Karma: SPLC Tried To Cut Off “Hate List” Groups From Fidelity Charitable, Now It’s Cut Off
SPLC tried to weaponize Donor Advised Funds to cut off groups on it’s politicized Hate Watch lists, now it is cut off after federal indictment.
For decades The Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) terrorized the right-of-center political spectrum with fear of being put on SPLC’s “Hate Watch” lists. As I’ve discussed in many recent interviews, the lists were political clubs used against people like Dr. Ben Carson, Prof. Carol Swain, Rand Paul, the Family Research Council, and countless others who did not deserve to be on a list next to Neo-Nazis.
We have been on SPLC’s case for over 15 years,
SPLC’s hate lists were inflated both by counting “chapters” as individual groups (thereby inflating the numbers) as well as including groups that may have been nothing more than websites with no on-the-ground presence. Such was the case with supposed Klan and neo-Nazi groups on the hate map in Rhode Island.
But the lists were worse than that. SPLC struck deals for the SPLC list to be used by the FBI and major corporations, and also as a pressure tactic. SPLC pressured Fidelity Charitable, one of the largest Donor Advised Funds (DAF) not to permit pass through donations to groups on the hate list. A DAF functions as a pass through way to donate – you donate to the DAF and the DAF gives you a tax deduction receipt, and you later can “recommend” that the funds you donated be sent to certain groups. It’s a very common way for both large and small donors to donate in years when they need the tax deduction, but spread the payments to groups over longer periods of time. It’s a massive industry and perfectly lawful.
DAF’s have hundreds of billions of dollars under management, and as of 2024 passed through over $65 billion to charities.
Having tried to pressure Fidelity to cut off others, SPLC now finds itself cut off by Fidelity and Vanguard Charitable from pass through donations. The NY Times first reported the story:
Two of the country’s largest sponsors of donor-advised funds have cut off the Southern Poverty Law Center.
Last week, the Justice Department indicted the civil rights nonprofit on charges of committing financial crimes. Many of the center’s supporters immediately went online to donate money to help it fight the federal government.
But Fidelity Charitable told its customers, who have over 350,000 charitable giving accounts that allow them to maximize tax savings while giving money to eligible nonprofits, that they could not donate to the center through the accounts anymore.“Fidelity Charitable is aware of an ongoing governmental investigation into Southern Poverty Law Center,” according to an email it sent to a donor. “Consistent with our grant-making standards and practices, the organization is not an eligible grant recipient during the ongoing investigation.” Fidelity Charitable shares a parent company with Fidelity Investments.
Vanguard Charitable sent a similar message when denying a grant request: “The organization has had allegations and/or charges brought against them for activities that may call into question their ability to carry out their tax-exempt charitable purpose.”
The Times noted SPLC’s prior attempts to pressure Fidelity, Vanguard and other DAFs:
In 2023, the S.P.L.C. criticized Fidelity Charitable and other sponsors of donor-advised funds, including Vanguard, for acting as a “consistent and significant source of income for groups peddling a variety of hateful and extremist beliefs.” It specifically mentioned white nationalist, hard right and anti-LGBTQ+ groups.
Tyler O’Neil at The Daily Signal, who has written extensively about SPLC, noted that Southern Poverty Law Center Gets Taste of Its Own Debanking Medicine:
After years of the Southern Poverty Law Center demanding that charitable foundations blacklist conservative and Christian nonprofits, the shoe is finally on the other foot: Fidelity Charitable has denied contributions to the SPLC.
Fidelity hasn’t targeted the SPLC for ideological reasons in the same way the SPLC targets conservatives, however—America’s largest sponsor of donor-advised funds is merely following its own policies regarding nonprofits under criminal investigation….
Conservatives may be forgiven for indulging in a little bit of schadenfreude at this news.
As I documented in my book “Making Hate Pay: The Corruption of the Southern Poverty Law Center,” the SPLC weaponized its history of suing KKK groups into bankruptcy to smear conservatives. It places mainstream conservative and Christian nonprofits on a “hate map” with Klan chapters, claiming the map reveals the “infrastructure upholding white supremacy.” This “hate map” inspired a terrorist attack in 2012.
The SPLC doesn’t just release this list every year to its donors and the media, exaggerating “hate” in order to drum up relevance and scare donors into ponying up cash. It also encourages social media platforms and companies like Fidelity to blacklist the groups on the map.
The SPLC has partnered with the Council on American-Islamic Relations to publish “Hate-Free Philanthropyopens in a new tab” reports that call on companies in the charitable sector to blacklist “anti-Muslim hate groups.” The Amalgamated Foundation, a project of the SEIU-owned Amalgamated Bank, launched the “Hate Is Not Charitableopens in a new tab” campaign, urging donor-advised funds to blacklist the groups on the SPLC “hate map.” Amalgamated Bank has, thankfully, sunsetted the campaign and removed it from the website.
In 2023, the SPLC released a report on “extremist finance,” pressuring donor-advised funds operated by major banks to blacklist “hate groups” like Alliance Defending Freedom and “antigovernment extremist groups” like Moms for Liberty.
In 2017, Vanco Payments abruptly ceased providing payment processing services to the Ruth Institute. Vanco Payments noted that the Ruth Institute “has been flagged by Card Brands as being affiliated with a product/service that promotes hate, violence, harassment and/or abuse.” It did not specifically cite the SPLC, but the “hate” accusation likely traces back to the SPLC’s brandingopens in a new tab the institute an “anti-LGBTQ hate group.”
In 2022, PayPal froze the Moms for Libertyopens in a new tab account, providing no explanation. Only after Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, a Republican, pressured the company did it restore the account and allow Moms for Liberty to access the $4,500 in that account.
Some companies, such as Eventbrite, make no secret of the fact that they use the SPLC “hate map” to blacklist organizations, refusing to do business with them.
In the wake of the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol, the Treasury Department’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network sent an email to leadership at major banks, urging them to stop “bankrolling bigotry,” specifically citing the SPLC on “hate groups.”
This loss of DAF funding could be significant, though SPLC has several hundred million dollars in assets and over $100 million in annual donations as of 2024.
The DAFs cutting off the SPLC is a HUGE blow.
Fidelity is their biggest source of publicly disclosed revenue, usually giving them $3-4M per year, and their second and third largest donors are also DAFs. https://t.co/Afjedjk5IE
— Parker Thayer (@ParkerThayer) April 29, 2026
For a smaller non-profits, like the ones SPLC tried to cut off from DAF’s, such news would be devastating. For SPLC it’s a rounding error for now, but if it escalates into states suspending SPLC’s right to solicit, that would be financially more serious.
Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.






Comments
splc getting their just desserts
The SPLC’s Intelligence Report is the far left’s Der Stürmer of hate.
If you use PayPal, you’re a collaborator.
If you leave actual money in PayPal accounts, you’re a sucker.
Now it’s time to target all corporations and government agencies that still make use of the SPLC hate list. Force them to sever their connections to the SPLC. They should also be deplatformed off the major social networks and debanked as well. It’s what they would do after all,
The IRS should terminate SPLC’s tax exempt status.
unfortunately that is not going to happen. lots of impediments to losing tax exempt status, one of which is the tax exempt group at the IRS that handles exemption qualifications is very partisan (most of the IRS is politically agnostic, however as evidenced by lerner, that group is not)
Speaking of hate and violence…
The Otroushko family (that assaulted a reporter at an anti-ICE rally) has been indicted by the feds.
While I can find a couple of breathless “Yay! They were indicted!”, I can find nothing saying of what. Lots of rah-rah, but no indication what federal law they supposedly broke.
According to Yahoo…”obstruction with force”
I do see an announcement from DOJ, now, saying “allegedly assaulting journalist.”
Annnnd, how is that a matter under federal jurisdiction? I’m happy someone cares enough to apply justice to these animals, but I do not want our federal government having legal jurisdiction over everything. It’s a violation of federalism (and opens everyone up to double jeopardy).
Maybe the Professor or another legal beagle here can give us a post on the subject.
I think the assault occurred on property that is owned by the Fed government. That gives them jurisdiction.
The SPLC deserves this and so much more. May the prison sentences be long.
Lawfare was constraining and suppressing the activities of many otherwise participating conservatives until recently.
The left had weaponized the courts into destroying healthy public discourse. This is a big problem. I’ve compiled a list of anti-Trump conspirators if anyone would like to add to it. This list might need updating since I last updated it:
Co-conspirators involved in destroying America’s faith (what’s left of it) in our election freedoms:
Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton (and staff including Robert E. ‘Robby’ Mook), Ray Hulser (former chief of the DOJ’s Public Integrity Section, and on Jack Smith’s team prosecuting President Trump; known to have declined prosecution of the Clinton Foundation in 2016 – see John Durham’s report; also see “Clinton Cash” by Peter Schweizer), Jim Clapper, James Comey, Lisa Monico (assistant AG), Andrew McCabe, Laura Dehmlow, Peter Strzok, Lisa Page, Loretta Lynch, John Brennan, Michael J. Morell, Joe Biden, Merrick Garland (in his role as Attorney General of the United States), Biden’s White House Counsel Dana Remus and Jonathan Su (case known as “Arctic Frost” opened 4/13/2022 by anti-Trump former FBI agent Timothy Thibault), Biden’s Deputy Attorney General Lisa Monaco, Biden’s former National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan, anti-Trumper Andrew Weissman, Special Counsel Robert Mueller in his role as an MSNBC contributor, lawyer Mark Zaid, who represented Eric Ciaramella – the CIA analyst identified as the whistleblower in Trump’s impeachment in 2019, Norm Eisen – special counsel to the Democrat-led House Judiciary Committee during the impeachment, Leon E. Panetta (one of the 50 signers), Michael E. Horowitz (IG), Ian Sams (a spokesman for the White House Counsel’s Office), Politico’s Heidi Przybyla, CNN’s Manu Raju, Jay Bratt, Katherine Reiley, Melanie Joy, Caroline Saba, Bradley Weinsheimer (associate deputy AG) for his role as a conduit for Hunter Biden’s legal team, Fatima Gross Graves (wife of U.S. Attorney for D.C. Matthew Graves, appointed by President Biden, and a vocal liberal activist), NY Attorney Gen. Letitia James (an elected democrat who campaigned on a platform of going after Trump), PR firm Berlin Rosen, Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg (an elected democrat who campaigned on a platform of going after Trump), NYC judge Arthur Engoron, judge Juan Merchan (made 3 political contributions to Joe Biden, the Progressive Turnout Project, and a group called Stop Republicans in 2020), Lesley Wolf, (assistant U.S. attorney in Delaware and a top prosecutor on the Hunter Biden firearms charges investigation), The Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC), Nina Jankowicz (former head of a newly created bureaucracy called ‘Disinformation Governance Board’ under the Department of Homeland Security), Stephanie O’Sullivan, Edward Giataro, Samantha E. Vinograd, William J. Tuttle, Yael Eisenatate, Corinna A Graff, Emily J. Horne, Julia Santucci, Megan Dempsey, Shelby L. Pierson, NinhX. Nguyen, CNN analyst Beth Sanner, (continued)
(resumption) … Sid Blumenthal, Rachel Cohen (spokeswoman for Senate Intelligence Committee Vice Chairman Mark Warner, D-Va.), Michael Sussman (Hillary Clinton campaign lawyer at Perkins Coie and the operative who perpetrated a massive Russia-collusion fraud on the American public which not only manipulated the 2016 election process but also froze the Trump presidency and nearly paralyzed the nation politically for 4 years), Adam Schiff, Mitt Romney, Emmet Sullivan, Christopher Steele, Igor Danchenko, Brian Auten, Adam Kinzinger, Richard and Liz Cheney, Joseph Cofer Black, Glenn Simpson, Christopher Wray, Laura Dehmlow, Susan Rice, Rod Rosenstein, Thomas Catan, Bruce Ohr, Nellie Ohr, Neil King Jr., Shailagh Murray, Mary Jacoby, Peter Fritsch, Edward Baumgartner, Rinat Akhmetshin, Samantha Power, Stephen Somma, Stefan Halper, John Podesta, Cody Shearer, Marc Elias, Thomas Williams, Colin Kahl, Kevin Clinesmith, Kathleen Kavalec, Lewis Lukens, Gregory Craig, Jonathan Winer, Victoria Nuland, Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman, Tashina Gauhar, John Carlin, Sally Yates, Rodney Joffe, Fani Willis (an elected democrat), the cybersecurity firm Neustar, the Perkins Coie law firm, Georgia Technology Executive 1, James Baker, FBI special agent Elvis Chan, John McCain (deceased), Allison Gill, former Twitter head of legal/policy/&trust (aka chief censor) Vijaya Gaddle, former Twitter head of trust & safety Yoel Roth, the Election Integrity Project at Stanford University, CNN, MSNBC, NPR, NBC, CBS, ABC, Facebook/Mark Zuckerberg, Jack Dorsey, Reid Garrett Hoffman (LinkedIn), almost every democrat politician, …
Thanks for the list. My only quarrel is the inclusion of Mitt Romney. He means well but is a fool, not a conspirator.
A couple of names are repeated.
The list is not long enough. Think of the judges at the trials of January 6 defendants, leaders of “election integrity” NGOs, etc.
Dehmlow and Monaco are repeated.
Also, how is that indictment involving Don Lemon going?
I would like to see civil suits, perhaps even a class action, filed by every group that SPLC put on their watch list. Take them for all they have now and every future penny donated. It would not surprise me a bit if SPLC wasn’t disbursing this money into their own pockets as I type. All good grifts come to an end.
Their side of story: https://www.splcenter.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/us-splc-motion-disclosure-grand-jury-transcript.pdf
cant wait for the Clinton Foundation to be strung up. I know theyve kept a low profile since Hillary has been shuttled from power, but that pay to play money needs to be yanked.