Newly Declassified Appendix To Durham Report Ties George Soros to the Deep State Plot: Update
Clinton campaign advisor: “It will be a long-term affair to demonize Putin and Trump. Now it is good for a post-convention bounce.”
Sen. Chuck Grassley publicly released the newly declassified Appendix (Durham annex) to John Durham’s 2023 Special Counsel report. The lightly redacted annex provides additional detail into much of what was previously known including: the Steele dossier as the basis of its application to the FISA Court for warrants to spy on Carter Page, the FBI’s failure to review evidence they believed would be incriminatory to Hillary Clinton, and then-President Barack Obama’s attempt to “scuttle” the investigation into Clinton’s use of a personal server during her tenure as secretary of state.
What is new, however, is the involvement of billionaire activist George Soros in the elaborate plot against then-candidate Donald Trump.
Here are a few initial takeaways from the newly released document from investigative journalist John Solomon, the founder and editor of Just the News, who has been following this story closely:
Newly-declassified so-called Clinton Plan intelligence included intercepted communications from a George Soros ally which suggested that Hillary Clinton’s 2016 campaign against Donald Trump was plotting a “long-term affair to demonize” Trump by linking him to Russian leader Vladimir Putin, and that the Clinton campaign expected that “the FBI will put more oil into the fire.”
The revelations, including intercepted purported communications from Leonard Benardo, a top official at George Soros’s Open Society Foundations, and communications by Clinton foreign policy adviser Julianne Smith, provide new insight into information that the U.S. intelligence community received in July 2016 – just before the FBI launched its politicized Crossfire Hurricane investigation.
According to the annex, long before the FBI launched Crossfire Hurricane, credible foreign sources were telling the U.S. intelligence community that the bureau would “play a role in spreading the salacious Trump–Russia collusion narrative”:
During the first stage of the campaign, due to lack of direct evidence, it was decided to disseminate the necessary information through the FBI-affiliated…technical structures… in particular, the Crowdstrike and ThreatConnect companies, from where the information would then be disseminated through leading U.S. publications. The media analysis on the DNC hacking appears solid…. Julie [Campaign Advisor] says it will be a long-term affair to demonize Putin and Trump. Now it is good for a post-convention bounce. Later the FBI will put more oil into the fire.
One of the emails from Benardo said:
HRC [Hillary Rodham Clinton] approved [Campaign adviser Julie’s] idea about Trump and Russian hackers hampering U.S. elections. That should distract people from her own missing emails. The point is making the Russian play a U.S. domestic issue… In absence of direct evidence, Crowdstrike and ThreatConnect will supply the media, and GRU [Russia’s Main Intelligence Directive] will hopefully carry on to give more facts.
Solomon highlights Durham’s comment that “there is evidence to believe the Clinton Plan intelligence was authentic and that the Clinton campaign did carry out such a dirty trick.”
The annex states:
The office’s review of certain communications involving Smith provided possible additional support … to the notion that the Clinton campaign was engaged in an effort or plan in late July 2016 to encourage scrutiny of Trump’s purported ties to Russia, and that the [Clinton] campaign might have wanted or expected the FBI or other agencies to aid that effort (‘put more oil into the fire’) by commencing a formal investigation of the DNC hack.
The Durham annex also contained two memos from January and March 2016. The first “detailed the alleged intention by then-President Obama to scuttle the FBI’s investigation into Clinton’s illicit private email server.”
The second “alleged that “[the Democratic Party] opposition is focused on discrediting Trump…. [a]mong other things, the Clinton staff, with support from special services, is preparing scandalous revelations of business relations between Trump and the ‘Russian Mafia’.”
There is a lot of material in this document. We will provide a more detailed update after we’ve had a chance to digest it more fully.
Update: August 1, 9:30 a.m.
The New York Times had a distinctly different take on the Durham annex. Reminiscent of the October 2020 assessment of 51 former Intelligence Community officials that the Hunter Biden laptop story bore all the classic hallmarks of a Russian information campaign, the Times reports that the purported email from July 27, 2016 included in the annex “was most likely stitched together by Russian spies.”
For those who don’t subscribe to The NY Times, because why would you, the article can be viewed here.
Everybody needs to read this for themselves — the spin this morning from NYT and others is the eye-popping claims about Clinton hatching a plan to smear Trump as colluding with Russia were completely fabricated by Russian intel.
But that's not what the report concludes! https://t.co/Y849ByYhfI
— Mark Hemingway (@Heminator) August 1, 2025
DONATE
Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.
Comments
Is there anything actionable? I really want people to pay.
Yes! As an unrepentant, unapologetic Nazi collaborator, Soros could have his citizenship revoked and be deported
I don’t think he lives here in the first place. As for his citizenship: do you think he really cares?
“Soros is a dual citizen of the U.S. and Hungary. As of 2019, he has owned several homes in the U.S., including an estate in Southhampton, N.Y., a duplex on Manhattan’s Fifth Avenue, and a residential compound in Katonah, N.Y., reports Business Insider.”
I believe Hungry curb kicked him a bit back.
But he could be “brought” to the states to face charges, and should he been found guilty, have his citizenship revoked, and then deported to some third world.hell hole, yes?
No. Even if the paranoid evil lies about what he did in Hungary during the war were true, there would be no charges he could face in the USA over them. His naturalization would presumably be found to have been invalid, but that would not be a criminal case. No “charge”, and nothing to “find him guilty” of. At worst he would be found never to have been a US citizen, and he could be denied a visa to come here, but he would still be free to go anywhere else he liked.
On the other hand any crime he hypothetically committed in the USA, for which he could face charges, would not affect his citizenship in any way. He could not lose it or be deported, even if he were found guilty of a crime and served prison time.
Of course in this universe there is no evidence that he did commit any crime, either in Hungary during the war, or in the USA at any time.
Again with these fucking evil lies. No matter how evil you think Soros is, making that false accusation — that blood libel — is even more evil.
And no, his citizenship cannot be revoked, nor can he be deported. He was validly naturalized, and that is an end of it.
Nor has he committed any crimes after naturalization. Everything he’s done has been above-board and legal. He was a useful ally in the aftermath of communism. Since then his views and ours have diverged. That’s all.
Objectively his views, and his ability to fund those who further them, have done great harm to the USA and its allies. That’s enough reason to oppose him and all of his works. It doesn’t justify inventing lies about him.
LOL. I love how you state this as if it’s a fact. How the F would you know? Why do you pretend to know? You love to make up stuff and state it as though it’s the truth. But we all know you are full of sh*t – and you know you are full of sh*t. Soros appears to have committed lots and lots of crimes.
LMFAO!! Are you totally retarded? Seriously … are you? Even Soros would laugh at how retarded you are.
That’s not how it works. There is no evidence that he has committed any crimes; therefore the default assumption is that he has not. If you wish to assert that he has committed crimes the onus is on YOU to show how you know this, or at least to name those crimes. You can’t, because they don’t exist.
LOL. Is that “how it works”?? Where’d you find that “law”? In the Big, Big Book of Delusional International Law, as dictated by the WEF??
We know what Soros has done in other countries. We know what he, himself, has bragged about doing. We know the many, many crimes the dems have been committing and we know that the person running them is the major criminal. It is much more than likely that Soros is the person running the dem machine and those crimes (and there are so, so many and they are so, so serious) are his crimes.
That’s how it works, genius.
And that’s why you’re an evil person, Primordial. You cannot accuse someone of a crime without any reason to believe it to be true, let alone actual evidence.
The same is true for other countries. The only country where he was “convicted” of a crime is France, where there is no justice system as we would recognize it, and in any case the “law” he was “convicted” of breaking is utter BS. It’s no different from saying someone was “convicted” in China of “whispering counterrevolutionary sentiments”.
His life experience has taught him that nationalism causes misery and destruction, so he has become an all-out globalist, determined to oppose all forms of nationalism, everywhere, including American and Jewish nationalism. To that end he has made common cause with neo-Marxists, despite his opposition to actual Soviet-style communism. He has financed organizations that are deeply destructive to the USA and our allies. That makes him objectively our enemy. But it doesn’t justify lying about him.
Oh, just STFU. You are a blithering idiot.
LOL. Seriously. That’s awesome!!
I haven’t laughed this hard in a while.
“fucking evil lies” Soros may or may not have collaborated with Nazis. There may be no hard evidence but the Soros family was of Jewish descent yet escaped the fate of the half million other Hungarian Jews who were sent to the death camps late in the war. It’s not unreasonable to suspect there was a quid pro quo in there somewhere.
And even if it’s a lie it’s nowhere near as evil as Soros himself. You laughingly call criticism of him “blood libel” while the motherfucking Jew-hating commie mamzer has never embraced his Jewish heritage but instead funds BDS organizations that were behind a lot of the antisemitic riots in the wake of 10/7. He gets his minions like the far-left Chicago Newspaper Guild to smear good men like John Kass as “antisemitic” for daring to criticize him. The same thing you are doing with your insane “blood libel” charge. On top of the other depravities we know about, particularly funding DA races that have installed ruinous regimes in several American cities mocking the rule of law by deliberately letting criminals run free. Even San Francisco couldn’t tolerate his pet psychopath Chesa Boudin and finally recalled him. He is the embodiment of evil.
Wheewww! Thar she blows!! The usual legalese responses by you seem plausible – UNTIL you drop the “F” word! Clearly this shows that you KNOW what you are saying is NOT TRUE and just need to amplify your “judicial proclamation” as fact ! Nothing puts the emphasis and the imprimatur on a “fact” like the “F” word! Hmmm, any “funding” involved??
Making false statements on your Immigration Interview can lead to you being stripped of your citizenship and deported! Obviously soros’ actions to destabilize Our Nation are PROOF that he had ANTI-US ideology and should be GONE! I know you’ll have some kind of “Freedom of Speech” paragraph, sub-section, like number crap to disprove that, but people do lose their citizenship when it’s shown they LIED! It’s the LAW – even for DEMOcrats/HYPOCRITES!
My first thoughts upon reading this piece. And that would put a grin across my mug so big that strangers would be lining up to ask me what it is I am “on” and can they buy some from me.
A pox upon Soros and his whole house, to the tenth generation following.
The hoaxsters harnessed the federal government’s entire LE and intel community to the Democrat party and put it to work for the Democrat candidate for president and against her opponent, and it continued its work into Trump’s administration. This effort cost how much? Tens of millions, hundreds of millions of dollars? These funds were fraudulently acquired for the Democrat party’s use by Democrats using their offices as cover for highly partisan, unethical, and illegal acts conducted in the interests of their party and themselves, betraying their allegiance to the country, violating their oaths of office, and defrauding the taxpayers while attempting to deceive the voting public to the corruption of the electoral process. It was robbery at least.
Looks like conspiracy., perhaps mail fraud.
Unfortunately I have to wonder if the statute of limitations has passed.
“using their offices as cover for highly partisan, unethical, and illegal acts conducted in the interests of their party”
An interesting avenue: Are these people all senior executive service; or are any of them bound by the Hatch Act, which prohibits partisan activity during business hours and/or facilitated with government resources or equipment?
“Now it is good for a post-convention bounce.”
Because that sounds a little down The Hatch to me.
Clearly, it will all fall on this Julie [Campaign Advisor] person, who should prepare for years in prison
Na Clinton sentence. Time to get her affairs in order.
The better question may be, who was not involved during the years since the anti-American Obama took office?
At least many people that were called kooks and worse are being vindicated. Pretty soon may they gloat at the dupes that swallowed as if AI was feeding the truth.
I think it’s you that has used this AI acronym a lot here. It clearly isn’t the AI that immediately jumps to my mind. What is it?
Not sure what you mean, but have not used AI (artificial intelligence) a lot here or elsewhere. The point is that people ate up the Russia hoax like some accept AI as the authority and answer to all things under the sun.
I have you beat. I have no idea how to use AI if I wanted to. Chat GPT? I don’t know how to access it. Now and then I do a search using a browser and will get an AI-generated answer. Fine. But, i have never gone to this or that AI site and asked “Compose a Sonatina based on Beethoven concertos, in rag-time arrangement” or some such.
Same. Have not used it or care to. People should have to pass a written test to show they have brains before they can use AI.
Biden turned me off to artificial intelligence.
If you recall, Biden didn’t show much intelligence and what little he did have looked artificial.
OK. Someone has been using it a lot here in non-obvious contexts. Also, I can never figure out if it says “a eye” or “a ell” due to the vagaries of computer typography, so I can’t even tell what he’s trying to say.
Just a moment while I put my Mainstream Me(D)ia hat on…
“THE WALLS ARE CLOSING IN!!!:
“….newly declassified Appendix to Durham Report”
Pray tell, why was it ever classified?
Excellent question. Who was involved in that discussion and who signed off on it?? There doesn’t appear to be anything of a classified nature in it – other than saving the azzes of a HUGE number of seditious democrat/intel/judicial conspirators.
And I maintain my point that no one “lied” to the FISC court. The court and all the judges were in on it. After all, no one comes to that court and asks to spy on a major Presidential candidate based on just regular, run-of-the-mill suspicions (which they didn’t even have!). When asked for warrants to spy on a major Presidential candidate, the FISC would require the evidence to be clear, solid, and beyond question. Clearly, the FISC judges were part of the whole seditious conspiracy, including the Chief Judge … Benedict Roberts.
The false warrant application was not for “a major Presidential candidate”, it was for Carter Page. Having been granted the warrant, to spy on him and anyone he corresponded with, they used that as their “in” to the Trump campaign.
And the lie was subtle. It was merely the insertion of the word “not” into a single sentence, which of course completely changed its meaning.
In other words, it WAS used to spy on a major presidential candidiate, just as indicated.
Most everyone knows that it was for Carter Page, too.
Way to completely miss the point. Who cares what it was used for? It was not for Trump, which completely invalidates Primordial’s point. If Primordial knows it was for Page and not Trump, then his comment was not merely uninformed but deliberately dishonest. I prefer to think he forgot, and meant it honestly.
It was used to spy on Trump. You are the one that missed the point by playing the role of school marm. You acknowledged such in your school marm comment, but are too proud to let it go. The appliction was for Carter Page? Really? Stop the presses!
Stop with your retarded bullsh*t. Go sell it on whatever site the lefties go to, these days. It doesn’t fly here.
The FISC knew that they were aiming at a major Presidential campaign and that’s enough to know that the entire FISC was in on it. They are all dirty. And you are retarded.
No, they did not know. How should they have known? The warrant application was for Page only, and on its face the evidence presented was sufficient. How was any judge to know that the agent submitting it had inserted a “not” into it?
I love when you stupid, because you do it so well.
LOL.
And the Mar-A-Lago raid was nothing more than your standard National Archive action … nothing special about that … nothing weird about SWAT teams with shoot to kill orders looking through Melania’s underwear … with MSM media in tow …
Noooo … the FISC had no clue that Carter Page had anything to do with the Trump campaign or that the spying was going to impinge on a major Presidential campaign in any way … no sirreee … Carter Page wasn’t Donald Trump .. just an advisor – no big deal. The FISC court didn’t have to treat it any different than getting warrants to wiretap some Ukrainian mobster in Lisbon …
You are a friggin retard.
Yes, it was used to spy on Trump. That was the reason they wanted it in the first place, so badly that one agent was willing to perjure himself for it. But that is entirely beside the point.
Have you f****ng read Primordial’s comment? Do you even know what he asserted, to which I responded?! His entire point rests on the premise that the application was for permission to spy on “a major presidential candidate”. Without that his entire point disappears. And as you acknowledge, and say everyone knows, that is simply not true.
The application was not for Trump, it was for Page, and that makes all the difference in the world. The court could only know what was in the application; there is no way it could possibly have known what was hidden in the heart of the agent who submitted it, any more than it could have known that he inserted that one word that turned it into a lie. All it could have known was that there was this person, Page, who appeared to be a Soviet spy or something like that, and the CIA wanted to spy on him. There was no apparent connection to Trump at all. So how does Primordial’s point make any sense?
Of course it was read. No need to be silly.
You obsess over a speck and miss the lump. What more needs be said? It is quite feasible that Boasberg did look the other way. He really dished out a harsh penalty. Looking at the lump, rather than the speck, one cannot put anything by these people that were not interested in Page, but Trump! Common sense.
Page was a senior advisor in the Trump campaign. Spying on him is spying on the Trump campaign. And the FISC knew exactly what was being done and how extraordinary and dangerous and un-American it all was.
What the f*ck is wrong with you??
And your claim seems to be that no judge on the FISC had any clue that Page had ever worked for the Trump campaign. “Just some guy … nothing special … little wiretap …”
Puh-leeease. Everyone knew he had worked on the Trump campaign and they wanted to tap him, thereby allowing contact with the campaign and campaign info in any number of different ways.
Any reasonable, non-criminal would have said, “This guy worked on a major Presidential campaign and we can’;t just go wiretapping him willy-nilly like he’s some run-of-the-mill foreign spy without having ironclad evidence that is beyond reproach.”
But the criminals on the FISC court didn’t bother. They looked at wiretapping someone who had been a close advisor to Trump and said, “Sure – go for it!!”
The FISC and all of the judges on it are co-conspirators. That is obvious to everyone but you. You get a lot of that, being the great defender of traitors and seditious nihilists.
You ask: HOW could the presiding judge KNOW about the insertion of the bombshell word “NOT” into the document?
Simple:. Judge, READ IT.
Why else do they classify anything anymore. It was embarrassing to somebody
I have been firmly convinced, for some time, that Soros has been the person running the democrat party. Barky is a complete retard and the people around him tended to be fairly stupid and incompetent, so the main strategizing and operations had to come from somewhere else, and Soros is the kind of guy with the intelligence to actually plan and carry out all of the various, underhanded (though effective) operations of the dem party.
Luckily, Soros is not long for this world and when he’s gone the dems will have no one to plan their mega-crimes for them. The ugly Soros spawn is a moron who will run through his inherited fortune in little time, I think, with less than nothing to show for it.
But, in the meantime, so many of these conspirators need to be imprisoned. They deserve hard labor (and worse) but just getting them into prison will be enough to put some sort of brakes on the complete lawlessness and seditiousness that infests the leftist political class.
If things are done correctly we’re going to need a little prison-building boom to house the seditious, nihilist democrat criminals.
Soros turned over the operations of his machine to his son many months, if not a few years, ago. The Open Society will not die with him.
I don’t believe that. I think that Soros knows that his kid is a retard and he’s maintained control of the main strategizing even though the kid is now the face of the money. We’ve heard a few of the kid’s ideas and he’s a complete moron. Soros isn’t the kind of guy to all-of-sudden drop out of the game. He’ll be running things until he physically can’t. That’s my thinking on this.
I wish the kid were in real control but I just don’t buy it. I could be sold on the idea that the retard is controlling the dem PR strategies, right now, but that’s about the extent of it. I don’t believe Soros will give up control of Dem policy and criminal operations until he is forced to.
Just my view on it.
He took care to marry Hillary’s girl-toy, Huma
Carlos DangerAbedin. So now they are a power couple to be feared. Or maybe an Electric Company couple to be mocked… only time will tell.Anthony Weiner’s leftover muslim baby mama. What a simp.
Pretty much what everyone who comments here believed was going on but couldn’t until recently prove, including burying the evidence.
I always find it humorous to be called a Nazi by people that are allied with a man who actually allied himself with the actual Nazi party.
That said, the list of people that should be permanently confined to a 6’ x 12’ windowless concrete box high up in the Colorado mountains is very long indeed, but three people top that list:
1) Barack Obama
2) Hillary Clinton
3) George Soros
The problem is that the youngest of the three is still in his 60s and by the time trials and appeals are exhausted they’ll all likely be dead.
But more importantly, we do need a full accounting of what occurred under Obama’s watch. His pledge to fundamentally transform the United States nearly worked if not for Donald Trump.
And if Obama hadn’t insulted him during the White House Correspondents Dinner, Trump might not have been prompted to run.
No, he did not, and repeating that lie makes you more evil than him.
No. It really doesn’t.
I’m still convinced Trump’s original idea in running was to help his friends the Clintons. It was only when he realized he could actually win that he decided to go for it, and after the election when he reached out to his old friends hoping to renew the friendship they spurned him, thus driving him into the hands of the conservatives. He was a good president, but only because his former friends rejected him. If they’d accepted his overtures his administration would have been very different. And there’d have been no inquiries.
When will Obama’s birth certificate be declassified? Who can blame the democrats for plotting anything when they got away with that? All 535 congressmen knew Obama’s background was a fraud and not one dared speak up. That says it all.
The birth certificate conspiracy was the brain child of Hillary Clinton.
Barky’s (lack of) eligibility was an important and legitimate question that our courts were too cowardly to even allow. It’s not so much the birth certificate and its problems (and there were many – not least of which that it was never released – just plain “released”, as in Barky telling Hawaii to issue official copies to press for evidence, as would normally be done). Barky’s eligibility problems were much deeper and more significant – such as his father having been a foreigner, rendering Barky to NOT be a natural born citizen. Whether someone agreed with that or not, it should have gone to court and been adjudicated.
And the problems with our system and the lack of requiring proof of eligibility were HUGE!!! The Donofrio case in New Jersey pointed out that, in addition to the questions involving both Barky and McCain, New Jersey had actually allowed a NON-CITIZEN!!!! on its Presidential ballot. Roger Calero, a Nicaraguan on a green card, was on the Presidential ballot in New Jersey (and 3 other states, I believe), so it’s clear that the SecState didn’t due the due diligence in handling ballot applications. Calero was not hiding the fact that he was an alien. All it took was 10 seconds looking his web page up to find out.
Obama has been implicated in the Russia conspiracy and the whole thing needs to be looked into. And if that happens, one of the first things that needs to be determined who the heck he really is, for we do not really know for sure.
Obama had three problems:
1. HIs mother was, by statute, unable to confer her citizenship upon him by birth
2. He was born in Kenya
The story of his birth in Hawaii was concocted to cover up his birth in Kenya, but not strictly to conceal his actual birthplace. It was concocted to cover up problem #3:
3. His biological father was Frank Marshall David, a communist agitator
Obama couldn’t use his genuine parentage to claim his citizenship, but without using the claim, his birth in Kenya (foreign born) would prevent him from claiming citizenship (unless he was later naturalized, which may also have disqualified him from the presidency).
It’s important to understand that being born in Kenya would not have prevented him from being born a US citizen, so long as he could claim citizenship through his father. But he couldn’t do that because he also had to conceal his true parentage. Hence the fake “born in Hawaii” story. It and the fake “a Kenyan was my dad” story were both necessary to conceal Obama’s real dad, and not where he was born. The “where he was born” controversy distracted from the actual, and slightly more complex, real story about his (real) dad.
To blow my own horn, I actually thought of all this myself, and was later surprised to find that there are web sites dedicated to this explanation of Obama’s ancestry and the fakery necessary to conceal it.
I see I misspelled “Davis”!
Look at Mr. Davis’ picture and that of Obama’s claimed father and draw your own conclusion – perhaps like Chelsea Clinton and Webster Hubbell.
Why would anyone ever care his father was Frank Marshall?
Wherever there is trouble, there is Soros. He brings sorrows (tzuris) wherever he goes.
Why is this just being declassified now? Didn’t Durham’s investigation conclude while Trump was still president? I honestly can’t remember. I also don’t remember Durham testifying in front of Congress on his findings. That would seem to be the prudent next move in light of these revelations.
Good question! The actual reasons can be only speculation in this forum; however, sometimes information is classified to protect sources and methods. The info itself is not much of a factor – the fact that the USG collected it/has the info might be the driving factor. When people realize they are being collected, they might start changing their methods to frustrate collection – or to identify/punish individuals. Protect sources and methods.
Durham found the “smoking gun” evidence proving that this was a coup – and he buried it in a classified “annex” and never mentioned it to anyone.
That seems felony bad.
Well … we don’t know who buried it. We don’t know who thought it should be buried and who actually carried out the burial. Bill Barr was in charge of the DOJ at the time. Chris Wray is certainly a main suspect in the burial.
But, even so, Durham doesn’t have any excuse in allowing it without going to Trump and telling him what the information was and what was going on – so there’s clear culpability and intent right there – and I’m with you on prosecuting his azz for that, at least.
My mistake on the Bill Barr reference. I forgot that Durham carried over (quietly) into the Traitor Joe admin and finished it under Garland and the rest of the traitors. And no opportunity to tell Trump anything. But I have a feeling that all of this work was done before Trump left office.
Perhaps the newly expanded ballroom should be named the Durham Annex.
Wow! Go to bed early and wake up to a cock fight in the comments section. Milhouse got a real workout last night. As well as Primordial.
Let’s remember that this declassified document dump has more than one smoking gun showing how this smear job was perpetrated. It showed Hillary approved of the smear. It ties into Stroyk saying to his lover “ we have an insurance policy” if he wins. It was a conspiracy hatched at the highest levels of government. The conspiracy was continued through the MarA Lago raid and includes Jack Smith. This doesn’t even require a special prosecutor. AG Bondi already has a Strike Force doing the investigation. You can believe that there are a lot of normal people in the DOJ, FBI, CIA, NSA with axes to grind for this abomination. Remember that the issue is the worst scandal in the history of our Republic. Focus on that and not differences in the interpretation of the evidence and Soros.
“Appendix”! These people really think highly of themselves. They spend 2 years gathering all the pertinent information on the subject at hand and separate all the info that that would disprove their published conclusion. I really have to hand it to them. They had the audacity to not only conjure this plan up, they actually went through with it!
The government is so accustomed to controlling narratives and outcomes it thought nothing of continuing business as usual with their belief the populace would be none the wiser.
The wall started to crumble with the twitter files. That was the first time the light started to shine on this crap. A light that is controlled by the populace instead of the controllers.
If I were POTUS the first thing I would do is send a ‘wet work’ team to visit both Soros and his cockroach son.