Image 01 Image 03

Napa Valley’s Famous Wineries Revolt Against Eco-Activist Bureaucrats

Napa Valley’s Famous Wineries Revolt Against Eco-Activist Bureaucrats

Meanwhile, there is a secretive FBI probe targeting Napa Valley vineyard owners, while eco- extremist taunts vintner with property burning.

There are signs that California is slowly waking up from its zombie-like stupor of mindlessly voting in Democrats.

For example, in deep blue San Francisco, voters are going right due to rampant crime in the area.

Now, Napa Valley’s famous wineries are revolting against eco-activist bureaucrats who are strangling their vineyards with climate cultism and red tape.

The wineries have one advantage over many people who are also being hurt by pseudoscience-spewing ninnies: They are rich enough to launch a lawfare campaign.

Wealthy vintners say they are being ‘crushed’ by ‘gross regulatory overreach’, which has included penalizing wineries for planting trees, making jam and conducting wine tastings on their own land.

One vineyard was even fined $1million for making too much wine.

There are fears that officials are cowing to ‘eco-mob extremists’, who view unfettered growth as a threat to their rural idyll.

But the grape growers behind Napa’s multibillion dollar industry are now fighting back, with a raft of lawsuits now pending against the county.

One example of the legal cases being brought against excessive regulatory overreach that is stopping him from developing an experimental hillside vineyard, which is due to be heard in November.

What the county officials assert and the realities on the ground appear to be 2 different things.

The case began in 2022 when Hundred Acre Jayson Woodbridge filed a lawsuit in Napa County Superior Court against Napa County alleging governmental overreach and deprivation of property rights.

One issue was the removal of burned trees and stumps from the destructive 2020 Glass Fire which “utterly” destroyed 80 acres of Woodbridge’s 113 acres and the development of a dry-farmed vineyard, according to the complaint.

A county official estimated 5 to 7 acres of steep land had been cleared and staked in 2022 for the vineyard, according to a court filing. The official also reported that earth moving activities had taken place within required setbacks of ephemeral streams, according to the declaration.

The site at 2355 Pickett Road was red tagged in June 2022, according to court records.

Napa County officials said erosion control plans are required for vineyard developments on slopes more than 5 percent and other permits are needed for development on slopes more than 30 percent or within stream setbacks, according to court filings.

In its lawsuit, however, Hundred Acre alleged Napa County would force him to replant the site with the same “high-fire-risk” trees that fueled wildfires in 2017 and 2020 instead of the dry-farmed vineyard.

Hundred Acre said there was no “earthmoving activity,” no living vegetation clearing, or soil grading, compaction or excavation; no permits were required, according to court filings. .

Fun fact: Jayson Woodbridge’s Hundred Acre Vineyard has produced 100-point-scoring wines over the past two decades.

Interestingly, the FBI recently subpoenaed Napa County, requesting records relating to as many as 40 high-profile vintners and their wineries. The agency also demanded the county’s Farm Bureau, a fierce champion of the local wine industry, hand over documents to the US Department of Justice.

It appears that a war between the wineries and the eco-extremists in government is heating up, and the FBI has set its sights on Woodbridge and other big names in the wine industry.

…The inventory of luminaries rolls on: Robin Baggett, a former general counsel for the Golden State Warriors, and his Alpha Omega Winery. Dave Phinney, whose “Prisoner” label changed the industry. Grant Long Jr. and his wineries Aonair and Reverie II. Jayson Woodbridge and Hundred Acre. Darioush Khaledi and his namesake winery. And on it goes — 40 people and businesses in total, including Napa’s exclusive Meritage Resort and Spa.

The subpoena seeking records on the wineries and their owners, dated Dec. 14, 2023, is filed under the name of Patrick Robbins, first assistant U.S. attorney for the Northern District of California. It also references an FBI agent, Katherine Ferrato, who has experience working on complex financial crimes.

…Baggett, of Alpha Omega, said his operations had “nothing pending” before the county and therefore “zero” documents that would have been turned over. He said it has been “a big waste of time daily explaining that we have done nothing wrong.”

Baggett dismissed the probe as a “fishing expedition” or worse, adding: “I hope it’s not a political witch hunt.”

Like several people interviewed, Baggett speculated that one person of interest could be Napa County Supervisor Alfredo Pedroza, who has generated ire among local environmental activists because he is perceived as pro-agriculture, which in Napa Valley almost always means pro-winery.

I wish the wineries much luck, as they are struggling against the cultists.

David DiCesaris spent several years and $2 million clearing a stringent environmental check, known as an erosion control plan (ECP), for their project to clear about 30 acres to build a new vineyard. The plan had initially been approved but was then denied after an appeal from the Center for Biological Diversity.

The UK Daily Mail interviewed one of the vintners, who said one of the green justice warriors wanted his property to burn.

David DiCesaris told DailyMail.com that he had been caught in the midst of a ‘political firestorm’ and that the decision marked a ‘turning of the tide’ against Napa wineries.

He claimed he had been ‘personally attacked’ over the project, with threatening notes slipped under his doorstep telling him, in no uncertain terms, that he and his vineyard were not welcome.

When he tried to explain the fire mitigation benefits of his proposed winery, he says a neighbor told him: ‘I would rather see your property burn than see a vineyard on it.’

Some eco-extremists even drove around his property on a dirt bike, churning up his turf, he alleged.

‘It was all kinds of nasty stuff,’ he said. ‘All I wanted to do was put a vineyard on agricultural land.

The threat being made is very troubling, given how many wildfires are started by arsonists.

The California wine industry is justifiably famous. In honor of this, I would like to share this video of one of my favorite movies with the wonderful Alan Rickman: Bottle Shock. It tells the story of the 1976 competition of California wines against the French before Napa Valley became famous.

Who knew the “good old days” would be so recent?

DONATE

Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.

Comments

henrybowman | May 1, 2024 at 5:13 pm

“Napa Vappy”??

Qualified Immunity needs to be more easily pierced.

This article named two government people but none of the government “eco terrorists” working for the government.

I have family that are Law Enforcement Officers. So this isn’t hatred for ALL of them. But making up stuff, costing someone pain and financial pain and then saying oopsie or having taxpayers pick up the tab is not enough.

    CommoChief in reply to 1073. | May 1, 2024 at 9:45 pm

    Indeed it isn’t. IMO, when claims of quality immunity are raised there needs to be a distinction between individual acts (both + and -)
    1. Acts that followed the policies of their agency/govt
    2. Acts that violated the policies of their agency/govt
    3. Acts by individuals who set/make policy

    If some LEO or county code enforcement guy is following the written policies then fine he has immunity BUT where the policy in question is a violation of individual liberty or exceeds the authority delegated to the political subdivision by the Legislature then the govt should be on the hook AND very importantly also the individual who misused their authority to create or allow a policy that violated the authority delegated or the liberty of Citizens.

    The answer, IMO, is basically to force individuals/govt entities to carry E&O insurance and then when some LEO keeps using excessive force or making illegal detentions (this happens often) then gets sued…the Insurance Co steps in and probably settles then raises the rate for that particular LEO and will also want to see policy changes and training implemented by that agency to mitigate future repetition. If those don’t happen the carrier will properly drop coverage. Ultimately this will create a financial incentive to stop bad actors who misuse authority.

    mailman in reply to 1073. | May 2, 2024 at 2:12 am

    If the President of the United States of America cannot have immunity from malicious prosecution then why the fuck should these clowns be protected from facing the consequences of their actions?

Gavin Newsom and The French Laundry need to file an amicus brief.

    geronl in reply to alaskabob. | May 1, 2024 at 6:31 pm

    All of these winemakers should not sell anything to the French Laundry

      TargaGTS in reply to geronl. | May 1, 2024 at 10:19 pm

      Newsom doesn’t own the French Laundry. He just likes to eat there. I can’t blame him. I’ve been there twice…and it was great. Thomas Keller owns the restaurant. About a decade ago, it was robbed. I believe they only took wine. But, the value of the theft was comfortably in the six-figures…it might have been seven-figures. I can’t remember.

    herm2416 in reply to alaskabob. | May 2, 2024 at 7:32 am

    He owns Plumpjack Winery, not the restaurant.

Camperfixer | May 1, 2024 at 6:17 pm

The Left destroys everything it touches…even top shelf wineries, and for no good reason (altho the Left will always have a lot of reasons they define as good in their tortured brains). 2 million for some stupid study for 30 acres of land? Asinine beyond the pale. Cui bono?…someone does.

That portion of California needs to secede as lawless regulation will only further amp up.

JohnSmith100 | May 1, 2024 at 6:30 pm

Right to farm laws often protect farmers from a lot of the bullshit. For example, they allowed me to blow off most restrictions related to wetlands, which I dredged and made ponds for both fish and irrigation water. I processed muck, peat and marrow into top soil as part of a nursery for conifer’s. I did not have to put with erosion control by the state. Now the property is highly desirable for development.

And here come the FBI? The Gestapo. The national police force America never had, or wanted, or contemplated in our constitution? Time to disarm the FBI and return it to its role as a forensics consultant to lawful local law enforcement.

    Gosport in reply to sfharding. | May 1, 2024 at 8:12 pm

    That was my first thought as well when I read the FBI was involved. WTF are they doing there? What national/constitutional interest is involved?

    The mission of the FBI is to protect the American people and uphold the Constitution of the United States. – FBI Mission Statement 2023

    I can find nothing in the FBI mission and priorities page that is remotely related to the issues described in this article. https://www.fbi.gov/about/mission

Grow the wine in Texas

Nice neighbor you got there

Be a shame if something happened to HIS property one day…

I live about 15 mins from Meritage. 35 minutes on Saturdays. Unfortunately, I am not seeing any sign that Californians are waking up from their stupor. There needs to be so much more shared pain before I expect to see any positive changes. I would like to move but deep family roots keep us here. Someday, maybe. Until then I just keep my politics to myself and pray I am not robbed at the ATM and my car windows are not broken when I come out of grocery store.

Tsquared79 | May 1, 2024 at 9:20 pm

Paso Robles is for wine, NAPA is for auto parts.

thalesofmiletus | May 1, 2024 at 11:00 pm

Ah, the War on Vino-tourism. The Left sure knows how to slaughter a golden goose.

Doesn’t Newsom own a vineyard? Maybe they should go attack that one.

    MoeHowardwasright in reply to Ironclaw. | May 2, 2024 at 6:42 am

    No he doesn’t, but the Pelosi’s do. Some of, if not the best vineyards in Napa. They lease it out to several wineries. Now if some other owners were making better wine using hillside techniques, well her land might lose a bit of its luster. I wouldn’t put anything past that creature from the crypt. FJB

    herm2416 in reply to Ironclaw. | May 2, 2024 at 7:35 am

    Plumpjack, named after the pumpjacks of old. He added the L.

“ephemeral stream” = not a stream.

In case anyone didn’t remember, Meritage is a Trump brand name.

    artichoke in reply to artichoke. | May 2, 2024 at 8:25 am

    Trump invests in land. Vineyards, golf courses, ways of holding land until it goes up in value. Parking lots are another although I don’t know of any parking lots he owns.

    The existing land owners don’t like the upstart, and they don’t like him even more since he presumed to get into policymaking.

I bet the Pelosi vineyards are not having any problems.

Capitalist-Dad | May 2, 2024 at 10:52 am

Looks like the FBI’s role is to help it solidify its reputation as the Democrat Party Stasi.

BierceAmbrose | May 2, 2024 at 5:22 pm

First they came for the appliances…
Then they came for the truckers…
Then they came for the farmers…

Then, when they came for the winemakers, who was left…