EPA’s Climate Cultists and Their Budget Are About To Get Culled
The new EPA Administrator, Lee Zeldin. plans to cut approximately 65% of the agency’s budget.

Few agencies became more power-crazed during the Biden era than the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
A few of the low-lights, as a reminder about how grasping and dictatorial it was becoming, include:
- The agency announcing its first arrest for a “climate crime” in December, 2024.
- One of its “special advisors” bragging Biden was giving out “gold bars” in the form of climate justice grants at the end of the Biden term.
- The lawsuit against the EPA brought by 25 States Attorneys General over the agency’s de facto electric vehicle (EV) mandate.
- The agency’s attempt to ban industry-essential chemical, methylene chloride.
- The EPA becoming an active participant in the “Global War on Meat.”
- The agency’s targeting of one of our most important oil fields as a “super-emitter“.
If there was any way a bureaucrat could virtue signal, weaken our nation, and be rewarded eco-activism with our tax dollars, that person found the EPA a great place to be.
That was, until President Donald Trump won in November.
Perhaps the EPA’s gang of bureaucrats thought they could continue to thwart the President’s will by conducting “business as usual.”
Happily, for taxpayers, that approach has now gone to the landfill.
The new EPA Administrator, Lee Zeldin, plans to cut approximately 65% of its budget.
Mr. Trump said Mr. Zeldin “thinks he’s going to be cutting 65 or so percent of the people from environmental. And we’re going to speed up the process, too, at the same time.”
Within minutes, managers at the agency said they received a White House memo telling them to prepare for mass layoffs.
The memo, which was sent to leaders of multiple agencies, said that the federal government “is costly, inefficient, and deeply in debt.” It did not mention the 65 percent goal, but laid out steps for the E.P.A. to prepare for what is known as a reduction in force, which would result in eliminating jobs.
Hours later, an E.P.A. official said Mr. Trump was referring to overall agency budget cuts and not a 65 percent reduction in personnel.
President Trump announces Lee Zeldin plans to fire up to 65% of the EPA employees. This will mean about 12k jobs cut from the fat.
Lee Zeldin also canceled 3 DEI contracts, saving us $45 million.
Let’s DOGE!!!! pic.twitter.com/gFhZPF48Jm
— Patriot Lady (@angelwoman501) February 26, 2025
And while it is not the “10,000” that would be 65% reduction in staff, Zeldin did indicate 1,000 were being targeted for dismissal shortly after he was confirmed.
Some progress is being made on this front.
Such a gutting of EPA’s budget would almost certainly mean significant reductions in staff. The president’s statement came shortly after the White House ordered EPA and other federal agencies to submit plans for “large-scale reductions in force” by mid-March.
EPA earlier this month terminated 388 workers, or about 2.5 percent of its workforce. However, at least some of those personnel have been called back, mirroring rehirings at other agencies for personnel who were apparently fired inadvertently.
There is joy on social media over this culling of bureaucratic power. An agency that was tasked with preventing pollution is now trying to direct personal choices in what we eat, how we travel, and what fuels were are entitled to use.
Wait until the EPA changes the 2012 CO2 endangerment ruling. IPCC heads will explode.
Also, Zeldin stated today that approximately 65% of EPA employees will be cut…that most are climate activists.
— Rod Hummel (@Royalacresrod) February 26, 2025
Trump clearly learned some valuable lessons in governance and bureaucratic demolition.
@POTUS is doing what should’ve been done in the first term but he trusted the people to actually want to do the right thing.
Lee Zeldin potentially firing 65% of all EPA govt employees
Wow
— James (@RealJTesauro1) February 26, 2025
And those that retain their jobs actually have to show up for work.
JUST NOW: EPA Secretary, Lee Zeldin says that thousands of EPA employees have just been ordered to return to in-office work today. pic.twitter.com/oJ7nANDbpW
— Ian Jaeger (@IanJaeger29) February 25, 2025
The climate at the EPA is about to get much, much colder.

Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.
Comments
Good! Let’s get the winning bus back on the road!!
And I’m still not tired
I ain’t in no ways tarred
Is that bus running on biofuels?
It’s running on full fat diesel GeeGee!!
There is a serious need for the EPA to reconsider some of its rules regarding automotive emissions. Some cars, trucks, motorcycles and the like have been abandoned by their makers. Either because the maker went bankrupt or because the model is no longer produced. A subset of these vehicles, but still hundreds of thousands or millions, have defective emissions control software, hardware, or both. Even if the manufacturer agrees there is a defect, the manufacturer will never fix the cars because to do so would require re-certification of the emissions and mileage systems, which can lead to class-action civil litigation due reduced mileage.
It is a crime to fix these cars because fixing them is “tampering” under the EPA rules.
What are example vehicles? Virtually all small diesels with single stage EGR systems. Like all BMWs and most Mercedes, and most GMs. Lots of gasoline powered cars and trucks with selective cylinder activation. Especially lots of cars with California-only emissions equipment that no longer made.
Sometime soon I am going to petition the EPA to make a rule on the topic of “Orphaned Automotive Emissions Systems”. The rule will recognize there are defective systems that the manufacturers will never fix. Attempting to fix these defective systems cannot remain a crime. That was never the intent of the Clean Air Act.
Not good enough.
Cut more.
The carpet bombing will continue until morale improves.
Consider:
https://youtu.be/xRfQzMgvfDA?si=50LEW0dwGNOo0XbL
Then share far & wide…
EPA head urges Trump to reconsider scientific finding that underpins climate action, AP sources say
https://apnews.com/article/epa-endangerment-finding-zeldin-trump-climate-change-4b34246d5ca798154af08560fd94f7b9
Corporate layoffs:
1980s-1990s
General Motors: 74,000 employees (1991)
IBM: 60,000 employees (1993)
AT&T: 40,000 employees (1996)
2000s
Citigroup: 50,000 employees (2008)
General Motors: 47,000 employees (2009)
2010s
HP: 34,000 employees (2012)
Microsoft: 18,000 employees (2014)
2020s
Meta (Facebook): 11,000 employees (2022) and 10,000 employees (2023)
Amazon: 18,000 employees (2022) and 9,000 employees (2023)
Microsoft: 10,000 employees (2023)
Citigroup: 4,500 employees (2024)
Wells Fargo: Approximately 750 employees (2025)
Hasbro: 1,900 employees (1,100 in 2023, added to 800 earlier that year)
State Street: 1,500 employees (2023)
Dyson: 1,000 employees (2024)
Stellantis: 1,600 employees (2024)
Hino Motors (Toyota subsidiary): 1,300 employees (announced closure by 2027)
Indeed: 1,000 employees (2024)
Southwest Airlines: 2,000 employees (2024)
Tesla: More than 10% of global workforce (2024)
Expedia: 1,500 employees (2024)
Why only 65%? EPA is the single most destructive agency in the entire civilized world. Cut it by 100%!
Time to review all those “Sue and Settle” cases the EPA has in the pipeline…. seems like old cases could be reviewed under the Chevron rules.