Trump: U.S. Navy Blasts, Seizes Iranian Ship
“Today, an Iranian-flagged cargo ship named TOUSKA, nearly 900 feet long and weighing almost as much as an aircraft carrier, tried to get past our Blockade.”
The Trump administration is claiming a major escalation at sea, saying a U.S. Navy destroyer disabled and seized an Iranian-flagged cargo ship after it allegedly attempted to run the ongoing naval blockade in the Gulf of Oman.
The development was first shared on Sunday in a post from Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, who tweeted a statement from President Donald Trump’s Truth Social account describing the encounter involving the sanctioned cargo vessel TOUSKA.
— Pete Hegseth (@PeteHegseth) April 19, 2026
“Today, an Iranian-flagged cargo ship named TOUSKA, nearly 900 feet long and weighing almost as much as an aircraft carrier, tried to get past our Naval Blockade, and it did not go well for them. The U.S. Navy Guided Missile Destroyer USS SPRUANCE intercepted the TOUSKA in the Gulf of Oman, and gave them fair warning to stop. The Iranian crew refused to listen, so our Navy ship stopped them right in their tracks by blowing a hole in the engineroom. Right now, U.S. Marines have custody of the vessel. The TOUSKA is under U.S. Treasury Sanctions because of their prior history of illegal activity. We have full custody of the ship, and are seeing what’s on board! President DONALD J. TRUMP”
The TOUSKA was not a random target. Shipping records tie the vessel to Iran’s state-linked shipping network, and U.S. authorities had flagged it under sanctions enforcement tracking prior to Sunday’s confrontation.
If confirmed, the incident would mark a clear shift from how the blockade has operated since it began earlier this month, when U.S. naval forces were focused on redirecting vessels rather than engaging them.
The Spruance had already been involved in at least one earlier encounter this week, redirecting an Iranian-flagged vessel that attempted to skirt the blockade along the Iranian coastline before the situation was resolved without incident. Officials have signaled for days that stricter enforcement was coming, and U.S. Marines have reportedly been training for maritime interdiction scenarios, including boarding operations and the seizure of sanctioned ships. Sunday may represent the first real test of that posture.
Sunday may represent the first real test of that posture.
Iran has not responded.
Update: 5:41 PM EST
CENTCOM has released footage of the interception of the TOUSKA
WATCH : U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM) has released footage showing the interception of the motor vessel Touska in the Northern Arabian Sea by USS Spruance (DDG-111).
According to CENTCOM, the destroyer issued repeated warnings over several hours before taking action after… pic.twitter.com/AmaiZeXAHs
— Inside the conflict (@InsidConflict) April 19, 2026
Update 6:35 PM EST
CENTCOM released a full press release:
“U.S. forces operating in the Arabian Sea enforced naval blockade measures against an Iranian-flagged cargo vessel attempting to sail toward an Iranian port, April 19.
Guided-missile destroyer USS Spruance (DDG 111) intercepted M/V Touska as it transited the north Arabian Sea at 17 knots enroute to Bandar Abbas, Iran. American forces issued multiple warnings and informed the Iranian-flagged vessel it was in violation of the U.S. blockade.
After Touska’s crew failed to comply with repeated warnings over a six-hour period, Spruance directed the vessel to evacuate its engine room. Spruance disabled Touska’s propulsion by firing several rounds from the destroyer’s 5-inch MK 45 Gun into Touska’s engine room. U.S. Marines from the 31st Marine Expeditionary Unit later boarded the non-compliant vessel, which remains in U.S. custody.
American forces acted in a deliberate, professional, and proportional manner to ensure compliance. Since the blockade’s commencement, U.S. forces have directed 25 commercial vessels to turn around or return to an Iranian port.”
Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.
Comments
What a difference it makes when America doesn’t f88k about!
How exactly did the ship’s captain expect this to work?
Either they planned on being caught, or expected a force with surface, air, and satellite sureivlance tracking every ship in the area to not notice a giant cargo ship trunlding for open waters.
Or did he think he could outrun all the naval vessels and our aircraft?
More likely, the IRGC was threatening him and people he cared about because they needed money and were praying nobody would notice.
Sorry, IRGC, nobody is listening to your prayers.
A lumbering cargo ship isn’t gonna win a race with a high performance naval vessel. “Hey, Hamid, think we can win?”
.
It simply never ceases to amaze me how people try to apply Western knowledge to these prehistoric savages.
Their entire country has been under an internet blackout for months. And even before that, only ‘approved’ news sources were allowed.
The Captain likely simply had NO IDEA that the US was in total control of the Strait, and had no authority to turn around or surrender, so once reality sunk in, he was… sunk.
After past U.S. (and Western) actions, the ship’s captain thought that he could just keep going and nothing would happen. He applied the FAFO rule and lost.
A little over 240 years ago (March 1786), John Adams and Thomas Jefferson travelled to London to negotiate an end to the attacks on American ships (by the “Barbary Pirates”) with the Barbary States envoy Sidi Haj Abdulrahman.
Here is a verbatim excerpt from their letter to John Jay who was serving as the Secretary for Foreign Affairs under the Continental Congress about the meetings. In that position John Jay was essentially the predecessor of the modern U.S. Secretary of State
“We took the liberty to make some inquiries concerning the Grounds of their pretentions to make war upon Nations who had done them no Injury, and observed that we considered all mankind as our friends who had done us no wrong, nor had given us any provocation.
When they asked him why they attacked innocent countries that had done them no harm, “The Ambassador answered us that it was founded on the Laws of the Prophet, that it was written in their Koran, that all nations who should not have answered their authority were sinners, that it was their right and duty to make war upon them wherever they could be found, and to make slaves of all they could take as prisoners; and that every Mussulman [sic] who was slain in battle was sure to go to paradise.”
That it was a law that the first who boarded an Enemy’s Vessell should have one slave, more than his share with the rest, which operated as an incentive to the most desperate Valour and Enterprise, that it was the Practice of their Corsairs to bear down upon a ship, for each sailor to take a dagger in each hand and another in his mouth, and leap on board, which so terrified their Enemies that very few ever stood against them, that he verily believed the Devil assisted his Countrymen, for they were almost always successful. We took time to consider and promised an answer, but we can give him no other, than that the demands exceed our Expectations, and that of Congress, so much that we can proceed no further without fresh instructions.”
The more things change, the more they stay the same.
So they have always been savages and lunatics.
.
Just what did they think would happen after Trump has shown the world repeatedly that he doesn’t bluff?
Good grief, these people are stupid.
.
The ship needed a cloaking device.
It could be Iranians are stupid and suicidal. Maybe. I think also that they are also essentially children throwing a tantrum. It has worked from them for 50 years. It will be difficult for them to come to terms with the reality that their nonsense games are over.
“Hey, Pahjeet. What’s that sign say?”
“It say, ‘No U-turn.'”
“U-turn here!, Pahjeet.”
Same energy.
Leave a Comment