Image 01 Image 03

DOJ Opens Investigation Into U California System for Race and Sex-Based Employment Practices

DOJ Opens Investigation Into U California System for Race and Sex-Based Employment Practices

“Public employers are bound by federal laws that prohibit racial and other employment discrimination.”

Higher education has gotten a free ride from both parties for years. That seems to be over.

From the DOJ website:

Justice Department Opens Investigation into the University of California System for Race- and Sex-Based Employment Practices

The Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division has opened an investigation into the University of California (UC) system, including its individual campuses, concerning potential race- and sex-based discrimination in university employment practices.

The University of California’s “UC 2030 Capacity Plan” directs its campuses to hire “diverse” faculty members to meet race- and sex-based employment quotas. These initiatives openly measure new hires by their race and sex, which potentially runs afoul of federal law. The Civil Rights Division’s Employment Litigation Section will investigate whether the University of California is engaged in a pattern or practice of discrimination based on race, sex, and other protected characteristics, pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

“Public employers are bound by federal laws that prohibit racial and other employment discrimination,” said Assistant Attorney General Harmeet K. Dhillon of the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division. “Institutional directives that use race- and sex-based hiring practices expose employers to legal risk under federal law.”

DONATE

Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.

Comments

It’s common knowledge among university faculty that hiring committees are always directed to make sure there are “diverse” candidates among their top picks for any job. If one of the “diverse” candidates is the second or third best candidate for the job, he/she will invariably get it. I was on a committee where our best candidate (by far) was a white male, and we were told to go back and re-score the candidates to put a “diverse” candidate on top.