U. Washington Women’s Soccer Team Loses to 14-Year-Old Boys
Another women’s soccer team has suffered a defeat at the hands of teenage boys.
Not only are men, on average, stronger and faster than their female counterparts – teenage boys are sometimes better athletes than female college soccer players.
Recently, the Crossfire U14 Boys soccer team defeated the University of Washington women’s soccer team 2 to 1.
Political commentator Brandi Kruse first noticed the April 30 match and then noted that the women’s team lost.
Update: The women lost. https://t.co/AwzsZd40IF
— Brandi Kruse (@BrandiKruse) May 5, 2026
As a reminder “U14” means “14 years of age and under,” so these players could have also been 12 and 13 years-old.
Commentator Ari Hoffman noted that the women’s team is still pretty good.
“The Washington Huskies women’s Division I soccer program is coming off a Big Ten Tournament championship and an Elite Eight appearance last season,” he wrote for The Post Millennial. “Yet despite the program’s success, the women reportedly lost to a boys’ team made up of players too young to drive.”
He said the result should come as no surprise, given the physical differences between men and women – even between 13-year-old boys and 21-year-old women.
Hoffman wrote:
To longtime observers of the issue, the outcome was hardly surprising. Women’s teams have frequently trained against boys squads for years because the increased speed, strength, and pace of play can sharpen performance ahead of competition against other women. Coaches often view the practice as a way to simulate tougher conditions before matches that are expected to be less physically demanding.
Indeed, this is not the first time a boys’ travel team defeated an elite women’s team.
Infamously, the U.S. Women’s National Team lost to a U15 boys soccer team 5-2 in 2017, as CBS Sports previously reported.
Reporter Roger Gonzalez ran interference for the team, claiming the women’s team “surely wasn’t going all out, with the main goal being to get some minutes on the pitch, build chemistry when it comes to moving the ball around, improve defensive shape and get ready for Russia.”
In 2022, Arsenal’s female team similarly lost 5-0 to a U15 squad.
“Biologically, a team of boys aged 14 to 16 are thought to provide the ideal test for a women’s team because, although they are often quicker and stronger, they are not at the insurmountable level of a senior men’s side,” The Times reported.
[Featured image courtesy of University of Washington athletics]
Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.
Comments
Ms Rappinoe, please take note.
She should know….she also lost to a boys team of similar age discrepancy.
Did you just assume Rappinoe’s gender? Bold move. Very bold.
yes – Mr. Rappinoe
How dare he use the wrong gender
It’s a despicable something or other.
Shocking!
Inconceivable, even!
This will be interpreted on the left not as a burn, but proof that women’s teams need more men on the roster, especially confused teens.
They always do.
I would love to see them face a team of young men who identify as “trans women”, too. Just to put another pin in that stupidity.
The stone age: Alley Oop know men women not same. Women soft, curvey, smell good. Men strong, stink, and taciturn.
The woke age: wOmEn CaN bE pEn!5 pOSSeSSeRs.
Hey, Elon. I don’t want to live on this planet anymore…
Not always smell good.
Re: Major advertising recently for vaginal deodorants.
Women’s teams play boys for practice. They don’t want to win, they want the experience because it makes them better. You choose the age so that you’re defeated but not wiped out. You’d learn nothing from a men’s team except that you never get the ball.
The reason women don’t play full out against boys is they would get hurt.
The best U-14 girl player I saw wore a full leg brace, because she wrecked her knee playin on boys teams.
Back in the day, my dorm pick up team would regularly practice against the top 20 ranked women’s basketball team.
We never played a game, but never “got beat” by the women even though no one was really keeping score. We were there for the women to perfect defenses and offensive plays.
The difference is that no one was keeping score. It was a practice.
Once you start keeping score, timing the game and have referees, it is no longer a practice.
It’s a game,
The women lost a game to a U14 team.
Not a practice. A game.
There’s a reason we have sex based categories for competition sports. Same.reason we have weight classes. Size, strength, speed, bone density, mass, arm reach, power, lung capacity, endurance all make a big difference, usually an insurmountable one. Rhonda Rousey can probably force a tap out of many untrained, out of shape Men…. but against an average size Man with a decent but lesser skill level (a new brown belt) who has similar level of fitness she’s gonna lose the vast majority of the time. Even more so outside the confines of a ring with a referee in a street fight. Pretending otherwise is irrational nonsense in service of an ideological narrative.
Rousey is a great woman athlete but if she got tagged once she’d be out. A good hard jab would rattle her noggin.
Kind of like how an average gorilla would destroy the top UFC fighters, as long as it knew it was in a fight
Both of my kids played soccer, and both agree that 14 is the absolute end of equality.
For those unfamiliar with youth soccer, it’s UNDER 14.
That’s how the age brackets work.
U-14 could include 12 year olds.
Puberty.
Are you sure there’s no 20 somethings identifying as U14?
This in itself is neither surprising nor informative. It’s a sideshow for the main issue: Female impersonators being allowed to play in women’s sports.
I find it fascinating that so many people accept them at the level we see today. Their acceptance requires a level of cognitive dissonance that borders on madness in itself. I would love to have a discussion with someone who holds the view that “self-identification” outweighs biology and have them explain how feelings can overcome scientific analysis.
I have no objection to deluded people indulging their fantasies in private or occasionally in public but indulgence should stop at doors marked “Women.”
The people who espouse men in women’s sports are the same ones who display a sign proclaiming “science is real” along with other liberal pap. They wouldn’t know science if it hit them up the side of their head.
“Science is real, but i read my horoscope every morning!”
the left had an easy explanation:
see, if we had allowed transmen to play on our team we’d have won
Wouldn’t that be women pretending to be men?
not to lefty
and they run the game
If only leftists would accept the facts, data, evidence, historical records and objective truth the sexes are not equal.
AND THAT’S OKAY!
MEN AND WOMEN WEREN’T CREATED TO BE EQUAL, THEY WERE CREATED TO COMPLIMENT ONE ANOTHER.
But alas, that strikes at feminism’s biggest lie, “Women can do anything men can do, better than men, because women are superior.”
Rhonda Rousey can probably force a tap out of many untrained, out of shape Men…. but against an average size Man with a decent but lesser skill level (a new brown belt) who has similar level of fitness she’s gonna lose the vast majority of the time. Even more so outside the confines of a ring with a referee in a street fight.
_____________________________________________________
another huge component, regardless of skill level / training /size / gender, is mindset–an assault / attempted rape / car jacking / murder IS NOT a sporting event–it is about survival only–absent effective escape,
it requires the determination to seriously injure / maim / neutralize an
attacker(s) so that YOU survive to live another day–all the training on earth or the lack of it means nothing without the will to use it
In a sane world, this type of thing would end the “confused men in women’s sports” debate.
“Confused men” in sports pretend to be “trans” for the same reason why Hispanic kids often take Spanish in high school – it’s an “easy A” (easy “win”).
Same reason Anglo kids used to take it in the ’60s.
In New England, proximity to Quebec (and no significant Hispanic incursion closer than the PRs in NYC) made French the more standard choice. A choice I would have reconsidered, had I known then where life and Joe Biden would take me.
All you need to know about women vs men is one of the first well publicized trans Renee (Richard) Richards was able to play women’s professional tennis doubles in her (his) 40s after transitioning.
why not singles?
I’m pretty sure I remember reading that the U.S. Women’s World Cup Championship team lost to a U15 boy’s team.
Indeed, it’s in the 4th-to-last paragraph of the story.
Example #2684 why males are better physically than females
What is the point of this article? At first I thought perhaps to demonstrate that MEN (including post-pubertal boys) should not compete against girls. But the author makes no reference to that. So I conclude the point s to humiliate the UW women’s team players.
What a gaggle of amateurs writing for this blog.
Leave a Comment