Image 01 Image 03

‘Total Annihilation’: Hunter Biden Sues Rudy Giuliani for Allegedly ‘Hacking’ His Data

‘Total Annihilation’: Hunter Biden Sues Rudy Giuliani for Allegedly ‘Hacking’ His Data

There was no laptop, you guys. It was an external drive.


Hunter Biden filed a civil lawsuit against Rudy Giuliani and Robert Costello, who used to represent the former mayor, in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California.

Biden claimed there was no laptop. Kind of like there was no spoon in The Matrix, right?

There was no laptop, and the defendants annihilated Hunter’s digital privacy:

1. Defendants are among those who have been primarily responsible for what has been described as the “total annihilation” of Plaintiff’s digital privacy. They also are among those who have been primarily responsible for the “total annihilation” of Plaintiff’s data. For the past many months and even years, Defendants have dedicated an extraordinary amount of time and energy toward looking for, hacking into, tampering with, manipulating, copying, disseminating, and generally obsessing over data that they were given that was taken or stolen from Plaintiff’s devices or storage platforms, including what Defendants claim to have obtained from Plaintiff’s alleged “laptop” computer.

2. Defendants themselves admit that their purported possession of a “laptop” is in fact not a “laptop” at all. It is, according to their own public statements, an “external drive” that Defendants were told contained hundreds of gigabytes of Plaintiff’s personal data. At least some of the data that Defendants obtained, copied, and proceeded to hack into and tamper with belongs to Plaintiff. But Plaintiff’s data was manipulated, altered and damaged before it was copied and sent to Defendants; and Defendants’ illegal hacking and tampering has involved further alterations and damage to the data to a degree that is presently unknown to Plaintiff.

Hunter alleges Giuliani and Costello violated the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, California’s Computer Data Access and Fraud Act, and California’s Unfair Competition Law.

Hunter wants the defendants to cease their “unlawful activities with respect to Plaintiff’s data and return any data in their possession belonging to Plaintiff, but they have refused to do so.” He also says their “statements suggest that their unlawful hacking activities are ongoing today and that, unless stopped, will continue into the future, thereby necessitating this action.”

I guess since the Russian hacking/misinformation narrative didn’t work out, the Bidens have to take another route…three years later.

I also don’t see any denial that the material on the laptop belonged to Hunter.

“Although the precise timing and manner by which Defendants obtained Plaintiff’s data remains unknown to Plaintiff, there is no dispute that Defendants have, at least to some extent, accessed, tampered with, manipulated, altered, copied and damaged Plaintiff’s data, and that their actions are illegal, unauthorized, and without Plaintiff’s consent,” the lawsuit states.

John Paul Mac Isaac, also known as Mac Isaac, said Hunter dropped off the laptop at his shop in April 2019.

Mac Isaac became the laptop owner because Hunter never picked it up despite Mac Isaac’s constant attempts to contact him.

The work order allowed Mac Isaac to access the laptop’s information to recover data.

Mac Isaac found “emails detailing influence-peddling involving then-Vice President Joe Biden and images of Hunter smoking crack and having sex with prostitutes.”


Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.


How would California have jurisdiction over this?

    diver64 in reply to rduke007. | September 26, 2023 at 3:04 pm

    That was my first question since the computer shop was in Delaware and Hunter was living there at the time.
    My second is that it is my understanding that according to the repair contract which Hunter signed that computer and everything on it became the computer guys property when Hunter abandoned it. If he wanted to copy stuff or give it away he had the right to do so or is Hunter’s argument that the computer was abandoned but everything on it remained his. Of course, when the repairman examined it and found evidence of crime he rightfully turned it over to the cops but that data…

    CapeBuffalo in reply to rduke007. | September 27, 2023 at 11:34 am

    Not a lawyer but my guess this in California because California has some specific law(s) that lawfare guru, Abbe Lowell has identified that give Hunter some “rights”.. a left leaning court is also helpful, easily found in California

If they aren’t suing for defamation/libel then they are all but admitting that it is his.

The right didn’t hack that computer (besides it was Russian disinformation according to the left) Teh Stasi had the data for at least a year.

This is not going to end well for him.

Remember that couple driving in Florida whose radio picked up a Republican party meeting… and they just happened to have a tape recorder to tape it? Or the Republican being nominated for a position… when the Dem senator got hold of a floppy disc of hers that had been erased but they retrieved a letter she had written criticizing some official.? She had to withdraw.

Hunter wants his drive back, and O.J. wants his gloves returned.

Well, since hundreds go to prison every year based on what computer repair techs see and report, he has absolutely no possible leg to stand on here.

But the admission of the fact that it is data he generated is a nice touch.

When you leave your laptop at a repair shop and they possess it because of non-payment and abandonment, there is no hacking required. All this does is verify that it IS his laptop and therefore the information contained within is real, especially as much has been verified from other sources.

I wonder how many crackpipe inspired paintings Hunter had to sell in order to afford this lawfare against trumpworld lieutenants?

Rhetorical. This is just the left doubling down on political enemies by any means necessary. Right, Saul? Lie, lie, lie. Attack, attack, attack. Then, lie some more. Then, attack again. Bring the pain and punishment. It doesn’t matter if its legal, or malicious. J6-ers, anyone?

In a just world, Hunter would be in prison already for unregistered foreign agent, racketeering, money laundering, felony gun violations, lying to the FIB, and on and on. But daddy is The Big Guy, so FEFF EWE , America.

Meanwhile, cOnSeRvAtIvE iNc is clutching its pearls and hiding under the bed to insure they don’t fight dirty against the left. WoUlDn’T bE PrUdeNt. Muh principles.

And ConInc will still be burbing up that same nonsense from the gulags in 2025.

    not_a_lawyer in reply to LB1901. | September 27, 2023 at 9:57 am

    I do not understand this weird random use of capitalization. But no matter.

    The basic thrust of your post is correct. The whole family is corrupt and/or immoral. Jill keeps propping up Joe although it is clear that he should be at home doting on his grandchildren. Hunter is the bagman of the family, raking in millions of tax-free bribes from foreign corrupt governments.

    Hunter actually seduced his dead brother’s widow. It can be deduced that Joe sexually assaulted his own daughter when she was pre-pubescent.

    The whole family is debased.

    In a nation of 350M, we can do better than this disgraceful lot.


      henrybowman in reply to not_a_lawyer. | September 27, 2023 at 5:12 pm

      “I do not understand this weird random use of capitalization.”
      It is derision, meant to emulate the crayon scribblings of the intellectually challenged sheep.

For starters, time to invade his attorney client privilege and log ethics complaints against his lawyers, and eventually their go after licenses.

Fat_Freddys_Cat | September 26, 2023 at 2:32 pm

Hunter is taking advantage of the fact that most news outlets won’t mention the holes in the case and will just gull their viewers with a simplistic story of how evil Giuliani is (and he does look the part, truth to tell).

But we were told that “Hunter’s laptop” was “Russian disinformation”…..

Besides, the bit about “digital privacy” was a hoot. NOBODY has “digital privacy” in this day and age.

Hunter hoping for a DC jury and Kangaroo Court?

As that famous detective and apiarist, Sherlock Holmes, said, “There is nothing more deceptive than an obvious fact.”

Hunter knows that Giuliani is being sued by his former counsel for unpaid counsel fees. He knows that Giuliani doesn’t have enough gas remaining in his tank to go the distance, and is hoping for a very favorable outcome against a weakened opponent. Meanwhile, Hunter’s counsel fees are probably being paid by one of the Soros entites.

So he’s suing for hacking his computer, but at the same time still denying its his computer.

I can only hope Giuliani’s counsel will introduce Hunter’s ambulance chasing dredge to the full scope of sanctions authorized by Rule 11 for filing an abjectly frivolous complaint.

Cockroach sues man who turned on light.