DNC Chair Brushes Off Mamdani’s Refusal to Condemn ‘Globalize the Intifada’ Chant
Martin acting like disagreeing over “globalize the intifada” is the same as disagreeing over other issues like taxes or Medicaid is just disturbing.
Hey, everyone. The Democratic Party welcomes everyone as the “big tent party!”
Yes, that welcome includes antisemites and those who want to destroy Israel.
Amna Nawaz confronted DNC Chair Ken Martin over socialist Zohran Mamdani, the next person likely to lead New York City, refusing to condemn the phrase “globalize the intifada.”
I hope by now you all know why “globalize the intifada” is a dangerous phrase. If not, read about why it’s antisemitic and the history..
Martin acts like it’s no biggie:
NAWAZ: What about concerns from some of your Jewish colleagues, in particular about him [Mamdani] not outright condemning the phrase “globalize the intifada?” In a recent interview, some of your Jewish colleagues have said that that could be very disturbing, potentially dangerous. Do you agree with that?
MARTIN: There’s no candidate in this party that I agree 100% of the time with, to be honest with you. There’s things that I don’t agree with Mamdani that he said.
But at the end of the day, I always believe, as a Democratic Party chair in Minnesota for the last 14 years, and now the chair of the DNC, that you win through addition, you win by bringing people into your coalition.
We have Conservative Democrats. We have centrist Democrats. We have labor progressives like me, and we have this new brand of Democrat, which is the leftist. And we win by bringing people into that coalition and at the end of the day, for me, that’s the type of party we’re going to lead. We are a big tent party.
Yes, it leads to dissent and debate, and there’s differences of opinions on a whole host of issues. But we should celebrate that as a party and recognize at the end of the day, we’re better because of it.
WATCH: Asked about Zohran Mamdani’s refusal to condemn the “globalize the intifada” slogan, DNC chair Ken Martin says Democrats are “a big tent party.” pic.twitter.com/ct5bXiFHPl
— Washington Free Beacon (@FreeBeacon) July 10, 2025
Dude.
This isn’t about taxes, Medicaid, or immigration.
“Globalize the intifada” is literally about destroying Israel. What happens when you destroy Israel?
You liquidate Jews.
“Globalize the intifada” is literally calling for the elimination of Jews.
These people are literally asking everyone around the world to take up arms against Israel and extinguish Jews.
My goodness, it doesn’t help that Mamdani tried to justify his decision by connecting “intifada” to the Warsaw Ghetto uprising. Even Jonathan Chait at The Atlantic knows this guy is not an ally of Jews:
Mamdani may sincerely believe this, as do some of his supporters. But he then delved into the semantics of intifada, citing the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum’s use of the word as the translation of “uprising” in an Arabic version of an article the museum published about the Warsaw Ghetto. This comparison, to a Jewish armed rebellion against the Nazis, hardly dispels concern about the incendiary implications of the slogan. If the intifada is akin to the ghetto uprising, then it is a call for violence. If its theater of operations is global, then it is necessarily directed against civilians.
(Granted, Chait made quite an effort to convince his readers that “globalize the intifada” has two meanings, violence and non-violence. Don’t want to upset The Atlantic‘s regular lefty readers after all!)
What kind of person thinks it is okay to apply the word “intifada” to the Warsaw Ghetto Uprising?
What kind of person then thinks, “I should totally say that out loud!” Holy moly.
I seriously had to read that part of Chait’s article at least five times because I never ever once thought a person would use a word to describe movements to murder Jews to a Jewish uprising against their murderers.
The fact is, as shown since October 7, 2023, those screaming “globalize the intifada” are calling for one thing: violence against Jews and Israel.
Wait, let me correct myself. Those screaming “globalize the intifada” since the First Intifada are calling for one thing: violence against Jews and Israel.
Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.
Comments
If Martin said anything in condemnation of the global intifada or re-booting the Holocaust he would be kicked out of the Democrat party for attacking a major segment of their supporters.
Subotai Bahadur
Yep. Martin is granting cover and legitimacy to the purveyors of ‘globalize the intifada’ ideology by refusing to condemn it or at least reject it. The reason he won’t do so is that, sadly the d/prog party and its leadership has adopted this sort of violent rhetoric and increasingly the street violence that springs from it. He’d alienate a substantial part of the d/prog base but especially their younger foot soldiers and their unreconstructed boomer elders.
“I don’t agree with everything David Duke has said.”
This is where today’s Democrat Party is.
The way many Dems see it, “globalize the intifada” isn’t all that much different from “globalize communism”, so it has already been under their big tent for a while, just marketed differently.
If he’s trying to tiptoe around the issue instead of condemning it then he’s favoring it. This is one of those binary points that can’t be blurred. The Dimocrats are favoring the defeat of Israel and the murder of Jews. And we thought Nazism was a thing of the past. Not.
.
perfect timing as the leftists at the nyt admit
Donald Trump has been vindicated after The New York Times accused him of pushing a false conspiracy theory about a migrant gang taking over a Colorado apartment building… only for the paper to now admit those same claims were true.
One article published last September scolded Trump for his ‘false’ claims that Aurora was overrun with Tren de Aragua goons.
But a recent investigation published by the esteemed paper now concedes the Denver suburb is indeed a hotspot for the Venezuelan gangsters.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14896915/New-York-Times-admits-migrant-conspiracy-theory-scolded-Donald-Trump-TRUE.html
SO LETS GUESS
is it b/c the j ewish populated nyt is FINALLLLLY READY TO ADMIT BEFORE THE OFFICIAL TAKEOVER
that the imadmen is in fact a true danger like the tren gangs are!!!
f the lefty!!
Dem dog whistle to islamofascists?
the dems are stronger than we think
no matter the talk about disorganized etc
they will coalesce around their che when the timing is right to do so
they know he is the new party
they know he is aoc in drag
they love the chaos
it alll starts at the top
if djt really wants to stop their agenda
he MUST reverse and not add to the socialist agenda that is leading to our demise
its not just good enough to slow it down
it must be reversed
maga
Well, some of the left were screaming “this is what decolonization looks like” after 10/7 — and they consider everyone whose ancestry traces back to anyplace north of the Mediterranean(*) as a “colonizer”. They want that violence to come down not just on Jews, but every one of us.
And if you doubt me, look up the British establishment pushing books with nonsensical claims about the builders of Stonehenge being black, the original settlers of the British Isles being black, etc.
(*) — excepting the Turks and Slavs, despite them being relative newcomers to the region.
Since DNA tracing of family lineage has been used there has been evidence that the Celts originated in the Levant. This was revealed in my family when the thallassemia minor that some of us suffer from has been well known in the eastern Mediterranean for probably a couple of thousand years. Nobody will claim the Brits are all Celts from the Holy Land but there that is.
As for them being black, any migrants from Africa who settled in the British Isles had their genes diluted by northern Europeans for so long that nobody with any intelligence would claim that Britain and Ireland were settled by blacks. The Angles, Saxons, and Nordics/Normans have left much more of an imprint on the islands.
.
Well, today’s PC and ideologically pure BBC is trying to cure all of that. Recently they did a program on the Battle of Bosworth Field between Lancastrians and Yorkists in the 1400’s that put the Tudors on the throne. They made sure that the troops on both sides were sufficiently racially diverse to meet modern standards.
Subotai Bahadur
I’m just sad that, for timing reasons, we all missed the opportunity to ask David Hogg what HE thinks of globalizing the Intifada. Whatever he would have answered, I know it would have provided us a full day’s entertainment.
Apparently the DemoncRats big tent doesn’t include Jews, or at least those who are living. Now if only Jewish DemoncRats realized that.
“We have Conservative Democrats. We have centrist Democrats.”
I call BS. There are no conservative or centralist dramacrats. There used to be. They were purged.
Martin is from Minnesota. You can’t be a bigger simp than a dramacrat from Minnesota. Look at the politicians from there. Unbelievable.
This is Exhibit A-Z why I will never ever vote for a dramacrat. I may not vote for a republican but I will definitely not vote for a dramacrat. After all the head of the part doesn’t mind that probably a third t0 half of his membership wants me dead.
It’s also why I have nothing but contempt for a Jew that claims to be a dramacrat whether politician or party member or even votes for a dramacrat in any election regardless. Every group has their scum. These are ours.
conservative dems are rinos or rinos are conservative dems …whatever
the money flows from the middle class to these thuggs
that power move is the destroyer of america
Soon, this guy’s office door key isn’t going to work when he shows up to the office.