Image 01 Image 03

UC-Riverside Prof Wants to Get Rid of Terms Like ‘Gay’ and ‘Lesbian’ Because They Harm Trans People

UC-Riverside Prof Wants to Get Rid of Terms Like ‘Gay’ and ‘Lesbian’ Because They Harm Trans People

“If being ‘gay’ means being a man attracted to men, it assumes ‘man’ is a stable, inherent category, when history shows the definition of manhood is constantly changing”

Once again, the world must be turned upside down in order to make things comfortable for the trans community.

FOX News reports:

California professor calls to abolish identities like ‘gay’ and ‘lesbian’ since they ‘harm trans people’

University of California, Riverside associate professor Brandon Robinson argued that a sexual identity label like “gay” or “lesbian” “harms trans people” and called for abolishing sexual identities altogether.

While promoting the book “Trans Pleasure: On Gender Liberation and Sexual Freedom,” Robinson, a member of the Gender & Sexuality Studies Department, spoke with UC Riverside about gender identities on Friday.

Robinson, who uses they/them pronouns, explained the importance of moving beyond “gender essentialism” from sexual identities, which the professor claims can be built around gender “stereotypes.”

“If being ‘gay’ means being a man attracted to men, it assumes ‘man’ is a stable, inherent category, when history shows the definition of manhood is constantly changing,” Robinson said. “Gender essentialism also harms trans people, who often complicate those binary boundaries.”

Robinson included traditional labels like “gay” or “lesbian” as ones to abolish, wanting readers to question “why we privilege gender and genitals above all other attributes” in our desires.

“I think the risk is worth it. While those communities are important, moving beyond those labels allows us to see people more accurately. It leads to a more complex — and more biologically accurate — understanding of ourselves as human beings. It allows us to explore our desires beyond labels that often confine and constrain us. And it allows us to explore our desires beyond shame that often comes with many labels as well,” Robinson said.

DONATE

Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.

Comments

“when history shows the definition of manhood is constantly changing,”
Only to the stupid, gullible, and those with ulterior motives.

destroycommunism | March 11, 2026 at 3:07 pm

same people that dont want voter id

sick fookers

Yup gay people time for you to wake up and realize “progressives” are throwing you under the bus just like they did to women, Jews and anyone who doesn’t support their completely insane agenda. Now you can’t say your a lesbian because it might harm some dudes feelings whose pretending to be a woman attracted to other women while he’s actually just a guy in a dress. Yup no room for sexual predators there at all.

    tbonesays in reply to schmuul. | March 12, 2026 at 2:57 pm

    I always wondered if any real homosexual believes that. It sounds like gay-conversion via ideology.

When will they get rid of boy cause it rhymes with soy? And I will ALWAYS be a lesbian trapped in a man’s body.

OK, let’s get rid of all those “objectionable” terms. We can replace them with one word:

Psychotic.

healthguyfsu | March 11, 2026 at 8:32 pm

History has shown the exact opposite of those definitions constantly changing. Why do supposedly intelligent people make such intellectually dishonest statements?

This story proves that God has a devilish sense of humor.

irishgladiator63 | March 11, 2026 at 10:34 pm

So he’s calling for gay genocide, right? That’s how this works.

Harm??? What harm? Being offended is being harmed? If so, he’s harming me.

This bullshit can only be the product of a diastrophic mind with too little productive work to do.

Suburban Farm Guy | March 12, 2026 at 11:35 am

Language Police queering reality. Make the maps gay! These maleducated freaks run you $250k in student debt to excel at playing word games. Good luck getting a job (other than making copies at the Gender & Sexuality Studies Department).

Orwell vs Darwin. Cage Match of the Year!

Again: the radical left eating its own.