Trump Georgia Case: Nathan Wade’s Divorce Attorney Contradicts Himself Regarding Start of Wade-Willis Relationship
At first, Terrance Bradley was absolutely sure Willis and Wade started their relationship before 2022. But under oath he said he was speculating. WEIRD.
Terrance Bradley, the former law partner and divorce attorney for Nathan Wade, contradicted himself on the stand on Tuesday regarding the start of the relationship between the special prosecutor and Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis.
The details are important because if Wade and Willis started their relationship before Willis indicted former President Donald Trump and she appointed Wade as special prosecutor, it could be a conflict of interest.
Bradley, when pressed under oath, said he couldn’t recall several details and timelines about conversations he had with former client Nathan Wade about Wade’s romantic relationship with Fani Willis.
Defense attorney Ashleigh Merchant at one point referenced text messages between her and Bradley in which she had asked Bradley if he thought the relationship started before Willis hired Wade in 2021. Bradley responded “absolutely” in the text exchange.
But in court Tuesday, Bradley said he was “speculating” in those comments.
Why the change? Bradley wouldn’t say:
Attorney Richard Rice later asked Bradley if he makes a habit of passing on “lies about your friends.”
“Do you tell lies about your friends? About a case of national importance?” Rice asked.
“I could have had, I don’t know,” Bradley responded.
Bradely [sic] said he couldn’t recall key details or specific information more than two dozen times in the roughly two-hour testimony in Fulton County Superior Court on Tuesday. He also said he had only ever discussed Wade’s relationship with Willis once with Wade.
Willis and Wade claimed they didn’t become romantic until 2022, which is after Willis indicted Trump and appointed Wade.
Willis kept losing her temper on the stand. She had a hard time answering questions with a simple yes or no.
A former friend and colleague of Willis said the two started the relationship in 2019.
Cell phone data contradicts Wade’s testimony that he didn’t go to Willis’s condo before the relationship started.
Now Bradley is changing his testimony. It’s all too fishy!
Witness in Fani Willis case comments on his knowledge of Fani’s relationship with Nathan Wade:
“I was speculating..” pic.twitter.com/RvI87E43s5
— Benny Johnson (@bennyjohnson) February 27, 2024
Terrence Bradley, Nathan Wade’s former law partner, testifies on Wade's relationship with Fulton County DA Fani Willis started. He says, "I never witnessed anything. It was speculation. I can't tell you anything specific, if that's what you're asking." pic.twitter.com/CX2DcDKDLk
— CSPAN (@cspan) February 27, 2024
Terrance Bradley is appearing nervous and having a ridiculous hard time remembering anything 😅… oh boy #faniwillis pic.twitter.com/MhAZlWFRtG
— boxingMD (@BoxingMD1) February 27, 2024
Terrance Bradley is a terrible witness and a huge liar
Based on him "not recalling " anything, I would never hire him as my attorney. #FaniWillis
— Kevin (@kevinpost) February 27, 2024
"I don't know why I said I didn't know"
-Terrance Bradley pic.twitter.com/hp2723ArTG
— Sara Rose 🇺🇸🌹 (@saras76) February 27, 2024
DONATE
Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.
Comments
Someone is under pressure.
“I speculated” has a tad more highfalutin-ness to it than “I misremember.”
Maybe this bro got some white privilege lessons before testifying.
“DANG!”
Weird? Hardly… there is an 800lb gorilla in that courtroom. Seems to me he was either paid off, threatened or both. But that never happens, amirite.?
See my contemporaneous post below….lol
We watched this at work (slow day yesterday) and we all came to the conclusion that this is the behavior of someone who has been threatened or intimidated. We can’t think of any other explanation for him to contradict his own text messages and sweating so profusely.
Maybe he’s just a stupid liar who got caught because his lies were stupid?
Or will get caught now because these lies are stupider.
The coverup always exceeds the crime.
someone who has been threatened or intimidated
For all the lawyers and lawyer-adjacent here:
Can one side’s lawyer ask the question, “Have you been intimidated or threatened over this issue in the last 30 days?”
They probably could but if he has been, he’s going to lie about that also
Mary, here’s what might have gone on in the Willis-Wade relationship. Wade said he had cancer. I will assume it was prostate cancer. I will assume that hormone therapy was part of the treatment, which meant he could not “get it up” for an extended period (thus Willis’ comment about not wanting to emasculate a black man,) I assume the effect of the hormone therapy wore off after November 2021, and, Boom, the relationship then really took off. So, yes, apparently they were in a relationship before November 2021, but it became truly intimate after November 2021.
“it became truly intimate after November 2021”
Then we get into the question of what is “truly intimate.”
I say it could be a sexually intimate relationship even if Wade were prostate cancer therapy inhibited from having an erection.
Merriam Webster: sexual: of, relating to, or associated with sex or the sexes
These two guys have always viewed themselves as impotent players.
So, count ’em, three, maybe four chain assumptions, all of which have to be true.
Whole lotta frogs out there looking not to bump their asses… can anything be done for them?
The argument also stinks of the old poser: “Kissin’ ain’t cheatin’, izzit?”
(The debate on which Democrat Bill Clinton significantly lowered the bar.)
If this were a witness for the Trump et al. defense who was so plainly dissembling on the witness stand, he would have been disbarred before the judge excused him. Since he was testifying for the government and that government is Fulton County, GA, he’ll probably be given some kind of civic award and a cash prize.
You would think that a prosecutor would be very well versed in how criminals attempt to hide their crimes. As such, you could conclude that a prosecutor should be an expert criminal and very hard to catch.
Yet, these two appear to be rank amateurs. It has to come from stupidity or hubris. Either source presents a very bad look. I’ve learned more watching crime shows than these two.
It has to come from stupidity or hubris.
Embrace the diversity of “AND”.
They are diversity hires, so nothing more than mediocre is to be expected. They have all excelled at living down to that expectation.
DEI is even affecting the criminal class. Having watched enough body cams to have it be listed on my CV, these clowns are geniuses compared to the general population of the criminal element.
Couldn’t recall two dozen times? Who does he think he is, James Comey?
or a Clinton
Or John “I do not recall” Mitchell.
Joe Biden has a better memory than him.
Translation: Wade and Willis are going down for perjury and losing their law licenses, but Bradley doesn’t want to go down with them.
(Apologies for the horrid inadvertent pun)
Really, Dems. Is it too much to ask for your political prosecutions to use minions who are not (censored) their married subordinate?
Is it too much to ask to actually come up with constitutional laws the prosecuted have broken and non-incompetent lawyers to prosecute them? Yes, I think it is too much.
This is the result of breaking the rule of law and substituting rule of
menwomen.I would not be surprised if nothing happens to them. If you start with low expectations you cannot be disappointed.
Wade and Willis will emerge unscathed
IDK about that. The testimony of all three was very shifty and does not come across as credible. The Judge could end up removing the Willis and her boyfriend from the case and appointing another prosecutor. Then there’s the State Bar. This is an opportunity to rein in incredibly bad judgement on the part of all three. Neither of those things require the Judge to ‘do anything’ to them, removing them then referring the matter to the Bar seems like an easy way to split the baby/pass the buck simultaneously.
Well in Georgia, the judge doesn’t assign another prosector. It would go to the Prosecuting Attorneys Council..which at this time is run by another black lady lawyer but from the next county over..
*prosecutor (sp)
And if she gets removed it would go to another black lady lawyer two counties over.
I’m seeing a pattern here.
Even better for the Judge’s opportunity to split the baby and pass off the issues, by means of referrals, while still seeming to have taken a degree of action albeit indirectly. IMO if he doesn’t do so he is basically announcing he’s a tool of the DA (IOW he is Willis’s bitch).
If I had to guess, that’s the direction I’d go as judge. Remove Wade and Willis from the case and refer them to the bar for disciplinary action, reprimand Bradley for not being more forthcoming during testimony (i.e. lying), and wash his hands of the whole mess. Of course, this entire load of bovine residue will then be split into two parts: the two liars headed to the bar, and the poor sucker at the Prosecuting Attorneys Council who has to decide between throwing the meritless case out and having every Leftist in the state howl in outrage, or finding some other witless patsy with a few million dollars in taxpayer money to try again. (Don’t they have to start from scratch if the prosecutor is thrown out?)
“Really, Dems. Is it too much to ask for your political prosecutions to use minions who are not (censored) their married subordinate?”
You’re asking the movement that co-opts children to be their moral policy proxies, and then chooses the very creepiest children available (Thunberg, Hogg, Shirley Temper).
Every parent recognizes the teenager defense.
“What did you do today?”
“Nothin’.”
“Where did you go?’
“Nowhere.”
“Whom were you with?”
“I don’t know.”
“How can you not know whom you were with?”
“I don’t know.”
Hmmmmm, that attitude flew in our house,…, never. He will finish with a BA and MS in Math in 4 years, because Dr. Princess and Dr. Dad taught by example. I actually have a child who looks at his phone so infrequently he misses the occasional text that I send to him.
He did have a friend in middle chool who behaved as above and that kid is not doing well. As I told my son, one can learn equally well what to do from a higher power and what not to do from a lower power.
Judge Jeanine of the five summed it up perfectly last Friday:
Wade got laid
Willis got paid
And the taxpayers of Fulton cty got played.
A hush comes over the coutroom and everyone holds their breath.
The star witness takes the stand.
What did you witness, sir?
“I never witnessed anything. It was speculation. I can’t tell you anything specific, if that’s what you’re asking.”
Do you have any evidence at all?
As a retired DEA agent who testified hundreds of times in court, I have been appalled at how these three lawyers could be so bad on the witness stand. They are all lying. The judge needs to disqualify Willis and Wade from this case, and that should be the least of their problems. What a miscarriage of justice if this crooked pair were allowed to prosecute Trump et al.
As for Bradley, doesn’t he know there is a vast difference in meaning between “absolutely” and “speculation”?
“Why the change? Bradley wouldn’t say”
“I’m a loyyah!” –TMZ
watching Fani, Wade and Bradley’s testimony has been hilarious. They are all clearly lying. Nearly felt sorry for Bradley as his eyes looked around the courtroom for help out of his situation.
Was he perchance checking for snipers?
I keep seeing mention of possible sanctions on Wade, Willis, and Bradley. This is a Leftist court on a political mission against Trump. The odds of any sanctions are minuscule. Indeed, sanctions against lawyers for anything are rare. When was the last time you heard of an attorney, especially a Protected Class Leftist attorney, being sanctioned in any way for lying?
Subotai Bahadur
As a non lawyer I am suprised these three schooled attorneys made it so easy for any opponent to catch them. Ran their mouths (texts), created paper trail and humpin around. Why have we not heard from Mrs. Wade. That would be interesting.
Maybe she signed an NDA to get her divorce settlement done?
Black Democrats cannot be expected to tell the truth under oath. Such expectations are white supremacy and racist. The judge will likely allow all testimony—even the ‘were you lying then or are you lying now’ testimony to decide Fanni’s fate.
It really is like court in S. Africa or Zimbabwe now.