Image 01 Image 03

Trump Attacks Marjorie Taylor Greene as “Traitor” After Dropping Support

Trump Attacks Marjorie Taylor Greene as “Traitor” After Dropping Support

“Marjorie ‘Traitor’ Green is a disgrace to our GREAT REPUBLICAN PARTY!”

Former President Donald Trump escalated his break with Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene on Saturday morning, posting a sharp attack on Truth Social that leaves no ambiguity about the state of their relationship.

Trump wrote:

“Marjorie ‘Traitor’ Green is a disgrace to our GREAT REPUBLICAN PARTY!”

The message, which quickly drew thousands of interactions, comes less than 24 hours after Trump officially withdrew his endorsement and announced he would support a primary challenger if “the right person” steps up.

Greene has spent months repositioning herself as a Liz Cheney–style opponent of Trump. She has become a frequent guest on liberal media outlets, criticized Trump’s agenda, and taken public positions at odds with the base, even as she insists she still “loves” the former president.

Prof. William Jacobson flagged the shift earlier this week:

Trump made the split formal on Friday. In a lengthy statement shared by @_johnnymaga, he blasted Greene for endless complaining, bitterness over failed statewide ambitions, and drifting politically left.

 

Greene responded with a defiant message:

Trump’s newest statement, accusing her of betraying the party and disgracing the GOP, marks the clearest and most public rupture yet. The former allies are now openly at odds, and the stage is set for a major primary fight in Georgia.

DONATE

Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.

Comments

The Gentle Grizzly | November 15, 2025 at 12:10 pm

This could get interesting. She has more bats in her belfry than a teller cage in a Thailand bank.

I’m so not liking this

22 million in what, 5 years?

She was worth 700,000 when she first came in Congress

    destroycommunism in reply to gonzotx. | November 15, 2025 at 12:42 pm

    anythinggggg that moves us away from capitalism

    rank choice voting
    healthcare that has any subsidies etc is a breaking down of the judeo -christian agenda
    when its the government that uses tax money to fund

    costs for meds and most everything would be market based so the costs would only be what people could pay b/c

    companies love to sell their products

    loomer is maga

    murkyv in reply to gonzotx. | November 15, 2025 at 3:55 pm

    Looney Loomer is as nutz as Marge

    The Gentle Grizzly in reply to gonzotx. | November 15, 2025 at 6:22 pm

    Gonz: I’m 76 and remain in awe of just how much control “my” people have over everything from politicians to chem trails to weather to the stock market to black kids’ grades.

      I’d like some control over my own life. I can control everything but that, at least according to the antisemites,

      Since you offered, can I request some rain in South Alabama? Will your 5G, sharks with lasers, cloud seeding contrails apparatus do that for us or do y’all have to coordinate that with the illuminate before that work order gets processed? /s

      Seriously though we do need some rain.

While I agree that MTG has taken the Snagglepuss’ Exit Stage Right from MAGA, it’s rather childish of Trump to call her names like an eight year old where the bigger kids won’t let him play in the sandbox.

    Yeah he should have ‘taken the high road’ and just let her smear him as an Epstein lister forever with no pushback.

    She started this fight, don’t whine that Trump is fighting back.

    What’s ‘childish’ is her throwing a public tantrum because they wouldn’t support her losing the Georgia Senate seat. Because that’s what this is about. Her pitching a fit because she didn’t get what she wanted.

destroycommunism | November 15, 2025 at 12:34 pm

look, trump has also had his lefty moments

open bank accounts for people
child care paid for by tax money

but most of his agenda is just pure commonsense in maga

trump for the win

    destroycommunism in reply to destroycommunism. | November 15, 2025 at 12:36 pm

    having the gov take financial positions in companies for anyyy reason is flat out wrong and gives the dems the keys to the power when they regain power

      Hang on. If Feds give money to private companies (and that’s gonna continue to occur absent a Constitutional amendment) then choice is really;
      1. Fed Gov’t takes an ownership stake in the company via a Sovereign Wealth Fund investment which gets a free market return on the funding aka a return on the capital investment of taxpayer dollars to the taxpayers
      OR
      2. Fed Gov’t gets nada as a return on handing over a capital investment to private entities so that the risks are borne by the public (taxpayer) but any gains/return on the investment are exclusively private

      The correct answer is 1. Every time. At least until you manage to get a Constitutional Amendment passed that forbids the Federal Govt from making direct investment, loans, grants or otherwise issuing any funds to corporations/private sector other than in a competitively bid, transparent, audited fee for service exchange.

        henrybowman in reply to CommoChief. | November 15, 2025 at 3:11 pm

        “Fed Gov’t takes an ownership stake in the company via a Sovereign Wealth Fund investment which gets a free market return on the funding”

        Of course, in most of the cases where the fedguv has done that, it was to bail out a troubled corporation, in which case the most probable “free market return” was Felicia.

          CommoChief in reply to henrybowman. | November 15, 2025 at 8:35 pm

          Yeah that’s true but if we did it using a deliberate sovereign wealth fund v haphazard bailout BS and handing over seed money, grants and bad loans as we keep doing and required a fiduciary obligation on the fund management then perhaps we’d turn a profit.

Nothing to see here. Just MTG with the evil Soros spawn. Yeah, she’s just being attacked over the Epstein hoax. Riiiiiiight.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/G5zxY0mWgAAcNc8.jpg

This chaos right before midterms is so unnerving

We just can not lose the house or senate

What a disaster, they will destroy this country

I think massive, mtg are all getting paid well to do that

But Trump is acting like a petulant child with all the name calling

Be better President Trump

Sliding towards the Marxists isn’t going to get you a dacha anytime soon

destroycommunism | November 15, 2025 at 12:49 pm

the left has been in charge of america for over a century now

once the fed was established that was just another ( after the anti capitalist moves as established by earlier decisions) that was imho the straw that broke the camels back

fdr’s full fledged socialist agenda cemented america into its quicksand grave and subsequent admins didnt stop it…..reagan gave a good pr show..but ultimately failed

and trump has given us a better showing than reagan but of course lefty is putting the puzzle pieces together to get the markets to fail and blame trump

like the did bush when IN REALITY its lefty polices that are the undoing of capitalism but the msm runs the pr so capitalism is blamed

go read that nutty bill maher apology on bb for that fact!

Is she trying to align herself with the Fientes groypers? She has some disturbing allusions to “Not taking money from AIPAC”

    CommoChief in reply to dwb. | November 15, 2025 at 1:40 pm

    Shouldn’t be an issue if a member of Congress chooses to accept or not accept $ from AIPAC. What matters is if you can take any lobbyists $ and still have the stones to against them or if you take their $ but don’t have the stones to vote against them, becoming their lapdog.

    That said she is definitely playing footsie with Fuentes, his overt antisemitism and his many followers in hopes of advancing her ‘brand’. I suspect she’ll run for Senate, probably not win, then launch a podcast attempting to frame herself as authentically MAGA Chick/truth teller to ramp up views, subscribers and advertising revenue as her grift.

    nordic prince in reply to dwb. | November 15, 2025 at 1:47 pm

    Why should it be okay for Congressmen to take money from AIPAC?

    This is a nonpartisan issue.

    The buying and selling of Congressmen’s allegiances is disgusting regardless of which side of the aisle it falls on. They were elected to represent their constituents – not lobbyists, big biz, or big tech.

      Why is it okay to take money from ANY organization at all. Maybe all donations should be individuals.

        geronl in reply to geronl. | November 15, 2025 at 3:19 pm

        Singling out AIPAC says more about you than them.

        Milhouse in reply to geronl. | November 15, 2025 at 5:52 pm

        Organizations are people. Who do you think makes them up? Anything an individual is entitled to do, he is entitled to join with like-minded individuals to do at a level that is impossible for one alone.

        Producing a movie, for instance, is beyond the means of most people. They can do it only by combining together, and they don’t lose their rights by doing so. This is fundamental. Otherwise every newspaper can be shut down.

      I’d rather they took money from AIPCAC than from left wing lobbyists who openly advocate for infringing on citizens rights.

      There is no “buying and selling of Congressmen’s allegiances”. It is not something that happens very often. People with an interest in what Congress does find candidates who align with their interests and help them get elected. Not a cent of that goes into the candidate’s pocket.

      That is exactly how it is supposed to work. The right to lobby explicitly protected by the constitution, as is the right to help persuade people to vote as you wish them to.

        CommoChief in reply to Milhouse. | November 15, 2025 at 8:22 pm

        ‘Not a cent’ into a candidate’s pocket might be a bit misleading. Hire a Spouse as a consultant to the campaign and pay ‘consulting fees’ from campaign coffers to the Spouse and the $ ends up supporting the household. Clothing can be funded, expensive suits are paid by campaign funds. Same for ‘security’ provided by a nephew. Then the rare non official travel which the govt doesn’t pay/provide or a lobby doesn’t pay for. Then there’s sinecure jobs handed out to relatives or worse relatives peddling priority/direct access to the elected official.

        None of that ‘went into the pocket’ but it all was kinda shady to most folks and all benefited the elected official and/or their Family finances. Doesn’t mean it is illegal but it is unseemly.

          Milhouse in reply to CommoChief. | November 16, 2025 at 3:34 am

          Those things can happen, but you have no information that they are. And of course if the spouse or nephew or whoever is providing genuinely needed services there’s no reason not to hire them rather than someone else.

          But the point is the donor is not doing any of that. The donor is just helping the candidate get elected.

          And that assumes they’re actually donating anything. There are limits on donations to candidates’ campaigns, so in most cases they will not be donating but will rather be buying their own ads, or donating to PACs that are doing so, without coordination with the candidate, because there’s no limit on that. And the reason there’s no limit is because there’s no way the candidate gets even a cent of what they’re spending

          CommoChief in reply to CommoChief. | November 16, 2025 at 8:19 am

          Sure we do in some cases. Lots of recent examples of Politicians have a spouse/family member on the campaign payroll, granted private sector positions they are less than qualified for.

          I agree that it isn’t illegal but if they supply a sinecure job or pony up the costs for an all expense paid ‘fact finding’ trip to Hawaii or wherever the donor/lobbyist is definitely aware of which Politician is getting the benefit.

          Again not illegal but not exactly ethical. Personally I’d like to see an easy to find disclosure done on all these things with a voting record scorecard in one convenient website in an easily searchable, downloadable format. Basically a spreadsheet with Name of Politician then columns of how much if any from each lobby large donor or corporation with the politician’s vote for/against any legislation/broad reg/tax policy that would benefit that donor, lobby, corporation. Transparency, sunshine and public awareness is the only antidote since Congress is unlikely to rein in things that benefit them collectively.

          Milhouse in reply to CommoChief. | November 16, 2025 at 6:10 pm

          Again, that’s only if they’re donating to the campaign, and even then you have to distinguish sinecures from actual jobs, and junkets from genuine fact-finding.

          But in most cases they don’t even donate to the campaign at all. When some organization independently tries to persuade people to vote for the candidate it supports, because his views are in line with its interests, there’s no likelihood of corruption at all. He gets nothing personally from the expenditure, he just hopefully gets elected, which is how it’s supposed to work.

          Milhouse in reply to CommoChief. | November 16, 2025 at 6:14 pm

          Add that AIPAC does genuine fact-finding trips, to take congressmen to Israel and show them the facts. Of course they don’t make them stay in youth hostels; if you’re taking a congressman somewhere you have to put them up somewhere nice, and on a long trip you have to fly them business class, so the congressman does get something out of it, but the point isn’t to buy him but to educate him.

          One of the big successes from this approach was Jesse Helms. Remember when he was anti-Israel? They took him there and showed him the facts on the ground, and he completely reversed himself. His previous stance had not been based on hostility but on ignorance; once he understood he turned into one of Israel’s biggest supporters, and it wasn’t because he’d been put up at a nice hotel.

    The Gentle Grizzly in reply to dwb. | November 15, 2025 at 6:24 pm

    Overdosing on Fuentanyl.

Trump should have denounced Lindsey Graham and Mitch McConnell long before MTG. Those guys are warhawks who are 50 years past their sell-by date.

She stood in front of a bunch of lunatics waving signs TRUMP IS ON THE LIST and TRUMPISPEDO with that moron Massie (and then of course cowardly backed away from their BS about reading the lunatic allegations into the Congressional record).

Then she went on all the typical leftist shows and started spewing leftist talking points.

Did she honestly think Trump was just going to sit there and take it?

Donald Trump spent the past week paving over his campaign promises and pulling people into private meetings to get them to shut up about the Epstein scandal he ran in favor of exposing, but you’re mad at MTG?

    There is no evidence Trump did anything wrong vis a vis the Epstein thing. Why did Democrats refuse to vote for the latest bill to release the files? Are they really all Democrats?

      gonzotx in reply to geronl. | November 15, 2025 at 3:44 pm

      To keep it going does t matter that they voted against
      Media will stay quite about that

      And keep pounding with MTG and Massie

        CommoChief in reply to gonzotx. | November 15, 2025 at 5:35 pm

        MTG is not in the same league of credibility as Massie. His whole career he’s consistently voted against bigger gov’t, raising the debt ceiling and in favor of much more openness/transparency to the public by the Feds across the board, not just Epstein files which the Trump campaign ran on releasing and his DoJ made a huge media production about releasing…then went silent. Not a good look on this issue. Asking for follow through on what the Admin promised isn’t unreasonable and releasing it will fill the current void where conspiracy theories propagate. Won’t stop the 1% true believing whackos but will end the rest of it and stop constant speculation in the absence of full release.

      CommoChief in reply to geronl. | November 15, 2025 at 5:38 pm

      No there isn’t. Which makes it baffling why the admin and the DC establishment are hell bent on not releasing the files. Release the data minus Redact the victims names/faces. If that means wealthy or prominent people go down so be it.

        henrybowman in reply to CommoChief. | November 15, 2025 at 6:29 pm

        A definable clique of us seem to share the same sense of smell. Trump’s flipflop smells worse than Jimmy Buffet’s.

          CommoChief in reply to henrybowman. | November 15, 2025 at 8:30 pm

          Yeah I don’t understand the reluctance to hold the Trump WH to doing what they said they’d do during the campaign and again once in office. The fiasco with the video of the Epstein cell they released by DoJ which it was clear had a time jump without them alluding to any issues with video until called out on it.

          Far too many folks willing to go along with ‘trust me Bro’ vibes instead of holding out for verification and accountability. Especially on some uni party issue like Epstein files. If the release causes a stock market sell off and a financial collapse with the revelations then so be it. Release the damn info and stop pretending like the WH and the Campaign didn’t create the impression they would be fully transparent.

        Azathoth in reply to CommoChief. | November 17, 2025 at 8:55 am

        Which makes it baffling why the admin and the DC establishment are hell bent on not releasing the files.

        They won’t release the files without the testimonies.

        The files don’t tell anything and implicate many whose ‘association’ has nothing to do with Epstein’s illegalities.

        The testimonies tell names and actions.

        And the dems are sitting on those like their lives depend on it.

I just sent Trump a message after listening to mark steyns Q+A and Laura I grahams interview
Trump
Sounds insane amd he’s left us amd MAGA by the alley.
He wasn’t to bring 600,000 Chinese students, otherwise 1/2 of all the colleges will collapse
Is t that the idea? That have produced nothing but big debt for our children who can’t afford a house cause they are in debt up through their ears
Chinese that will still our data take it to China, are bringing in bacteria, viruses in their luggage

THEY ARE OUR ENEMIES!!!!

And Americans can do the jobs the tech billionaires have convinced you they can’t do

MTG is right on H1B

Stop the crap. You had it all amd your about to lose everything

Who ever he’s listening to he had to stop, absolutely stop
I’m afraid Trump is being rolled amd too vain, way too vain

    henrybowman in reply to gonzotx. | November 15, 2025 at 6:31 pm

    When you figure out who your horse is in this race, let the rest of us know.

      gonzotx in reply to henrybowman. | November 15, 2025 at 8:25 pm

      I don’t understand MTG
      She’s always been a republican AOC in
      Any ways but she was always supportive of Trump and MAGA

      I support the no or severely decreased H1B and foreign student being blocked from our universities

      When Trump is talking 600,000 Chinese students, I have to think he’s lost his mind
      They are our #1 enemy and our collective colleges are a cesspool of commie introduction

      MAGA would be thrilled with 50% of them closing

      What a dream

      I really don’t know who had Trumps ear but it seems it’s the IT moguls who want cheap H1B, they have convinced Trump American workers are not up to snuff
      So they can spy the foreigners 1/2 the price and we the taxpayer pay for everything else.

      And then they never leave, and bring their families
      What is wrong with him

      We have what we want in our cusp and he’s throwing it away

      MTG has just really gone crazy, bad mouthing Trump on every left winged show she can get on, she makes my skin crawl, but I do support the above

      She’s so nuts she’s c/o ICE amd wanting illegals who have Jo s, American jobs by the way, to stay

      I actually think she throws darts at a wall each night and decides , with the help of 22 million in her coffers, what she believes in

      I’m just disappointed that our President seems to have lost his way on domestic issues

      And I don’t want to go to war with Venezuela

      I have no answer to the drug issues but I do think the Europeans are knee deep in the drug market, and I mean the big, old families, and that is why Britain is upset with what we are doing with the boats

      Trump knows.

Please site your senators , congress about the Chinese amd H1b insanity
Call them too