Wife of Deported Suspected MS-13 Member Sought Restraining Orders Against Him
“Respondent punched and scratched petitioner, ripped off [her] shirt, grabbed and bruised petitioner.”
You all know about the fiasco around deported illegal alien and suspected MS-13 gang member Kilmar Armando Abrego Garcia.
Jennifer Vasquez, Abrego Garcia’s wife, has described him as an excellent father and the love of her life, vowing not to stop trying to bring him home.
Oh, Vasquez also set up a GoFundMe account.
Interesting.
Investigative reporter Andy Ngo discovered that Jennifer Vasquez petitioned for a restraining order against him in 2021 because of domestic violence.
RedState’s Teri Christoph then found another petition from 2020.
The Department of Homeland Security produced a more in-depth report.
“Respondent punched and scratched petitioner, ripped off shirt, grabbed and bruised petitioner,” according to the report.
The court told Abrego Garcia to vacate the home and gave Vasquez custody of their child.
Kilmar Abrego Garcia had a history of violence and was not the upstanding “Maryland Man” the media has portrayed him as.
According to court filings, Garcia’s wife sought a domestic violence restraining order against him, claiming he punched, scratched, and ripped off her shirt,… pic.twitter.com/FpSV0k3i90
— Homeland Security (@DHSgov) April 16, 2025
The wife of deported suspected gang terrorist Kilmar Abrego Garcia either lied to the court when she petitioned for a domestic violence protective order against him or she is lying now on the GoFundMe claiming he is an excellent husband as over $162K has poured in. https://t.co/2PGNpuVefu pic.twitter.com/J7VQmviibE
— Andy Ngo (@MrAndyNgo) April 16, 2025
There's also one from August of 2020. Real nice guy. https://t.co/O9M7JeGg8b pic.twitter.com/cCf4Aqp1XR
— Teri (@TeriChristoph) April 16, 2025
Vasquez told The New York Post she acted “out of caution after a disagreement with Kilmar … in case things escalated” since she experienced domestic abuse in another relationship.
“Things did not escalate, and I decided not to follow through with the civil court process,” explained Vasquez. “We were able to work through this situation privately as a family, including by going to counseling.”
Vasquez claimed their marriage grew stronger.
Vasquez also argued that the allegations are “not a justification for ICE’s action of abducting him and deporting him to a country where he was supposed to be protected from deportation.”
“Kilmar has always been a loving partner and father, and I will continue to stand by him and demand justice for him,” Vasquez reiterated.
Okay, but Vasquez asked for protection TWICE.
DONATE
Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.
Comments
The United States needs a restraining order on the both of them.
Gang bangers gotta bang.
Like I said before if she loves her husband so much she can join him in the shole he was flown too. Nothing is stopping her.
The article notes that she was in a prior abusive relationship
fwiw – is common for women who are in abusive relationships to be attracted to abusive men. I am certaining not condoning his or her’s actions, just noting that it is fairly common for that demographic to be attracted to abusive partners. Its also fairly common, the for the abused to want to stay in the relationship which is reflected in the high recanting/forgiveness/high resolution rate of the “problems” .
She is another con artist, following examples set by black con artists.
Very interesting that many of the same folks who demanded easier access to restraining orders plus their use in ‘red flag’ scenarios to violate Citizen 2A rights and far stricter enforcement of DUI …these same folks don’t want to use those as part of the basis for deportation.
Well said. That doesn’t mean she’s wrong in this case. Those of us who demand more skepticism of such claims and oppose their use for such purposes should stick to our principles even when it would be more convenient to adopt the opposition’s rhetoric.
The most I think we should say is what you just did, that the other side, having staked its position that we should “believe all women”, ought to be morally estopped from saying otherwise now.
Yeah, Karens are at root just bullies. The only way to stop a bully is by hitting them where it hurts x2 as hard. IMO we have to do more than point out the hypocrisy by grabbing whatever new Karen imposed rulebook and vigorously jamming it up their behinds whenever it is applicable to them. They wanted it, now they get it.
Abrego Garcia’s wife vows that she will not to stop trying to bring him home.
Actually, he is home. In any case, look on the bright side: he is getting free room and board, haircuts, clothing, and all utilities are paid for.
Kilmar Abrego Garcia had a history of violence and was not the upstanding “Maryland Man” the media has portrayed him as.
You don’t say! Like the “gentle giant” Michael Brown who turned out to be a violent hulking brute, the J6 insurrection-that-wasn’t, the Virus That Shall Not Be Named that never originated in a Chinese “wet market”, the Russia-stole-the-2016-election hoax, the “I CAN’T BREATHE!” fairy story of St. George of Floyd, the “mostly peaceful protests” lie, the annual “we just experienced the warmest year in recorded history” fiction, the “very fine people” fraud, and countless other b******t stories over many decaded, there is now another addition to the American media’s Temple of Lies.
In the contest between who was worse – Joseph Goebbels or the American media – the latter is clearly the “winner”. Goebbels never had the vast technological reach that the American media enjoys. In terms of body count the American media has far more blood on their hands than the hapless all-thumbs Goebbels (Think I exaggerate? Remember that when WWII started many in the American media competed with each other to give Schicklgruber and his henchmen lavish tongue baths. The American media has been promoting totalitarianism, death and destruction longer than Goebbels did.)
What? This “Maryland man” isn’t a paragon of virtue following the likes of Cliff Huxtable, Ward Cleaver, and Rob Petrie.
When my sister was a little girl, she would cry whenever Laura Petrie cried.
I’m not certain that Bill Cosby is really the best role model here.
Senator Van Hollen, please pick up the red phone.
Gosh, I’ll start a Go Fund Me account to procure the services of a person that minds not doing a dirty deed.
It is beyond time to send a message. How many more CEOs must perish before fighting fire with fire?
Fundraise off ignorance at your own peril.
My tinfoil hat suggests that some judicious scanning of TikTok is likely to uncover a posting by some loudmouth illegal telling everyone how to use crowdfunding to make money off your criminal relatives, similar to the one telling everyone how to use squatter laws to steal houses.
Oh, he wasn’t kicked out for being a wife-beater. He was kicked out because he’s a gang banger, a terrorist, and an illegal alien. That’s more than enough
Right, we’re past that. But it would be comforting to find a way to deport her, too.
The key word in the headline is “suspected.”
Nope, not ‘suspected.’ This has been adjudicated, something that media has obfuscated, probably intentionally. There was a finding of FACT that he was an MS-13 member by Immigration Judge Elizabeth Kessler in 2019.
https://x.com/shipwreckedcrew/status/1912551977269248383
The so-called “finding of fact” was by an immigration “judge”, not a real judge, and it seems the evidence on which it rested was rather flimsy.
An immigration judge is part of the administration, not a neutral finder of fact, so the fact that one such judge “found” a fact is not really better than a plain assertion by a prosecutor.
Are the Judges appointed by a politician (President) and confirmed by at least 51 other politicians (Senate) to still be regarded as ‘neutral’? Not anymore. That presumption of neutrality is way passed its expiration date. The Judiciary has itself to blame for the shift and they have the ability to course.correct the perception of the public by going out of their way to demonstrate no bias, no trend lines in decisions, no ideological or political taint by becoming originalists. Even textualists fall prey to the false doctrine of an ‘evolving Constitution’.
Every Constitutional question should be in the context of the legit answer to the following question: did the founders really want/mean for this to generate X outcome? If the answer is no then it ain’t Constitutional and of the answer is yes then it is. Simple.
Commodor – Immigration judges are article II judges (ie executive branch) , somewha t similar to tax court judges or SEC administrative judges.
fwiw – it has been reported when he apprehended that he was in the room with two other m13 members and significant cash. Granted, it is only a report at this time, but an alleged fact.
El Salvador has no doubt he’s a gang member.
And? How would they know? And do you think they honestly care?
Somehow, America will persevere on without this turd in our countries’s punchbowl.
I wouldn’t put any weight on this. Her current explanation, that she lied to the court as a precaution, is probably true, and she probably did so on legal advice. As she says, she was afraid their disagreement would escalate and he would get violent, so she got her complaint in first, when it would do the most good, never mind that it involved perjury.
My guess is that most official claims of abuse made in the context of domestic litigation are false. It seems to be completely accepted nowadays that people (especially but not exclusively women) will do this and there will be no consequences, and many lawyers seem to advise their clients to do this.
This is quite possible true about her case unfortunately and yes, it happens all the time and there are almost never consequences for the plaintiffs filing the fallacious complaints. I know someone who had an estranged live-in girlfriend who swore out an almost identical complaint to this hoping to use it as leverage for some kind of common law marriage settlement. He challenged the TRO and was able to prove without question that he didn’t do it…because he was on a plane 1K-miles away at the time the alleged event occurred. Not only did the judge NOT sanction the plaintiff for clearly lying under oath, she (out-lesbian judge), KEPT the restraining order in tact for 12-months. He appealed and finally prevailed on appeal…which lasted 5-months. It took him another 3-years to get his firearms back (when they serve these orders, the sheriffs collect any the defendant’s firearms), except one which was destroyed ‘accidentally’ ‘ It cost him almost $20K in legal fees and he received nothing from the state for their ‘accidental’ destruction of one of his weapons. His lawyers told him that it’s very common to not get the confiscated firearms back in many states because the government destroys them with such alacrity.
The only time there’s even a remote chance of this backfiring on these plaintiffs is when they also swear out a criminal complaint against their spouse/partner (which doesn’t appear to have happened here, interestingly…probably to avoid any possible deportation). At that point, the police may be inclined to purse case against the plaintiff depending on how many resources were exhausted. But, even in these cases, prosecutions of the plaintiffs (almost always female) are exceedingly rare. So, in many jurisdictions, these really have an almost pro forma component of a domestic separation litigation, as you describe. This is the primary reason I’m so adverse to so-called ‘Red Flag’ laws; they’re simply too prone to abuse.
Yep. Yes DV is real but there are plenty of DV complaints that are an utter crock of BS. No TRO should be granted without a criminal complaint and e false allegation/complaint should be a felony. This file a TRO as a divorce tactic needs to end and that requires swift investigation to confirm/disprove the allegations. Making a false complaint has got to be punished very harshly, otherwise the Court System creates an incentive to lie. To those who say it isn’t a big deal …you should reread the ten commandments and you’ll find bearing false witness alongside murder. For the secular minded take a look at declining rates of family formation 6/1K lowest ever measured.
This and other elements of our societal choice to weaponize the use of Family Court is creating strong disincentives to marriage for Men. Less marriage= less children= greater societal/tax burden to care for these elderly singles without children. Less marriage means less financial drive to create,/accomplish to support and provide for a family = less productive economy = less tax revenue. See the how the declining birth rate is already impacting SSA finances to get a quick grasp of the unintended consequences.
“em> As she says, she was afraid their disagreement would escalate and he would get violent, so she got her complaint in first, when it would do the most good, never mind that it involved perjury.”
I don’t think that fits the situation. While I think you’re correct in most American domestic abuse cases, what good does it do her to “get in … first?” He is certainly not going to the Cops nor any for of the law.
As a gang member, he would tend to find his solution to a tedious wife elsewhere…say by beating her. Further she has no other avenue but the law to protect her. There is no church or family to put social pressure on him. Another point: people seem to default to the idea that theirs was a love match. In fact, an equally plausible answer is that he presumed some protection from deportation from marrying a citizen. The sex and the housekeeping and cooking are just free extras..
Finally, I think we can stipulate that it would not seem out-of-character for a gang-member to seek solutions in violence.
“While I think you’re correct in most American domestic abuse cases, what good does it do her to “get in … first?” He is certainly not going to the Cops nor any for of the law.”
Firearms self-defense instructors emphasize being the first person to report an encounter. It’s nonintuitive but quite common for the dirtbag to call the cops and accuse you of ADW, to get a second crack at the wallet they were denied and a whole lot more. If you haven’t called, that’s the case the cops end up running with, not yours.
This article should come with a disclaimer. ‘The author of this article is an ardent admirer of a man who was found by a jury to have done far worse”. And that goes for the commenters as well. Laffriot.
You remind me of a turd that won’t flush.
Cretin alert.
You lying about the r@pe accusation against Trump? The jury actually decided he was not liable, basically that he was innocent.
No, it didn’t. It found (on extremely dubious “evidence”) that he had done what was alleged, but the judge instructed it that at the time this had allegedly happened it didn’t meet the legal definition of “rape”.
That the jury “found” this doesn’t make it true, of course. But it is indeed what it “found”.
“Found by a jury” doesn’t mean “true”.
Nor does “found by an immigration judge”.
there’s ‘found’. It’s found. No quotes. A guy who openly bragged about grabbing women’s pussies actually doing it. Imagine that!
LAFFRIOT
It says a whole lot about the women on this site that take the side of a serial liar who has a long history of treating women like shit. MEn too. and none it is good.
And NONE it is good.
“Oh, let me taste your tears, Junior! Your tears are so yummy and sweet!”
Don’t be to hard on him. I mean it is people like him that helped Trump win, that’s gotta hurt. People like him will help keep conservatives in power in the future.
F off and die painfully.
They admire Kamala Harris’ husband? Oh that’s you that likes men who beat women.
lefty:
but this called love in their culture
What? The drug-running slave trader is also a wife beater?
Remember. This is the pig the commenters here idolize.
https://apnews.com/article/trump-rape-carroll-trial-fe68259a4b98bb3947d42af9ec83d7db
“Carroll gave multiple days of frank, occasionally emotional testimony, buttressed by two friends who testified that she reported the alleged attack to them soon afterward.
Jurors also heard from Jessica Leeds, a former stockbroker who testified that Trump abruptly groped her against her will on an airline flight in the 1970s, and from Natasha Stoynoff, a writer who said Trump forcibly kissed her against her will while she was interviewing him for a 2005 article.
The six-man, three-woman jury also saw the well-known 2005 “Access Hollywood” hot-mic recording of Trump talking about kissing and grabbing women without asking.
The Associated Press typically does not name people who say they have been sexually assaulted unless they come forward publicly, as Carroll, Leeds and Stoynoff have done.”
and what is Abrego’s wife saying now?
“Things did not escalate, and I decided not to follow through with the civil court process,” she said in the statement. “We were able to work through this situation privately as a family, including by going to counseling. Our marriage only grew stronger in the years that followed. No one is perfect, and no marriage is perfect.”
“That is not a justification for ICE’s action of abducting him and deporting him to a country where he was supposed to be protected from deportation,” she added. “Kilmar has always been a loving partner and father, and I will continue to stand by him and demand justice for him.”
https://www.yahoo.com/news/abrego-garcia-wife-responds-trump-224222554.html?fr=sycsrp_catchall
You see Jean Carroll saying that about Trump?……..
You left out the part where all the kids went into a “secret room” in the school, and then the clowns brought them up to their UFO to molest them.
This repetition is boring. All the Trump ‘dirty laundry’ was well publicised as legacy media banged on their drum about as incessantly as you. Yet a very solid majority voted for the Trump agenda and provided a GoP Majority in the HoR and flipped the Senate to GoP control in order to implement legislation to advance and support the MAGA, MAHA, Tea Party, center/right populist agenda.
That’s the piece you keep missing. For 80%+ of those who pulled the GoP lever it was about advancing their policy preferences that have been ignored for.decades by the ‘elite, credentialed, laptop class’ and deport illegal Aliens, disrupt the globalist economic and national security paradigm, to end the USA acting as ‘world police’, stop the fraud waste, abuse in govt, end the grifting gravy train for NGO and academic oddballs, stop sending $ we don’t have to anything not a direct benefit to the broad middle-class, drastically cut spending, put the fraudsters in prison and so on.
Is there a minority who created a cult of personality around Trump? Sure but it ain’t that big in comparison to the rest of us. Either you don’t know this or you do but ignore it simply to be annoying. Either way find some new material to present b/c this is boring.