Epstein Estate Gives Oversight Documents, Including Birthday Book
The Wall Street Journal reported on the book and letter in July. Trump sued the publication for at least $10 billion.
Jeffrey Epstein’s estate has turned over documents to the House Oversight Committee, including the infamous “birthday book” from 2003, which was given to him for his 50th birthday.
Apparently, it contains the crude letter from President Donald Trump.
Look at the signature.
Lawyers for Jeffrey Epstein’s estate have given Congress a copy of the birthday book put together for the financier’s 50th birthday, which includes a letter with Trump’s signature that he has said doesn’t exist.
On Monday, House Oversight Committee members confirmed that they… pic.twitter.com/5s5bCTogW1
— The Wall Street Journal (@WSJ) September 8, 2025
Can anyone compare Trump’s signatures? I figure we need to compare his signature from other pieces he signed in 2003 and his current signature.
To me…it looks off.
The Wall Street Journal reported on the book and letter in July.
Trump denied writing the letter and sued Dow Jones, News Corp, Rupert Murdoch, Robert Thomson, and two Wall Street Journal reporters, Joseph Palazzolo and Khadeeja Safdar, for at least $10 billion.
Oversight Chairman James Comer subpoenaed Epstein’s estate, requesting his will, as well as documents that could include a client list, black books, flight logs, and the birthday book.
“President Trump called the Epstein investigation a hoax and claimed that his birthday note didn’t exist,” said ranking member Robert Garcia (D-CA). “Now we know that Donald Trump was lying and is doing everything he can to cover up the truth. Enough of the games and lies, release the full files now.”
I don’t see any comments from Republicans or the Oversight Committee X account.
I hope the committee releases all the letters in the book along with pictures of it.
DONATE
Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.
Comments
just like the jfk $$$$ grab…just keep the feeding frenzy going…but like the jfk $$$$ grab..
let lefty stew in it and maga focus on electing local pols who will stop funding public schools etc
I don’t know if it’s related but I just got a birthday card from State Farm, the first in a decade when they apparently discontinued the practice.
Insurance agents used to be more creative, like a four leaf clover in amber key chain.
Was your card signed by “Jake, from State Farm?” You know the one that wears the khakis.
Would that be the original White Jake from State Farm or his replacement the new and improved black Jake from State Farm.
And was it Sealed With A Kiss?
As soon as all the evidence went to the committee I knew exactly what would happen. Democrats start saying names of Republican donors in front of cameras. Either give all the names R and D or STFU.
The WSJ, which is more lefty every month, compared other typewritten letters to that “birthday card,” whose type was center-justified and if it was actually a card would have been printed on card stock.
The other letters were almost certainly dictated. Does anyone think that Trump dictated that “birthday card?” And if you look at the WSJ drawing examples vs. the one on the “birthday card,” does anyone think the same person did those?
Cheesy stuff, but we know the media will run with it. LOL
Biden was sharp as a tack. The laptop was fake. These guys will swallow any hoax. Just put it out there and the drooling commences. The most laughable and sad part is how they never seem to learn. Then again, to accept the reality might challenge their whole world view which is so far removed. These petty things matter greatly to them for they are too dumb from ideology to understand that common sense policies are what most notmal people want, not lectures and bad ideas from a bunch of complainers.
This whole thing by the WSJ really disappointed me. I’d been paying them $40 a month for at least 10 years now, and I had viewed them as the most dispassionate and objective paper out there. It’s been obvious that they don’t always like or agree with Trump, but I’m okay with that. An objective critic is a good thing. However, this stunt disgusted me. There is absolutely zero relevance to anything in a 2003 Birthday Book even if Trump did actually sign it…which I find hard to believe. It simply doesn’t seem like something Trump would think or say.
But the main point: the only purpose to publishing this must best to function as a character slur on Trump. The Journal decided to do that, despite the fact it’s irrelevant to ANY current national or international issue. Well, now I can never trust any of their reporting to be remotely objective. I didn’t send an email or write. I just canceled.
WSJ’s news pages have always been just as leftist as its competition. It’s only the opinion pages that have been rightist.
The original WSJ tweet seems to have been deleted.
Yup. That didn’t age well.
Or maybe it’s missing only for us holdouts who don’t maintain X accounts. If you go there directly, it says “age restricted” and demands you log in.
Who cares about this except the Dems who have nothing else but “HATE TRUMP”