Image 01 Image 03

Hakeem Jeffries: We’ll ‘Fight’ Trump, GOP Agenda ‘in the Streets’

Hakeem Jeffries: We’ll ‘Fight’ Trump, GOP Agenda ‘in the Streets’

Democrats and media have established a rule saying if someone says fight they mean it literally! So will Jeffries apologize?

House Democrat Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries encouraged people to get violent with Republicans in the streets!

I mean, that’s the rule now, right? When you use a word like “fight,” you obviously mean actually beating up someone:

Keep focused on the need to look out for everyday New Yorkers and everyday Americans who are under assault by an extreme MAGA Republican agenda that is trying to cut taxes for billionaire donors and wealthy corporations and then stick New Yorkers and working class Americans across the country with the bill.

That’s not acceptable. We are going to fight it legislatively. We are going to fight it in the courts. And we’re going to fight it in the streets. Thank you, everyone.

Jeffries is calling for violence in the streets!

That’s what the Democrats and media said when President Donald Trump yelled, “Fight! Fight! Fight!” after someone tried to kill him.

Yes, they tried to convince people that Trump, who just got shot, tried to instigate violence when he yelled “Fight” and blamed his previous rhetoric for the assassination attempt.

Thems the rules, guys!

Then again, there are normal people like myself and our wonderful readers who know it doesn’t mean literally.

But the left always claims a Republican, especially Trump, means literal violence when they use words like fight! Remember when they all claimed Trump called for anyone to shoot Liz Cheney?

It was more pathetic to claim that right after the guy tried to murder Trump.

Trump hasn’t forgotten. Trump also hasn’t forgotten the violence in the streets caused by leftists.

DONATE

Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.

Comments

Ooooh, Hakeem, you’re getting all insurrectiony. How did that work out for your party in 1865?

BigRosieGreenbaum | January 31, 2025 at 1:34 pm

Oh shut up Hakeem and go away!

I don’t want him to apologize. I want him to follow through.
Please, please, Hakeem, bring it to the streets of my town. Pleeeeeeease….

    JohnSmith100 in reply to GWB. | January 31, 2025 at 4:48 pm

    I am not up to offensive action, but very well prepared of defense. The best defense is to get the hell out of blue states, especially their cities.

Fight, fight, fight, on the road to oblivion.

Guess he ignores that 57% of registered voters have an unfavorable opinion of the Democratic Party, the highest percentage since Quinnipiac started asking the question in 2008.

https://nypost.com/2025/01/29/us-news/democrats-unfavorability-rating-reaches-new-high-poll/

If it’s a civil war he wants

We got the M15’s now, and the tanks

    And the F-15s and F-35s.

    Concise in reply to gonzotx. | January 31, 2025 at 3:21 pm

    I could take everything else he said figuratively but saying fight in the streets? Kinda actually does literally sound like a call for violence.

      DaveGinOly in reply to Concise. | January 31, 2025 at 6:22 pm

      Pundits have been wondering, “Where is Antifa?” Jeffries just put out the call. Of course he means it literally, although he’ll deny it once the rioting starts.

      And just a few days ago some dope on TV (Joy Reid?) was declaring that Trump pardoned all the J6 defendants so they could become his “Brownshirts” enforcing MAGA at street level. Always accuse your opponents of what you’re doing yourself, right?

        diver64 in reply to DaveGinOly. | February 1, 2025 at 5:39 am

        The problem with Antifa is that they had a Federal Government that liked them burning stuff down and refused to go after them. This administration is definitely not onboard.

E Howard Hunt | January 31, 2025 at 1:44 pm

Sounds like a Churchill speech, had the great man been black and retarded.

Just a reminder of DEI and why our planes are crashing

https://x.com/mazemoore/status/1885148210659840037

This guy seems more Hokum than Hakeem.

Does that photo show only black people at the podium? If you are going to fight in the streets in the winter time then by all means tote your Red liberal arses out there and commence.

The photo does not say smart Americans. A marketing problem.

    henrybowman in reply to rhhardin. | February 1, 2025 at 12:26 am

    Hakeem and the old chick to his left are the only ones that understand professional attire. I bet all of them could afford some, it’s just not their priority.

Hakeem Jeffries: We’ll Fight in the Streets

Translation: I’m encouraging others to fight in the streets while I stay in my office

    diver64 in reply to Paula. | February 1, 2025 at 5:37 am

    Exactly. “You go fight in the streets, block traffic and riot, I’ll legislate in DC and do news conferences”

When a Democrat says “Fight in the Streets”, I take them literally. They don’t mean protest. They mean get out there and cause mayhem and chaos. And for the pictured group, that means get out there and get all of those White people.

    nordic prince in reply to BillB52. | January 31, 2025 at 2:33 pm

    TBH I kind of take it that way as well. After all, he’s the one who identified three arenas of fighting: legislatively, in the courts, and on the streets. If the first two were not allegory, then neither is the third.

    The Gentle Grizzly in reply to BillB52. | February 1, 2025 at 12:49 am

    I thought you were going to write, get all those flat screens and get all those Nikes.

Arm up then, they want a American Civil War II
And Jan 6 Ralliers got locked up for 4 years for a peaceful protest.

    JohnSmith100 in reply to Skip. | January 31, 2025 at 5:06 pm

    A problem for these people is that when it comes to war, we are far more lethal, they might not be smart enough to understand this.

      I would disagree, to a point! Leftist has no conscious or sense of shame or guilt, whereas most Conservative may have a hesitation to kill another

Yeah this was a bad PR look. Because he also referred to ‘fighting’ in the legislative and judicial sense and then insisted they would also ‘fight in the streets’, presumably if the ‘fight’ in the legislature and judicial systems was unsuccessful, then the logical inference is that ‘fight in the streets’ means …fighting in the streets to oppose the political agenda of the duly elected gov’t of the USA.

    Milhouse in reply to CommoChief. | February 4, 2025 at 2:41 pm

    The obvious meaning is peaceful protests, exercising the right to assemble.

    It’s fun to apply the same rules to them as they do to us. But let’s not forget that that’s what we’re doing. Let’s not start believing our own rhetoric.

That picture is kinda racissss, not very inclusive.

Dems, the party of Love

Dolce Far Niente | January 31, 2025 at 4:03 pm

Hakeem Jeffries, the Temu Obama.

From the photo, it seems Jefferies needs to go to the DEI class!

His party better put a muzzle on him. This is a good example of racism and he is a perfect example of one who preaches it. Porch monkey better shut his mouth. Engage his brain before he puts his mouth in gear.

I don’t see any “Diversity” and “Inclusion” in the vile Jeffries’ group. They seem like a bunch of subversive, corrosive and infantile agitators who seek to incite civil unrest and violence, and overturn the results of an election and the will of a majority of the voting-age population.

Of course, the fact that their first and only response is to “fight Trump” tells you how much you should hate them.
When they are in power, they’re always haranguing Republicans to “act bipartisan” and do what THEY want them to.
Why don’t they take a turn and suck on a little of that themselves, for a change?

    CommoChief in reply to henrybowman. | February 1, 2025 at 5:42 am

    Yep. The establishment definition of ‘bipartisan’ usually seems to mean ‘GoP must compromise to give the d/prog the ability to neuter whatever proposal they don’t like’.

The Marxists will try and steal Congress on 2027 so Jefferies will become speaker

I can see it now, Hakeem marshalling his shock groups of pink haired obese lesbians, men in taffeta gowns, non English speaking Uber drivers, communists, ex-cons and Harvard Professors.

BRING IT ON HAKEEM!

But the left always claims a Republican, especially Trump, means literal violence when they use words like fight!

How about the word “campaign”? That’s a call for violence too. Or have people become so illiterate that they have no idea what a campaign is?