Russia, Iran Using Social Media Bots to ‘Destabilize MAGA from Within’
“If you talk to Republicans right now, more than 80 percent of them support the war against Iran. But if you go on Twitter you get the sense that there is a civil war raging.”

The Make America Great Again movement is confronting a new and insidious threat. The U.S. political right has become the target of a coordinated foreign influence campaign — led by Russia and Iran — that uses social media bots to spread conspiracy theories online. These foreign troll farms aim to sow mistrust, deepen divisions, stir chaos, and ultimately ‘destabilize MAGA from within.’
The Network Contagion Research Institute is a nonpartisan nonprofit organization that searches for, identifies, and analyzes extremism on the internet. The group’s stated mission is “to track, expose, and combat misinformation, deception, manipulation and hate across social media channels.”
After noticing some puzzling rhetoric in the social media posts of self-identified “MAGA supporters,” the NCRI conducted an investigation and published their findings on Wednesday. Their report, titled False Flags and Fake MAGA: How Foreign and Inauthentic Networks use Fake Speech to Destabilize the Right from Within, can be viewed here.
NCRI researchers found that a coordinated group of Russians and Iranians, impersonating MAGA supporters, has been flooding social media with propaganda that’s intended to sow division among conservatives in the U.S. over the Israel-Iran war. These false narratives are then amplified by tens of thousands of social media bots.
[Note: Cloudflare defines social media bots as “automated accounts designed to interact with users and content, often mimicking human behavior. … Some are benevolent, but most are used for malicious and manipulative purposes,” as they are in this case.]
It's so obvious that anti-Israel accounts are being boosted – it's how to explain the disconnect between the polling on Iran-Israel and what you see on @X. https://t.co/F17qzpISUs
— William A. Jacobson (@wajacobson) June 19, 2025
NCRI researchers have seen these types of operations before, shortly after a major news event, particularly a crisis, has been reported.
[These initiatives are intended to] trigger an immediate surge in online “false flag” discourse, emerging within minutes of initial reports and aimed at recasting the events as evidence of hidden conspiratorial plots, obscuring the true motives and perpetrators.
In the days following these crises, Kremlin-affiliated propagandists and Iranian state-linked media are able to rapidly inject narratives that are taken up by MAGA-impostor influencers [humans], who then inject them into MAGA-branded spaces [via social media bots], often within minutes of breaking news.
And just like that, their preferred new narrative — aimed at “destabilizing the [American] right from within” — enters the social media discourse.
An NCRI analyst told the New York Post (the first media outlet to report on this study), “If you talk to Republicans right now, more than 80 percent of them support the war against Iran. But if you go on Twitter you get the sense that there is a civil war raging.” He added, “This is exactly the purpose of the psychological operation — to destabilize people’s perceptions of institutions that are supposed to protect us.”
The bots create the illusion that extreme viewpoints have far more support than they actually do, which can influence unsuspecting social media users into believing the content is real. They generally use generic, unremarkable names and craft profiles designed to resemble everyday Americans.
According to the report, “during one such activation window, 650,000 posts citing false flag conspiracies drew nearly four million interactions, powered by a pipeline of Kremlin-affiliated propagandists, spam-bot networks, and domestic influencers.”
Following President Trump’s recent public spat with Elon Musk:
The same network first turned inward to smear Donald Trump with accusations of pedophilia and Epstein ties, deploying the same bot-driven infrastructure that had amplified false-flag narratives days earlier. In the lead-up to the war with Iran, this network then pivoted outward and amplified false Iranian claims that the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) was operating under foreign control, echoing Tehran’s strategic messaging.
This constitutes a systematic effort to impersonate MAGA-adjacent audiences, fracture right-leaning coalitions, and repurpose nationalist symbols in service of foreign subversion. Such a network operates as a constant amplification system driven by foreign seeding accounts, inauthentic engagement farms, and U.S. influencers.
NCRI explains how two MAGA-impostor influencers, Noctis Draven, “who is a regular consultant for Kremlin media,” and his colleague, Megatron, tried to spread the “false flag conspiracy theory that Israel was behind the deaths” of two Israeli embassy staff members outside the Capital Jewish Museum in Washington, D.C., last month.
Noctis Draven reposted an earlier post from Megatron which said, “The shooter that killed the Israeli embassy staff in Washington reportedly yelled ‘Free Palestine.'”
In his repost, Noctis Draven remarked: “They even made sure to leave him alive and unharmed and they MADE SURE to get that shot of him saying, ‘Free Palestine.’ … Guys, if you can’t tell this is a false flag, I don’t know what to tell you.”
NCRI reported, “Combined views exceeded 4.7M within hours, illustrating how foreign seeding and domestic amplification work in tandem to hijack crisis narratives.”
The report said “@AdameMedia amplified the narrative hours later and repeatedly throughout the day with widespread engagement.” The post read:
The world was turning on Israel.
The media was turning on Israel.
Politicians were turning on Israel.
Everyone was racing to be on record as being against Israel.
Then this false flag happens.
And its all labelled antisemitism.
Genius.
Similarly, after Egyptian national Mohamed Sabry Soliman attacked demonstrators at a peaceful event to support Israeli hostages held in Gaza with a homemade flamethrower and Molotov cocktails in Boulder, Colorado, earlier this month, the group sprang into action.
An influencer posted a photo of Soliman on X with the caption: “This man is not a Muslim. This man is not called Mohammed. This man is an Israeli agent who has just perpetrated a false flag event in Boulder Colorado. It is all theater. Period.”
And the charade began anew.
The NCRI report says, “Domestic personalities with large but unstable followings … supply a veneer of grassroots legitimacy, completing an ‘asset-adjacency’ model in which fringe US influencers ride the same engagement farms that propel Kremlin messaging.”
The report delves much deeper into the mechanics of these operations, offering detailed analysis and screenshots of the posts cited as examples. It’s a highly eye-opening read that lays bare just how sophisticated and targeted these influence campaigns have become. It reveals a digital battlefield most people don’t even realize they’re standing on.
Because clearly, we needed one more thing to stress over.
Elizabeth writes commentary for Legal Insurrection and The Washington Examiner. She is an academy fellow at The Heritage Foundation. Please follow Elizabeth on LinkedIn or X.

Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.
Comments
excuse me
but that would be russia iran and the dnc
How about the CCP? I bet it’s doing the same thing.
“The MAGA movement is confronting a new and insidious threat”
Yes — that President Trump has sold out to the Neocon warmongers, and broken his promise to keep us out of “regime change” wars.
if you understooooddddd
iran is powerful enough to hurt the usa especially with dems in charge of the usa
so maga ACTUALLY equals defeating people that want to eliminate us and have the pwoer to do so
Tissue, snowflake?
We are not in a regime change war. Get your facts straight. And if we drop some bunker busters we will not be in one either.
Didn’t you read the post that President Trump left on Truth Social immediately after Israel’s initial attack? He crowed at length about all the weapons that the US supplied to Israel to make that attack possible. Plus all of the subsequent logistical and anti-missile support. More recently, he’s bragged that “we” dominate the skies over Iran, and bragged that “we” can kill Khamenei any time .
To say that he hasn’t gotten us into a regime change war delusional — if not deliberately dishonest.
The only one in this thread that’s dishonest is you, Moonmouth. You’ve been dishonest since you first started posting here.
steves59 Do you deny that President Trump posted the statements that I attributed to him?
If it was as you say, it would have happened already. Getting rid of Iran’s capacity to make nukes and fire missiles is defensive, and US support does not change that, even if Israel is virtually unimpeded. Looks like you are letting YOUR deragement get the best of you. Perhaps you should re-think your false allegations, but most likely you are incapable.
Moonmouth: I categorically reject your comment that Trump’s statements mean “he’s gotten us into a regime change war.”
Categorically.
Get the hell out of here.
to steves59
“Get the hell out of here.” Trump can kiss the midterms goodbye if the MAGA commissars of ideological purity keep saying that to people who voted for Trump last year because of his promise to keep us out of more wars, and now feel betrayed,
“Trump can kiss the midterms goodbye if the MAGA commissars of ideological purity keep saying that to people who voted for Trump last year because of his promise to keep us out of more wars, and now feel betrayed,”
That’s just what the bots with fake messages say. The “now feel betrayed” crowd is smaller than the bots pretend, and is likely outweighed by Americans that support what we are doing, which is not getting us into war, but creating peace.
@Moonmouth.
“Get the hell out of here.” Trump can kiss the midterms goodbye if the MAGA commissars of ideological purity keep saying that to people who voted for Trump last year because of his promise to keep us out of more wars, and now feel betrayed,”
You voted for Trump like I voted for Harris, buddy.
You’re all wee-wee’d up over something that hasn’t yet happened. And may not if the Israelis complete the task at hand.
You’re just a feeble hand-wringer, not cut out for this kind of work.
If a commenter at LI is sufficient to drive you out of MAGA, you were never MAGA to begin with.
Don’t you have some unwashed natives to proselytize to? I suggest you get busy.
By the way, my advice still stands. Get the hell out of here.
In today’s world, is the DNC capable of doing something like this?
We have bots here too. They don’t seem to be too effective but they are here nevertheless.
If they aren’t bots or paid influencers they might as well be for how effective they are,
Now we have to worry about whether the Junior and the Junior Varsity trolls are Iranian or Russian. Or maybe one of each.
And here I was just getting comfortable considering JR as an agent of Hillary and TJV as an agent of Nickelodeon.
There has to be an agent of winnie the pooh around here somewhere,
We’re blaming Russian bots now?
China has a stake in Iran.
I have a steak in the freezer.
Uh, the problem is not the bots, but with conservatives who inhabit X-space and believe it is reality.
Interestingly, I just watched the implosion of a more-or-less rational commenter on another site who was deeply influenced by those X bots.
I have tried to spend time on X, InstaFace, SnapBook, and so many others. I just can’t seem to catch on. I find them boring, pretentious, and in a lot of cases, outright obnoxious.
I appreciate the writers here at LI because they capture the interesting and connected X posts (tweets?) that are important to the story, but I can’t spend any time just flipping through those platforms.
I tried FarceBook. Found some very useful groups re home automation. But, ended up being stalked and harassed out of the blue. I decided to kill my account.
Visiting the low-income housing automation forums was a mistake.
I think these are the same people investing in bitcoin.
We got bots. They got bots. All God’s Chil’en got bots.
You know what’s good for bots? Ivermectin.
Trump’s going to do what Trump’s going to do, notwithstanding the bot wars.
Yes, Trump will do whatever he’s hell bent on going to do, even if it ends up in nuclear war. You think the Neo Cons are hell bent on warfare? You haven’t seen nothing yet until you see Trump’s nuclear fallout. See you on the other side.
You have seen Trump’s nuclear fallout, yes? The only “hell bent” here is your fanatical hatred of Trump. It’s almost as if you wish he would start a nuclear war to satisfy your derangement.
Put the crack pipe down, dumbass.
I love a vacillating media that dithers on command…they are subjects of the king.
If someone is so gullible as to be influenced by the dribble coming out of something named “Megatron,” I don’t know what to say, but that kind of person needs some serious looking after for their own health and safety.
Not ever having been a Transformers fan, I had to look it up to be sure:
“He is the tyrannical leader of the Decepticons, a villainous faction of alien robots…”
It’s like reading stuff published by a screename “Satan” and saying, “Hey, this makes sense!”
No, no. We’re not stuck in there with them.
They are trapped in here with us.
(maniacal laugh gets louder)
Why would Russia (Putin) want to destabilize MAGA? MAGA and Putin are aligned against the WWB (World-Wide Blob). It doesn’t make sense for Russia to destabilize a strategic ally. MAGA’s non-interventionism (not isolationism) also should (at least theoretically) give Putin more freedom to act in Russia’s own interests within its sphere of influence.
Iran, yes. North Korea, yes. China, yes. Russia, no. It’s not in Russia’s interests to destabilize MAGA.
What I always find interesting is names I never see post here all of a sudden pop up and post on one topic. There is one on this topic thread right now, I realize everything costs money but it would be nice if they invested a bit in better software so we could least see some meta information about posters. I know everyone has other capabilities they would like to have as do I.
I’d be happy either way an edit function. New voices are, to me, welcome unless they become a nuisance or are obvious trolls. I have been on this site for a long time, but far from one of the longest term. I was at one time, myself a new voice here.
I;m not talking about just new voices being one. I’m talking about those that pop up out of nowhere and post once. Or post on just one topic. Then you never see them again, It’s likely AIs scan LI and notify their principal when certain topics or certain people mentioned and then a bot or a troll is directed to that conversation as a one time gig.
So it’s Democrats colluding with Russia just as I figured all along.
There’s also the purity test drama that’s overlayed on issues. There are some, often many depending on the topic, who want to exile/shame/attack folks in the coalition b/c they don’t agree with the majority on a particular topic. If have folks who agree with us 2/3 of the time (I’d argue 51%) then we should keep them in the coalition so long as the disagreement isn’t about a core belief and merely the application of that core belief to a particular issue. IMO this knee-jerk response mechanism some have towards any dissent or disagreement makes it possible to create fissures to be exploited by bots and other Information Operations designed to divide.
Speaking as an outlier I probably agree with about 60% of the cire beliefs. Maybe a little higher. I don’t mind people disagreeing with me but I very much get triggered by insults or disrespect. Just disagree and explain why. Sometimes I change my opinion with new information but I’m unlikely to respond positively if someone is an ahole.
This is a problem online in general and not just here or on conservative sites. Milhouse who is an asset to this site has it worse than me. Of course Milhouse sometimes brings it on himself whether he realizes or not.
I.was referring to the political coalition of center/right populists + social conservatives + budget hawks + the ‘compassionate’ conservatives + Only Trump and so on that formed the mass of voters to elect DJT and a Congressional majority. If we got an elected official who makes a consistent principled argument/stand on a topic then we shouldn’t expect them to change for tactical advantage in a particular vote out of ‘party’ loyalty. Principled people like that are sometimes a pain in the ass but also serve a useful purpose in reminding us whay politics is supposed to be; taking stands out of principle not crass partisan political advantage or ‘team’ loyalty. It’s good to be reminded we don’t have a parliamentary system and Congressional votes gotta be earned not demanded and certainly not taken for granted…that’s how the d/prog operate.
I suppose it could apply here but IMO the comment boards are place to bounce ideas/theories and opinions off each other, not a popularity contest. LI has a well informed group of commenters who collectively have broad experience across different academic and professional/career disciplines whose geographic dispersion can provide local insights/knowledge sharing.
I mostly agree on ad hominem attacks with the caveat of ‘if you can’t take it don’t dish it out’. I’d prefer we didn’t insult each other but sometimes folks get heated or read things into posts that aren’t there. Passionate discussion is fine so long as we keep in mind we’ll be discussing a new set topics next week. The trolls and the folks who lead off with insults meh everyone should feel free to respond when attacked.