Image 01 Image 03

Mamdani Admits He Wasn’t Talking About His Aunt Who Feared for Safety After 9/11

Mamdani Admits He Wasn’t Talking About His Aunt Who Feared for Safety After 9/11

The woman was his father’s cousin.

Socialist Zohran Mamdani, the likely next New York City mayor, made waves the other day when he said his aunt feared for her safety while wearing a hijab on the subway after 9/11.

It didn’t take long for people to prove that Mamdani lied as a way to accuse people of Islamophobia, as people continue to bring up his anti-Israel views.

Mamdani admitted the person in his story wasn’t his aunt but a distant relative.

Mamdani told reporters today:

Yes, that’s I was speaking about my aunt. I was speaking about Zehra Fuhi, my father’s cousin, who sadly passed away a few years ago. And for the takeaway for my more than 10 minute address about Islamophobia in this race and in this city, to be the question of my aunt, tells you everything about Andrew Cuomo and his inability to reckon with a crisis of his own.

Oh give me a break. It proves you’re a liar and trying to deflect from the truth that you’re anti-Israel and a danger to Jews in New York City.

DONATE

Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.

Comments

Any more than Newsom described his family as having to ‘hustle’ to pay the bills.

“Macaroni and cheese – that’s how I grew up, bro.”

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15230719/California-Gavin-Newsom-family-hustle-mocked.html

As for Mamdani, is anyone really surprised? The Democrats have jumped the shark, as they say, and the clowns are running the circus, on behalf of fake aunts and fake concern for normal people.

Subotai Bahadur | October 27, 2025 at 9:16 pm

It does not matter whatever he says true or false. This is NYC, and he will be elected.

Subotai Bahadur

    And if he is, reports indicate that as much as 25% of the New York City population will be heading for the exits…

    Mandani will kill New York City deader than Detroit.

      Martin in reply to Rusty Bill. | October 28, 2025 at 8:25 am

      Anyone with money for bus fare. I just read that DeBlasio’s reason for not raising taxes on the rich was that 1000 New Yorkers paid half the taxes and if the left the city would collapse. I don’t think Mamdani is smart enough to not do that. He see’s taxing the rich as a moral imperative.

Muslims attack NYC in the worst single act of destruction the city has ever seen—and just a few short years later they’re ready to turn control of the city over to a Muslim.

    TrickyRicky in reply to Paula. | October 27, 2025 at 10:33 pm

    Pretty damn depressing isn’t it?

    diver64 in reply to Paula. | October 28, 2025 at 5:50 am

    Obama’s happy on a number of fronts. Mandani is a Muslim. Pouring millions of illegals into the country and that city works and Mandani is an Islamist Communist. Trifecta win for Obama.

    MattMusson in reply to Paula. | October 28, 2025 at 11:38 am

    Half of the people living in NYC were born in another country. That did not mean as much back when people assimilated.

The guy’s full of it, like all Marxists are.

We can only pray the voters of New York City will come to their senses or, at least, enough of them to keep this Islamist out of office will.

irishgladiator63 | October 27, 2025 at 10:08 pm

Plenty of people were afraid to take the subway after 9-11. Also to fly. Or to congregate in large groups. All because of mamdanis people.

Anyone who objects to him calling his father’s cousin his aunt must immediately stop referring to Pelosi as Newsome’s aunt, and pledge never to do so again. Because your father’s cousin is a lot closer to the role of “aunt” than your aunt’s ex-husband’s sister-in-law.

That said, as it happens my aunt’s late husband’s sister-in-law just passed away at the age of 97, and I did call her “Auntie” even though she was not my aunt or really any kind of formal relative.

    Mike 1969 in reply to Milhouse. | October 28, 2025 at 4:35 am

    Communist says what?

      Milhouse in reply to Mike 1969. | October 28, 2025 at 4:45 am

      I don’t know, you’re the communist, you tell me. You pig.

        Evil Otto in reply to Milhouse. | October 28, 2025 at 6:43 am

        “no u”

          Milhouse in reply to Evil Otto. | October 28, 2025 at 8:33 am

          Mike 1969 is a communist, so if he wants to know what a communist says, he should ask himself. How would I know?

          Meanwhile I note that no one has even attempted to make a distinction between Mamdani’s “aunt” and Newome’s “aunt”, or to defend attacking Mamdani for calling his actual older cousin an aunt, while at the same time insisting that Pelosi is Newsome’s aunt.

      Azathoth in reply to Mike 1969. | October 28, 2025 at 10:16 am

      It’s ‘Democrat says what?’ when talking to Milhouse.

        Milhouse in reply to Azathoth. | October 28, 2025 at 12:48 pm

        You should go back to Hell too. You both belong there. All three of you, and however many more of you think this behavior is funny or in any way acceptable. You are all evil, without any redeeming features whatsoever.

          Evil Otto in reply to Milhouse. | October 28, 2025 at 5:07 pm

          It’s hilarious how touchy you are. You spend endless time here correcting everyone on everything, no matter how trivial, and the second someone says anything that’s even mildly insulting you fly off the handle like a toddler throwing a tantrum.

          Grow the hell up, Milhouse.

          Milhouse in reply to Milhouse. | October 29, 2025 at 2:34 am

          Azathoth, Paddy M, and a few others exist here for no other purpose than to slander me and falsely claim that I am a Democrat, a leftist, a communist. They don’t care about the truth or honesty or anything at all, they just exist to torment me. I have had it with them. They make this a toxic place and reduce the value I get from coming here down to nearly zero. They also pollute the place for everyone else. And you can not expect me to be silent and let them attack me without responding. I will not. I am not a pinata and I don’t have to put up with them. If you don’t want to read my responses, tell them to stop attacking me. I never attack; I always defend. But they do nothing but attack. I’m the victim here and intellectual debate is impossible with them so all I can do is respond in their own language.

          Evil Otto in reply to Milhouse. | October 29, 2025 at 6:03 am

          I don’t give a shit, Milhouse. You do nothing but tear at everyone’s comments, even to the point of pulling your “wElL aKtuaLLy” act on obvious jokes. Not only do you attack, you do so in a hysterically over the top manner. “You are all evil, without any redeeming features whatsoever.” That’s cartoonish. If you can’t take an occasional insult then all I can say is that the internet isn’t the place for you.

          You WILL put up with it, because you don’t have a choice. This isn’t a safe space, and if it bothers you that much then leave.

          Azathoth in reply to Milhouse. | October 29, 2025 at 12:40 pm

          Azathoth, Paddy M, and a few others exist here for no other purpose than to slander me and falsely claim that I am a Democrat, a leftist, a communist.

          YOU said you were a registered Democrat –that you had to in order to have a voice in the politics around you.

          Fuzzy said a similar thing, that she’d also ‘had’ to do what you did.

          And I blasted you both for it.

          Because, you don’t get a voice for the right by joining the left for expediency’s sake.

          Fuzzy shut up.

          But you kept talking. And over time it became more and more evident that you were here for purposes of demoralization.

          You are here to chide, and dishearten, and serve your leftist masters.

          But your mask is off and you will never be able to wear it here again, Democrat.

    Paddy M in reply to Milhouse. | October 28, 2025 at 8:02 am

    The pretend lawyer is white-knighting for a fellow fabulist.

      Milhouse in reply to Paddy M. | October 28, 2025 at 8:29 am

      Look, you disgusting pig. You serve no purpose in this world. You have never contributed one thing of value to this forum, or to the world at all All you do is lie and taunt and be evil. I know for a fact that people value my contributions here, but you are dedicated to driving me off, and you may yet succeed, making this a poorer place. You pollute the world just by existing. So go take a long walk off a short pier.

        Paddy M in reply to Milhouse. | October 28, 2025 at 8:47 am

        Such a fragile pretend lawyer!

        Not sure what your personal beef is with these folks, but your responses to their comments are out of line with what’s posted here, IMO. Go outside, touch grass, then come back.

          Milhouse in reply to GWB. | October 28, 2025 at 12:58 pm

          You should be asking these evil people what their personal beef is with me. It is they who are constantly and deliberately lying about me and slandering and tormenting me. Not a single one of them has ever made a single contribution to this forum. They exist only to torment me and lie about me and drive me out of this forum. And they’re on the verge of succeeding.

          And none of them give the slightest crap about the truth. Truth not only doesn’t matter to them, they don’t even understand the concept of truth. Not only do they decide their position on any matter based entirely on whose ox is gored, they attack me for not doing so, because the entire concept that doing so is deeply wrong and corrupt makes no sense to them. And that means they have evil and irredeemable characters.

        Go away, Milhouse, you know nothing about law or anything else. My father’s cousins are not my aunts or uncles. They are distant relatives. Mamdi read a prepared statement. It was a flat out calculated lie.

          Milhouse in reply to rbj1. | October 28, 2025 at 12:51 pm

          Your father’s cousins are your cousins. Not distant at all. And although they are not your aunts or uncles it’s extremely common to call them so.

          But it is impossible for any person with a shred of decency to call Mamdani out for calling her his aunt, and at the same time to claim that Pelosi is or ever was Newsome’s aunt. Anyone who does so exposes himself as a filthy liar.

    Obie1 in reply to Milhouse. | October 28, 2025 at 9:51 am

    What the f does Pelosi or any of her relatives have to do with this? Focus. This is about a lie told by a political candidate–nothing new there, but unrelated to other lies told by other politicians. Also, convenient that the person is dead so she apparently can’t be reached for comment.

      Milhouse in reply to Obie1. | October 28, 2025 at 1:03 pm

      If you can’t see that it’s exactly the same, then you’re a moron. How can any person claim that Pelosi is Newsome’s aunt, and then turn around and claim that Mamdani lied by calling his older cousin his aunt?

      If someone attacks Mamdani for this then they must immediately renounce any claim that they ever made that Pelosi is Newsome’s aunt, and must commit never ever to repeat such a claim, or to allow it to be made without challenging it. Otherwise they show themselves to be fundamentally dishonest.

        Obie1 in reply to Milhouse. | October 28, 2025 at 3:13 pm

        I am occasionally bemused at how quickly you resort to ad hominem attacks when someone questions you, or heaven’s sake, disagrees with you. In this thread alone, you have called fellow posters evil, liars, morons, indecent, and suggested we all go to hell. All over your strained belief that two entirely different circumstances are essentially the same, citing as your only evidence the alleged fact that YOU called your cousin Auntie, therefore rendering Mamdani’s lies perfectly logical and even acceptable. Putz!

          Milhouse in reply to Obie1. | October 29, 2025 at 2:40 am

          I did not call a cousin Auntie.

          My point, which should be obvious to any honest person with an IQ above 80, is that people who claim that Pelosi is Newsom’s aunt, which was never true at all, have no right to condemn Mamdani for referring to an actual close relative of an older generation as his aunt. You can’t hold both positions simultaneously.

          It is normal practice in the English language, as in many other languages, to refer to older relatives as “aunt” or “uncle”, even though they are not. So Mamdani did not lie. But the fact remains that she was not in fact his aunt, and Pelosi isn’t even a relative of Newsom, so the fact that so many people here are complaining about his words here makes it impossible for those same people to make the claim they do about Newsom. You can’t have it both ways, and those that think they can merely because in both cases it’s the position that attacks a Democrat show that they have no morals.

    Given what we know of Mamdani, it’s likely he’s lying about the cousin, too.
    Also, if you (Mamdani, not you) are going to spout off on something like that and accuse people of things, then you probably shouldn’t fling words carelessly about. At least, if you want people to not dismiss you as a liar later.

      Milhouse in reply to GWB. | October 28, 2025 at 1:12 pm

      What the hell are you talking about? What lies, or potential lies, are you accusing me of? Do you dare to deny that it is fundamentally dishonest for anyone who has ever described Pelosi as Newsome’s aunt to object to Mamdani calling his older actual close relative his aunt?!

      And it makes no difference whether the story he told about her is true. (Though there’s no reason to doubt it.) The point is the relationship itself, and the term he used for it, not whether she was actually concerned about wearing hijab in public at that very fraught time.

    Azathoth in reply to Milhouse. | October 28, 2025 at 10:19 am

    Rarely does a Democrat give so exact an example of hypocrisy than this. The classic ‘do what I say, not as I do’–

    Anyone who objects to him calling his father’s cousin his aunt must immediately stop referring to Pelosi as Newsome’s aunt, and pledge never to do so again. Because your father’s cousin is a lot closer to the role of “aunt” than your aunt’s ex-husband’s sister-in-law.

    That said, as it happens my aunt’s late husband’s sister-in-law just passed away at the age of 97, and I did call her “Auntie” even though she was not my aunt or really any kind of formal relative.

    Excellent work, Milhouse, you’re a credit to the Democratic Party.

      Milhouse in reply to Azathoth. | October 28, 2025 at 1:05 pm

      And there you have the demon showing exactly what an evil and dishonest creature he is. Calling truth lies and lies truth. Calling honesty hypocrisy, and hypocrisy honesty. Go back to Hell and stop polluting LI.

        Azathoth in reply to Milhouse. | October 28, 2025 at 2:38 pm

        Cry more, Democrat.

        No one should refer to Pelosi as Newsome’s ‘aunt’ WHILE you, yourself, refer to someone just as unrelated as your ‘aunt’

        And you vomit all this forth in defense of Mamdani –who was just spitting out a lie, one that he thought would never be checked. No relative of any type told him anything about wearing anything after 9/11. He just needed an islamophobia dig.

          Milhouse in reply to Azathoth. | October 29, 2025 at 2:49 am

          Drop dead, demon.

          No one should refer to Pelosi as Newsom’s aunt, because she isn’t — and never was. Saying she is is simply a lie.

          And the woman who just passed away was not my aunt, and I never claimed she was; she was not technically related to me at all, but I called her “auntie” as an honorary title of respect. If I were to casually refer to her as “my aunt” in conversation I would not be stating the truth, but might just be simplifying what would otherwise be a complicated story, rather than an attempt to deceive. If the exact relationship were not the point of the story, then it would be an understandable simplification, because human language is like that. But it still wouldn’t be accurate.

          People who make the claim about Newsom are always doing so for the sole purpose of implying that he somehow corrupt, or that he benefits from that relationship, or that there’s some sort of nepotism going on. And that’s just not true, because they are not related. She isn’t his aunt, she’s not even a cousin, she’s just a relative’s ex-relative. And there’s no evidence that they have the sort of relationship one has with older relatives that involves calling them “auntie”. So making the claim is wrong. And doing so while at the same time attacking Mamdani is dishonest.

Ah, but according to his belief system it’s perfectly okay to lie to infidels. I believe they call that Taqiyya

His culture approves of the ability to lie without any consequences. I have a friend who spent two years in an Islamic country. Her response to “some of them are really nice” is that they feel free to tell you what they think they want to hear. IOW, they will lie under any circumstances, anytime, anywhere if it fits their goal

He lied, And then he tried to cover it up by pretending he was really talking about some distant relative who died years ago and may or may not have had the experience he claimed.

I don’t honestly give a shit what happened to her. In the days after 9/11 the country was on edge, angry because we had been attacked BY MUSLIMS who murdered nearly 3000 people. Who destroyed some of the most iconic buildings in New York City, attacked the Pentagon, forced the passengers of multiple planes to die in terror, who did untold billions in damage to our economy.

And somehow Mamdani thinks his supposed aunt’s supposed experiences trump that?

This guy is a commie wokiesta. The voters of NYC according to the polling seem poised to elect him as Mayor. I’m not sure what his positions re Israel and ‘Palestine’ or his professed religion have to do with being Mayor of NYC on a day to day basis. Mayors don’t have power to make foreign policy decisions for the Nation. The average AWFL politician who attends some wokiesta congregation has pretty much the same views as he does and they ain’t Muslim but woke/lefty Catholics, Episcopalian, Presbyterian or whatever flavor of wokiesta drivel/nonsense posing as religious beliefs they profess. IOW this guy’s beliefs/policy preferences are very representative of the emerging power block of the far leftist/commie wing within the d/prog party.

    Milhouse in reply to CommoChief. | October 28, 2025 at 8:30 am

    NYC has always run its own foreign policy.

      CommoChief in reply to Milhouse. | October 28, 2025 at 1:15 pm

      Some Jack leg Mayor/City Council issuing a resolution, shaking hands with foreign dignitaries, wasting city tax dollars on boondoggle foreign junkets for a photo op or applying pressure to their Congressional delegation/POTUS don’t constitute ‘foreign policy’. At best City leaders have foreign policy preferences they advocate for but that’s not even close to conducting (running) their own ‘foreign policy’ in violation of Art II.

I don’t believe it was a cousin, either.
I also don’t care that someone was afraid, if they are part of the same group that advocates terrorism. You want to not be afraid, then loudly and clearly denounce it and point fingers when imams advocate for it.

    ChrisPeters in reply to GWB. | October 28, 2025 at 11:35 am

    Aunt, cousin, mother, sister, family friend . . . It really doesn’t matter what the relationship is, as it is far more likely that there was NO PERSON AT ALL, and this was all a fabricated narrative.

Why were they letting their Aunt/Cousin/Female relative travel without a male relative?
I thought they were Muslims.

Oh. Right they are Eid al-Adha and Ramadhan Muslims but mostly they worship in front of a mirror and read from the holy Communist Manifesto. (There is no god and Marx is his prophet).

What a complete POS.

destroycommunism | October 28, 2025 at 11:09 am

who fears more for their safety from the crowd…. IN REALITY

wht person walking through blk neighborhood

or

blk person walking through wht neighborhood

blks will say the police but that would be much better ( despite the lies of blmplo )

than whts who would have to face the hoodies and in a place where the po wont even go

Proverbs advises:

4 Answer not a fool according to his folly, lest you be like him yourself.

5 Answer a fool according to his folly, lest he be wise in his own eyes.

And it’s not an easy choice, apparently, sometimes, I guess…

Verbum sap., etc

Just another brazenly and flippantly mendacious, Islamofascist/Muslim supremacist piece of excrement. This reprobate lies with the casualness of any seasoned Muslim agitator, terrorist or propagandist.

This POS’s contrived victimhood-posturing is as nauseating as his brazen Jew-hate and Israelphobia.

If New Yorkers are sufficiently gullible to elect this POS, after everything negative that’s been revealed about him, they have no excuses and deserve the outcome.

Just another moslem doing that taqiyya thing for furthering his satanic cult.