One of the problems with the recent revelations about federal government officials hiding was what was known about the link between adverse impacts on the heart tissue (myocarditis) and the COVID-19 shot, is that there is now reason to question much of the assertions they made about the vaccines being “safe and effective”.
Let’s take a look at the claims that the vaccine had no impact on human fertility or pregnancy. As an example, a Baylor University study in 2023 tracked the levels of Anti-Müllerian Hormone AMH) in women. By way of background, AMH is introduced by specialized cells in the small, growing follicles of the ovaries.
AMH levels in the blood reflect the number of these developing follicles, making it a widely used marker to estimate a woman’s ovarian reserve—that is, the remaining quantity of eggs in the ovaries. The ovarian reserve is the ovary’s ability to produce eggs capable of fertilization, resulting in a healthy, successful pregnancy.
Antral Follicle Count (AFC) is another key measurement. Antral follicles present in a woman’s ovaries at a specific point in her menstrual cycle, typically between days 2 and 5. Each antral follicle contains an immature egg, and these follicles represent the pool of eggs available for possible ovulation and fertility treatments.
The Baylor study assessed both factors and determined there was no link between the COVID-19 vaccine and poor ovarian health.
A more recent study (Impact of mRNA and Inactivated COVID-19 Vaccines on Ovarian Reserve) published in Vaccine (March 2025) investigated the effects of both mRNA and inactivated COVID-19 vaccines on ovarian reserve using a rat model.
The findings were much more troubling.
The researchers took 30 female Wistar albino rats, divided into three groups: control, mRNA vaccine (like the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines), and inactivated vaccine (like the Novavax vaccine) and studied a wider array of hormones and features that not only included follicle count and AMH but also transforming growth factor beta-1 (TGF-β1, a hormone deeply involved in the recruitment and growth of ovarian follicles), Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF, for the maturation of follicles), and caspase-3 (a hormone regulating the life cycle of ovarian cells).
So, right away, it appears that the study from the Turkish researchers who conducted the study was a bit more broad-based. Let’s see what it uncovered:
The study suggests that both mRNA and inactivated COVID-19 vaccines negatively affect ovarian reserve in rats. The effects are more pronounced with the mRNA vaccine.
It must be noted that the authors emphasize that these findings are from a rat model and that further research in humans is necessary before drawing clinical conclusions.
I would like to offer this bit of history in this discussion, via Hot Air’s David Strom:
It has long been known that women who were administered the COVID-19 vaccines suffered from menstrual changes–this effect was noticed early on and is now well-established–so it shouldn’t be shocking that the vaccines had a detrimental impact on fertility itself.Despite this fact, public health officials went on a campaign to reassure women that there was no danger at all to their fertility and that any suggestion that there might be was misinformation–misinformation that was, of course, censored for quite a while.Oops.
I agree with him. If, like the myocarditis link, officials hid the truth about adverse impacts on fertility, then it is a crime against humanity.
I shudder to think about what the next batch of redacted vaccine documents will show, and am grateful that the Turkish researchers were able to get their findings published.
Good policy is based on all the information, just not the studies that fit the preferred political narrative.
CLICK HERE FOR FULL VERSION OF THIS STORY