Anglosphere Leaders’ Bad Responses to Bondi Beach Terrorism
Public statements from elected officials across the Anglosphere added insult to injury, erasing or gaslighting Jews.
There’s a formula to public statements elected officials release after mass casualty attacks: Express sincere sympathy for the victims and reference already-confirmed information, including the targeted individuals and event. However, those rules are sometimes bent when the victims are Jews.
On Sunday, hundreds of Jews gathered at Sydney, Australia’s Bondi Beach for Chabad’s “Chanukah by the Sea” celebration, marking the first night of Chanukah. Two men attacked the group, murdering at least 15, including a Rabbi leading the event. Forty-two others were hospitalized.
All of this is horrifying enough. But public statements from elected officials across the Anglosphere added insult to injury, erasing or gaslighting Jews.
Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese called this a “targeted attack on Jewish Australians,” said “an attack on Jewish Australians is an attack on every Australian,” and promised to “dedicate every resource required to making sure you are safe and protected.” That promise would be more believable if Albanese’s government had done more in response to the mob shouting “Gas the Jews!” outside the Sydney Opera House two days after 10/7, arson attacks on two Melbourne synagogues in December 2024 and July 2025, or assaults and vandalism targeting Jews since 10/7.
Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney tweeted he was “horrified by the antisemitic terror attack,” and Canada “stands with the people of Australia and Jewish people everywhere in sorrow, and determination never to bow to terrorism, violence, hatred and intimidation.” That prompted angry responses from people who rightly accused Carney and his party of abandoning Canadian Jews. The proof is in the numbers. A B’nai Brith Canada report recorded “6,219 antisemitic incidents in 2024,” which “was 125% higher than in 2022, and about 7% higher than in 2023.”
Deputy Prime Minister of the United Kingdom David Lammy tweeted it was “horrific to see this antisemitic terror attack on a Chanukah celebration,” offering prayers to “all affected and Jewish communities worldwide feeling this pain.” Except, British Labour just spent two years standing in solidarity with British antizionists who marched weekly for Israel’s destruction, not with the vast majority of British Jews.
Irish Taoiseach (head of government) Micheal Martin tweeted he was “shocked and appalled by the gun attack” and said “such hate and violence can never be tolerated,” without specifying the identity of the victims, why they gathered, or the relevant “hatred.” Ireland’s government is so implacably antizionist, Israel’s government closed their Dublin embassy last December. Dublin City Council also recently made news for wanting to rename a local park named for Irish Jew Chaim Herzog, former president of Israel, possibly as “Free Palestine Park.”
First Minister of Scotland John Swinney tweeted he was “horrified” and called this “an appalling incident” but directed “sympathy and solidarity . . . to those affected,” erasing the Jewish nature of the victims and the targeted event.
New Zealand’s Prime Minister Christopher Luxon announced he was “shocked by the distressing scenes at Bondi” and sent thoughts to “those affected.” Again, the Jewish identities of those attacked and the event itself were deleted.
In the United States, Maryland Senator Chris Van Hollen called this “a horrific act of antisemitism,” adding “antisemitism has no place in our world.” But this month started with Van Hollen picking a public fight with the Jewish Community Relations Council of Greater Washington’s CEO — by name — and calling him an “apologist for the Netanyahu government” in an attempt to stigmatize.
Rep. Rashida Tlaib described herself as “heartbroken by the horrifying attack on the Jewish community in Australia,” calling it an “unbearable tragedy.” However, Tlaib spoke at a conference that drew terrorist sympathizers in August.
New York City Mayor-elect Zohran Mamdani acknowledged the attack targeted “a Hanukkah celebration” and deemed it “a vile act of antisemitic terror,” while dubbing the attackers “men with long guns.” However, Mamdani’s devoted years to antizionism, a hate movement that endangers Jewish safety, and has refused to condemn the phrase “Globalize the Intifada,” which is precisely what this attack was.
There are those who will be grateful these elected officials acknowledged Australian Jewry’s tragedy. However, the words those officials choose matter, as do their actions, including what they enable and what they ignore. It all sets a tone for the public in their home countries.
The Bondi Beach attack wasn’t a random attack on all beach-goers. The father and son involved shot at Jews gathered to celebrate a Jewish holiday. Yet, some officials can only bring themselves to express sympathy if they bleach out the victims’ identity. Even then, they offered weak words of solidarity.
Others offered warmer and more specific messages, as is customary, along with hypocrisy. Officials who only selectively criticize Jew-hatred, do nothing to ameliorate it in their own nation, or actively stoke it, simply aren’t believable friends after such a tragedy.
The Jewish Representative Council of Ireland rightly requested world leaders “examine their words and their actions and to reflect honestly on whether rhetoric that dehumanises, inflames or excuses hatred has consequences.” Without a doubt, yes.
The world’s been reminded yet again that Jew-hatred is deadly. What the West needs now are responsible leaders willing to stand for truth, moral clarity, and Western civilization, including their nations’ Jewish minorities. Unfortunately, too many politicians across the Anglosphere simply don’t fit the bill.
[Featured image via YouTube]
Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.






Comments
While you’re at it: “Tucker Carlson’s Brother Suggests Australia Terror Attack Was a False Flag Operation, Mocks Victim”
“Buckley Carlson took to social media to comment on the antisemitic massacre, insinuating that victims’ injuries were faked and key details were fabricated. He reposed a comment which claimed that “Zionist networks and intelligence staged shooting incidents,” described the attack in Sydney as “theater,” and argued and that the terrorism will become pretext for new speech restrictions regarding antisemitism.”
https://www.algemeiner.com/2025/12/15/tucker-carlsons-brother-suggests-australia-terror-attack-false-flag-operation-mocks-victim/
At least he’s not engaged in performance like so many that sit on their hands or even enable the danger, then pretend to care.
Sounds like Alex Jones about Sandy Hook. Arsen Ostrovsky should sue him.
Maybe it will be a trillion dollar settlement….maybe even trillions and trillions of dollars!
Who cares about Tucker Carlson’s brother? He has as much relevance as Tim Walz’s daughter.
This is relevant because it shows that Carlson and his brother come from the same rotten, bigoted, Jew-hating stock. There’s something profoundly wrong with that family.
My oldest sister was a thief and drug addict who died in a drunk driving accident. I sure hope I’m not judged by being her brother.
Interesting you need to make such a big deal about it.
Is this comment some preemptive action to get you out of jury duty?
“This is relevant because it shows that Carlson and his brother come from the same rotten, bigoted, Jew-hating stock. There’s something profoundly wrong with that family.”
Just an observation. This statement was authored by a “bigot”.
Yet sadly receives great acclaim in the thumb department.
Just because you don’t does not mean that no one else does.
Look, I can’t stand Tucker Carlson and his recent drive into Toontown lunacy, but his brother having an opinion on social media isn’t relevant. My brother has some nutty views, and I’ve given up trying to talk him out of them.
I would imagine that most families have at least one with “nutty views.” Makes holiday get togethers super fun.
Absurd to you, but it was not absurd to report it in Israeli media. If you’re brother was as nutty as you, then maybe there’s more to it.
I don’t follow Tucker Carlson but I have noticed an obsession some have with finding any fault they can, no matter how absurd. And this is absurd. Almost paid troll, rent a mob absurd. Now tell us some insane thing his second cousin once removed said.
Tell it to the Algmeiner. It’s his BROTHER, not a second cousin once removed. Quite a difference.
Remember Billy Beer? Good times!
Another nut job who loves Jewish conspiracies. Simply amazing these people are still out there in the numbers they are.
There is no help for ‘leaders’ like these people. Same for those who vote for them.
Spencer rejected media narratives attempting to separate antisemitic attacks from anti-Christian jihad violence, explaining that while the targets may differ, the Islamic doctrine does not.
“People think the targets in Australia were Jews and the targets in Europe were Christians, so they assume these are different situations. They’re not,” Spencer explained. “The clear tie between the two is jihad ideology.”
According to Spencer, Western analysts repeatedly misdiagnose these attacks because they refuse to acknowledge the religious doctrine driving them.
“Islam is political, aggressive, and expansionist,” he said. “It calls for warfare against and the subjugation of both Jews and Christians. That’s why they attack Hanukkah celebrations and Christmas markets—those are moments where Jewish and Christian identity is strongest.”
from,
https://jihadwatch.org/2025/12/bondi-beach-hanukkah-massacre-robert-spencer-details-the-islamic-ideology-driving-jihadist-violence-worldwide
All true. Islam views the Judeo-Christian world as a horse to be mounted. That’s the polite version. It is being aided by the western left for now.
F them one and all.
Albo’s initial response also “forgot” to mention the Jews. It was only after an outcry that he finally came out with this statement.
And his idea of “dedicating every resource” seems to be to make Australia’s gun laws even more draconian than they already are.
I was about to point that out. It took hours of his getting pounded for the initial statement before he course corrected. He left out what effect recognizing “Palestine” as a state might have had or that they knew about the radical son for over 5 years but did nothing about it or his government stood by while riots in the streets shouted “gas the Jews”. Their big idea’s on this is to warn about islamiphobia and vow tougher gun restrictions. No one bothered to mention not importing jihadi terrorists into a country they hated.
They are all in for match control while they stockpile boatloads of dynamite. Islam will find other ways to attack….eventually pushing infidels out of mainstream and then out of existence. They won with destroying Christmas markets, they won with a world of bollards .and they won as 9/11 turned the West into surveillance states against the wrong people. When “all cultures are equal”, this is what happens.
I could not agree more with both the article and the comments (to date)!
The hypocrisy of the national leaders is stomach-turning.
I expect nothing better from the left, but the eruptions and posturing from the (relatively few) anti-Jewish right is a source of shame for me.
Every single western leftist/Labour member/Dhimmi-crat — both rank-and-file, and, apparatchiks in office (and, retired) — who has unfairly, viciously and dishonestly vilified and slandered Israel as an alleged “settler-colonial,” “apartheid” and “genocidal” state, erasing Jews’ millennia-old historical ties to ancient Israel, Judaea and Syria Palaestina, while simultaneously dishonestly mythologizing and casting as alleged “victims” the genocidal, terrorist Arab invaders from Arabia who’ve re-branded themselves after an ancient Roman province that pre-dates Islam by 600 years (Syria Palaestina), is as responsible for this Australia terror attack (and, others like it) as the terrorist pieces of excrement, themselves.
Let’s cut out the rhetoric and be perfectly blunt:
The only way to keep Muslims from killing Jews and Christians is to shoot back.
And if your political “leaders” believe that the inanimate object is the problem and not the religious fanatic, then your political leader is on the same side of the argument as the fanatic. How in the world is the public safer if it is further disarmed, unable to defend itself, (as police officers who are supposed to be surrogates for armed citizens cower behind cars) while those who follow a murderous creed have no allegiance to laws other than that of their prophet who *explicitly* commands them to kill the unbelievers?
Talking isn’t going to work, diplomacy isn’t going to work. Violence, raw violence, is the ONLY antidote here.
Sorry. I wish it were otherwise but I have 1,500 years of evidence and bodies piled to the sky backing me up.
There is actually another way to keep Muslims from killing Jews and Christians (and, Hindus and Buddhists) — don’t import them into one’s country.
Yes, it’s getting nigh time for another one of those crusade thingys.
Almost every Anglosphere leader mentioned is Leftist, more concerned about pandering to anti-Semitic voters than doing the right thing.
The reality is Australia’s government is culpable for this atrocity, and there’s a fair few voters who hold this view. The problem is far too many voters either support anti-Semitism, don’t care about anti-Semitism, or basically forget about it, so chances are the same circus clowns will be re-elected.
Australia’s current opposition is rent by strife, conflicted about whether to be Leftist lite, or quietly and softly push some non-Woke views. Recent(ish) polling suggests they are at risk of being replaced by a disorganised minority party as Conservatives flee en masse. And yet commentators contend it’s their failure to hew Left that’s the cause for their imploding support. Why not show why Right policies are the solution? Is it incompetence, that the party itself has been taken over by Leftists, a hostile Far Left and Left media, something else, or a combination of these?
The problem is that the Coalition tried right policies, and the voters rejected them. So the contention is that in order to have a hope of winning elections again one day, it must abandon its principles and become a more moderate, less insane, and more competent version of the ALP, which in turn is a more moderate, less insane, and more competent version of the Greens. No one seems to consider that if the Coalition abandons its principles then there’ll no longer be any point in it winning elections.
It occurs to me that if your response to a jihadi invader committing mass murder is to call for more laws restricting the rights of your citizens and not keeping the invaders out you might be on the wrong track.
Yep. It seems pretty simple.
1. Stop importing anyone who can’t be quickly vetted. If that means some folks get hung up b/c their Nation of origin is incompetent/corrupt and can’t/won’t provide quality data for a background so be it.
2. Immediately reinvestigate all persons coming into the Nation over the past two decades. Particularly they’re coming from a Nation where customs, religion, social and civic norms are at odds with basic Western culture/values.
3. Leadership and others of influence gotta stop allowing much less encouraging violence, division, strife based on group/tribe. The rhetoric encourages violence. The leadership gotta proactively call out those who use goofy tropes to cast blame and gin up violence.
Finally they gotta come to terms with reality. Someone determined to commit violence will find the means to do so. Disarming the average Citizen, creating ‘gun free zones’ doesn’t stop the criminals or terrorists hell bent on killing members of X group/tribe. Those only make the average Citizen a softer target for violence.
This is the PM who said “right wingers” are the real threat. Unbelievable stupidity/willful ignorance.
Australia, England, New Zealand and Canada are deep into the One World Order of socialist/ communist way of governing. They have been told to accept muslim refugees no matter what their loyalties may be. They are destroying western civilization. The worst part is they don’t care. We have Australian friends who live about an hour from Sydney. They think that “we” are the world’s problem because of President Trump. The scales may never fall from their eyes.
However, those rules are sometimes bent when the victims are Jews.
Those rules are bent ANY time the victims are not an approved grievance group. It ain’t just Jews, people.
Oldschool noted Buckley Carlson spewing vile antisemitic bile as Tuckers brother.
A search came back as Buckley Carlson is Tucker’s son who works for VP Vance in communications.
There we can cast dispersions against Tucker and Vance.
I imagine having a first name like Buckley led to an awful lot of schoolyard bull bullying
Both his brother and his son are named Buckley.
If his son spews like his brother, then Vance would come into it. Bad enough that Vance has said nothing of Carlson’s flirtations with antisemites.
Not mentioned in the above article is that Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese also stated that the two shooters “hijacked” and “misrepresented” the “tenant’s of Islam, a religion of peace.” Does Mr. Albanese not understand the “tenant’s” of Islam? Does he not understand that the tenant’s of Islam include the domination and subjugation of their host societies? That the tenant’s of Islam include wiping all Jews from the face of the earth with the rally cry of “from the river to the sea, Palestine will be free?” Does he not understand that Islam is a militaristic ideology that seeks world domination? Does the Australian Prime Minister understand that the enemy is no longer at the gate but has breached said gate and has his people firmly in their sights???