No, Border Czar Kamala Harris, You Don’t Support Increasing the Number of Border Agents
I’m laughing so hard. The gaslighting is unbelievable.
I guess presumptive Democratic presidential nominee Kamala Harris is the border czar again because she’s been so tough on the border.
She plans to stay tough on the border.
I cannot stop laughing. So many lies, especially since she wanted then-President Donald Trump to cut funding to hire more Border Patrol agents.
What a liar.
This new Kamala Harris ad claims she “supports increasing the number of Border Patrol agents.”
However, In 2018, Harris signed on to a letter to Senate colleagues urging them to reject a request by the Trump admin to fund more BP agents.
Letter link: https://t.co/q9Fb3gpDrV https://t.co/xBOnL3BWTe— Bill Melugin (@BillMelugin_) July 30, 2024
DONATE
Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.
Comments
defund the government
of course we are $35 trillion to late
but start now
lying by the msm is in fact
stealing the election
That’s standard operating procedure for Fascists.
Perhaps Speaker Johnson should start taking these newly discovered moderate positions of the Vice President and writing bills to enact them. If even a few dems join their party standard bearer in supporting these positions, they could be signed into law before Labor Day.
The House has had a border bill sitting at the Senate since the beginning of the term. It was one of the first things the new Congress did.
Well … Traitor Joe and his junta has constantly called for more “border agents”, but the key is that they don’t want border agents to enforce the border. They want more “border agents” to do paperwork to increase the flow of illegals into the country through supercharged processing.
It has driven me up a wall as the left has disingenuously been wailing (ever since the treasonous retards McConnel and Lankford colluded with the America-hating dems) that they wanted a bill to “fund the border” and most conservatives decline to mention what the left means by “fund the border”. What they mean is “increase processing to raise the flow of illegals into America). Conservatives should pound this home every single time some dirtbag claims that Traitor Joe and his junta want to “fund the border”.
Also, I don’t like the metric of “border encounters” as a measurement of the state of the system. It isn’t “encounters” that are most important. Encounters can end up with detention and then deportation. It is RELEASES that is the important metric. How many illegals are released into America. THAT IS THE IMPORTANT FIGURE. We could have 8 billion encounters at the border, but if none of them are released into America it is fine. One release on one encounter is worse than zero releases on 8 billion encounters.
Any idiot can see that some campaign weenie Photoshopped the word “supports” over the “opposes” that used to be there.
It’s a woman’s prerogative to change her mind. I wouldn’t laugh too hard because Kamala might have the last cackling
laugh. In today’s WSJ Holman Jenkins outlines Trump’s peril and JD Vance told staff members that the Harris switcheroo was a campaign sucker punch. All of these Kamala “revelations’ are preaching
to the choir. The people who are wary
of Trump and predisposed to like Kamala are not known for their superior mentation skills.
as we have talked about before
america is once again at a crossroads
the depth of which will literally bankrupt the usa via a lefty economic agenda that even a gop will support to make themselves popular ( yeah Im look at djt )
should the women vote win
well than the above is the natural move towards communism
as the socialist economic link is and will be fully entrenced into our society
facts have to be faced
The Ds think our immigration system is “broken” because there actually is an orderly process for immigration.
That is not acceptable, so they want it destroyed. That’s what they’ve been doing for the past umpteen years.
That’s what they mean when they say “fix our broken immigration system.”
Kamala sure is good at lying with a strait face. She has a lazy streak.
I don’t know which offends me more: the obvious contempt the Democrats have for the intelligence of the electorate, or the fact that in roughly half the cases that contempt is entirely justified.