A few days ago, I wrote that green activists were melting down as the Trump administration strategically gutted their “climate crisis” funding and eco-activist agendas.
The melting intensifies, as the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) recently cut ties with the Environmental Law Institute (ELI). Official statements from the agency indicate that the decision was taken because of concerns about ELI’s alleged attempts to “inappropriately influence the judiciary,” particularly in the context of climate litigation and judicial education programs.
EPA Deputy Administrator David Fotouhi said in a memo sent Wednesday that agency employees should no longer engage with the Environmental Law Institute, a more than 50-year-old nonpartisan, nonprofit organization that holds policy forums and training seminars.The group has faced criticism from GOP officials over providing climate science courses for judges.“It is no longer in the Agency’s interest for employees to participate in their official capacity in any conference, program or other event organized by the Environmental Law Institute, including but not limited to ELI’s Climate Judiciary Project,” Fotouhi said in the memo, which was obtained by POLITICO’s E&E News.The deputy administrator added, “Thus, EPA employees should not accept invitations to or participate in such events, including ELI’s Annual Award Dinner in Washington, D.C., scheduled for October 7, 2025, in their official capacity.”
While the “Politico Pro” article above asserts that ELI was a “nonpartisan, nonprofit organization that holds policy forums and training seminars”, I have my doubts. For example, nearly two dozen Republican state attorneys general sent a letter to EPA chief Lee Zeldin Tuesday, calling on him to cancel funding to a “left-wing environmental group” — specifically the ELI’s “Climate Judiciary Project.”
“The Environmental Law Institute’s Climate Judiciary Project is using woke climate propaganda, under the guise of what they call ‘neutral’ education, to persuade judges and push their wildly unpopular agenda through the court system,” he said. “I commend President Trump’s efforts to cut waste and abuse during the first eight months of his presidency, and I am optimistic that his Administration will do the right thing and halt all funding to ELI.”Knudsen spearheaded the letter sent to Zeldin Tuesday, which included the signatures of 22 other Republican state attorneys general, calling for the EPA to axe its funding to the left-wing environmental nonprofit, called the Environmental Law Institute, which oversees the Climate Judiciary Project (CJP).The Environmental Law Institute founded the Climate Judiciary Project in 2018, which pitches itself as a “first-of-its-kind effort” that “provides judges with authoritative, objective, and trusted education on climate science, the impacts of climate change, and the ways climate science is arising in the law.”
American Energy Institute subsequently asked House Judiciary Committee Chairman Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH) to subpoena records from the EELI’s Climate Judiciary Project as part of an ongoing probe into the influence of climate advocacy groups in climate policy litigation.
For example, the “project” funded a study that was presented as “independent”.
Jason Isaac, CEO of the American Energy Institute, a conservative pro-U.S. energy production policy group, wrote a letter to Jordan last week pointing to evidence from a Sept. 12 Multnomah County v. ExxonMobil et al. court filing that he says suggests “covert coordination and judicial manipulation.””This new evidence raises serious red flags about the credibility of both the so-called science being used in climate lawsuits and the judicial training programs behind the bench,” Isaac told Fox News Digital.According to Isaac’s letter to Jordan, the court filing submitted by Chevron Corporation earlier this month reveals that “one of the plaintiffs’ lead attorneys, Roger Worthington, had undisclosed involvement in at least two so-called scientific studies that the county is presenting as independent, peer-reviewed evidence.”One of those studies “acknowledged funding from the Climate Judiciary Project in a draft version, but that disclosure was inexplicably removed from the final publication,” Isaac said in the letter.
The decision to cut ties with the Environmental Law Institute marks another firm stand against special interests steering American policy from the shadows. By holding environmental organizations accountable and refocusing EPA priorities, President Trump and his team are delivering on a better environment, energy dominance, and a recovering economy… all while putting America first.
CLICK HERE FOR FULL VERSION OF THIS STORY