Image 01 Image 03

The War for Your Mind Began on July 21

The War for Your Mind Began on July 21

Just as the Democrats had hoped, a feeling of despair has engulfed the Republican Party. Unfortunately, blinded by the Left’s demoralization campaign, many conservative writers are doing the Democrats’ work for them.

Shortly after the Obama administration replaced the word “terrorism” with “man-caused disasters,” they stopped calling psychological operations “psyops” and began referring to them as Military Information Support Operations, or MISO. Regardless of the name change, administration officials immediately recognized that the same techniques used by the military to influence the opinions and ultimately the behavior of foreign populations could be applied in the political world.

Democrats began using their newly discovered “bloodless weapon” in 2011 to persuade Republicans that President Barack Obama’s reelection was inevitable. Professor Jacobson recognized what was happening at the time and gave it a name: Operation Demoralize. And he’s been tracking it ever since.

In the video below, posted on Wednesday evening, he defines Operation Demoralize as a “concerted effort [by Democrats] every presidential election to suppress Republican votes by creating a narrative that it’s over. There’s nothing you can do. The momentum is with the Democrat.”

Professor Jacobson notes that it’s happening again this election cycle and warns readers to resist it. He sees “it all over the internet. I see it in my inbox, I see it in comments, I see it everywhere.”

(The original post can be viewed here.)

I see it too. In fact, as much as I recognize what’s happening, I’m not entirely immune to its influence either.

Obviously, no two elections are the same. But the 2024 presidential election cycle is already one for the history books. We watched in June as President Joe Biden, the spavined leader Democrats rigged the primary to anoint, crashed, and burned on a debate stage. Three weeks later, following a successful coup by the leaders of his party, he withdrew from the race, endorsing his previously unpopular, unprepared, inauthentic, far-left running mate, a candidate once considered so weak as to be a “drag on the ticket,” as his replacement. In the meantime, former President Donald Trump survived an assassination attempt at a Pennsylvania campaign rally.

The events of the past four weeks have taken our collective breath away. The Democratic Party, with the help of its communications team – the legacy media, have turned Vice President Kamala Harris into a rock star, whose victory they would have us believe is inevitable.

There’s no denying that Harris is riding high. That said, part of the excitement we see is the Left’s tremendous relief over Biden’s departure.

Call it Operation Demoralize, a psyop, or a Military Information Support Operation, but we are witnessing a real-world demonstration of the power of propaganda.

Harris has now surpassed Trump in the national polls and even leads in some critical battleground states. Just as the Democrats had hoped, a feeling of despair has engulfed the Republican Party. And unfortunately, even conservative writers, clearly affected by the media onslaught, are directing their anger at Trump.

A glance at the top three most popular articles in the Wall Street Journal’s opinion section tells the story. First, columnist Gerard Baker declares that “Trump is looking like a loser again.” He claims that “about one third of his remarks at last week’s press conference were false, obtuse or lunatic.”

Next, the editorial board asks, “Will Donald Trump Blow Another Election?” The editors note that as “Harris rises in the polls, the former President doesn’t know how to respond.” Rather than reminding readers of Trump’s many triumphs on the campaign trail, they provide a list of his every misstep. The editors even swat Trump for his age: Harris “presents a youthful contrast to 78-year-old Mr. Trump, who has now been on the presidential stage for nearly a decade.”

They conclude, “[t]he political reality is that he has a ceiling of support that is below 50% because so many Americans dislike him. And now that he is in the news every day campaigning, he is reminding those voters why they didn’t vote to re-elect him in 2020.”

And finally, Peggy Noonan, a rabid anti-Trumper who served as a speechwriter and adviser during the Reagan administration, informs readers that “Harris just won her third week in a row of the first three weeks of the hundred-day campaign” while Trump spent most of the week having what a GOP strategist told Politico was a “public nervous breakdown.”

Other conservative writers wish Trump would stop talking about crowd size. And rather than applauding his courage for attending the National Association of Black Journalists conference or his restraint during ABC News correspondent Rachel Scott’s stunningly offensive interview, they condemn Trump for saying that Harris isn’t black.

Blinded by the Left’s demoralization campaign, these writers are doing the Democrats’ work for them.

Yes, Trump is a flawed candidate. He is impulsive, unpredictable, egotistical, and sometimes boorish. (These are arguably the very characteristics that make him a formidable adversary on the world stage, but I digress.)

He was also one of the most accomplished presidents in modern memory.

I would posit that Harris’s negatives far outweigh Trump’s. Anyone who trusts her election-year conversion is naive. Voters need to look at the radical positions she championed during the 2020 Democratic presidential primary. To name a few, Harris supported a ban on fracking and off-shore drilling, Medicare-for-all, and open borders. She also compared U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement to the Ku Klux Klan.

As President of the Senate throughout the Biden-Harris administration, she often cast the deciding vote on the bloated, unnecessary spending bills that triggered the worst inflation in 40 years. Their open border policy allowed more than 10 million illegal immigrants, including terrorists, into the country as well as large quantities of fentanyl, which kills over 70,000 Americans each year.

I’ll take impulsive and egotistical any day over the terrible Biden-Harris record.

Republicans need to turn off the noise, difficult as it may be, and focus on the task at hand. Exposing Harris for the far-left politician that she is.

Professor Jacobson provided some “historical perspective” in his Wednesday remarks. He noted that on Aug. 14, the Real Clear Politics national polling average showed Harris with a 1.1% lead. (A Fox poll added later in the day brought her lead down to 0.9%.)

He then reminded us that on this date in 2020, Biden was up by 7.7%. On this date in 2016, Clinton was up by 6.8%.

Summing up, he said, “That’s the historical record. That doesn’t mean people shouldn’t be concerned. That doesn’t mean people can’t do better. That doesn’t mean really anything other than you are being played.”

DONATE

Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.

Comments

Not ONE Trump voter switched to Harris when Xiden was coup’d


 
 0 
 
 6
SeymourButz | August 15, 2024 at 1:07 pm

How does a politician that couldn’t get 2% of the primary vote poll above 50%?

There is no satisfactory answer to that question.


 
 0 
 
 2
Exiliado | August 15, 2024 at 1:07 pm

I do not own a mine.


 
 1 
 
 4
rhhardin | August 15, 2024 at 1:11 pm

Women support Harris by 15% and men support Trump by 17%.

Women vote feelings, men vote structure.

Joy is feelings, regulation and tax code is structure.


 
 0 
 
 2
Ironclaw | August 15, 2024 at 1:14 pm

I think the headline needs a bit of an edit, MIND instead of MINE…

The title has a typo.

Also you listed all the bad stuff about Harris, but Trump should be doing that instead of saying she ain’t black and talking about crowd size. Trump has many things and issues he can talk about besides bragging or name-calling.

Now that she is endorsing price controls he can hit her harder on inflation.


 
 0 
 
 3
henrybowman | August 15, 2024 at 1:24 pm

Meanwhile (because there’s no more relevant place to put this today), the Secret Service Chickies the administration has assigned to Trump are again providing him their usual excellent standard of protection:

“Secret Service Agent Leaves Trump Post to Breastfeed”

https://www.newsmax.com/newsfront/donald-trump-rally-secret-service/2024/08/15/id/1176639/

Reality is going to catch up to Harris when people tire of her schtick and the excessive dishonesty and attempt to manipulate with disinformation.

Peaking too early is not good, There are many shoes to drop.


 
 0 
 
 0
scooterjay | August 15, 2024 at 1:48 pm

EBC, stay on message.
America has no propaganda, only gaslighting.


 
 0 
 
 1
Mauiobserver | August 15, 2024 at 2:38 pm

In my opinion the first part of the operation to attack the GOP positions has largely not been successful. Vance’s comments on the anti-family positions of the leftist in power has only gained traction with left leaning women so it hasn’t moved the needle. What is has done is start a conversation about the anti family anti traditional western values that our pro Marxist elites have been pushing for many decades.

I think the bigger focus for the left right now is to motivate their voters and rally the base for what will be a turnout election. The joy and positive vibes and stealth campaign are basically a combination of the Obama Hope and Change and the Biden basement campaigns. We will see how it works as Trump/Vance keep pounding the border, energy and economic message combined with what likely will not be a positive vibes message from the expected huge pro Hamas demonstrations in Chicago for the DNC.


 
 0 
 
 1
E Howard Hunt | August 15, 2024 at 3:17 pm

If there be a war for my mind, then captured combatants can expect to be locked in my little gray cells.


 
 0 
 
 2
retiredcantbefired | August 15, 2024 at 4:14 pm

WSJ editorial writers all hate Trump already. Fear, uncertainty, and doubt are always part of their game.

And… Can anyone explain why Peggy Noonan is still employed by the WSJ? What market segment does she cater to?

“Unfortunately, blinded by the Left’s demoralization campaign, many conservative writers are doing the Democrats’ work for them.”

As opposed to irrational exuberance of inevitable election infallibility?

Maybe, juuust maybe, there are actual concerns or less than flattering observations, and listening to them is better than plugging one’s ears? I already see people trying to set up a “Stolen Election” narrative. The Right suffers already from to many people pushing clearly partisan propaganda in order to get clicks or sell merch, and it’s clear that that ain’t going to change anytime soon.

I still think that at this point Trump is favored, but with so many people already making excuses and blaming people at a form of cope, I may need to reevaluate that.


     
     1 
     
     0
    henrybowman in reply to The Political Hat. | August 16, 2024 at 1:45 am

    Democrats cheat and steal elections. It’s what they do. Kennedy did it. Johnson did it. Gore and Hillary did their damndest and almost succeeded at it. What’s your claim, that Democrats intend 2024 to be a clean, up-and-up, Marquess of Queensberry election? Then you’re a fool.

“Operation Demoralize”

Because not enough people “clapped for the fairies”?

Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.