NYU Professor Insists American Colleges Aren’t ‘Left-Wing Hotbeds’
“Our national discourse about universities tends to be focused narrowly on the Ivies, which are not representative. But even if we keep the focus there, the idea that universities are hotbeds of left-wing lunatics is just wrong.”
Leif Weatherby is an associate professor of German at New York University. In a column for the Boston Globe, Weatherby insists that American colleges are not indoctrinating students in leftism and almost seems disappointed by this.
His argument seems to be from the perspective of someone who supports Bernie Sanders, as he reserves much of his criticism for the corporatization of higher education.
I first heard about the column when it was highlighted by FOX News:
Boston Globe column denies that American colleges are ‘left-wing hotbeds’: ‘Not indoctrinating students’
A new column in the Boston Globe argued that despite a “tradition of conservatives complaining of liberal tendencies on campuses,” “no elite university is driven by left-wing politics.”
New York University associate German professor Leif Weatherby insisted in his piece that though American universities seem to give lip service to leftwing ideas, they are merely corporations tasked with “expanding” their “massive amounts of wealth” and act in “conformity with the rightward swing of our society over the last half century.”
He opened the column declaring, “But here’s the simple truth: No elite university is driven by left-wing politics. It can seem otherwise, because over the course of our young century universities have committed themselves to social justice rhetoric. But they have not committed themselves to social justice.”
Here are some excerpts from the Boston Globe:
Universities are left-wing hotbeds? Nonsense.
Whatever you think of the outcry over speech on college campuses, the past month will surely confirm the general consensus that universities are overrun with radical left-wing views, including “critical race theory,” “decolonialism,” and Marxism. That impression is bound to deepen with Claudine Gay’s resignation this week as Harvard’s president, a situation that played out as another predictable skirmish in the culture wars.
But here’s the simple truth: No elite university is driven by left-wing politics. It can seem otherwise, because over the course of our young century universities have committed themselves to social justice rhetoric. But they have not committed themselves to social justice, which should disappoint the actual left much more than it does. Our national discourse about universities tends to be focused narrowly on the Ivies, which are not representative. But even if we keep the focus there, the idea that universities are hotbeds of left-wing lunatics is just wrong.
It’s true that there’s a good deal of left-wing activism from students and that there are prominent professors voicing antiracist views, like the much-discussed Ibram X. Kendi of Boston University. But these same universities have influential moderates and conservatives and produce figures like Brett Kavanaugh (Yale) and Representative Elise Stefanik (Harvard), and that’s not an accident. As institutions, elite universities flaunt radical rhetoric while acting in conformity with the rightward swing of our society over the last half century.
Does the fact that some people remain conservative while attending these institutions negate the idea that higher education has become radically progressive?
Weatherby then offers more evidence:
The argument that campuses are beset by a lack of “viewpoint diversity” or by outright Maoism runs into trouble when you see that Harvard isn’t pumping out community organizers and beret-wearing literary critics. A whopping 57 percent of Harvard grads go into finance, consulting, or technology; the top landing spots are Google, McKinsey, and Goldman Sachs.
To which I would point out that Google, McKinsey, and Goldman Sachs are themselves hotbeds of leftism.
This is one point where I may agree with the author:
Over the last 50 years, universities have become increasingly corporatized. As federal and state governments have pulled back funding, tuition has ballooned and the customer-service model has flourished. Instead of an emphasis on fundamental research and a liberal arts education, faculty and students must contend with a casualized labor force — the replacement of full-time faculty with adjunct lecturers — endless real estate development, and a bloated class of administrators tasked with promoting student “wellness.”
At the end of the day, however, it is impossible to ignore the hard leftward shift of higher education. DEI policies have been embedded on college campuses across the country, and it is conservative speakers who are regularly shouted down at various schools, while left-wing radicals enjoy the freedom to speak their minds with little to no protest.
Weatherby co-organized this meeting at NYU in 2020: Covering and Confronting the Far Right
Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.
Comments
The good professor has “I drive a Prius written all over him! *. In my college days he’d have been driving a used Peugeot.
* full disclosure: I drive a Kia Sorento hybrid.
My guess is that his Prius has a “COEXIST” bumper sticker on it.
Just loading the lead photo leaked soy all over my display screen.
Peugeot? In my college days the lefties all drove Volvos.
To prove his point, Leif Weatherby should invite a conservative to speak at NYU.
Oh, wait…
Take Your Pick:
He is either delusional or lying.
Why not both?
Well, if he is delusional, he actually believes that American colleges are not Left-wing hotbeds, so he would not TECHNICALLY be lying.
In either case, he is wrong.
Talking to this bubble denizen about leftism is like talking to a fish about water.
“What water?”
Why not gaslighting.
Or spreading intentional disinformation.
Or issuing talking points for other leftists to use as duplicative language.
You’re leaving out the possibility that he’s a complete idiot. Personally, I think he’s a lying idiot but I might be giving him too much credit.
Apparently Leif Weatherby does not understand that half the population are so dissatisfied that they are rejecting universities.
Ask him to define “hotbed” Maybe he thinks it has something to do with Epstein and a certain island?
I watched some of the above video. He organized a panel to discuss the far right, No one on the panel is even slightly right wing.
“….and in other news, collectivists insist that water is NOT wet.”
Summary: “Obviously the faculty isn’t radical leftist, because they all agree with me”.
If not “hotbed”, how about a venue of smoldering coals of Marxism, or a fiery furnace for Leftist indoctrination? Both are equally descriptive.
He should stick to German.
They actually believe the claptrap they sputter. That are not intellectuals, but fools.
Hum…teaches German…. with an devout East German accent?
“What smell? I don’t smell anything,” says 4th-generation pig farmer.
“Leftwing lunatic prof who helped make NYU a leftwing hotbed of lunacy claims colleges aren’t lunatic hotbeds.”
He probably views himself as a centrist. And by the standards of NYU, he probably is. There probably are not that many to the left of him there. It’s sort of like a fish not knowing that he’s wet.
The herring did a comprehensive survey of the other herring in his shoal, and none of them had noticed any dampness.
The left uses Stalin as the center of their political spectrum; that’s how they can claim National Socialists are “right-wing”.
He said, without evidence, from his overton window 410 ft. out in left field…
Professor, give me just one example of who is a left-wing lunatic.
While you’re at it, give us an example of what kind of public policy is supported only by left-wing lunatics and thusly considered too left-wing lunacy for someone like you..
Please cite in the article above where the phrase “left-wing lunatic” is used.
Welllll….
Serve me up some crow. Haha!
I didn’t scroll up far enough!
Left-wing lunatic? Claudine Gay. Ibram X. Kendi. Any “studies” professor. Most of the faculty in “education” schools.
College profs vote and contribute $$$ in the rough ratio of 95% D and 5% R across the board. This is well documented. So the guy is a liar.
But… but… but… D isn’t left wing, it’s CENTRIST!
This is the kind of guy who says that Bill Maher is now a right winger. So his estimation of who is left wing is not reliable.
I can’t prove that academics have always been imbeciles, but this proves that at least one of today’s academics is certainly less intelligent than hard working imbeciles.
Can’t be much of an academic if the proof he offers is that students go to work for banks, financial institutions, big business, etc. Isn’t he familiar with Disney, Budweiser, and Blackrock’s crazy ESG policy?
Leif Weatherbys are a dime a dozen in academia. Just more recitation of warmed-over, repackaged leftist tripe. He, and they, are the reason that academics generally have lost credibility and integrity.
Prime example of why those graduating from universities are incapable of critical thinking… they are being “taught” by professors who were already brainwashed and not only incapable of critical thinking but believe it to be bad.
From our “moderate” professor Weatherby:
Similarly, it’s not an accident that our good professor didn’t give any example of CURRENT moderate or conservative faculty or students, but cited examples of students from a generation or more ago. Bret Kavanaugh began his freshman year in 1983- 40 years ago. Elise Stefanik began her freshman year in 2002- 21 years ago.
Oh what a deft palmed card, shifting what’s being argued about. Exceptional programming at work in that useful idiot.
Clearly this guy is a product of our curretn “higher-ed.”. Were he educated he’d get the irony of institutions not themselves operating all social justice-y, BUT selling indoctrination in social justice stuff. Yet he’s programmed enough to execute that deft slide from one claim to a different one. Would be impressive were that his original work, vs. uncredited programming.
From this episode it seems that the people inside the Us are also livestock, grown managed for the use of other.
What’s that quote I can steal? Oh, right: “Welcome to the party, pal.” (For “pal” read “useful idiot.”)
He reminds me of the lunatic fringe sociology (aren’t they all?) professor I had in undergrad who kept mentioning the same conservative colleges as evidence that not all higher education was completely stuffed to the rafters with loons like himself. Somebody more daring than me (I needed the “A”—Pre-med!) told him that 10 colleges/universities out of thousands constitutes a minority, not a true sampling at all. The prof screamed to high heavens for ten minutes, turned mauve and dismissed the class for the rest of the period., Go figure.