King Charles Gives Two-Tier Keir The Thumbs Up
“His Majesty was updated on the current situation and expressed his heartfelt thanks to the police and emergency services for all they are doing to restore peace in those areas that have been affected by violent disorder.”
This is incredible. The insane two-tiered justice system being applied against native Brits who merely look at a riot vs. the shrugging nothingness in the face of machete-wielding foreigners roaming the streets and attacking people and/or vandalizing pubs and other businesses is breath-taking.
But fear not! The great King Charles III, beta soy boi of the ages, has weighed in, and he is grateful for the crackdown on his subjects who dare to dislike rampant crime, murders, and rapes. Raping children you say? Murdering little girls at a Taylor Swift party, you say? Tosh. That’s just the exuberance of our new neighbors. Embrace them, their “culture.” Or be imprisoned. With the King’s approving nod and gentle girly hand wave.
Keir Starmer has the full support of King Charles to crack down on speech. England is toast. pic.twitter.com/gfqK7jNUBT
— Ian Miles Cheong (@stillgray) August 10, 2024
The King has praised ordinary Brits who rose up against far-right hate in the wake of the Southport stabbings, praising the way in which ‘the aggression and criminality from a few’ had been met by ‘the compassion and resilience of the many’.
King Charles spoke warmly of the ‘many examples of community spirit’ that have thwarted attempts to instil hate and fear in communities across Britain during a call with Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer tonight in the wake of the rioting.
He also spoke to police chiefs about the strain their officers have been under as more than 100 are thought to have been injured attempting to keep the peace amid hate riots stoked online by the far-right.
Hating those who slaughter tiny little girls at a party is wrong! We should not hate these people, in fact, hating them is a crime, a thought crime. Further, expressing that hate in peaceful protests is a violent act of terrorism. You will be imprisoned for noticing the slaughter of these children. Because we love our new neighbors who think slaughtering little girls is good.
Or something.
Everything is upside down now. What is good is bad, and what is bad, evil, is now good. This can’t end well.
This thread is likely illegal in the UK, and you may be arrested for sharing it.https://t.co/BlUBLF4GDK
— Liza Rosen (@LizaRosen0000) August 10, 2024
The Daily Mail continues:
The Palace spokesperson continued: ‘This evening The King held a phone audience with the Prime Minister, and additionally had a joint call with the Chair of the National Police Chiefs’ Council, Chief Constable Gavin Stephens, and UK Gold Commander Ben Harrington, Chief Constable of Essex.
‘In these calls, His Majesty was updated on the current situation and expressed his heartfelt thanks to the police and emergency services for all they are doing to restore peace in those areas that have been affected by violent disorder.
‘Additionally, The King shared how he had been greatly encouraged by the many examples of community spirit that had countered the aggression and criminality from a few with the compassion and resilience of the many.
‘It remains His Majesty’s hope that shared values of mutual respect and understanding will continue to strengthen and unite the nation.’
Ah, that mutual respect and understanding that has two-tier Kier locking up native Brits who dared to “like” a post on Facebook? I have no words.
UK Update: You will be imprisoned if you even look at the rioters
Demonstrating is a human right and fundamental to a democracy
The Labour Party is now running a totalitarian regime #FreeUK https://t.co/KU2djYM96Y
— Lisa (@Lisa9Sophia) August 10, 2024
And apparently doing so with the support of the King. Surreal.
[Featured image via YouTube]
DONATE
Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.
Comments
Charles is kind of slow-witted, so please don’t hold this against him. He’s doing the best he can. #Falseking.
One would think he would have picked up a few pointers from QE2 ….obviously not. That said, major gun control evolved from two issues….The Irish Problem and the greater concern of communist overthrow of the monarchy after WWII. No government gives the people the knowledge and means to overthrow it. Islam now has a lock on UK…. A king one day and a sultan the next.
Nope, there is a reason he is and has been kept pretty much out of the public eye. He is a spoiled princeling with the political acumen of a Fence Post and not terribly bright.
He can not hold a candle to his Mother and I think she realized that early in his life and then he cemented it with his behavior throughout the years. Frankly I am surprised she didn’t remove him from the line of succession when he married Camilla (which is exactly what should have happened).
Here is what happened. They opened the bubble they keep him in and said bad people were rioting and the police was handling the situation and the evil doers were being arrested.
So his statement makes sense. Then they immediately closed the bubble and told him to go play with his toys so he doesn’t do something that will let the general public know that he is only King because it is his turn and they are just waiting on him to kick it so they can get William the Crown.
“slow-witted”, so is that due to inbreeding, or just an outlier?
Want to end the monarchy? This sort of thing will bring it about.
The monarchy relies on the British people’s support to survive. Give them a reason to remove that support and the monarchy is finished.
Charles I lost his head, will Charles III lose his monarchy?
Now that would be entertainment.
Muslims will end Britton’s monarchy.
It’s people like Charles who give effete, inbred buffoons a bad name.
Labour won in a landslide. They’ll be there for another 5 years. The riots were the last gasps of a dying democracy.
Bloody good reporting, Ms. Slippers.
I’m present King Charles as Exhibit One in the case for inbreeding. Somewhere, how long ago, can’t say,
Inbreeding was common with the ruling class, not just the UK. Now they have Is Meghan Markle, most certainly not a good addition to their gene pool.
Being British means you are the enemy now. Maybe y’all shouldn’t have given up your guns. Goo luck to y’all.
During WW2 numerous countries were manufacturing guns, I wound if that is now a lost art.
@Lisa9Sophia had her post removed.
According to Wilson Law, @tehterminator,
Australia’s new surveillance laws can now modify social media posts.
Not surprising in a country that has no tradition or laws protecting the freedom of speech and expression. Oh, they talk a good game about it but when push comes to shove it all goes out the window and the
citizenssubjects end up in prison for a very long time for their wrongthink and thoughtcrimes.The reason we have freedom of speach was Brittions example.
Charles is a fool and his son Harry is worse.
The worse part of England falling is the Muslims will pick up the pieces along with the nukes that Great Brirain posseses.
British monarchs used to order heretics be burnt at the stake or beheaded. At least they aren’t there….yet.
Their Muslims will feel entitled to do either.
Some of the first Brits arrested in the social media crackdown were sentenced late last week, several of them with sentences longer than 20-months.
Also last week, two young ‘immigrants’ who were convicted of murdering a 14-year old white boy and initially receiving laughably short sentences of 9-years and 2-years respectively, were both released after serving only 6-months due to ‘overcrowding.’ They are literally emptying the prisons of murderous immigrants to make way for indigenous people who are sharing sarcastic memes on social media.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13713889/mother-teen-killed-machete-attack-killers-released.html
If they murdered mine, they wouldn’t last long on the street’s
They were not convicted of murdering anyone. They were convicted of manslaughter. It was a gang fight, and the victim was as guilty as these two.
Sad but doubt England will survive long with the Cultural Marxists at 10 Downing St and Windsor Castle.
Eventually it will come to Civil War, not much way around it except Brits are not armed so won’t end well.
Lucky for me I have been there and never going back
Oh there will still be a country and a state. Now it might be a caliphate instead of a Monarchy, but who knows.
If you really think so, then you should have denounced Farage and Reform when they decided to contest the election in order to take the Tories down. Everyone knew that if Reform did well then Labour would automatically win. The only way for the Tories to remain in office was for Reform’s support to collapse, and it didn’t.
I trust Farage; he’s a smart person, and if he thought five years of Labour was a price worth paying in order to force the Tories to reform, I’m willing to accept his word for it. We’ll see how it works out.
Gonna be an interesting few years for the UK as this current cultural crisis is resolved and one side emerges as the victor.
It’s already obvious who is the victor. Britain is a conquered country.
With France, Germany, Sweden and the Netherlands, to swiftly follow.
Make no mistake — what we’re witnessing is Islamic “holy war” via unfettered immigration and reproduction.
Except that the muslims aren’t even the ones doing it. It’s the suicidal Western nihilists who are forcing their own countries to be swallowed up by muslim hordes (and others). The muslims just seem to find themselves there, in huge numbers, and figured … “we’re here, let’s take it!”.
The abomination of desolation can’t be far behind
Well, the Muslims are most certainly affirmatively “doing it,” enabled and abetted by European leaders’ naivete, historical and theological ignorance, and, general stupidity. They’ve very shrewdly read the political situation in Europe, over decades, assessing and appraising the idiotic, self-debasing, emasculated, meek and obsequious dhimmitude of leaders such as frau Merkel, Macron, and many others.
The Muslim immigrants have adeptly exploited the situation, by playing the humanitarian and general victimhood card. They’re fleeing the intrinsic oppression, poverty and general misery that Islamic rule outside of the wealthy Arab Gulf states inevitably inflicts upon its populace, yet, they’re bringing to their new host states the same ideological pathologies, supremacism, totalitarianism and belligerence which caused societal dysfunction and impoverishment in their countries of origin.
Germany and Sweden are already gone. France and the Netherlands are rapidly headed in that direction. I fully expect to see Europe completely subjugated within ten years.
In the short term there’s no question that the open borders globalist wokiestas have the upper hand. Whether that holds true long term is less clear. Especially so when the anti Nationalist, anti Western, anti individual liberty philosophy underlying the globalist wokiesta policies become starkly clear as they are implemented. A regime threatening and in some cases following through on imprisonment of folks up for ‘wrong think’ remains abhorrent to most
people in any Western Nation. The real question is how hard are these folks willing to work to restore basic Western civic norms and what will the process look like if they rouse themselves to do it?
The history of England seems to heavily favor invaders.
Be ungovernable.
It will get worse before it gets worse.
I always knew when the Queen died, so would the Royal family
They are done
A great deal the the Royal Families political influence (their only real power), died with Elizabeth.
The Royal Family has no political influence at all. It’s not allowed to have any political influence, or to take sides in any way. As far as I know they’re not even allowed to vote. They have to be like American “journalists” used to pretend to be, but for real.
The way things are going in the U.K., Charles will soon be deposed by a self-anointed Caliph and his goose-stepping hordes of Muslim supremacist and Islamofascist foot-soldiers.
I’m not British, so this is really none of my concern … but Tower of London seems to be short one King, right now.
Great Britain is pretty much dead.
I see no reason to help defend Western North Korea [formerly the United Kingdom] anymore and would not be unhappy to see the US military and its equipment come home. Maybe to be stationed on our southern border. American tourists should avoid WNK, since they openly threaten to arrest Americans who exercise free speech from their own homes. And I would not be averse to letting any Brits encountered here know about how I feel.
I do have one question though. Is the Starmer regime and the Crown in negotiations with the Federal Republic of Germany to hire Hessian troops to use against the subjects of King?
Subotai Bahadur
Discarding a millennium of English heritage for WEF head pats.
Utterly disgraceful.
Charles has always been a problem. He should have called Starmer in and demanded to know what he was going to do about their little “migrant” problem. The public should have been reassured the government would take swift action against those who refuse to assimilate and obey the laws of the UK. Instead they’ve turned perpetrators into victims and the masses have decided they’ve had enough.
For all you or I know he may indeed have had such a conversation with Starmer, but he can’t give Starmer orders; Starmer gives him orders, though it’s called “advice”. Advice that he is constitutionally required to accept and act on, no matter how he feels about it.
This post is very ill-informed, because it ignores the fact that the King can act only on his ministers’ advice. He is not allowed to publicly express his own opinions, if he has any; he can only express them to the PM in private. His statement is based on the information and talking points he was given by the government, was made on the government’s advice, and the government likely approved the text before it was released. We can only guess how much he actually knows, or what he actually thinks of it.
Sometimes you can’t stand by and watch. There are hills you should be willing to die on.
He can’t express his own opinions in public. No matter what. That is his job, for which his mother trained him from childhood. He is required to do exactly as his government advises him, and never to contradict them or let it be known that there is any daylight between him and them.
His mother would have made the exact same statement, regardless of what she might have been telling the government in private.
His mother would have had the balls to tell Herr Sturmer what her statement was going to be.
So you want to have it both ways, Milhouse. The King has no sway at all and therefore doesn’t comment on politics, and when he does specifically do so, it’s meaningless because he’s “not allowed” to do so? Even though he clearly did?
The only reason this was released was to assure his subjects (they are no longer citizens, obviously) that it’s all for the best and the King, himself, approves of it. This is politics, Milhouse, and you have to know it; you can’t be this obtuse. WHY have anything come from Charles at all if it is not intended to sway public opinion? Good grief.
No, it isn’t politics. It’s about law and order, and not deliberately burning down hotels full of people. There’s unrest, so it’s his job to call for calm. That’s not political, it’s what all parties would expect him to do.
The government would have given his people talking points, his people would have carefully gone over it to avoid anything political, and then the government would have approved the final text.
You seem not to understand the UK’s constitution, and how the monarchy works. Look at how the Queen acted her whole life; this is exactly how. If she were alive, she would have issued the same statement, because it would be the same government and the same actors.
I do not think the Queen would have issued this statement or allowed it to be issued in her name; indeed, I think she would be appalled by what is happening and would be privately pressuring the lunatic PM to get a grip. Publicly standing by the tyrants who are locking up native Brits for liking a post on Facebook is so far beyond the pale. Might the Queen have not commented at all? I think this is more likely than taking a stand against her own people. And yes, Milhouse, taking such a stand IS political. We will have to agree to disagree, Milhouse.
YOU, Milhouse, have no idea how the UK works.
Or how many things work.
But that doesn’t seem to stop you prattling on, minglessly, uttering the most demoralizing statements you can while still appearing as if you’re just barely on the side of reason.
Reminds me of when there was the government shutdown and Barky closed all of the lookout points in the national parks and threatened to arrest/fine anyone “looking” from them. That was at the same time that Barky spent EXTRA money to close down open-air war memorials. How Barky got away with these things .. I’ll never know.
Good Germans like fascistic government
3 social media posts that will now get you arrested in Britain:
“God Save the Queen!”: It’s Allah save the Queen, you Islamophobe.
”I would prefer my young daughter not be stabbed by an Islamic terrorist.”: Keep your bigotry to yourself.
”I’m Anglican, I don’t want to wear a burqa and bow to Mecca.”: Will the xenophobia never end?
Will no one rid Britain of this thick-witted monarch?
The King is not the problem; and if he were gone William would be required to do exactly the same.
The problem is the government, which was just elected with a huge majority because Nigel Farage decided that it was worth having five years of Labour in order to make the Tories see reality, and enough voters agreed with him that it had to be done. This was a tradeoff that Farage and his voters made with open eyes. They knew exactly what they were doing, and what the price would be, and decided to pay it on behalf of the entire UK. We will see over the next five years whether it pays off, whether the benefit will outweigh the cost.
Remember, without Reform in the mix the Tories would probably have won the election, Sunak would still be PM, and he would probably be doing much the same as Starmer is now doing.
If Tory voters + Reform voters = electoral victory over Labour then an equally viable alternative view of the election would be that the Tories not Reform should have stood down their candidates instead. IMO many if not most of the Reform voters may have joined the significant number of other ‘conservative’ voters who stayed home had Reform not fielded candidates.
This is the eternal conundrum, when the party supposedly on your side is a disaster, but if you challenge it the other party will win, and that will be an even bigger disaster. Usually you have to grit your teeth and vote for the lesser of two evils. But sometimes things get to the point where the only chance at it ever getting better is to deliberately let the greater evil win in order to force the lesser evil to improve. That is the decision Farage took, and I tentatively think that it was the right one. Because the Sunak government was just Labour Lite.
While he’s limited in some ways, he can do some things. At least not be part of the problem. A man of brains and principles could make a difference, in spite of limitations on the monarch. At the very least, Notice things.