Image 01 Image 03

Trump: No Need To Deport Prince Harry, Being Married to Meghan is Punishment Enough

Trump: No Need To Deport Prince Harry, Being Married to Meghan is Punishment Enough

“I’ll leave him alone. He’s got enough problems with his wife. She’s terrible.”

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rsu_Bx-RZK0

Leave it to Donald Trump to defend a man while taking a shot at him at the same time.

Since his highly public and acrimonious split from the royal family, Prince Harry has been living in Montecito, California, with former Suits star Meghan Markle.

Since his split from the royal family—dubbed Megxit—Nile Gardiner, a former aide to Margaret Thatcher and current Director of the Margaret Thatcher Center for Freedom at the Heritage Foundation, has led a persistent effort to scrutinize Prince Harry’s legal status in the U.S. Citing Harry’s own admissions of past drug use in his memoir Spare, which should have denied him a US visa, Gardiner, and the Heritage Foundation have launched a legal challenge questioning his residency.

However, Trump may have just thrown cold water on the effort. In an exclusive with the New York Post, he cast doubt on the idea of deporting Britain’s most famous royal.

“I don’t want to do that,” he said. “I’ll leave him alone. He’s got enough problems with his wife. She’s terrible.”

Ouch—talk about a blow to the pride.

Trump then took a moment to praise Harry’s older brother and future king.

Trump took the opportunity to praise Harry’s estranged older brother William, with whom he met privately in Paris in December during the reopening ceremony of Notre-Dame Cathedral.

“I think William is a great young man,” he said.”

Trump’s jab at Markle likely stems from their long-running feud, which began when she called him misogynistic years ago.

Meanwhile, Nile at Heritage responded in his own way—retweeting old posts about the lawsuit’s progress without direct comment but strongly hinting that the litigation will continue.

Only President Trump could help and undercut someone in a single statement.

DONATE

Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.

Comments

Meghan Markle is the poster child for the Hot/Crazy matrix.

    MajorWood in reply to CommoChief. | February 8, 2025 at 2:10 pm

    Only if Crazy goes to 11.

      CommoChief in reply to MajorWood. | February 8, 2025 at 2:13 pm

      She ain’t THAT hot and the crazy axis begins at 4 b/c well …

      diver64 in reply to MajorWood. | February 8, 2025 at 3:52 pm

      I had a pretty hot chick that was a social worker. She threatened to have me involuntarily committed for 3 days. I told her to book a flight to the moon because there was nowhere on Earth she could hide from me if she did that so, yes, crazy goes to 11.

    thalesofmiletus in reply to CommoChief. | February 8, 2025 at 3:27 pm

    She is proof that even a 6 can screw an incel and catch a prince.

    fscarn in reply to CommoChief. | February 8, 2025 at 5:12 pm

    I’d go along with Trump’s decision, but I would make in known far and wide that Harry LIED in his application, including making public, as a pdf, that part of the application where he states he never used controlled drugs. Yep, Harry is p-whipped. She carries his balls under lock & key in her purse.

Doesn’t Heritage have better things to do?

    Harry’s past drug use is well-known, so whether the form says no he hadn’t used drugs or yes he had and officials ignored it, Heritage wants to show that there is are double standards and corruption in the visa process.

      Paula in reply to p. | February 8, 2025 at 4:25 pm

      There’s a precedent for presidential pardons of drug users, particularly if they’re connected to other crimes involving jail time.

      It needs to be worded just right. Such as, “Harry is pardoned of all offenses against the United States which he has committed or may have committed during the period September 15, 1984 to February 8, 2025.”

Is Meghan Markle an example of the one drop rule? When I was picking a mate I did consider rather their blood line might adversely affect offspring.

“Their marriage will implode on its own. No need to help it along and get blamed for it.”

    gonzotx in reply to p. | February 8, 2025 at 4:20 pm

    Nah, only if she sees more money in that.
    He’s sold his soul

    Not coming back from that

So far, American women have had two positive and one negative effect on the Monarchy and the UK in general.

1) Winston Churchill’s mother: Best clean political import into the UK
2) Wallace Simpson: There is an empty pedestal at Trafalgar Square that one British historian wants a statue of her on. Without her, the Nazi leaning King of England might have successfully sold out the UK to Hitler. Here being a negative was a positive.
3) Markle: Just as Benedict Arnold’s wife steered him to treason, she was the total downfall of Harry Fitz-Windsor. The odd “son” had been dutiful to the UK and accepted in the Royal Family. This half brother of William had it all considering his position… and tossed it all away.

The only thing more savage than Trump is quoting Meat Loaf.

“I’m praying for the end of time, to hurry up and arrive.”

    AF_Chief_Master_Sgt in reply to Andy. | February 8, 2025 at 5:04 pm

    I thought Royals had the privilege of beheading recalcitrant women. Or was that stopped when Brits became emasculated?

E Howard Hunt | February 9, 2025 at 9:44 am

A nose job can’t take the ghetto out of a sista.

Ha ! The stuff Trump comments on is hilarious. I think they both deserve each other ; two air headed narcissists that thought every door would automatically open for them simply because they are so wonderful. Now forced to become dirty hustlers selling their family secrets and drama.