% and Pratt dropping to 28.2%
“Spencer Pratt has been losing share of the vote with every one of these new ballot dumps, and we expect that to continue,” election data expert Paul Mitchell said on Thursday.
How is this happening? Mail-in ballots.
Steve Kornacki of NBC News recently admitted that mail-in ballots always seem to favor only Democrats, for some strange reason.
I transcribed the video below:
REPORTER: Why would those votes, we don’t know what they’re gonna be, but why would the mail-in votes, the later votes, break for Raman, possibly?
STEVE KORNACKI: Because that is the pattern in California with this system. We’ve seen this now probably for about a decade out there. It’s those votes that get tabulated after election day; they tend to be almost always or heavily, heavily Democratic. We’ve seen this in congressional races in California now over the last decade or so where on election night, we’ve had cases where, a number of them where the Republican candidate is ahead on election night and then it’s a process over days, sometimes even weeks in these key congressional races where just with every one of the updates like the one you just saw right here in LA, the Democrats get closer and closer and closer.
Watch:
"For whatever reason, the late mail-in votes in key races tend to pull Dems ahead"
Hmm, I wonder why 🤔 pic.twitter.com/Y9AbrxR0jT
— End Wokeness (@EndWokeness) June 5, 2026
Isn’t it funny how this voting policy only benefits one side, and that it’s the same side every single time?
That Pratt-Free LA Ballot Drop: 'It didn't happen!!!'
But it DID Happen
Bass: +12,853
Raman: +9,521
Miller: +1,227
Others: +1,233
Pratt: 0@JBBlackClover https://t.co/7JcHfHpOOH— Rasmussen Reports (@Rasmussen_Poll) June 5, 2026
Maybe this is what Gavin Newsom meant when he said that they have a ‘break the glass scenario’ to fall back on.
When asked about the possibility of ending up with two Republican candidates for governor and no Democrats, Gavin Newsom responded:
“We all have agencies. We can shape the future… I don’t anticipate this need to be the case, but there is a ‘break the glass scenario.’ There’s… pic.twitter.com/b4Glz0neVu
— Laura Powell (@LauraPowellEsq) May 15, 2026
Featured image via Twitter/X video.
Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.
Comments
Because the Roberts court has absolutely REFUSED to address the absolutely INSANE leftist process.
Literally every step of the process is designed to prevent you from
Ballots have no postmark, no date, and are accepted WEEKS after the supposed ‘Election Day’, with no proof they were even mailed to begin with.
They register people to vote at the DMV, where they hand out drivers licenses to illegals, absolutely forbid anybody from verifying whether they were actually eligible to vote in the first place, then automatically mail out ballets to EVERY REGISTERED VOTER regardless of whether they asked for one or not.
It’s an absurd process that’s blatantly corrupt, but Roberts steadfastedly declares nobody ‘has standing’ to contest the insanity.
Motor Voter is a national disgrace; it is not limited to California. I stand on principal and a) refuse to register at the DMV, and b) vote on election day.
Yes. I know, I am shoveling sand against the tide.
And you wonder why people who do vote by mail are almost all Democrats. It’s because so many Republicans refuse to do so.
That’s questionable that most of the mail-in ballots are even legitimate.
You just can’t help yourself, can you?
Democrats gotta Democrat.
You seem to imagine that Roberts invented the need for standing!
The need for a plaintiff to have standing is the only real constraint on the judiciary. Without it judges could effectively take on cases sua sponte, by just finding some practice they don’t like and having some friend file suit against it. You might as well dispense with the need for a plaintiff altogether! And that would turn the judiciary into a dictatorship. That’s what we’ve seen happen in Israel.
So tell me, who do you think should have standing to challenge such laws? By definition standing requires the matter being the plaintiff’s business more than that of any random person. If the plaintiff is only affected the same way as the general public is, then how can that be standing?
There is a difference between completely abrogating the requirement of standing (which as you point out contributes in Israel to the judiciary’s being completely out of control, though as you know there are a number of other elements to this) and recognizing that circumstantial evidence can establish that the members of one defined group of people are affected adversely relative to another group of people and concluding that any members of the first group should have standing to challenge the practice in question. Thus, start with the classical expression of the rule that nobody has standing to challenge government expenditures on the basis of “I don’t my taxes used for that.” You have no standing merely on the basis of being a taxpayer, since every taxpayer is affected in exactly the same way by how the money is used regardless of whether they support that or not. And in the same way, in a vacuum nobody has standing to object to a state’s deciding that votes can be cast by mail. It is only If a cognizable claim can be made that the process is being manipulated for the benefit of one political party that anyone in the other party is specifically aggrieved by that and should have standing to challenge the practice. The impediment is that so far no court that I know of has recognized even extreme statistical implausibility as meeting the requisite pleading standard for fraud. The elimination of Pratt will probably not survive a challenge, but based on the numbers so far if Hilton ends up with fewer votes in the official tally than Steyer, that might be the straw that breaks the camel’s back.
One might wonder why the official bean-counters would engage in any kind of fraud in California, given that the establishment choices of Becerra and Bass would likely defeat Republican challengers handily in a general election. The answer may lie a suggestion I heard made by one official whose name escapes me that (I am paraphrasing quite a bit) that the voters of California deserve to have a choice and far more of them would like to have a choice between leftist and a Maoist then a choice between leftist and conservative.
Don’t forget that filing before the election because of these things means you’re filing too early. Filing afterward, while counting is going on and you’ve filed too late.
Election fraud should be a capital offense.
Conviction -> sentencing -> gallows
All on the same day.
There is no crime worse than robbing a man of his liberty.
Allowing vote counters to determine how many votes are needed to ensure a victory is criminal.
At the very least, no votes should be counted at all until all votes to be counted have been collected.
Strange with ballots still being counted that Bacerra has had the race “called” for him and he leads Hilton by only .5%
That’s not strange at all. It’s clear that Becerra will be in the top two. Or do you seriously think that it’s possible, on these numbers, that he will come in third?
True, but It is not unreasonable to object to an announcement of partial results of an election when that is more than just the provision of information but is also a political statement. I believe that Jimmy Carter objected vociferously to announcements that he was getting crushed by Reagan in the east while the polls were still open in California, claiming that that depressed his vote total in the west. He may have been right to a degree, although no one rationally believes that it would have flipped any state let alone changed the overall result.
In an analogous way, one could reasonably believe that the eagerness of the media to announce that Becerra has advanced to the runoff even though ostensibly he is neck and neck with Hilton in the running tally is in the service of “conditioning the market” by creating the impression that virtually all of votes yet to be counted are likely to break heavily Democratic and so no one should be surprised if Steyer is announced as the second-place finisher.
And MINIMIZE the length of time that these late ballots can be counted. In addition, prior to even counting them they should be sorted by date. If they have not been postmarked by noon on election day, they cannot be counted.
Having been on the inside of MN voting for a number of cycles, it was obvious there were problems. But even though there were people who worked extremely hard to increase the presence of Republicans inside precincts and help with early voting, when numbers didn’t work, no one in the party would financially or legislatively support what needed to be done or pay for a much needed investigation.
CA shotgun blasts vote by mail ballots without checking for validity. Living, dead, moved out state, illegal aliens, vacant properties, etc. No elections integrity.
It simple… they are curing the ballots…… removing the psychological “disease” of conservatism…. ballots filled out by mentally incompetent people. Just as the Soviets hospitalized dissidents ,,,, this is just another adjustment. Peter Thiel has likened California to Saudi Arabia….. the natural resources and potential of the state make stupid decisions survivable. California is not great because of the Dem Party…. they just can’t see that and believe this faux workers’ paradise is of their own success.
‘But it DID happen.’
We’re not voting our way out of this.
“For whatever reason”
MUST DO HOMEWORK FOR ANY CONSERVATIVE JOURNALIST.
It was surfaced elsewhere that the King County/Seattle crew from the Washington 2004 Governor’s election (stolen in 3 recounts) is running the ballot counting.
If you didn’t live it, you have no idea how corrupt those recounts were.
They kept “finding” boxes of ballots that had no chain of custody during the recounts. (R) Dino Rossi won in a close election (with cheating baked in) but it was too close, so after 3— yes 3 recounts where ballots kept magically appearing, all in Christine Gregoire’s favor. Since then they’ve learned to push the mail in across the state so they can bake in an unbeatable margin.
Wa is still cheating with boxes of ballots (and empty ballots) being found in random places… you couldn’t make up stupider communist cheating.
I thought I had heard wind the feds were going to intervene in LA, but not going to hold my breath.
It’s not stupid, though. Because ITS WORKING.
It’s only stupid if it doesn’t work.
Once all of the cheating is over Bass will be knocking on the door of 50% with Raman just ahead of Pratt. Then the pressure will be on Raman to concede.
I agree with the outcome but why should Raman noodlehead concede? Pratt, in the end, will be defeated by endless counting just like Harris benefited from in her first statewide race. She lost on election night but 2 weeks later, viola!
How can you intervene they had the ballots ready to go, put them in mail bags
No id necessary
It’s insane
And, remember: the postal workers are union.
No one has to be surprised, it’s naked vote packing and nothing will be done about it.
Golly gee whiz who’d have imagined that the recurring late traunch of ballots would yield low to no votes for Pratt or Hilton? /s
The SAVE act is critical. Next step needs to be communicating to the d/prog that they stop their opposition or prepare to have the entire congressional delegation from States with zero effective election security such as CA be denied seating.
Bass leads Pratt by 6 and she is waiting for her opponent. Pratt leads Ramn noodlehead by 6 and she is closing the gap. Are none of the votes going to anyone down ballot? Are any going to Bass? If this doesn’t set off anybody’s radar nothing will.
Whenever in any close election a massive post-election drop of mail-in ballots happens to be ALL for the (D) candidate – just remember that we have the (D)s solemn word and promise that there’s no such thing as election fraud.
California: Making North Korean elections look free, fair, and competitive.
“decades”…. It makes me think Ca voters aren’t as bad as their elections indicate.
The beneficiaries of the fraud (“winning” candidate) must be tried in a military tribunal with the rest of the offenders
-Summarily executed no appeals, within 24 hours of entry of judgment
Almost like it was as rigged as we thought.
“Good evening, ladies and gentlemen, this is T F Grizzly, your reporter at Forest News. It’s the second of November. The first Tuesday after the first Monday of November 2028 and I will be here all evening to bring you nationwide election results.”
[I reach up and touch my earpiece]
“This just in. Karen Bass and Spencer Pratt are still the top two vote recipients in Los Angeles, with 67% of the vote counted.”
As usual, the longer the counting goes on, the better the communists do. Funny how California loves to brag about being high tech, they can’t manage to count ballots faster than they used to be counted by hand. Back when they didn’t use technology, we usually knew the outcome on election night. Now it takes weeks, or until the communist gets ahead.
Re motor voter:
AB60 is some kind code that indicates a driver’s license holder is not eligible to vote in in Federal Elections. If they totally ignored that code, the illegal aliens would be eligible and would then be able to receive and cast ballots. Gee, I wonder if that could have happened.. Naaaa, impossible!
https://www.aclusocal.org/know-your-rights/your-rights-ab-60-drivers-license/
Yup, that’s how it works. I lived in the OC district that they stole to get the disgusting Katie Porter into Congress in 2018. Mimi Walters was way ahead the day after the election, by Thanksgiving Porter was the “winner”.
Let CA sink before it infects the rest of the country with its plague.
Another issue of this system that I have not seen talked about is the fact that the vote count starts getting published on election day while votes are still being counted. This gives the democrats time to alter the trajectory of the election with just enough “found” ballots to “adjust” the outcome. If they are going to take weeks to count, the tabulated results to date should be kept a secret.
At this point (Sunday afternoon), Pratt is done. Since the results shown at the top of the article, Raman has outscored him nearly 7 to 1. Burn on, big river, burn on.
Down by 40,000 election day and Raman noodlehead pulls in the lead. Count until you win. We all saw this coming.
Leave a Comment