Jonathan Ross, the ICE agent struck by Renee Good in Minneapolis, suffered internal bleeding.
Ross shot at Good when he feared for his life. Good passed away.
CBS News was the first outlet to report the injuries (from what I can tell), stating that DHS has not confirmed Ross’s injury.
I’m always hesitant to report anything coming from “sources,” but this sounds serious:
Kristi Noem, the Homeland Security secretary, previously acknowledged that Ross was taken to the hospital after the shooting and was released the same day. She said he was recovering from his injuries, describing him as an experienced law enforcement officer who believed he was defending himself and fellow agents.
“The officer was hit by the vehicle. She hit him. He went to the hospital. A doctor did treat him. He has been released,” Noem told reporters on Jan. 7.
Ross, a 10-year law enforcement veteran with ICE, was seriously injured in June in a separate incident in the Minneapolis area when he was dragged by a car during an attempted arrest, requiring 33 stitches and hospital care, court records show.
Earlier this morning, Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey downplayed Ross’s injuries. From Fox News:
“The ICE agent walked away with a hip injury that he might as well have gotten from closing a refrigerator door with his hips,” he told reporters Friday. “Give me a break. No, he was not ran over. He walked out of there with a hop in his step.”
DHS has been quiet about Ross since the shooting.
Can you blame the department?
U.S. Border Patrol Commander Gregory Bovino told CBS News “that Ross ‘has had several threats against his life'”
DHS has put Ross in a safe location where he is recovering from his injuries.
Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.






Comments
DHS hasn’t commented because they would violate his rights to do so. These other crybabies can speculate with impunity…for now. DHS doesn’t have that option. If this is true, their comeuppance may be having Ross sue the mayor for defamatory statements if they can be shown by preponderance to accelerate the threats and other Dem tactics.
This is a perfect example of why the perps internal bleeding was justified. Parents try to instill good character in their children, unfortunately some turn out to be bad seeds regardless of parents best efforts.
Someone should ask the mayor what his security team would do if I tried to give him a hop in his step.
In less charitable terms, he suffered a bruise.
So, now you’re admitting he was actually struck and, therefore, was justified in his use of lethal force? Because at the start of this, it was complained that he didn’t need to shoot because he wasn’t actually in danger. Now that you acknowledge the danger was real, do you admit his reaction was justified? Probably not. But you believed lies when the truth was available to you (in the form of the videos of the event). What does it say about you that you sided with lies and liars?
I think Rags is still haunting LI.
Seymour just wants cops to die. And Republicans. And you.
Actually, he would be justified even if he hadn’t been struck. All it takes is a reasonable expectation of death or serious physical harm.
We know that. I was making a point. Butts wasn’t just wrong, he was completely wrong. He goes about making the admission in an indirect manner.
So: no (external) blood no foul?
If her wheels hadn’t spun out in the ice as she accelerated, this attack would have had plenty of external blood.
Ducking the question I see. What would the judgmental mayor’s security detail do if I drove right at him and tried to “bruise” his hip with my car?
No, nitwit.
A bruise is not the same as internal bleeding. 🙄
The vile, stupid and evil Dhimmi-crats will claim that the internal bleeding wasn’t life-threatening, so, the agent had no cause to shoot the deceased.
That’s how fanatical, irrational, unhinged, stupid and wicked these wretched pukes are.
At any rate, an injury suffered or not suffered is totally irrelevant to a legal analysis of the agent’s lawful use of lethal self-defense. All that matters is the agent’s reasonable perception and fear of suffering imminent, serious/fatal bodily harm.
If I was police in MN I would be looking at leaving as I know I have no backup.
If someone did not leave in 2020 after what happened, then they deserve what they get. There is such a thing as being too stupid to survive.
I agree. I can’t comprehend how anyone would want to risk their life and livelihood to be an officer in MN. The moral has to be low. You do a job and the administration will throw you under the bus, put a target on your back then put you in prison for doing your job.
How long, oh Lord? How long?
renee good = domestic terrorist
murdered: ashli babbit who had no weapons and was a peaceful protestor the thug that murdered her was given blanket immunity by the
dems
gop
msm
goods own husband said she was at fault
I stand behind the “It doesn’t matter if she hit him or intended to hit him” as far as the issue of self-defense. But, this is more evidence she actually did strike him. I hope they send her ‘wife’ up the river for getting her killed. (I would treat “Drive, baby, drive!” as incitement and a conspiracy.)
So, to recap:
She didn’t drive toward the agent.
Okay, she did drive toward the agent, but didn’t hit him.
Okay, she did hit the agent, but didn’t injure him.
Okay, she did injure the agent, but none of his bones were broken.
I just read that her family hired the George Floyd attorney who plans on launching an investigation into the fatal shooting and intends to take legal action against the federal government.