Tim Walz Lied About 1995 DWI Arrest During First Congressional Campaign
Is anything true about Walz?
Is anything about presumptive Democratic VP nominee Gov. Tim Walz true?
CNN (yes, CNN!) discovered that Walz lied about his 1995 DWI during his first Congressional campaign in 2006. It turned into a DUI charge once the alcohol test came back:
According to court and police records connected to the incident, Walz admitted in court that he had been drinking when he was pulled over for driving 96 mph in a 55 mph zone in Nebraska. Walz was then transported by a state trooper to a local hospital for a blood test, showing he had a blood alcohol level of .128, well above the state’s legal limit of 0.1 at the time.
But in 2006, his campaign repeatedly told the press that he had not been drinking that night, claiming that his failed field sobriety test was due to a misunderstanding related to hearing loss from his time in the National Guard. The campaign also claimed that Walz was allowed to drive himself to jail that night.
None of that was true.
The reports say otherwise:
In fact, the incident’s police report clearly states that Walz was transported by police to a local hospital for blood alcohol testing after being arrested. And this week, Nebraska state police confirmed to CNN that Walz was taken by a state trooper to jail.
“Under NSP procedure, a person suspected of impaired driving is not allowed to continue driving,” Cody Thomas, a spokesman for the Nebraska State Patrol, told CNN. “In this case, the suspect was transported by the trooper and was lodged in Dawes County Jail.”
Now that Walz is the Democratic nominee for vice president, renewed scrutiny is being paid to the details of his 1995 arrest and how his campaign described the incident a decade later as he launched his political career.
Walz taught high school at the time of his DWI. The trooper smelled “a strong odor of alcohol” on his breath, leading him to request a sobriety test:
Walz failed the test and was transported by a state trooper to a local hospital for a blood test showing he had a blood alcohol level of .128 – well above the state’s legal limit of 0.1 at the time.
Walz took a plea deal, court records show, pleading guilty to reckless driving. In a court hearing in March 1996, Walz admitted that he had been drinking and driving.
His lawyer said Walz intended to use the incident as a way to educate his students on the perils of drinking and driving.“It’s just a dangerous situation,” Walz said in a court transcript, which Alpha News, a conservative Minnesota outlet uncovered in 2022. “Not just to myself, but to others who aren’t even involved with it.”
In court, Walz’s defense attorney said that when the state trooper started following him, Walz believed someone was chasing him and sped up out of fear that he was being pursued until the trooper turned on his police lights.
Walz’s attorney added that he reported the incident to his school and resigned from extracurricular activities such as coaching. He offered to resign his teaching position entirely, his lawyer said, but the principal urged him to stay on.
Fast forward to 2006.
A Republican blog alerted everyone about Walz’s DUI:
Then in early September, a local Republican blog ran the story, “Walz jailed for DUI,” based on a copy of Walz’s ticket for speeding and DUI.
Walz’s campaign disputed that he had been drunk – and claimed he had driven himself to the station. They did not mention whether or not Walz had been jailed.
The local GOP blog later posted a a copy of the police report from the incident to suggest Walz’s campaign was lying in their claims he wasn’t drunk – but no one in the local press appeared to have followed up on the report.
Walz’s then-spokesperson told a local outlet the authorities dropped the charge because none of it was true: “The trooper had him drive to the station and then leave on his own after being at the station. Tim feels bad about speeding and has paid the ticket and apologized to his family at the time it happened.”
The spokesperson told another outlet that the judge dismissed the charges:
“According to Walz’s campaign staff, Walz denies being drunk the night of the incident. Walz was hard of hearing, a result of his years as an artillery soldier in the Army National Guard, and had trouble hearing the trooper, according to Meredith Salsbery, communications director for the Walz campaign,” read the report in the New Ulm Journal, a local newspaper.
“He couldn’t understand what the trooper was telling him during the field sobriety test, and the trooper refused to speak up,” Salsbery said at the time.
‘The DUI charges were dropped for a reason,’ Salsbery added. “The judge would not have dismissed them if there were anything to them. Tim drove to the police station that night (after being stopped), and he drove home afterwards. I don’t think the trooper would have allowed that if he thought there was a problem.’”
The arresting state trooper, Nebraska State Trooper Stephen Rasgorshek, spoke out recently:
As for troubles with balancing, Rasgorshek said that the tests he conducted included the horizontal gaze nystagmus, in which the subject is asked to follow an object with his eyes. A twitching before the eyes are at 45 degrees is a reliable indication of inebriation. Walz failed it.
“We were told that having a hearing problem had nothing to do with what the eyes are doing,” Rasgorshek noted.
Walz also failed a breathalyzer. And a hospital test that followed put Walz’s blood alcohol level at .128, which was .028 over the legal limit at the time. And, considering that there was a long wait for a tow truck to haul away Walz’s car before they could head to the hospital, Rasgorshek figures Walz might have actually been at a .170 when he was stopped.
—
But a lie is still a lie and that is why a long-ago drunk driving collar is still an issue. Rasgorshek, who is now retired, put forth the truth on Monday in the simplest terms.
“Saw drunk. Arrested same.”
Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.
Comments
leftists dont go to jail
they just go back home
Leftist judges take care of their own. duh!
Any reason to believe the judge was a leftist? Or that he had any reason to believe that Walz was one?
It’s easier to find something he lied about than when he told the truth.
The obvious lack of scrutiny local Minnesota media applied to Walz through his four or five different elections in the state perfectly underscores how rotten and corrupt ‘the media’ is at every level. It’s not just the big papers and national networks that are horrible. Local news/papers are just as bad an in some markets, probably even worse.
“Tim Walz Lied…”
You could have just stopped right there.
Over the limit and allowed to plea to reckless? He got off easy.
Over the limit and driving 40 mph over the limit? In a Semi 15 mph is enough for an automatic 1 yr suspension.
Kamalalaladingdong is hoping the media love fest will take her to November. Probably right
Next question – what lies are he telling now about his long-time China connection?
“Saw drunk. Arrested same.”
A good old J.D. “Buck” Savage quote. LOL
WHOA!!
in a stroy covered the other day by LI
the lefty who stole $1.5 million in chicken wings from kids no less
CHECK THIS OUT::
Despite her being convicted of stealing food from kids during the COVID pandemic,
Kansas City Chiefs defensive tackle Chris Jones offered to cover the $1.5 million worth of chicken wings stolen by a former food service director in exchange for the woman’s release from prison.
Vera Liddell, who served in the director role for Harvey School District 152 near Chicago, is incarcerated at the Cook County Jail for theft and operating a criminal enterprise, WGN, ABC News and CBS New
What? Did he go to school there or she a family friend? Hunter has a sugar daddy paying millions, this chick has this guy. Where do I get a millionaire of my own to drop money bombs on my problems?
as someone else stated:
why doesnt this blmplo playa donate THAT MONEY DIRECTLY TO THE POOR KIDS SHE STOLE FROM!!!
b/c his agenda is like allll the rest
poc should not be in prison
its a racist system
while he earns MILLIONSSSS IN THAT RACIST CAPITALIST SYSTEM they complain about
And they will probably continue to lie about the lie and say he wasn’t lying…Liars gonna lie
the walz response:
I am proud to have served in the military
again….trump ..tear down this walz
Was the DUI reported to the Army National Guard?
A DUI kills a security clearance
For this reason I am pretty sure that it was not reported. A DUI does not help promotions either. So we can assume he covered it up.
Subotai Bahadur
Driving under the influence is taught in the first week of the onboarding process for joining the Democrat party.
See: “The Real Tim Walz: A comprehensive – and troubling – look at the radical record of Kamala’s VP pick.”
https://www.frontpagemag.com/the-real-tim-walz/
According to FP: “the most comprehensive and informative profile of Walz that’s been published thus far.”
I think we’re all on the same page vis-a-vis drunk driving and many of us have lost friends and family members to people driving under the influence. But DWIs are common enough that a single instance in someone’s past shouldn’t preclude them from office, even as President (see: GWB).
The problem comes in lying about it.
It’s 2024, people. There’s nowhere to hide this kind of stuff from coming out. So instead of lying about this he should have stepped forward, admitted to the infraction, mentioned that he had completed the sentence imposed by the court, sought help for his drinking problem and moved on.
But noooooo…
Which leads me to this conclusion: Falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus.
He’s a fat, bald, creepy commie.
Definitely true.
They should have revoked the plea deal and thrown both Walz and his retarded lawyer into prison just for saying something as stupid as this out loud. Now, THAT would have “[educated] his students on the perils of drinking and driving”.
“Walz lied about his 1995 DWI during his first Congressional campaign in 2006. It turned into a DUI charge once the alcohol test came back”
Can someone explain to me exactly what this means? I always thought that DUI and DWI were simply different terms of art used by different states for the same thing; same as the various three-letter abbreviations used by different states for their firearms carry permits that are all really the same thing. If indeed a single state uses both these terms for different situations, I would expect that DWI would be more serious than DUI – DUI standing for driving under the influence, while DWI stands for driving while intoxicated, implying that a definite level of intoxication (other than “influence”) has been established. So I would think the escalation of a charge would go in that direction, not the other direction.
Come on, man. Just sloppy writing. The writer is using the two words interchangeably. The meaning still isn’t clear, but maybe the writer was drunk or being chased by a deadline.
I was confused by that too, but I think it means that it was originally put in as just a speeding charge, pending the BAC test. Once that came in, DWI/DUI/whatever was added to it.