Election Forecaster Shifts Three Senate Races Toward Democrats
“Democrats need to win all four of our Toss-ups to get to a majority, while Republicans need just one to preserve a nominal 50-50 majority.”
With Republicans holding a 53-47 majority in the Senate, Democrats face a steep but not impossible climb to regain control of the chamber in 2026. As both parties jockey for position in a relatively limited number of competitive races, election forecasters are constantly reassessing the battlefield. This week, one prominent political analysis site, Sabato’s Crystal Ball, made three Senate rating changes — and each one favored the Democrats.
Before diving into the changes, I should note that while Larry Sabato, the site’s editor-in-chief, claims to be nonpartisan, the handful of times I’ve heard him speak suggest otherwise. My impression is that he is a leftist through and through.
At any rate, the Crystal Ball moved North Carolina’s open Senate race from the Toss-up column to Leans Democratic. The seat is currently occupied by Republican Sen. Thom Tillis, who is retiring. Meanwhile, the seats currently held by Republican Sens. Dan Sullivan of Alaska and Jon Husted of Ohio were downgraded from Leans Republican to Toss-up, signaling a more competitive outlook for both races.
Despite these changes, however, the publication still claims to “favor Republicans in the overall race for the Senate.”
According to the Crystal Ball:
Democrats need to win all four of our Toss-ups to get to a majority, while Republicans need just one to preserve a nominal 50-50 majority because they hold the vice presidential tiebreaker.
Democrats also have their work cut out for them in the four Toss-ups, albeit for different reasons. In Maine and Michigan, there are questions about the quality of the Democratic candidates. In Alaska and Ohio, meanwhile, the questions are more about Democrats’ ability to overcome each state’s pronounced GOP lean.
…
Our topline count now shows 49 seats Safe/Likely/Leans Republican (including races not being contested this year), 47 Safe/Likely/Leans Democratic, and 4 Toss-ups. If Democrats sweep the Toss-ups, they would win the Senate, assuming that the favored party wins the seats rated as Leans, Likely, and Safe. But Republicans can block Democrats by winning just one of the Toss-ups, meaning that they’re still better-positioned to hold the majority.
The changes, according to the site’s most recent newsletter, “are more about the macro-level, big picture political factors as opposed to micro-level developments in these individual races.”
The article notes that recent polling of these races, President Donald Trump’s poor approval rating, and the Democrats’ strength in the House generic ballot, are factors in this week’s downgrades.
In the same paragraph, however, the Crystal Ball acknowledges that none of these indicators have changed much. But “to the extent they have, they’ve gotten worse for Republicans, to the point where 2026 could be as bad for Republicans as 2018 was, or perhaps even worse.”
So, the analysis tells us that while the GOP might hold onto the majority, the midterms could also be as bad — or even worse — as 2018 when Republicans got crushed. Trump was also under a bogus special counsel investigation at the time for allegedly colluding with the Kremlin to win the 2016 election.
At any rate, the Crystal Ball may be right about North Carolina. Democratic Gov. Roy Cooper has maintained a solid lead over former Republican National Committee Chair Michael Whatley throughout the campaign. Cooper is currently ahead by 6.8 points in the RealClearPolitics polling average. He also enjoys a fundraising advantage over Whatley.
The publication expressed concern that Whatley may have tethered himself too tightly to Trump at a time when the president’s standing in North Carolina appears weak. “With Trump’s standing in the state double-digits underwater in multiple polls, we wonder if Whatley has tied himself too closely to the president,” the Crystal Ball wrote.
But while the Crystal Ball focused on Whatley’s vulnerabilities, Cooper has some baggage of his own — namely his administration’s inept and inadequate handling of Hurricane Helene and the recovery effort in western North Carolina.
The Crystal Ball makes the case that Democratic challengers Mary Peltola and Sherrod Brown in Alaska and Ohio are “stronger candidates than Republicans would typically face in those states and could benefit from a more favorable midterm environment.”
The two polls of the Alaska Senate race in the RealClearPolitics average were conducted in 2025. Sullivan led by one point in the first and Peltola led by one point in the second. But, a survey conducted by Alaska Survey Research in March showed Peltola ahead by five points.
Former Sen. Sherrod Brown lost his seat in 2024 to Republican challenger Bernie Moreno who won by 3.6 points. Moreno did not lead in a single public poll until the final two weeks of the campaign. Trump won the state by 11.2%, but he is not on the ballot this year.
Husted, then serving as the state’s Lieutenant Governor, was appointed to the Senate by Ohio Governor Mike DeWine in January 2025 to fill the seat vacated by J.D. Vance.
While Brown and Husted are currently tied in the RealClearPolitics polling average, the most survey from Fox shows Brown up 8 points over Husted. [My experience with Fox polls is that they routinely favor Democrats.] Naturally, the folks at Crystal Ball cite this poll as evidence of Brown’s strength.
Sabato says Republicans must win one of the tossup races to maintain control of the Senate. While stranger things have happened, I can’t imagine Maine incumbent Sen. Susan Collins, a moderate Republican, losing to the embattled, unqualified Democratic nominee, Graham Platner. Collins trailed her opponent Sara Gideon in every single poll up until the day of the election, and wound up defeating her by 8.6%.
There is still a long way to go before voters cast their ballots, and Senate races have a way of looking very different in June than they do in November. For now, the Crystal Ball’s rating changes reflect growing Democratic optimism and mounting concern about the political environment facing Republicans. But optimism is not the same thing as victory. Republicans need only hold one of the four Toss-up races to retain control of the chamber, and several of the contests Democrats are counting on remain fraught with challenges of their own. If recent election cycles have taught us anything, it’s that today’s conventional wisdom often bears little resemblance to Election Day reality.
Elizabeth writes commentary for Legal Insurrection and The Washington Examiner. She is an academy fellow at The Heritage Foundation. Please follow Elizabeth on LinkedIn.
Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.






Comments
I have doubts about NC. Whatley isn’t catching fire.
Whatley recently told me he is ahead of where he planned to be at this point. He also spoke of how Trump called him and offered full scale rallies.
I don’t know if he can pull it off. But I do know that the money and advertising are going to be at record levels. And, it is going to get nasty.
The math says it still favors Republicans because each election is fundamentally an independent (not a mutually exclusive) event. So even if he was saying 60% each for Dems the likelihood of all 3 happening drops to around 20% in basic math. Now that doesn’t account for other factors and it’s an oversimplification, but it’s possible to see the foundation where that prediction could stem from. Also 60% is a huge exaggeration for the margins.
That’s why they didn’t move the Texas race. Paxton might under perform the other statewide republicans candidates, but there won’t be enough crossover for him to
Loose.
They are not independent. Most “toss-ups” historically go the same way in midterms because of the national environment. RCP has 8 races as tossups, based solely on polling, which includes some seats the Dems currently hold.
NC, maybe, but Alaska? Pull the other one.
I’m sure ranked choice voting will make sure the least wanted candidate will win.
The ranked choice outcome depends on who makes the final 4. Things will become clearer after the primary. Whether or not the 2nd Dan Sullivan gets onto the ballot and makes the final 4 will be very important.
That is impossible. Preferential voting ensures that whoever wins was preferred over all other viable candidates by an absolute majority of the voters.
But for some reason they have a primary first, which is not preferential, but just “pick one”, and the top four advance to the general election. I don’t understand why, since the preferential system is designed to handle any number of candidates. They could eliminate the primary and just have everyone run in the general, and whoever gets 50%+ of the preferred vote wins.
It gives a baseline for needed theft to win…..if just single party choice then smooth sailing.
God save us from pundits.
The bigger issue is that with so many “citizens” favoring the candidates of the party that hates this country, its constitution, its history, and half the population this country is toast, A greater bunch of stupid , ignorant. entitled, pampered, whiny bastards have never existed except perhaps in Rome prior to its downfall.
“President Donald Trump’s poor approval rating, and the Democrats’ strength in the House generic ballot, are factors in this week’s downgrades.”
Pfffft…
If this is what they’re basing their projections on then their projections are complete 🐂 💩.
President Trump is as unpopular as the pollsters decide they want him to be, not how popular he actually is. Witness the recent primary elections in which most, if not all, of the candidates he endorsed won their races.
Obama, the most dreamy president ever, couldn’t do that. Joe Biden was such a complete wreck they wouldn’t let him.
Spare me the “Crystal Ball”.
While Trump is wildly popular in many places there are definitely geographic pockets where he is equally reviled. Lots of establishment type GoP folks don’t like him b/c his policy agenda has overturned their apple cart in some way.
The candidates in toss up States could use some help. Everyone keeps downplaying the risk of losing Maine with Platner v Collins but never explain why his trouncing of the sitting Gov Janet Mills to the point she suspended her Senate campaign doesn’t matter. It gkes something like ‘Oh Mills is older and out of touch and part of the State’s political establishment that younger motivated voters rejected’..that description could also be made to mostly fit Collins. NC is probably the nest pick up opportunity for the d/prog. Gonna need more than after labor day rallies in all four to keep them.
the gov funded scchools breed the next generations of anti americans while the msm/hollywood create the friendly videos etc to support the schools agenda
who runs hollywood and the msm??
Too early to predict. A number of factors could significantly impact the mid terms.
If the Iran war ends soon enough for oil to ship from the gulf states to Europe and Asia that would likely lower gas prices. Lower gas prices by Labor Day and dropping food prices in the fall would probably give the GOP a big boost and take away the Democrats current campaign issue.
Ball is an idiot. NC will be tough but Whatley hasn’t begun to hammer Cooper on Covid, western Carolina flooding, the young lady murdered in Charlotte not to mention all the criminals he helped let out of jail that have caused epic destruction to peoples lives for social justice or something. As for the other races, Alaska also isn’t that great as the Sec of State up there is looking into that Dan Sullivan character who entered the race after switching from Dem just to confuse the voters. Ohio is the only one that might be interesting but if gas continues to drop Husted is positioned to win that one too.
If you want a good rundown of races check out The Huddle’s Thursday show on YouTube where they run down several states, how they are shaking out so far and why.
Leave a Comment