Hillary Clinton: Americans Spreading ‘Propaganda’ Should be ‘Criminally Charged’
The failed presidential candidate also complained the press isn’t hard enough on Trump and stressed he would he a dictator.
THANK GOD this woman never won the presidency. Such an awful and terrible person.
FAILED presidential candidate Hillary Clinton told Rachel Maddow that any American participating in spreading propaganda should be charged.
Hillary also spread more dangerous rhetoric about former President Donald Trump a day after someone attempted to assassinate him. She had the nerve to complain the media is too friendly to him.
I applaud the actions taken by the Justice Department and the State Department. I think that they’re very important. But, truly, we are just at the beginning of uncovering everything that Russia, but not just Russia, other countries, have done and are doing to influence our election.
If you focus on Russia — and I commend you, Rachel, for your new movie — because we are only at the beginning of understanding the whole iceberg here. What the Russians started doing in 2015 and 2016, what they continued doing, they have gotten more sophisticated. They aren’t even pretending anymore.
Their international news operation, Russia Today, R.T., is an arm of the Russian government, an arm of its intelligence operation. It’s basically an extension of their spying efforts. They are using Americans, both those who are witting and willing and those who are unwitting and are just so surprised they’re getting $400,000 a week or $100,000 a podcast to parrot Kremlin propaganda.
We know from what even Republicans have said, the chairs of the Intelligence Committee and the Foreign Affairs Committee and other Republicans who are currently in office have said that Republicans go to the floor of the Congress and they parrot Russian talking points.
So, I think it’s important to indict the Russians, just as Mueller indicted a lot of Russians who were engaged in direct election interference and boosting Trump back in 2016. But I also think there are Americans who are engaged in this kind of propaganda.
And whether they should be civilly or even in some cases criminally charged is something that would be a better deterrence, because the Russians are unlikely, except in a very few cases, to ever stand trial in the United States. They’re not going to be going to a country where they can be extradited or even returning to the United States, unless they are very foolish.
So I think we need to uncover all of the connections and make it very clear that you could vote however you want, but we are not going to let adversaries, whether it is Russia, China, Iran, or anybody else, basically try to influence Americans as to how we should vote in picking our leaders.
Hillary Clinton tells #Maddow that Americans who are working with Russia should be charged, "Americans who are engaged in this kind of propaganda. And whether they should be civilly or even in some cases, criminally charged is something that would be a better deterrence." pic.twitter.com/hUhZwVB1dG
— Sarah Reese Jones (@PoliticusSarah) September 17, 2024
Yes, Hillary, let’s add more gas to the fire:
“And I don’t understand why it’s so difficult for the press to have a consistent narrative about how dangerous Trump is,” Clinton said. “You know, the late, great journalist Harry Evans, you know, one time said that, you know, journalists should, you know, really try to achieve objectivity. And by that, he said, I mean, they should cover the object. Well, the object in this case is Donald Trump, his demagoguery, his danger to our country and the world.”
Then, the former secretary of state, who lost the election to Trump in 2016, denounced the Republican candidate as a dictator.
“Well, Americans need to understand that they have to take Trump both seriously and literally. He has said what he wants to do. He and his allies with Project 2025, his desire to be a dictator, at least on day one, all of that is in the public record,” Clinton said. “And I believe that more Americans have to be, you know, willing to endure what frankly is discomforting and to some extent kind of painful to take him at his word and to be outraged by what he represents.”
.@HillaryClinton issues orders to the corporate media:
"I don’t understand why it’s so difficult for the press to have a consistent narrative about how dangerous Trump is. You know, the late great journalist Harry Evans, you know, one time said that, you know, journalists… pic.twitter.com/mrpGIO7deo
— Tom Elliott (@tomselliott) September 17, 2024
DONATE
Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.
Comments
Brainwashing needs repetition.
I’d say it’s a total lack of self awareness because Hillary and MSNBC would be guilty of these very things. It’s more like they are Big Brother making thought criminals of anyone who dares to disagree with them. If Kamala wins Democrats will bring about the very totalitarian State they supposed don’t want.
It’s projection.
It’s what Progressives do. And Hillary, too.
Was going to say–that’s pretty funny coming from her.
Says the “woman” that spread lies about Trump and caused 40 million to be spent on an unnecessary investigation. I’ve worked with people that were in the WH during the Clinton administration. They describe her as vile and disgusting.
Says the woman who, in her capacity as SOS, got 4 people killed and an unknown number injured. All of whom had to sign non-disclosure agreements.* And that doesn’t count the people she Arkancided.
*Since Stormy Daniels didn’t have to honor her NDA, Hillary’s victims shouldn’t either.
Why isn’t this vile venal witch in prison already??
Because she is Hillary Clinton.
Because there has never been prosecutable evidence of a crime that was within the statute of limitations. Trump promised to appoint someone to look for such evidence and “lock her up” if any was found, but he broke that promise.
Most of her known crimes passed the statute long ago. She should have been prosecuted at the time she committed them.
Funnily enough, that’s what Trump said!
It doesn’t look like she was calling for charges against anyone who spreads propaganda, which would be impossible because of the first amendment. Rather it looks like she was calling for charges only against anyone who does so at the behest of a foreign government, without registering as an agent of that government. That, the acting as an agent, is not protected by the first amendment.
Of course you’d have to be able to prove beyond reasonable doubt that they were acting for the foreign government and not for themselves.
I don’t think she or the Democrats care about the First Amendment. They have already gone pretty rogue with their minions in the legal system inventing garbage charges to go after Trump with. I just do not think they look at things the way normal people do.
I seem to recall something Clinton something something Podesta something FARA something, but I’m getting on and the memory isn’t that great.
Is it just me or does she resemble the Quaker Oats dude in that picture
Having those two together on the same screen is painful. FYI, the Quaker Oats dude is called Larry.
Charge folks who spread propaganda? Ok. Let’s start with the Obama admin ‘if you like you’re DR you can keep..’, then lets hit the liars about Ukraine then the Covid Karens. If there’s any time left maybe we can add others. Pretty sure that’s the ‘propaganda’ HRC wants criminalized.
How about the folks who lied about Hunter’s laptop being Russian Propaganda? Can we go after propaganda spreaders who knowingly falsely claim other stuff is propaganda?
The CCP couldn’t buy a better advocate. She is committed to the cause.
She’s still stuck on the Russians won the election for Trump. Maybe she should be taken off the air for spreading propaganda. I guess according to her, we’ll be safe if we vote in her favored dictator, the one world government.
It has to have been Russia. It can’t have been that she was a terrible candidate and even the people who “like” her don like her.
The biggest distributor of propaganda on American soil is now the American federal government. In the National Defense Authorization Act of 2012, a ‘bipartisan’ group (of Deepstate operatives) inserted a provision that repealed essential elements of the Smith–Mundt Act of 1945 that specifically forbade the US government from using State Department propaganda on US Soil. The legislation was written by Adam Smith (the horrible Dem rep from Washington State) and Mac Thornberry, the Neocon Texas Representative who know works at the Council on Foreign Relations…because of course he does.
It infuriates me that no one in Congress, but particularly the notable ‘limited government conservatives’ have given any effort to restoring the crucial elements of Smith–Mundt that prohibit the FedGov from doing what they’ve been clearly doing since 2013.
You mean like YOU and your ‘russian collusion’ hoax you disgusting fu*king c*nt?
wellll,,,yeah
when you are the slave masta as she and her mates are
its easy to control the kangaroo court system
no wonder bill strayed
Hillary Clinton IS walking, talking propaganda. As is every libtard.
Leave a Comment