Harris Campaign Desperate Staffers ‘Went Rogue’ to Reach Minority Voters
“They hadn’t talked to anybody. It was like: ‘Hey, nobody has come to our neighborhood. The campaign doesn’t care about us.’”
Back in mid-October, reports began to surface about deep worries among Democrats familiar with the Kamala Harris campaign’s efforts in Pennsylvania, with some openly saying she needed to do more to reach black and Latino voters and that their ground operation was sorely lacking.
External and internal grumbling was going on along with meetings that were called after repeated complaints that state HQ did not have it together:
Top Democrats in Pennsylvania are worried Vice President Kamala Harris’ operation is being poorly run in the nation’s biggest battleground state.
They say some Harris aides lack relationships with key party figures, particularly in Philadelphia and its suburbs. They complain they have been left out of events and surrogates haven’t been deployed effectively. And they’ve urged Harris staff in private meetings to do more to turn out voters of color.
[…]
For some Pennsylvania Democratic elected officials, party leaders and allies, 20 of whom POLITICO spoke to for this article, they’re anxious the in-state operation has set them back.
As we reported at the time, their worries were particularly pronounced when it came to winning over male Latino voters, who they believed were gravitating towards Donald Trump in part because they supposedly didn’t like the idea of a woman president.
In the immediate aftermath of Harris losing the Keystone State – and her chance at the presidency along with it – tensions boiled over as Bob Brady, chairman of the Philadelphia Democrat Party, went off on resource management and what he said was the campaign’s failure to connect one on one with local leaders and voters:
“I would’ve liked to see the Harris campaign – especially the national campaign – coordinate with us a little bit. Talk to us a little bit. Give us a little bit more resources. Show us some respect. Didn’t happen,” he told NBC10 on Wednesday. “They were just elitist and went out there, did their own thing and didn’t include Democratic city committee or (ward leaders) or committee people. They just didn’t do it.”
[…]
“I don’t think that the Democrats that live in the city related to her,” he said. “And I don’t know why. I don’t know whether there was an elitist factor out there. I don’t know why she didn’t talk to them.”
Fresh reporting confirms that the concerns from Democrats about Pennsylvania were real, so real in fact that staffers were “going rogue” in an effort to reach the minority voters that they felt the campaign wasn’t doing enough to win over:
Two days before the November election, a rogue team of campaign organizers for Vice President Kamala Harris turned a Dunkin’ Donuts in Philadelphia into their secret headquarters.
Their mission was simple: Knock on the doors of as many Black and Latino voters as they could in neighborhoods that they believed the Harris campaign had neglected in its get-out-the-vote-operation. And they could not let their bosses find out.
[…]
Many of the thousands of Black and Latino voters they talked to said they had never heard from the campaign, a stunning breakdown so close to Election Day.
“I was the first one knocking on these doors,” said Amelia Pernell, a Harris campaign organizer involved in setting up the clandestine Dunkin’ Donuts field office in North Philadelphia. “They hadn’t talked to anybody. It was like: ‘Hey, nobody has come to our neighborhood. The campaign doesn’t care about us.’”
In the words of the New York Times, “The covert operations, many of them led by Black organizers, represented extraordinary acts of insubordination against the Harris campaign.”
The report also detailed that despite Harris raising $1.5 billion, staffers said some of the campaign offices in the Philadelphia area “were filthy and lacked basic supplies like tables, chairs, cleaning products and printers.”
The strategy, it appears, was to focus primarily on what they felt were white voters in the suburbs who weren’t fans of then-GOP presidential nominee Donald Trump. This was a strategy that also was in effect in other battleground states including Georgia, according to at least one local Democrat Party official:
Keith McCants, the chair of a county Democratic Party in a rural part of Georgia with many Black voters, said the Harris campaign’s get-out-the-vote operation had been nonexistent, even as he had pleaded for resources.
“They didn’t do nothing, absolutely nothing,” he said. “They thought: ‘Those Black voters are going to come home. They will vote for her regardless because she’s a Black woman. So let’s just focus on the suburbs.’”
Black staffers also allegedly complained of “outright racial discrimination” in a campaign survey, according to the Times report. But after the election was over, staffers were told by the deputy campaign manager to refrain from talking to the media or he’d ruin their careers:
Per NYT, Kamala Harris deputy campaign manager @quentinfulks threatened staffers after the election that they would ruin their career prospects if they spoke to the media. https://t.co/26F9tgc9AR pic.twitter.com/DJSwtzkGRK
— Chuck Ross (@ChuckRossDC) December 7, 2024
Between this, the tens of millions they spent on the election-eve concerts, the hundreds of thousands they donated/paid to prominent celebrities and media figures for their time and endorsements, it makes you wonder: is there anything this campaign did right?
— Stacey Matthews has also written under the pseudonym “Sister Toldjah” and can be reached via Twitter. —
Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.
Comments
I personally dont think it mattered. A combination of 8 years of Obama, and 4 years of Biden/bidenomics, Any republican candidate was going to win in 2024. Same as in 2008 when any democrat candidate was going to win.
Just my two cents,
Yeah, that’s true, but there’s clear evidence they stole PA in prior elections. Trump via Musk seemed to change that in 2024.
The only silver lining of Obummer’s 8 years was that he blocked the Clinton’s from getting back in the White House. Twice.
Not just anyone
Trump
It wasn’t outreach that was lacking.
It was sanity.
The Trump campaign had the best analysis as to why Harris went down in flames: “Kamala is for they/them. Trump is for YOU.”
“is there anything this campaign did right?”
Yes. They lost.
Incompetence, thy name is ‘Kamala’, and any Democrat who had spent any time around her prior to the campaign knew it.
“Between this, the tens of millions they spent on the election-eve concerts, the hundreds of thousands they donated/paid to prominent celebrities and media figures for their time and endorsements, it makes you wonder: is there anything this campaign did right?”
But that’s a fitting epitaph for the entire four-year Biden/Harris administration. For four years, every option they had, every decision they made, whenever they had two choices, they invariably chose the worst one.
The Harris camp looked at it like liberals always do. We must be leaders no one is in front of us. They always fail to look behind to see if anyone’s following.
What I’m hearing here is a lot of people complaining they didn’t spend enough of that $1 Billion plus on us.
Well, they do have staffers wondering why celebrities worth millions were paid money to stand next to Kamala while the staffers went unpaid.
That’s because, like other whores, the celebrities were only going to perform if paid _in advance_.
Let me be frank. The only way they could’ve done better was to replace Tim Walz with Howdy Doody.
OK. You can be Frank. But who will be Paula?
How about you, Sweetie?
Best comeback I’ve read in quite a while.
Never mind that… who’ll be Buffalo Bob Menendez?
Of course they didn’t work to reach out to a demographic that has reflexively voted Dem for generations.
Why should the campaign bother? They focused spending on the whites who might be agreeable to voting Not-Trump.
Bad strategy? I don’t know. The Harris campaign had only two messages; abortion and Trump is Literally Hitler, so their cross-over targets had to be emotionally driven and fairly low IQ.
Their core voters, many of whom are insulated (to an extent) from the realities of the Biden/Harris economy by their government benefits, the economic issues are less compelling.
I think they did about as well as they could.
If voters in inner cities believed Harris cared for them, they are sadly mistaken. The Democrats turned their eye toward the “new” and improved voter, the illegals being shipped in by the millions.
Blacks and minority city dwellers were sooooo 80s and 90s. The new new is the voter who owed it to the Democrats for their improved lives here in the “Land of the Free (literally everything was free).”
They expected blacks to vote like the lemmings they have already proven to be. They didn’t “need” you because you were a proven cult-like voter block.
Sorry for your disappointment, no matter how appropriate it was.
It wasn’t just the inner cities. This is the first election I can remember when the democrats absolutely ignored areas that traditionally vote blue. People in my area were designing and printing their own Harris lawn signs because the campaign wouldn’t spend money to provide official signs.
Idiots
BTW. My reference to “you” was not a personal comment. The “you” referred to those who said the “campaign didn’t care about us.”
Those are not voters yet. The Dems hope they will one day be voters, and that their US-born children will support them 18 years from now. They also benefited in the 2020 census from those who came in under 0bama and Trump, and hope to benefit in 2030 from the ones they brought in under Biden. But none of this could have had a significant effect on the 2024 election.
Trump took 22.1% of voters in Chicago, which is the most any Republican has won in more than 40 years. Even inner city black folks are realizing that Democrats don’t really want to improve anything. They do just enough to buy votes for the next four years. No real solutions. I see this as one of the most positive things coming out of the Biden/Harris years.
The campaign was a victim of its belief in identity politics, which dictated that certain votes were “theirs” because of how those voters identified. Another failure for identity politics.
When will they learn from Jordan Peterson, who said something to the effect that when you parse a person’s identity to the Nth degree, what you have is an individual. Identity politics, taken to its logical conclusion, should be about the individual. But nothing about liberals is logical, they think nothing through.
She lost because of rampant illegal immigration and everything costs almost twice as much as four years ago.
Let’s put the Harris campaign in the junk drawer and move on.
it came to winning over male Latino voters, who they believed were gravitating towards Donald Trump in part because they supposedly didn’t like the idea of a woman president.
Ok, sure that is the problem.
And yet, it sure is some tasty irony.
Could their Great Replacement Plot have been flawed?
“Those whom the gods wish to destroy, they first make mad.” Ideology and belief trumps reality. The Harris campaign people had a set of beliefs, and no matter what their internal polling showed, they were not going to change. They would rather lose, and did.
Tiffney Prickett, who runs Voiage Salon in Coeur d’Alene Idaho destroyed her business with anti-Trump and anti male insults. While her actions might be fine in places like NYC, Berkeley, SF, and the like, her conservative clients in Idaho were infuriated, and her business collapsed. Her response to losing a 22 year old career: she would rather lose her business and “go work at Chipotle” than than change. Ideology and belief trumps everything. Wars are lost with such behavior. Are you listening Europe? Are you listening Mexico, California, New York, and Colorado?
“It was like: ‘Hey, nobody has come to our neighborhood. The campaign doesn’t care about us.’”
Why the president should be saddled with the responsibility of being our national mother, I cannot understand. I don’t need a president to “care for me” or to tour a hurricane-ravaged area or shake the hands of grief-stricken family members. I want to know he is making good, well-informed decisions in a timely way, choosing good subordinates, and giving them the authority and resources to accomplish their responsibilities. I want him to have a vision for the country that I can support and be able to articulate that vision in a way that wins the backing of the nation. Warm and fuzzy feelings fall a long way down on my list of desirable presidential characteristics.
What a successful candidate must do to get elected and what he should do after being elected are two different things. If you’re not smart enough to do the former, you may not be smart enough to do the latter. If you’re smart enough to do the former, you’re not necessarily smart enough to do the latter. The best candidate does both well. Trump had the advantage of having a record as president during which nearly every metric of well-being for the country was superior to those same metrics under the Biden-Harris administration. All Trump had to do was run a good campaign (it was) and run on his pervious performance.
Agreed – and the images of Trump in the barbershops, in convenience stores, making fries at McDonald’s, and riding in the trash truck will not soon be forgotten. They made him so relatable and were the perfect response to the claims that “he is a billionaire and he doesn’t care about you”. And, he looked like he was having a good time doing it!
But that’s because you’re not a “whatchu gon do for ME??” voter.
Still, many progressives will defend her, oblivious to how out of touch in their bubble they are with reality.
Harris is old news. Would rather look at AOC, who has her own presidential aspirations, and her annouced care and the reality, as illustrated here:
“AOC’s ‘Red Light District’ plagued by crime as Democrat who helped her rise to power says she ‘disappeared'”
Ramon Ramirez Baez: ‘She only defends the socialist agenda, which is not for the American people’
https://www.foxnews.com/us/aocs-red-light-district-plagued-crime-democrat-who-helped-her-rise-power-says-she-disappeared
Will she ever be allowed to lead Democrats on the Oversight Committee?
The people in Philly waited until 2 days before the election to realize they had a problem and no one anywhere said anything about the train wreck. Forgive me if I could care less about the Monday morning quarterbacking from people more interested in grabbing cash than being competent. The first DEI campaign ended about as well as expected with people speaking out now that it’s safe, campaign leadership threatening employees to keep quiet about what a disaster Harris is and Kamala heading to Hawaii for the mother of all benders.
Of course they went after the White suburbanites in PA and other states. This happened because the Democrats have an obvious problem — HUBRIS. They think they own the minority vote in America and that the only issues that matter are those of their fart-sniffing, elitist, costal friends.
I’m 69 years old and I’ve never had campaign workers show up at my door wooing me to vote for their candidate. And guess what? My feelings weren’t hurt and I voted for the candidates that I thought best represented my interests and the welfare of the country. These people need to get over their feelings of self-importance and start to consider those around them instead of me, me, me all the time.
When local demonrats complain, it’s because they didn’t get any of that money from the Kameltoe campaign.
“… it makes you wonder: is there anything this campaign did right?”
Yep: she created just the right conditions for Trump to return to office. Despite his numerous attempts to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory.
And I’d say she did a grand job of it.
Thanks, KH!
That’s a funny way to spell “Acted on orders”
Never mind that she’s an unqualified, horrible, cackling idiot
Janet Jackson called kamala fake black. lol