Image 01 Image 03

Sean Combs Acquitted on Most Serious Charges, Guilty Verdicts on 2 of 5 Counts

Sean Combs Acquitted on Most Serious Charges, Guilty Verdicts on 2 of 5 Counts

Considering what Combs was up against when his trial began on May 5, many are calling today’s verdicts a victory of sorts.

A Manhattan jury has found Sean “Diddy” Combs not guilty of racketeering conspiracy, the most serious of the charges he was facing, and the one that could have put him behind bars for life. This charge, which falls under the RICO Act, “alleged that Combs participated in a criminal enterprise. Prosecutors claimed he used his business empire to facilitate illegal activities,” according to NBC News.

He was also acquitted on two counts of sex trafficking, by force, fraud, or coercion. This charge relates to “allegations that Combs coerced individuals into engaging in commercial sexual activity,” as per NBC. If he had been convicted, he would have faced 10 years to life in prison for each count.

Combs was found guilty on two counts of transportation to engage in prostitution, a crime that carries a maximum penalty of ten years in prison. “This charge alleges that Combs knowingly transported individuals across state lines or internationally with the intent that they would engage in prostitution.”

Considering what Combs was up against when his trial began on May 5, some are calling today’s verdicts a victory of sorts.

The mixed result in the sex trafficking case against rapper, record producer, and entrepreneur “Diddy,” in United States v. Combs, came on the third day of deliberations. The jury notified Judge Arun Subramanian on Tuesday afternoon, that while they were unable to reach a unanimous verdict on the first count of racketeering conspiracy, they had reached decisions on counts two through five. The jurors informed the judge that there were “unpersuadable jurors on both sides.”

Following discussions with prosecutors and defense attorneys, the judge ordered the jury to reconvene on Wednesday morning and try to reach a decision on the racketeering charge. And shortly after 10 a.m., the jury announced they had arrived at a verdict on the final charge.

Initial reactions on social media suggest widespread disappointment with the verdicts.

This story will be updated as more details come in.


Elizabeth writes commentary for Legal Insurrection and The Washington Examiner. She is an academy fellow at The Heritage Foundation. Please follow Elizabeth on X or LinkedIn.

DONATE

Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.

Tags:
,

Comments

Sounds like someone is going to have a big party soon.

E Howard Hunt | July 2, 2025 at 11:49 am

A Mann Act Violation, but not sure the White-Slave moniker is apropos.

Transporting young gulls across state lions for immortal porpoises.

    LeftWingLock in reply to E Howard Hunt. | July 2, 2025 at 11:57 am

    Nothing fishy about those activities

    destroycommunism in reply to E Howard Hunt. | July 2, 2025 at 12:12 pm

    its their attempt to please the metoo movement

    all consenting adults traveled of their own free will

    DROP THOSE CHARGES!

      DaveGinOly in reply to destroycommunism. | July 2, 2025 at 12:52 pm

      I expect the charges to be dismissed upon appeal. Diddy didn’ do nuffin’ that fits the raps. Nobody he moved across a state line was prostituted. He engaged prostitutes after crossing state lines, but that’s not a federal crime. He may also have invited prostitutes to cross state lines so that he could pay them for their services. Diddy wasn’t making money from prostitution, nobody in his entourage was prostituted (others weren’t paying for sex with them), so he wasn’t “trafficking.” Diddy’s activities cost him money.

    diver64 in reply to E Howard Hunt. | July 3, 2025 at 6:25 am

    Transporting prostitutes across state lines to be…prostitutes. I always thought the entire thing was ridiculous. Diddy is a creep and the parties revolting but the people showed up of their own free will. Now that the details came out they are running for the hills claiming some type of coercion. If you did something for several years and texted love notes back and forth with the guy organizing it then you are not coerced into anything.

BigRosieGreenbaum | July 2, 2025 at 11:59 am

What a piece of trash. Too bad he didn’t get the death penalty.

    artichoke in reply to BigRosieGreenbaum. | July 2, 2025 at 4:17 pm

    “Being a piece of trash” is not a crime. I didn’t get invited to his freak-offs either, don’t feel bad. It just really seems there’s no “there” there, or very little, in this case.

destroycommunism | July 2, 2025 at 12:11 pm

except for the nod to the

women are equal BUT THEY ARE CHILDREN ( when the going gets tough)

he is innocent of all of it

the motives of the state to indict him??

like capone..forget the murders…tax evasion

like cuomo,,,for sending the seniors to their german shower moment….se xual harassment

like trump…anything we can make up/lie about him…….s exual abuse ( which as we know is pure bbbbsssss)

Not surprising. Putting a celebrity on trial is always a crapshoot.

Elsewhere it has been reported that he might do little additional jail time beyond the nearly a year he has already been held – which counts toward the sentence.

This is why there have been no trials for all the DC corruption.

    artichoke in reply to Petrushka. | July 2, 2025 at 4:31 pm

    In a sense. This is the bread and circuses they feed to the media and the populace so we don’t demand trials on the serious crimes that affect us all.

US DOJ overplayed its hand and the jury busted them.

    DaveGinOly in reply to maxmillion. | July 2, 2025 at 12:54 pm

    DOJ threw the charges against the wall to see what might stick. I’m somewhat shocked that any of them did. But then again, a jury was bamboozled into acquitting OJ, so go figure.

    artichoke in reply to maxmillion. | July 2, 2025 at 4:24 pm

    There’s no “penalty” to the prosecutor for adding excessive charges. There should be. I was on a Florida state jury and they way overcharged the guy. We acquitted on the main charges but some jurors thought we should convict on some lesser charges because we weren’t sure of innocence either and so we should “split the difference”. But there was no more proof of the lesser charges than the greater ones. Fortunately we acquitted on everything, but it’s a known tactic to get convictions.

    Here it is still possible that if the most serious felonies had not been charged, he would not have been convicted of two lesser felonies. Was the jury persuaded to convict on a lower standard on the ‘little” charges? If so the DOJ was rewarded, not punished, for their immoral behavior in overcharging.

healthguyfsu | July 2, 2025 at 2:06 pm

More evidence that privilege is not a race thing but a class/wealth thing.

nordic prince | July 2, 2025 at 2:20 pm

All the Hollyweirdos breathed a collective sigh of relief.

As my old law partner said, anytime you beat the offer, it’s a win.

There are going to be MANY J6ers who received far longer sentences than this idiot is going to get. Comey’s daughter understood her assignment; Tank this case so that double-jeopardy attaches.

    artichoke in reply to TargaGTS. | July 2, 2025 at 4:27 pm

    You make two completely unrelated statements. The J6 people did not belong in court at all. That doesn’t mean Diddy was guilty of sex crimes.

He should have been found guilty of crappy music, ugly clothes, stupid name, and poor taste. He should then have been given the death penalty.

2smartforlibs | July 2, 2025 at 4:49 pm

Never let it be said noone is above the law. We now have proof too many are.

    ztakddot in reply to 2smartforlibs. | July 2, 2025 at 5:43 pm

    OJ would have up clicked you but he’s no longer available. I will do so in his stead.

    artichoke in reply to 2smartforlibs. | July 3, 2025 at 1:55 am

    Denied bail until sentencing for prostitution? Seems like he’s beneath the law, when facing a judge that wanted him convicted on the heavy hitter charges and didn’t get it.

He wasn’t charged with the crime of rape, but I read in the NYPost that he’s facing future civil suits for rape.

That seems like bullshit, that you can avoid the reasonable doubt burden of proof by just switching to a civil suit. But it lets courts “delight to do justice” and lots of punishing, which seems to make courts feel they’re productive or something.

This guy is another Epstein. The FBI and the DoJ only cultivated enough evidence — and buried the rest — so as to convict him without exposing the politically connected. That’s why he’s not looking at serious jail time.