Image 01 Image 03

Woman Who Accused Three Duke Lacrosse Players of Rape Admits She Lied, Seeks Forgiveness

Woman Who Accused Three Duke Lacrosse Players of Rape Admits She Lied, Seeks Forgiveness

Forgiveness is a wonderful thing and I’m glad that Mangum has had a moment of clarity and found the courage to confess her lies publicly. But as far as lies go, this one was a whopper.

Crystal Mangum, the woman whose false allegations of rape against three Duke Lacrosse players 18 years ago sparked a nationwide media frenzy, has admitted to lying. She also requested forgiveness from the men.

Mangum’s confession came during a jailhouse interview with Katerena DePasquale for her podcast “Let’s Talk with Kat” which aired on Dec. 11. Mangum is currently serving time at the North Carolina Correctional Institution for Women “after being convicted of second-degree murder of her then-boyfriend in 2013.”

Her false accusations in March 2006 upended the lives of David Evans, Collin Finnerty, and Reade Seligmann, and captured the attention of the nation. The young men suddenly found themselves at the center of a media firestorm that continued for 13 months. Ultimately, then-North Carolina attorney general Roy Cooper, “dropped the remaining charges against the players, [and] declared them ‘innocent.'”

The case was exacerbated by Mangum being black and the players being white.

Mangum told DePasquale, “I testified falsely against them by saying that they raped me when they didn’t, and that was wrong, and I betrayed the trust of a lot of other people who believed in me. I made up a story that wasn’t true because I wanted validation from people and not from God.”

The Duke Chronicle reported that during the interview, Mangum “referred to the three accused lacrosse players as her ‘brothers,’ saying they ‘didn’t deserve [the accusations].’ I hope that [the players] can heal and trust God and know that God loves them and that God is loving them through me, letting them know that they’re valuable.”

Asked if she had any regrets, Mangum replied she had none, explaining, “Everything happens to get everybody to the point where they are and it’s all to show God’s love and His forgiveness, His grace and His mercy.”

The Chronicle provided a recap of events after Mangum reported to police that she had been raped by three Lacrosse players at a team house party on March 13, 2006, “where they paid to have two strippers — including Mangum — in attendance.”

Many members of the Duke community — and the nation — believed her. [Former Duke University President Richard] Brodhead led a widely criticized administrative response, in which the University did not push back on antagonism towards the defendants from the Duke community.

The allegations triggered a widespread national response from the media, which spent months on and around Duke’s campus.

Amid the national outcry, the University canceled the team’s March 25 game against Georgetown.

“We have done this in view of the situation we’re now in,” Brodhead said in a press conference following the game’s cancellation. “There are questions so grave that are in the air, that for us to continue to play would be inappropriate.”

Tensions heightened when an email written the night of the party by then-lacrosse player Ryan McFadyen was circulated, which joked about cutting the skin off of strippers. McFadyen later clarified that this statement was in reference to the movie “American Psycho.” The day the contents of the email were released, [then-head men’s lacrosse coach Mike] Pressler — who received death threats at the time — was asked to resign from his position as head coach by Brodhead. Pressler later successfully sued the University to void the resignation. Brodhead later moved to cancel the remainder of the season.

Then-Durham County district attorney and lead prosecutor in the case Mike Nifong, was appropriately disbarred the following year for “lying in court and withholding DNA evidence which ultimately absolved the defendants of responsibility for Mangum’s allegations.” According to The Chronicle, Nifong was running for reelection during the trial and spoke often – and openly – with the press. In a March 2006 interview with CBS News, he said, “there’s no doubt a sexual assault took place.”

Initially, Nifong said that the DNA would prove which players were innocent. However, once all of the tests came back negative, Nifong reversed his statement, noting that courts of law used to have to “deal with sexual assault cases the good old-fashioned way, [where] witnesses got on the stand and told what happened to them,” absent of DNA evidence.

Despite the media pile-on, some journalists saw through Mangum’s questionable and often shifting allegations. One of those was writer K.C. Johnson, who followed the case closely and used his “Durham-in-Wonderland” blog to expose the injustice unfolding before him. His closing comments on the case can be viewed here.

Although the players were exonerated in April 2007, their lives had been changed forever. The Chronicle reported:

Evans graduated in 2006, while Seligmann transferred to Brown University and Finnerty to Loyola University Maryland. Many journalists who reported on the case — including former Chronicle Editor-in-Chief Seyward Darby — appeared in ESPN’s 2016 documentary, “Fantastic Lies” to talk about the impact of the case.

Now, forgiveness is a wonderful thing and I’m glad Mangum has had a moment of clarity and found the courage to confess her lies publicly. But as far as lies go, this one was a whopper. And it may take time for these men (now close to 40) and their families, to let bygones be bygones.

No doubt their pain was softened by a settlement with Duke University in which each player received $20 million, a nice little nest egg to begin their new lives. Still, for all that these men endured at the whim of a confused, malicious young woman, forgiveness might be a tall order.


Elizabeth writes commentary for The Washington Examiner. She is an academy fellow at The Heritage Foundation and a member of the Editorial Board at The Sixteenth Council, a London think tank. Please follow Elizabeth on X or LinkedIn.

DONATE

Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.

Comments

Forgiveness is a wonderful thing, unfortunately she tried to destroy the lives of three young men who did nothing wrong to her. They personally might forgive her but she should still be made to pay for that. We can’t have people going around me making accusations like that and being taken seriously and destroying people’s lives for no good reason.

    Paula in reply to Ironclaw. | December 13, 2024 at 3:17 pm

    She thought confessing would look good on her application for parole.

    gonzotx in reply to Ironclaw. | December 13, 2024 at 4:57 pm

    They did get 20,000,000
    I was raped…

    The guy got off with indecent exposure, not even assault with a deadly weapon, a 12 inch butcher knife he tried to thrust into my neck, and it had my mangled skin and blood all over it , his dna

    I got nothing, not an apology, not a dime

    They did ok

    She may be confessing to make her look good, probably, seeing as she doesn’t have any regrets, but they did get paid and she doesn’t have a dime to pay them

    And never will

Why would anyone forgive her? Wouldn’t her actions send her strait to hell on judgement day?

I lived near Durham at the time. She, and many of her backers, were trying to split the community with racial hatred. Durham and Chapel Hill were, and still are, liberal areas whose minority communities fared better than most of the South. The damage she and Nifong did to the communities is close to what damage they did to those kids and their families.

Apology not accepted.

Some women are incapable of being raped. She is among them.

Sorry. As far as I’m concerned no forgiveness. I remember this case well and tracked it. Obvious Mangum was lying from the get go. Of course many Americans believed her. We live in a very stupid country. I was extremely impressed with the team’s lawyers. They studied DNA evidence on their own and mastered it. Nifong was one of the worst. In my opinion he knew the team was innocent and didn’t care. He should have been executed. With great power comes great responsibility. Make an example of those who abuse their power to deter future abuses. Finally I don’t believe she’s repentant. I think she’s trying to game the system to get parole. A liar and a murderer. We should we trust anything she says?

    diver64 in reply to oden. | December 13, 2024 at 4:23 pm

    Nifong had his eye on riding this to the State AG position. Who knows where he is now. Working as a WalMart greeter I hope but I don’t care enough about him to find out.

      DaveGinOly in reply to diver64. | December 13, 2024 at 10:30 pm

      It seems he may be doing nothing. Wikipedia says he lives with his second wife and mentions no employment, appointment, office, or position for him at all. He pretty much got wrecked (and justifiably so) for his conduct in Duke rape case.

As of 1600 on 12/13 The New York Times, who vilified the lacrosse players in both news and opinion coverage, has yet to cover this story. (As best as I can tell.)

Wife and I moved quite close to Durham just before this. We both thought that the story was odd. The race baiters piled on, the press salivated and lives were ruined on allegations. A couple of things struck me at the time. Nifong made Chuck Schumer look like an amateur finding any camera in the vicinity and running over people to get to it then made wild claims, questionable statements for a DA and flat out lieing at times. The Duke faculty piled on claiming rape with no evidence and demanding the 3 be expelled immediately before any investigation or trial. When it turned out she lied everyone just went about their business with no accountability like nothing happened although 3 lives were destroyed. “Just some rich white privileged boys”.
It struck me at the time like Mangum made the claim to cover herself from something else like prostitution then the train got so out of control that she not only couldn’t stop it but no one would let her get off.
It’s good she has finally come out and admitted it but I don’t think I’ve seen anyone actually ask her about it until now. She is paying for that and the murder and seems to have actually repented so I’m willing to give her the benefit of the doubt however, it’s not me that has to do it. Those 3 boys have to forgive her.
As for the Duke Faculty that demanded heads roll and screamed racism with white privilege thrown in, where is the accountability for them?

    Mercyneal in reply to diver64. | December 13, 2024 at 7:12 pm

    I emailed three of the most outspoken faculty members today about the ad that 88 faculty members took out against the Lacrosse players, but did not receive a response. None of them have ever apologized.

    markm in reply to diver64. | December 14, 2024 at 2:12 am

    The rape accusation came after the frat threw her out for being too drugged/drunk to even strip. Then the cops on the scene explained to her that she was going to the drunk tank unless she cried rape. So she cried rape and the police took her to the hospital instead. If the cops wanted to collect false rape accusations, they could not have found a policy more likely to do that.

    But the real problem was that the story leaked immediately, and Nifong was on record vowing to get the “rapists” even before the detectives began checking on her story. And then, rather than embarrass Nifong by admitting the obvious truth, they kept trying to get her to identify the rapists. They showed her photo line-ups of the fraternity members until she finally broke down and picked three at random. And Nifong systematically ignored alibis and other exculpatory evidence.

    Perhaps worse, when comparing logs from the taxi that brought her to the frat house and the police that were called when she was dumped on the back porch, there simply wasn’t time for the gang rape she (had been encouraged to) claim. So Nifong threatened the taxi driver…

      SeiteiSouther in reply to markm. | December 16, 2024 at 2:41 pm

      I believe it was also because if she got arrested, she’d lose access to her kids, if I remember correctly.

“To err is human, to forgive is not my policy!”,…..John Thompson

thalesofmiletus | December 13, 2024 at 4:31 pm

Maybe Jesus can forgive her, but I don’t see why anyone else should.

The problem was people believing her, which was not her fault. It was just an ordinary false allegation otherwise, a police report problem.

    Mercyneal in reply to rhhardin. | December 13, 2024 at 7:11 pm

    No, it was the district attorney Mike Nifong, who gave news conferences every day to make a national name for himself and to convict the lacrosse players in the public eye. When the attorneys for one of the boys tried to give exculpatory evidence to Nifong- a bank slips that showed he had been at an ATM when this attack was supposed to have occurred, Nifong refused to look at it and other exculpatory evidence. That’s part of the reason Nifong was disbarred.

      stella dallas in reply to Mercyneal. | December 13, 2024 at 9:32 pm

      Roy Cooper is now the governor of NC and was the AG when this happened. He refused to prosecute her for lying about being raped.

      Milhouse in reply to Mercyneal. | December 14, 2024 at 10:22 am

      Actually it isn’t part of the reason he was disbarred. As a prosecutor he had absolute immunity. His mistakes were conspiring to conceal evidence, and lying to the court. His immunity didn’t cover those.

    diver64 in reply to rhhardin. | December 14, 2024 at 7:31 am

    From being within 10 miles of the entire fiasco it was clear Mangum made the allegation to try and divert attention from the prostitution she was engaged in so as to not be arrested for that. The Duke faculty, Nifong, the press and the usual race baiters piling on so quickly took the entire thing to a level she couldn’t get out of.

A second problem is that rape is a crime against feminine modesty, which strictly speaking no longer exists, especially for strippers. The right crime was assault and battery, if it happened.

I am in favor of her being prosecuted for this admission and maybe also serving the duration of her current term in solitary. She is probably doing this now because she knows that come 1/20 all the freebies be off the table. All the sincerity of “I was sorry that I got caught.”

    Milhouse in reply to MajorWood. | December 14, 2024 at 10:29 am

    1. What has 1/20 got to do with anything? Biden is not the president of North Carolina, and Trump won’t be its president next year.

    2. An admission on TV is not evidence of anything. She’s not under oath and can say she lied.

Suburban Farm Guy | December 13, 2024 at 6:02 pm

When there is an accusation, somebody needs to go to prison. If the charge proven, the guy, and if it isn’t, the woman goes. Put an end to this stuff.

    It can’t work that way. A jury’s determination that someone is “not guilty” could only mean the prosecution didn’t overcome the presumption of innocence/failed to meet the burden of proof necessary to convict. This does not make the accuser guilty of anything. That’s a separate charge that should be pressed if the DA thinks he can prove it. But this would lead to the ridiculous situation in which the same office that prosecuted one person based on an accuser’s claim also believes it can prove the accuser a liar.

    For a provably false allegation absolutely yes, charge the person who makes the allegation. Can’t apply that solely based on a not guilty verdict.

She should be made to serve the same possible sentence that those young men were facing. She was already proven a liar in court, so I am unimpressed with her “confession”. It’s probably more about getting in the spotlight again to make some money.

She doesn’t deserve much, but I’d rather see her paroled and Nifong locked up, than the reverse. He was the real villain.

I emailed Mangum’s interview to three of the most outspoken Duke professors of the 88 who took out an ad against the lacrosse players, to say that I hoped they regretted what they did. I did not get a response

    Mercyneal,

    I attempted a “thumbs down” but it was recorded a “thumbs up”. …

    Look in a mirror. I cannot imagine that you are without “sin”.

    You condemn yourself.

      gibbie in reply to Sisu. | December 13, 2024 at 9:06 pm

      You go too far. There is nothing wrong with what Mercyneal did.

      Did you just send a comment to Mercyneal saying he/she regretted what he/she did?

      [I hate using a plural pronoun for one person of unknown gender.]

      DaveGinOly in reply to Sisu. | December 13, 2024 at 10:46 pm

      Take your sanctimonious attitude elsewhere. Around here we don’t believe people are condemned to perdition for having an unpopular opinion. Personally, when I was a believer I thought the idea was inconsistent with a loving god. Now I just don’t believe it at all, period.

      gonzotx in reply to Sisu. | December 14, 2024 at 9:52 am

      What a weird belief, really

Telling lies to ruin someone else is horrific. There’s no excuse for knowingly making a false criminal allegation. The penalties should be increased dramatically. Until criminal and civil penalties are dramatically increased and those making false allegations are vigorously prosecuted and sent to prison it won’t end.

    What if everything they told you was a lie?

    https://americandebunk.com/

      CommoChief in reply to gibbie. | December 14, 2024 at 7:33 am

      If by ‘they’ you refer to the mainstream media …no kidding. These ideological laptops have long since shown themselves to be untrustworthy. They abandoned their role to inform with neutral facts presented in a complete and unbiased manner.. Nearly every story they produce is carefully edited to project a carefully crafted propaganda message. Even the topics they choose to cover are carefully curated with those stories/events running counter to the ‘narrative’ being ignored or downplayed.

      Thankfully we have many more options today to find news. Lots of alternative media out there, nontraditional media companies, podcasts and with Musk buying X the average Citizen can report in way only networks could just a few decades ago.

I know one who shortly after the first news reports of the “Duke incident” met with a PE firm’s members re: a position with a portfolio company. The “social” conversation initiating the interview included the PE mbas asking about the incident … the interviewee reported that hiring prostitutes was not relevant, but such “fools” set themselves up; the PE mbas boasted about their own “exploits” and “stupidity”. The candidate interview was falsely pleasant but ended without any follow-up. …

Such are the morals taught by “higher education” during the last score, or perhaps three or more decades.

The lack of integrity cannot be blamed solely on the “institutions of ‘higher education'”. The blame rests squarely on the shoulders of the generations back to the 40s – 60s. …

But wait, at some point every individual is actually responsible for themself, and cannot blame their parents (or the lack thereof). …

I pray that Crystal Magnum is honestly speaking; seeking redemption and attempting to teach others …

As to the lacrosse team members who are now forty-somethings …

“What have you each to say, publicly ?”

Repentance precedes forgiveness. It was not clear from the interview if Crystal Magnum actually contacted the players and attempted some form of repentance. The interviewer, I thought, prematurely cut off the interview, There are a lot of questions that come to mind such as “Once you saw that these young men were being damaged, why did you not come out sooner?”, or “What sort of validation did you seek?”, or “Why did you think your life being falsely validated was more important than the lives of those young men?”, “Who helped you and in what way did they help you damage the lives of these young men?”, …

In short, while this admission is welcome, I think that it is insufficient.

    MajorWood in reply to Arnoldn. | December 14, 2024 at 3:39 pm

    Too many people think that “explanation” and “excuse” mean the same thing. Saying that “I was drunk” does seem to explain your actions that night, but in no way, shape, or form does it excuse you from the crimes that were committed. Neither does “I was skeered” or “I kain’t breeve” which seem to be common to pretty much every police bodycams video these days.

“after being convicted of second-degree murder of her then-boyfriend in 2013.””
-But aside from that she’s a fun date…

    MajorWood in reply to rduke007. | December 14, 2024 at 3:42 pm

    Part of the “Southern Charm” I guess. Give her a bottle of Clairol 21 and she could be a sorority girl over in Apple Chill, where I served time in the 80’s.

This is attention seeking behavior that is common among incarcerated felons. She gets zero credit and probably waited for statute of limitations to expire.

Attempting to get brownie points for parole or one of Quisling Joe’s pardons.

Dolce Far Niente | December 14, 2024 at 1:09 pm

I find myself less interested in her late night professions of my-bad than in the people and institutions who carried on the actual prosecution and persecution of those boys.

The justice system, starting with Nifong, the university and the media, appear to me to be far more morally culpable than she is.

She was/is a stupid drugged-up kid who made provably false allegations; they were ostensible rational, professional adults who just enjoyed that race-warrior thrill of accusing and prosecuting those Privileged White Boys.

So Crystal Mangum lied, did she? Well surprise, surprise, surprise.

Richard Aubrey | December 15, 2024 at 3:42 pm

A good many others need to ask forgiveness.

Sorry, fresh out of forgiveness. When you lie to ruin peoples’ lives, you don’t deserve and won’t get forgiveness.

It has never been about her! Nifong, 88 professors, Nancy Grace and the rest of the media were the real villains. Nobody could look at the case with minimal objectivity and believe her – especially after DNA evidence (or, rather, lack thereof) came back. Oh, and her name was not used for a while, because she was “alleged victim”.

And nobody learned anything from experience. Same people continued to believe similar cr@p. Oberlin, Smollett – not to mention politically charged hoaxes like russian collusion and Kavanaugh.

Finally, speaking of her interview. Prisoners don’t get makeup. She did. Tells me that this interview was a show as well. But again – I don’t care about her. Until all DEI departments in Duke, Oberlin, etc are closed – this will continue