Supercut of Numerous Times Media Saying Biden Won’t Pardon Hunter: ‘He Would Accept the Outcome’
“A current president of the United States has so much respect for the law that he said he would not pardon his son.
Tom Elliott of Grabien put together a nine-minute video of the numerous times the media swore President Joe Biden wouldn’t pardon Hunter.
All of these clips started in June 2024.
Have fun!
SUPERCUT!
Corporate media: Obviously Biden would never pardon Hunter pic.twitter.com/gJRhASCAUs
— Tom Elliott (@tomselliott) December 2, 2024
Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.
Comments
Given a choice between lying and telling the truth, Democrats in general – and Biden in particular – will lie. Every time. Every. Time.
It’s simple to explain President Alzheimers pardoning his boy: He forgot he said he wouldn’t do it.
Hurry up, 1/20/25.
.
Biden (speaking in his normal low creepy voice): “Hunter, my boy, how you doing today?”
Hunter (not hearing): “Pardon me?”
Biden: “Okay.”
No one is above the law except Democrats.
Oh, please. Virtually any town in America has what are called pillars of the community. Those are usually the people that have lived in town for generations, and own the police department. Their kid wraps the family car around the phone pole and they got a ride home. Meantime, one of the peasantry does the same thing and they’re sitting jail for several days. And it doesn’t matter what party they’re in.
“No one is above the law”? Sorry, that’s a typo. It should say: “No! One is above the law!” What’s his name: “Hunter.”
The “these charges would never have been brought” ruse is hollow. The left is trying to obscure the fact that the charges were originally brought because a corrupt DoJ corruptly thought they could corruptly include blanket immunuty in a corrupt pleas agreement for no jail time on these relatively minor charges. Essentially a stealth pardon but with some political cover for Biden since he could say he had nothing to do with it. The deal only blew up when the judge did due diligence and started asking questions.
The Biden Family public corruption is, in my opinion, EASILY the worst example of federal public corruption in US history. There is credible, COMPELLING evidence that Biden not only sold influence (and who knows what else) to America’s friends, but also to America’s worst contemporary enemies, including RUSSIA and China. And now, with the stroke of a pen, Biden is effectively absolving himself of all culpability without the media even offering a whimper. This truly is how Empires die.
Without further pardons, doesn’t this increase Joe and Jim’s exposure, along with other unknown potential co-conspirators? If Hunter is subpoenaed to testify he now has absolutely zero basis for pleading the fifth. Anything less than complete candor exposes him to new obstruction/perjury charges.
There will absolutely be further pardons. He’ll wait until the last day to issue those. The only reason he issued this one now is to spare his son from ever being convicted; his sentencing was scheduled for next week. Now that he’s been pardoned before that sentencing, Hunter will never be convicted, as a technical matter of law.
This is complicated. The judge does not have to acknowledge the pardon unless Hunter brings it up it to the attention of the court.
If Hunter brings it up, he is accepting it.
If he accepts it, it is an admission of guilt, per Burdick.
Not correct. Accepting a pardon is NOT an admission of guilt. Burdick was on what to do if someone rejects a pardon. Burdick stipulated that non-acceptance of a pardon means the pardon does not take effect. Later judicial rulings stipulate that accepting a pardon is not an admission of guilt. However, acceptance of a pardon has an implied admission of guilt in the public eye.
This isn’t complicated. Biden’s lawyers have already moved for dismissal citing the pardon. The judge has no other option available to him other than to immediately dismiss the case, which will likely come sometime in the next few days, if not sooner. Something similar played out 4-years ago when Trump pardoned Gen. Flynn. The judge in that case – a crazy leftist named Emmitt Sullivan, IIRC – initially refused to dismiss the case even after Trump issued a pardon, this after he refused to dismiss the case when the prosecution moved for dismissal a month earlier, which is what necessitated the pardon. Sullivan was roundly criticized and after (roughly) two or three weeks, he eventually relented and dismissed the case before he could sentence Flynn, who had already entered a guilty plea.
“ This brings us to the differences between legislative immunity and a pardon. They are substantial. The latter carries an imputation of guilt; acceptance a confession of it.”
https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/236/79/
Hunter’s Lawyer Moves To Dismiss Indictment After Pardon
… judge should require a complete elocution
That was back when lawfare might take Trump out of the race. There’s no point in it now.
They aimed Me Too at Trump.
They aimed lawfare at Trump.
But like a poor marksman they keep missing the target.
Once it became apparent that Hunter must face justice both trials and convictions were carefully timed and choreographed. If Harris lost, Biden himself would pardon Hunter ostensibly for the gun and tax charges. But the real intention was to pardon him for a decade’s worth of treasonous shenanigans; thus closing off any action against the Biden crime family. Joe is too old and senile to be prosecuted and going after his brother would involve the pardoned Hunter too much.
This forever forestalls the new administration from pursuing the Bidens. The gun and tax portion of the pardon was just cover for the broader pardon. These people are clever.
I believe it is likely he will pardon his brother also. Jill may not have any overt acts. Joe will probably assume that there will be little appetite to pursue charges against him directly but I would not be completely surprised by a pardon of himself.
That wouldn’t surprise me either. I’m not sure it would really be necessary because as Robert Hur pointed out, Biden is effectively non compos mentis and can’t be prosecuted or forced to testify against anyone. Personally, I think when the honest history books are finally written, Jill will finally be revealed as the wizard behind the curtain. She has PLENTY of criminal culpability here, which is why I expect her to be pardoned as well.
Rule for thee but not for me.
Dem platform.
Why now? What is on the horizon for FJB that makes the move now?
Because this will save Hunter from ever being convicted. Like Trump, because Hunter has yet to be sentenced (one of his two sentencings is scheduled for next week), he’s not yet a convicted felon; neither the order of conviction nor the order of sentencing have been entered into the record by the judge. This is important because a pardon is NOT an expungement. Once you’re a convicted felon, that conviction remains on your record even after a pardon is issued. Most people, even a lot of lawyers, don’t understand this. But, because Biden has preempted that sentencing, Hunter will never have a conviction on his record.
Acceptance of a pardon is an admission of guilt, per Burdick.
The Judge already displayed reluctance to play games.
Reminds me of that annoying judge in the Gibsons shoplifting case who refused to accept the plea bargain which he felt was obtained under duress.
Sentencing for the gun charges on December 4th.
That’s really great work by Mr Elliott. I suspect that he will soon be audited by the IRS.
After the dust settles, what will we learn today, children?
“Reward your friends, punish your enemies.”
That is the whole of politics.
Hunter, drug using financial genius that he is, will no doubt commit more crimes after his dad leaves office.
It will be difficult to do real damage after Joe is out of office. The Biden family store will be out of product to sell.
He might have a little blackmail especially with his full pardon. It would allow him to testify against other Democrats without imperiling himself.
If a liberal mouth is moving they are lying.
Luke Skywalker: “What is white privilege?”
Wise Old Yoda: “I dunno. Ask Hunter Biden.”
Wrong
Yoga knows all
Luke Skywalker: “What is privilege?”
Wise Old Yoda: “Ask Hunter Biden.”
Luke Skywalker: “What is privilege?”
Wise Old Yoda: “Hunter Biden.”
They kept going on and on about the contrast being so clear that Trump would definitely pardon his son blah blah blah. They were correct the contrast was clear Trump wouldn’t have lied and claimed he wouldn’t pardon his son.
Democrats will lie even when better served by the truth.
Leave a Comment