Image 01 Image 03

Rutgers Professor Resigns From AAUP Over Radical Anti-Israel Activism

Rutgers Professor Resigns From AAUP Over Radical Anti-Israel Activism

American Association of University Professors continues its descent into activism. Rutgers Professor: “There are people who are now resigning from AAUP because of your radicalization. … Your bashing of Israel continually is misplaced. I don’t think it belongs as part of the AAUP program.”

If you’ve been following the decline and fall of the American Association of University Professors (AAUP) at Legal Insurrection, you know the faculty group has been completely captured by left-wing activists. Founded in 1915 to guard academic freedom and tenure, the AAUP is now, for all practical purposes, an ultra-progressive labor union.

So May 1st was perfect timing for last week’s membership meeting. “I think we were all waiting for May Day,” said AAUP’s national president, Todd Wolfson, who led the program.

The video of the online conference is available on YouTube and embedded below, thanks to @thestustustudio’s outstanding investigative work. Stu also posted a great thread highlighting the speakers at the meeting here.

Wolfson was in his element last week as he introduced himself to the audience with his he/him pronouns, then guided the hour-long back-and-forth among staff and AAUP members across the country.

Wolfson is a professor at Rutgers, but at heart, he’s a union guy. He’s made his mark leading the school’s AAUP-AFT chapter since 2019. Notably, in 2023, he organized the first faculty strike in Rutgers’ over 250-year history. It was a huge success, as I wrote here.

He is also a founding member of the Rutgers chapter of Faculty for Justice in Palestine (FJP).

Shortly after his election in a landslide last year, Wolfson announced he wanted to make the AAUP a “fighting organization.”

And, as you would expect, the online meeting was “all about the fight”—against the Trump administration’s “authoritarian right-wing attack” on higher ed. The battlefront in that fight is shifting from Trump’s executive orders to the Republicans’ budget proposals in the fall, explained Mia McIver, the AAUP’s Executive Director.

The Republicans’ threatened $330 billion in budget cuts are not only attacks on higher ed and higher ed workers, McIver warned. They’re attacks on the working class: They’re going to make a college education “accessible only to the wealthy few”:

 

 

Wolfson agreed: “When Trump attacks higher ed, he attacks everybody’s imagination of having a better life.” [17:08]

So, with an eye toward the budget resolutions in the fall, he laid out a battle plan, including: lawfare, the fight at the ballot box, and countering the right-wing narrative. But most important of all, “taking it to the streets.” “We have to meet force with force.”  “There’s a broad understanding,” Wolfson later concluded, “that we have to escalate our tactics.” [28:27]

Guest speaker Saquib Bhatti knows how to escalate. He’s Co-Executive Director of the Action Center on Race and the Economy (ACRE) and a key organizer of May Day Strong.

As Stu points out here, Bhatti doubled down on the meeting’s core theme: disruption. “We need to figure out how we’re actually making the actions more disruptive. So it’s not business as usual; it actually starts to hit them where it hurts,” Bhatti advised the group. [20:25]

Bhatti also knows how to do what leftists do best: tap into grievance. “People are fed up, angry and have had enough,” he said. “We need to develop the analysis … of who’s responsible for the pain that we’re suffering.” In other words, to exploit people’s worst sensibilities for our own political gain, we need to find someone on the right for them to blame for their unhappiness.

Wolfson loved the next guest speaker, Jessica Tang, president of AFT Massachusetts and a national vice president of the American Federation of Teachers. A leader of pre-K/12 organizing, Tang brought the “disruption” theme to life, joining the meeting from the middle of a street protest in Boston. “We need to have larger mass mobilization,” she urged as she stepped away from the crowd for a moment. “The way we fight back is by getting in the streets.” “We’re shutting down the streets in Boston here.” [26:14] Wolfson cheered her on: “Jessica, you’re the best! Now get back to that rally!”

Toward the end of the meeting, and to his credit, Wolfson opened the floor to Rutgers Professor Stanley Weiss, a longtime member who then and there announced his resignation over the AAUP’s radical turn: [46:00]

I’m very concerned with the radicalization of AAUP. …  There are people who are now resigning from AAUP because of your radicalization. … Your incorporation of many of the pro-Hamas oriented organizations is misplaced.  … Your bashing of Israel continually is misplaced. I don’t think it belongs as part of the AAUP program. And I have personally resigned effective today from being a member of AAUP here at our university despite my being a leader here and it’s all because of your leadership and that of your executive committee.

Wolfson listened politely but then shrugged Weiss off as an outlier: AAUP membership was growing “by leaps and bounds” he said, and its leadership had no intention of reversing course: “We are not standing down, we are stepping forward.” [47:00]

“Organizing and building our power, that’s how we win,” Wolfson said, emphasizing the need for a broad coalition. “Higher ed workers alone cannot protect against the attacks on higher ed.” [59:00] They need an “aligned strategy” that includes other sectors under threat: “our K-12 brothers and sisters,” “the May Day folks,” higher ed workers, federal workers—and yes, “the people standing up around Palestine.” You know, the ones who want to “globalize the Intifada“—a euphemistic call for Jewish genocide.

As the meeting drew to a close, it was obvious that Weiss’s protests over the faculty group’s mission failure had come far too little, far too late. Under Wolfson’s radical leadership, the AAUP doesn’t stand for anything anymore. It’s “a fighting organization”—fighting to perpetuate its own political power.

DONATE

Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.

Comments

Why does it seem like the newer generation of professors are not very professorial or learned, especially compared to those that were true academics, in both knowledge and approach to the values of education.


     
     0 
     
     2
    destroycommunism in reply to oldschooltwentysix. | May 7, 2025 at 1:50 pm

    great point

    my guerss is
    b/c actually being educated with knowledge is NOT the main requisite for them

    racial identity per the na zi agenda

    or gender/class per the communist agenda

    is the main cause


     
     0 
     
     3
    The Gentle Grizzly in reply to oldschooltwentysix. | May 7, 2025 at 4:42 pm

    I notice that in many – not all – cases, the radical professors are teaching nonsense courses. Before colleges became infested with such, there was far less of this sort of thing.

    Ah, but for a return to the days when professors wore corduroy coats with leather elbow patches, had neat beards or VanDykes, smoked pipes, and – gesturing with the stem of that pipe – started every reply with “Actually…”. They drove Volvos and Peugeots.

    I’m not.so sure it’s just the newer profs. I remember reading decades ago about pros who wrote more conservatively were denied tenure.

    These profs appear to be the grandchildren of the 1960s radicals. Those radicals raised their kids saying “anything goes” choice of words. They also learned that education and government careers were ones where it was almost impossible to be fired. I other words, they looked for risk-free jobs that paid decently and had good pensions as a bonus.


 
 0 
 
 1
DSHornet | May 7, 2025 at 1:12 pm

Bhatti has bhats in his bhelfry.
.


 
 0 
 
 0
ztakddot | May 7, 2025 at 1:16 pm

This is absolutely bat shit crazy. Do these clowns actually do any teaching?


 
 1 
 
 0
SeymourButz | May 7, 2025 at 1:42 pm

Keep the focus on Jewish students, I think. Racist and criminal behavior shouldn’t be tolerated. Criticism of Israel must. And no matter what you say they are not the same.


     
     1 
     
     2
    CommoChief in reply to SeymourButz. | May 7, 2025 at 2:04 pm

    Criticism of Israel is fine for sure. No Nation and no National Leadership is perfect and pointing out perceived errors and mistakes is legitimate. Calling for the destruction of Israel or the harm/death of Israeli Citizens isn’t criticism of Israel. It’s a fine line to police but really the speech isn’t the true issue on University Campus. As you point out the real issues are the illegal actions; menacing behavior, threats of harm, blocking ingress/egress, taking over buildings, taking over public spaces, shutting down classes, refusal to allow the willing audience to listen and interact with invited speakers. Usually performed by mobs of disguised individuals often unaffiliated with the Univ. Those actions are not free speech no matter how often they falsely claim it is. They can easily get a permit and assemble peacefully to state their case but choose unlawful means instead.


 
 0 
 
 0
destroycommunism | May 7, 2025 at 1:45 pm

for every one of these KNOWN /resigning na zis ..lets call them what they are

there has got to be 50 more


 
 0 
 
 2
destroycommunism | May 7, 2025 at 1:47 pm

if yuo even try and arrest of correct a crimonal who is a poc

you risk getting fired/jailed etc

these je wish students should be times “people of the year” for putting up with the continued attacks and not just surviving /living off the taz payers BUT THRIVING


 
 0 
 
 1
destroycommunism | May 7, 2025 at 1:48 pm

correction:

if you even try and arrest or correct a criminal

should be times magazines “people of the year

living off the tax payers


 
 0 
 
 1
destroycommunism | May 7, 2025 at 1:56 pm

they want a repeat of 9 11 against america and/or israel

When resigning from AAUP, do they also cease paying union dues?


 
 0 
 
 1
Alex deWynter | May 7, 2025 at 2:47 pm

“The way we fight back is by getting in the streets.” “We’re shutting down the streets in Boston here.”

Because screwing up people’s commutes is great for winning hearts and minds. /sarc


     
     0 
     
     1
    destroycommunism in reply to Alex deWynter. | May 7, 2025 at 5:24 pm

    they dont worry about that

    they know that they are putting fear into people and that if they dont give in…like they do toooo many times,,there will be more trouble coming


 
 0 
 
 0
henrybowman | May 7, 2025 at 3:51 pm

He and that Leninist librarian could both use a good…
Maybe they can find each other.


 
 0 
 
 0
artichoke | May 7, 2025 at 4:13 pm

I do hope DOJ is working with some moles in this organization for information collection, and criminal charges will doubtless be possible as a result of this organized disruption.

Also it underlines the need to suck money out of that system. Without overflowing money, these people would have to hustle to do their actual jobs to keep their institutions in business and keep their pay coming in.


 
 0 
 
 0
HarvardPhD | May 8, 2025 at 8:02 pm

Todd Wolfson is a socio-cultural anthropologist. Of all the social science disciplines, anthropology is the most polluted with neo-Marxism, antisemitism, and anti-Americanism. These people ought to be run out of (even) reputable academic society.


 
 0 
 
 0
Dimsdale | May 14, 2025 at 8:05 pm

The AAUP, MTA, AFT etc., are all completely useless except as donation pipelines for Democrats. They do NOTHING for professors in tenure distress etc. Been there, done that.

Here is the story of James Miller, who went for tenure at Smith College in Northampton MA. It is a tale of leftist subterfuge and the AAUP played a big part in his persecution:

https://www.academia.org/cracking-the-ivory-curtain-at-smith/

Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.