Image 01 Image 03

Maxwell: Trump ‘was Never Inappropriate With Anybody’

Maxwell: Trump ‘was Never Inappropriate With Anybody’

“I think they [Trump and Epstein] were friendly like people are in social settings.”

The DOJ released transcripts of Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche’s conversation with Ghislaine Maxwell.

I don’t know how anyone could believe anything this woman says about anything or anyone, even if you believe President Donald Trump never did anything with Jeffrey Epstein.

Maxwell wants a pardon. She received a transfer to a cushy new prison.

Maxwell will say and do anything to get her way. I wouldn’t even believe her description of a meal she’s eaten.

*sigh*

OK…here we go.

Trump & Epstein

The most significant part:

I think they [Trump and Epstein] were friendly like people are in social settings. I don’t — I don’t think they were close friends or I certainly never witnessed the President in any of — I don’t recall ever seeing him in his house, for instance.

I actually never saw the President in any type of massage setting. I never witnessed the President in any inappropriate setting in any way. The President was never inappropriate with anybody. In the times that I was with him, he was a gentleman in all respects.

Bill Clinton

Maxwell also described former President Bill Clinton as her friend, not Epstein’s friend. She also doesn’t believe Clinton received a massage.

Another bombshell: Clinton never went to Epstein’s island. Maxwell also doesn’t have any memory of Clinton visiting any of Epstein’s properties.

Client List & Birthday Book

Maxwell said Epstein did not have a client list..at least that she knows of. She went off on a spiel about the “genesis” of the existence of a list. I guess it started around 2009 after Epstein got out of jail and came out of the “disgraced law firm” Rothstein, Rosenfeldt, & Adler.

Blanche brought up The Wall Street Journal‘s report that Trump wrote an inappropriate letter for a birthday book for Epstein, put together by Maxwell.

Maxwell confirmed the birthday book existed in Epstein’s New York City home. She didn’t remember everyone who submitted a letter for him.

However, Maxwell specifically did not remember Trump giving her a letter for the birthday book.

Prince Andrew

Then Maxwell insisted the photo of Prince Andrew with Virginia Giuffre is fake. The photographer has said many times that it is real.

Maxwell claimed she did not remember the photo being taken or whether Andrew ever met Giuffre.

Maxwell acknowledged that Andrew could have come over to her house and met Giuffre while there, but she never arranged for them to have relations, and they never had sexual relations in her bathroom because the bathroom is too small.

DONATE

Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.

Comments

How did Epstein make his money without clients? It doesn’t mean the clients did anything inappropriate or illegal, but there has to be a book of clients.

    DaveGinOly in reply to rbj1. | August 22, 2025 at 7:58 pm

    Because any blackmail that was going on wouldn’t have involved the transfer of money. The threat of blackmail was meant to get favorable political decisions for whoever was pulling Epstein’s strings. Epstein himself was likely on the payroll of the string-pullers, but he wasn’t doing the blackmail himself nor did he directly benefit from it. That’s why he had no “list.” His handlers had, and were using, the list. Epstein just laid out the bait for the targets, he did not lean on them himself.

    Money going from multiple victims to Epstein would have been too easy to trace. Even the targets of the operation were probably quite happy to have their perks and not have to pay cash for them, but rather to just throw around government money to certain NGOs, projects, and causes, to provide legislative support for this or that, or to exert other forms of influence. In this sense, Epstein provided “cheap dates” for his marks.

      You got it hand delivered to you that everything you just said is a lie.

      Start living in reality, Donald Trump does and so should you.

        BobM in reply to Danny. | August 23, 2025 at 1:24 am

        DGO’s scenario is at least a plausible conspiracy theory – no one thinks Jeffery provided underage girls out of the goodness of his heart – or just because he was the Hugh Hefner of baby bunnies.

        He was in the business of knowing powerful people and doing them favors – it’s never then proven he expanded his business to explicit blackmail – although any sensible pedo after being supplied what he needed gratis would not only want to return favors but also feel he HAD to return favors even if Jeffery never straight out said “Do X or else”.

        DaveGinOly in reply to Danny. | August 23, 2025 at 6:09 pm

        Explain then, why nobody has ever identified money from any of his island’s visitors to Epstein. Sure, it’s possible it was a free ride and there was no extortion going on. But let’s be real. Why do you think Epstein was untouchable for years? Someone was protecting him, and that’s not done out of the goodness of anyone’s heart. Epstein appears to have outlived his usefulness. Maybe because a large portion of his clientele was “aging out” and retiring from the offices and positions that had made them so valuable to the operation.

        We’re waiting for you explanation of events and the known facts.
        And for what I wrote to be a “lie” I must know the truth first, so by definition it’s not a lie. It’s a theory. I didn’t say it was true.

      geronl in reply to DaveGinOly. | August 23, 2025 at 3:08 pm

      A lot of bad things were going on, but still no evidence of blackmail exists

Anyone without a TDS-infected brain knows if Trump had done anything inappropriate it would’ve come out long ago.

“I don’t know how anyone could believe anything this woman says about anything or anyone”
———————————————————-
No offense but… talk about a poison pill.

What exactly is the point of writing an article then.

I stopped reading right there…

    The Lefties have their narrative. If she says anything against Trump, she’s angelic and truthful. If she says anything that does *not* implicate Trump, she’s protecting him in hopes of a pardon. It gets painfully obvious when you look at the stories being waved about.

    Dolce Far Niente in reply to xleatherneck. | August 23, 2025 at 9:47 am

    ^^ this. To reflexively assume everything she says is a lie is childish.

    The very most you can say about Maxwell is that it may be impossible to discern what is truth and what is fiction. And how does this differ from any other criminal or suspect?

    Of course her answers will be self-serving, as would the answers of 99% of the people in this situation.

OTOH, her replies also explain why the Dems never asked these questions of her (about Trump), or, if they did, why they didn’t reveal her answers. Coming out with this info on Trump during the Dem’s watch would have been difficult to explain if it weren’t true. Wouldn’t she have smeared Trump to get into the Dem’s good graces? So having her give Trump a pass when DJT is POTUS isn’t just not surprising, it could very well be true. Because if the Dems thought she’d “say anything” to get her bread buttered, they would have asked these question expecting her to condemn Trump. The fact they didn’t, or did and didn’t get the answers they wanted, is really all we need to know. What the Dems did or didn’t do actually reinforces what she’s saying now about Trump.

    diver64 in reply to DaveGinOly. | August 23, 2025 at 6:49 am

    She might have smeared Trump to get in Dems good graces but to what end? She was in prison and whoever was doing the pardons most likely wouldn’t promise to get her out of jail and if she went after Trump to be a media darling Trump would never let her out nor would any Republican. She shrewdly waited out Biden to see who was President next. Since Trump won she sure as hell wasn’t going to implicate him for any reason.

    I think she should be let out of jail. She is the fall guy for the whole thing. I’m not saying she is not guilty but the girls were recruited, taken care of, men were flown down there and they were taken care of. There were a whole lot of people involved and we are supposed to believe that the only evidence the government could get was against her? Makes zero sense and if the underage girls were recruited all over the world why isn’t any other government interested in their minor citizens being taken out of their countries for prostitution.

      DaveGinOly in reply to diver64. | August 23, 2025 at 6:20 pm

      Might have smeared Trump but to what end? You answered your own question – to get in the Dems’ good graces. You seriously think Dem DOJ operatives didn’t approach Maxwell for dirt on Trump? Of course they did. (Or did they need to do so? See below.) They were inventing shit left and right because they couldn’t find anything on him. How could they possibly have overlook Maxwell? Maxwell gave them the wrong answer. That’s why she was never offered a deal.

      As for waiting out the Biden administration, she would have had to do that to give the same answer to the next Trump administration. But she had no guarantee that would happen. So why didn’t she volunteer to tell the Dems what they wanted to hear, without waiting for them to come knocking? Likely DOJ already knew there was no dirt on Trump with respect to Epstein. This would explain why they may never have asked her – they already knew the answer.

      So why ask her now? Because having no evidence and having testimony play differently to the public. Much of the public believes “no evidence” means it hasn’t been found yet. Now it’s possible there’s both no evidence and supporting testimony, a one-two punch.

“Another bombshell: Clinton never went to Epstein’s island. Maxwell also doesn’t have any memory of Clinton visiting any of Epstein’s properties.”

So then, he posed for his portrait over Skype?

“they never had sexual relations in her bathroom because the bathroom is too small.”

Oh, cone on, Virginia.
If anyone ever did it in the back of a VW Bug, you did.

    If I remember correctly, they got a list (not a client list as such) of prominent passengers on his private plane from the crew members.
    Billy Boy – by their testimony – flew in to pedo island more than once.
    Also – photos of him and other famous guys posed for pictures there.
    So maxwells claim that Clinton was never there is totally sus.

    OC not everyone who visited necessarily got invited to one of Jeffery’s “special” parties with hot and cold running underage girls.

    diver64 in reply to henrybowman. | August 23, 2025 at 6:32 am

    Because no one ever joined the Mile High Club. That was an interesting statement but maybe she is a wild one and needs a backyard sized place to get get it done

Hopefully, moonhammed reports on the fallout from this. He and his commie/Hamas/Hezbollah internet bros have a finger on the pulse of these things.

So everything I said about the case that the coalition of EVERY judge involved in the case SDNY of the First Trump and the Biden Era, Donald J Trump, Kash Patel, Dan Bongino, Pam Bondi after she stopped pandering to nut jobs, Alan Dershowitz, EVERYONE who read the court files, told the truth.

There is no Epstein list, out of the wrongdoers one killed himself while the other is serving 20 years for what she did, and a judge is not going to agree to ruin the lives of professors who asked Epstein to contribute money to their universities, neither will a judge send you a list of doctors who asked for their hospitals to get a contribution.

As far as I’m concerned this case is closed, anyone who wasn’t aware of if Mrs. Jew Lasers herself MTG, or Donald J Trump was more reliable as a source of information or if we should stick with Donald Trump or switch to Tucker Carlson

Congratulations on this reality delivered by Maxwell herself.

I hope her warden is a fair person who doesn’t give the courts any reason to determine it is cruel and unusual punishment.

By the way

I knew this was untrue from the first second. I do not support candidates I think even for a second would cover up or participate in SA.

If you can’t say the same thing because you thought the conspiracy theory might be true go see a psychologist.

    diver64 in reply to Danny. | August 23, 2025 at 6:41 am

    I agree that there isn’t any there, there. I’m just interested in one thing about the entire mess. There were supposedly hundreds of girls involved and we haven’t heard from one of them plus out of the dozens of men getting busy only Maxwell is in jail. With that many involved there has to be evidence of someone doing something illegal enough to get Maxwell into prison. I’d like an explanation on how this years long blackmail scheme, if that was what it was, managed to fly so under the radar nobody knows who was involved, what information was blackmailed and where it was sent. That seems like a pretty big deal to me.

      Dolce Far Niente in reply to diver64. | August 23, 2025 at 9:50 am

      “supposedly hundreds of girls involved and we haven’t heard from one of them”

      Actually, many of these victims testified in the civil case that awarded something like $100 million in damages.

    DaveGinOly in reply to Danny. | August 23, 2025 at 6:34 pm

    You knew what? That there was a pedophilia ring run by Epstein? Or that there wasn’t? If the former, where are the people who actually had relations with Epstein’s and Maxwell’s underage girls? If the latter, why is Maxwell in prison? It doesn’t matter if this was a blackmail and/or intelligence operation. There were either crimes (and people who have yet to be identified as suspects in their commission), or there were no crimes and Maxwell is in prison for nothing.

    I presume you mean the crimes occurred, but Epstein is dead and Maxwell is in prison, but that is that? Where are the johns? They’re criminals too. Don’t you find it odd that their identities are completely unknown and that there is an institutional level disinterest in determining who these people are?

“Maxwell … doesn’t have any memory of Clinton visiting any of Epstein’s properties.”

She wants to live.

She wants to get out of prison and the only way that happens is through Trump so I wouldn’t believe much out of her. I don’t think Trump did anything as others have said because we would have known it already and Trump throwing Epstein out of Mar A Lago throws a wrench in that but there is little reason to believe a whole bunch of others got their freak on down at Pedo Island. Notice she said Clinton didn’t visit the island, she didn’t say he was not on the plane getting handsy with a girl.

I think it’s pretty obvious Epstein was using girls to blackmail people for something. Money, someone else IDK. I also think that there most likely is not a magic list floating around and even if there had been it’s long destroyed.

E Howard Hunt | August 23, 2025 at 6:41 am

Sounds like this misunderstood lady was running a convent rather than a brothel.

With respect to the ‘client list’ that she is now claiming never existed, that’s a very curious development considering that Epstein’s former butler -Alfredo Rodriguez – was sentenced to two-years in federal prison for stealing Epstein’s ‘journal’, which was believed by PROSECUTORS and the judge overseeing the case, contained names of victims and other personal information of the victims. But, it’s also believed the ‘journal’ contained other information as well, information that the judge believed would be material in the prosecution of Epstein. As far as the public is aware, that journal has never been recovered by authorities.

It’s notably odd that having the opportunity to discuss this case with Maxwell, this DoJ official didn’t ask Maxwell if she knew where the journal was or if she was in possession of a copy (at the time of the first investigation in the early 2010s, the feds believed there were multiple copies of the journal).

Look, I don’t know what to believe about this. I do know that this Administration, for reasons known only to them, lied their behinds off about the jail surveillance tape. I don’t know why they did that. But, nothing they say about this case moving forward should be taken at face value.

    oldvet50 in reply to TargaGTS. | August 24, 2025 at 10:21 am

    TargaGTS – you mean Exhibit 52 in her original trial? The one she did not want revealed and the judge agreed, excluding it from trial? That list?

destroycommunism | August 23, 2025 at 11:58 am

its over lefty

its over

maga