Image 01 Image 03

Lawsuit: UCLA Facilitated “Jew Exclusion Zone” Blocking Access To Heart of Campus

Lawsuit: UCLA Facilitated “Jew Exclusion Zone” Blocking Access To Heart of Campus

Complaint: To enter the Jew Exclusion Zone, students had to disavow Israel and get approval from the pro-Hamas activists in the encampment.

This spring, we watched with disgust as radical anti-Israel protesters set up camp and wreaked havoc at one elite university after another. They made life miserable not only for Jewish students, but for everyone else on campus: Classes were forced online, graduation ceremonies were canceled. At Columbia, even the janitors couldn’t escape the mob of  “smarmy, sort of entitled, spoiled, bratty occupiers.”

It was frustrating to see these once-esteemed institutions descend into chaos while school administrators sat on their hands.

UCLA was one of the worst offenders. For days on end, the school stood by while its Jewish students were harassed, assaulted, and intimidated by pro-Hamas agitators camped out in a major thoroughfare on school grounds in late April. There was no response from “any kind of authority or law enforcement”:

 

The school leadership could have shut it all down on day one but refused to take responsibility.

But now, finally, in a hard-hitting lawsuit filed by Becket Law and superstar lawyers Paul D. Clement and Erin E. Murphy, three Jewish students are asking a federal court to hold UCLA to account. Their complaint alleges a barrage of constitutional and civil rights violations by the school administrators.

Months before the encampments started, the school signaled its willingness to accede to the pro-Hamas agitators, according to the lawsuit. It was already clear on October 8 that, rather than elicit sympathy, the barbaric attack in southern Israel the day before unleashed rabid, pent-up Jew hatred at UCLA, as on other college campuses. And at UCLA, the school did nothing to stop it, the complaint says:

Instead, UCLA officials routinely turned their backs on Jewish students, aiding and abetting a culture that has allowed calls for the annihilation of the Jewish people, Nazi symbolism, and religious slurs to go unchecked.

Things went from bad to worse after anti-Israel activists set up an encampment at Columbia University on April 17, 2024. As if on cue, students and outside agitators at other elite schools, including UCLA, set up their own copycat “tentifadas.”

On April 25th, the lawsuit says, UCLA allowed activists to set up an encampment with metal barricades in the center of campus where protesters chanted antisemitic threats like “death to the Jews,” “death to Israel,” and “intifada revolution.”

UCLA’s tolerance emboldened the pro-Hamas mob even further, according to the complaint. With the school looking on, and even facilitating them, the activists created a “Jew Exclusion Zone” that effectively barred both students and faculty from going to their classes, offices, and the library.

To get by the encampment, you had to pass a loyalty test—and disavow Israel—the complaint says:

To enter the Jew Exclusion Zone, a person had to make a statement pledging their allegiance to the activists’ views and have someone within the encampment “vouch” for the individual’s fidelity to the activists’ cause.  … [T]he practical effect was to deny the overwhelming majority of Jews access to the heart of the campus.

And yet, the school directed campus security not to intervene. Instead, they became part of the problem, according to the lawsuit:

Campus security staff, acting as agents of Defendants, directed students away from the encampment and, in some cases, stated that they needed permission from the activists to access the encampment, essentially acting as force multipliers to the activists manning the barricades.

The complaint says the school did not step in until violence escalated between the encampment and counter-protesters. Even then, it allowed the encampment to stay in place for days.

The Jewish students—two in the law school and one undergraduate—describe how UCLA’s refusal to remove the faculty-supported, school-facilitated “Jew Exclusion Zone” made it impossible for them to study, go to class, or simply meet with friends on campus.

As one of the law students put it, that’s not what they came to UCLA for:

I chose to attend this university to receive an education. If I had known I would be faced with extreme antisemitism on a daily basis, I would have committed elsewhere. I have not been able to sit in class and learn for the past 34 days, especially when these students sit behind me in my classes four days a week with their Palestinian resistance/terrorist scarves (and only seconds before class is to begin, they are chanting for the genocide of my people).

The students are asking the court to declare that UCLA violated their constitutional rights under the First and Fourteenth Amendments and the California Constitution; and their statutory civil rights under Title VI, Sections 1983, 1985, and 1986 of the Ku Klux Klan Act, the California Education Code, the Ralph Civil Rights Act of 1976, and the Tom Bane Civil Rights Act. And they request an injunction to prohibit the school from doing so again.

“If masked agitators had excluded any other marginalized group at UCLA, Governor Newsom rightly would have sent in the National Guard immediately,” said Becket President Mark Rienzi in a statement. “But UCLA instead caved to the antisemitic activists and allowed its Jewish students to be segregated from the heart of their own campus.”

DONATE

Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.

Comments

The Gentle Grizzly | June 7, 2024 at 1:32 pm

To which I respond, “get out of my way or I’ll break your fingers one by one”.

henrybowman | June 7, 2024 at 1:35 pm

CHAZ II.

JohnSmith100 | June 7, 2024 at 1:54 pm

There should be eyewatering damages, expulsion of students, and deportations..

Stop allowing students from problem countries.

    Subotai Bahadur in reply to JohnSmith100. | June 7, 2024 at 6:08 pm

    You have more faith in their legal system than I do. UCLA is in the Peoples’ Democrat Republic of Alta California. As such they view both the Constitution and the Law to be optional for the political convenience of officialdom.

    Subotai Bahadur

The antisemites always want to separate us into “good Jew” and “bad Jew” so they can shield themselves With a few token weirdos who don’t represent that overwhelming majority of us. Then they can say no I don’t hate Jews just Zionist’s and act like that doesn’t include 95% of Jews. The idea that 95% of any group can agree on anything is incredible. So it needs to be well understood that when you say Zionist you mean Jew, and you all but a handful of us. There will dumb people in every group that tokenize themselves and Jews are no exemption to that . But you’ll notice these token Jews scream loud but have real power or influence on us as a group and by and large most Jews like themself find them to be repellent and pitiable at best.

For years under Chancellor Gene Block, Jewish students have been subjected to anti-Semitic harassment. Block is retiring July 1, but he should be fired. Hopefully, more lawsuits will follow because there are so many universities guilty of the same thing.

In addition, Students for Justice in Palestine (SJP) should be permanently barred from every campus and be investigated by DOJ. This is really a nationwide conspiracy to deprive Jews on campus of their civil rights. That is a crime.

This is so nauseating and contemptible to read about. And, make no mistake — the vile and evil Dhimmi-crat Party and its self-congratulatory, narcissistic standard-bearers — crime boss, Biden, narcissist-incompetent-dunce, Obama, and, others — are totally complicit in this decades-long escalation of and enabling of Islamofascist and Muslim supremacist Jew-hate and brazenly dishonest propaganda slanders and vilification of Israel.

Schoolkids are being indoctrinated by Dhimmi-crat “teachers” to hate Jews and Israel, using revisionist and mendacious propaganda that is Nazi-level in its brazen dishonesty, bias and evil. Read this, if you can stomach it:

https://www.city-journal.org/article/in-portland-the-intifada-begins-in-kindergarten

Does UCLA actually endorse HAMAS or merely succumbs to the heckler’s veto?

“For years under Chancellor Gene Block, Jewish students have been subjected to anti-Semitic harassment.”
****
Dr. Block is the grandson of Eastern European Jewish immigrants. He is a psychologist who obviously has some serious issues with his religious/ethnic heritage.

    Dimsdale in reply to SHV. | June 7, 2024 at 4:02 pm

    So he is a self hating Jew? Worse than despicable.

    DaveGinOly in reply to SHV. | June 7, 2024 at 9:24 pm

    “He is a psychologist who obviously has some serious issues.”

    You could have left it at that. Most do.

BigRosieGreenbaum | June 7, 2024 at 2:47 pm

I guess I would be in trouble for a hate crime against some of those Pali students. And they would have new nicknames: Lefty, One Eye, Slow Achmed.

stevewhitemd | June 7, 2024 at 2:49 pm

It’s been demonstrated elsewhere that one reliable way for the community to force the police to deal with the troublemakers at these encampments is —

— get ready —

— a modest application of violence.

Yes, violence. If a group of Jewish students attempt to walk past and are stopped by the Stasi enforcers, the police will do absolutely nothing.

But if the Jewish students then brandish axe-handles and start to force their way through, the police will immediately respond to separate the two groups and (usually) allow the Jewish students through.

With regret, this is what it is going to take. You only have the rights for which you are willing to fight to keep. The Jewish students at UCLA, and elsewhere, need to start fighting.

    JohnSmith100 in reply to stevewhitemd. | June 7, 2024 at 3:18 pm

    2′ of quarter inch chain might be better and it will fit in a pocket, put a bolt through the last link.

      DaveGinOly in reply to JohnSmith100. | June 7, 2024 at 9:26 pm

      A padlock.

      Officer: What is that you have there?
      Jewish student: This? Oh, that’s my bike chain and lock.
      Officer: I see. Move along.

    Subotai Bahadur in reply to stevewhitemd. | June 7, 2024 at 6:19 pm

    I agree with one caveat. “. . . the police will immediately respond to separate the two groups and (usually) allow the Jewish students through.”

    It will be more complex than that. I expect the police, especially if University Police, to arrest and charge the Jewish students for whatever they can. And probably at first to look the other way as the pro-Palestinians attack the Jews. The rule of law is based on the exclusive power of the state to use force to enforce the law on all. When the state will not enforce the law equitably, things degenerate to the point where superiority in the application of force is the determinant. That is the game that the pro-Palestinians and the Leftists running California are playing deliberately.

    Subotai Bahadur

      DaveGinOly in reply to Subotai Bahadur. | June 7, 2024 at 9:27 pm

      “So much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don’t even know that fire is hot.”
      George Orwell

Ann in L.A. | June 7, 2024 at 3:11 pm

Across the country this was incredibly preventable, especially among schools which had encampments spring up after some of the initial ones–they had advanced warning.

All it would have taken was a statement from the school emphasizing the right to free speech, with clear delineations against harassment and disruption. The SCOTUS is clear that even public universities have a right to protect their campus from disruption when it interferes with their stated purpose: education. Likewise, they have a Title VI obligation to prevent harassment of protected groups, including groups defined by nationality and religion.

There also should have been clear lines drawn about the consequences, and those should have been strong: you will not finish this semester for serious infractions and you will never get a degree from this institution for severe infractions.

Then a following through on the rules. If there was disruption, the schools should have moved to shut things down, whether it was noise or blockages, or whether encampments were allowed at all. Arrests, suspensions, and expulsions in accordance with the rules laid down in advance.

The ultimate problem was that the administration of these schools *agreed* with these students, are themselves overwhelmingly anti-Jew, and behind closed doors supported the demonstrations. Protests they agree with are encouraged, regardless of the disruption or harassment they entail; while protests they disagree with would have been suppressed within an hour. If this had been an anti-globalization protest, a pro-Trump protest, or an anti-big government protest, it would never have been allowed, and everyone knows that.

    Dimsdale in reply to Ann in L.A.. | June 7, 2024 at 4:04 pm

    “All it would have taken was a statement from the school emphasizing the right to free speech, with clear delineations against harassment and disruption.”

    But then what would the lefties do without their harassment and violence??