Image 01 Image 03

Thune Brushes Off House Repealing Senate’s $500K Payout Provision

Thune Brushes Off House Repealing Senate’s $500K Payout Provision

I doubt the Senate passes it.

The House repealed a provision in the continuing resolution (CR) that allows the senators targeted by special counsel Jack Smith in Arctic Frost to sue the government for up to $500,000.

The House passed it 426-0.

I laughed when the House GOP said it wanted to repeal the provision because, um, you voted for the CR. Did you really think a repeal would pass in the Senate?

Speaker of the House Mike Johnson even said he didn’t know the measure was in the CR until after it passed.

Thanks for confirming what we already know! You guys don’t read anything before you pass it.

Anyway, it appears the repeal won’t make it through the Senate.

Thune said yesterday before the House voted:

“We’ll see what the House does, but I will tell you that that was designed — that was a Senate-specific solution. The statute that was violated applied only to the Senate, which is why we addressed it the way that we did,” he [Thune] told reporters at his weekly press conference.

“We strengthened that provision when it comes to allowing a federal government agency, the Justice Department, in this case, to collect information, private information, on individual senators. We think that is a violation of powers under the Constitution,” he said.

The Senate GOP leader said members of his conference will continue to debate what to do if the House passes a bill to repeal senators’ ability to sue the Justice Department, but he made it clear he views the language, which he had a role in adding to the government funding package, as justified given what some Republican senators view as overreach by former special counsel Jack Smith.

A few Republican senators said they would vote for the repeal, according to Roll Call.

Smith targeted Sen. Josh Hawley (R-MO), but he would vote to repeal it. Sen. John Kennedy (R-LA) joined him:

“I just don’t understand why taking taxpayer money is a good idea,” Hawley said. “Who does that deter? That doesn’t deter Jack Smith.”

Sen. John Kennedy, R-La., said he would vote to repeal the provision and slammed the last-minute adding of it to the funding package. “Whoever put this in had an obligation to tell us about it, and they didn’t,” Kennedy said.

Kennedy said the senators already had a case under existing law, and there was no need for the provision in the funding bill. “I don’t know how it got there, but I sure am curious to find out,” Kennedy said.

These people who are against the measure, Republicans and Democrats, blow my mind. It was literally in it. I don’t care if it was a last-minute add.

You voted for the measure. You voted for the CR.

DONATE

Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.

Comments

Maybe we should repeal Congress…

    ChrisPeters in reply to Rusty Bill. | November 20, 2025 at 2:17 pm

    In large part, Congress HAS been repealed.

    Congress has ceded many of its responsibilities to the various agencies and administrations of the executive branch, and even though we have collectively voted for the various members of Congress who allowed this, we did not amend the Constitution accordingly.

      henrybowman in reply to ChrisPeters. | November 20, 2025 at 6:46 pm

      The Arizona constitution has specific language saying that none of the three branches can wield any of the powers of another branch,

      The fedguv could have used that one.

It would make a lot more sense if Jack Smith had to pay it.

destroycommunism | November 20, 2025 at 12:04 pm

sweety lauren boebert and >>>

But just as when other censure pushes against Democrats failed, Democrats declined to pursue the censure against Mills on Tuesday.
Rep. Anna Paulina Luna (R-Fla.) raised a parliamentary inquiry to express her displeasure with the situation.
“I was wondering if the Speaker of the House of Representatives can explain why leadership on both sides, both Democrat and Republican, are cutting back-end deals to cover up public corruption in the House of Representatives for both Republican and Democrat members of Congress,” Luna said.
https://thehill.com/homenews/house/5612208-boebert-republicans-censure-plaskett-mills/

again,,,the gop falls more lefty while causing america to move left

while when the the dems go off the reservation occasionally we still stay left or even move further left as their more radical childs get rougher

I know how much I enjoy reading the sludge they crank out. I can’t imagine they enjoy it any more. I’m sure reading bills sucks all the joy out of bossing around the country.

    Ironclaw in reply to henrybowman. | November 20, 2025 at 1:24 pm

    I guess it’s too much to expect responsible stewardship of the tax money they steal out of us. You know, like being able to defend a vote later or something.

When something is so egregious, you wouldn’t think that civil immunity would apply, so they should sue JACK SMITH for Jack Smith’s illegal actions. And here we thought they managed this flawless victory with that shutdown which would have been a first, but no, they had to tarnish it with such a ridiculous self own.

Isn’t “deprivation of rights under color of law” a thing? Why can’t the Senators sue Smith and Boasberg under that?