Lawsuit Alleges CDC Manipulated Diagnostic Codes on Death Certificates to Hide Covid Vaccine Connection
The former law student, booted out for not following the covid mandate, took a look Minnesota death certificate data, in a quest to see how reliable the information on that documentation would be, as it relates to covid vaccine connections.
John Beaudoin Sr. was a law student at the Massachusetts School of Law in Andover before the school expelled him for refusing its vaccine mandate.
Beaudoin asserts the mandate was based on federal COVID guidance devised in part from Massachusetts death certificate data.
The former law student obtained Minnesota death certificate data in a quest to see how reliable the information on such documentation would be as it relates to covid vaccine connections. This research was for the Brownstone Institute, a think tank that challenges the scientific basis for covid policy.
That review includes as an exhibit in a lawsuit Beaudoin is bringing against Massachusetts, according to Just The News contributor Greg Piper
The suit includes a 123-page exhibit analyzing death certificates Beaudoin claims either wrongly omit vaccine-induced deaths or falsely attribute them to COVID. And in May he requested a hearing in response to the state’s motion to dismiss his January amended complaint. His website includes legal filings.
The Minnesota analysis is part of three years of questions about the reliability and integrity of federal and state governments’ COVID-related statistics.
The New York Times found up to 90% of COVID-positive tests officially recorded in Massachusetts, New York and Nevada in summer 2020 were based on SARS-CoV-2 viral loads too small to be infectious.
Oregon lawmakers similarly sought a federal grand jury investigation into COVID statistical manipulation nearly two years ago, claiming the Center for Disease Control and Prevention employed a “double-standard exclusively for COVID-19 data collection” that inflated cases and deaths starting early in the pandemic.
The Brownstone Institute offers a sample of the findings on its website. In a nutshell, death certificates have entries for diagnostic codes for the cause of death.
The codes for deaths that could be associated with the covid vaccines should be either T88.1 – (Other complications following immunization, not elsewhere classified) or Y59.0 (Viral vaccines).
There is an example of one death certificate that specifies the main cause of death as sudden cardiac arrest within 10 hours after receiving the covid vaccine. However, the code for covid disease was used (U071) because she had the illness…seven months before her passing.
The first fraudulently filled out death certificate offers a crucial detail highlighting not only the fraud but the naked double standards for assigning CoD’s.
This death certificate identifies both a covid vaccine and covid itself as contributory CoD’s (in the last row highlighted in yellow, vaccine underlined in green, covid in blue):
- “covid vaccine second dose 10 hrs prior to death”
- “history of covid infection in May 2020” (about 7-8 months prior to death)
Any remotely objective person would presume that if a condition that occurred 7 months prior without any clear link to the actual death still nevertheless meets the standard for being identified as a CoD, then surely a condition or event that occurred a mere TEN HOURS before death identified by the doctor filling out the death certificate merits inclusion as a CoD.
Yet, the CDC assigned [U07.1] – “COVID-19, virus identified” – for covid, but neglected to assign T88.1 or Y59.0 for the covid vaccine.
The review suggests that codes were omitted to avoid indicating breakthrough infections occurred. One document analyzed indicated a covid death in August 2021….five months after the decedent was “fully immunized” by the definitions at that time.
At minimum, this death certificate should contain T88.0 – ‘Infection following immunization’ – to document the breakthrough infection (which is a subject for a separate article as this seems to be fairly widespread).
The exhibit contains many other examples of alleged death certificate manipulation. For example, in one instance, the document indicated covid vaccine status was “unknown” when the medical examiner had declared the decedent had been vaccinated.
Medical Examiner Elin mentioned that the decedent received the C19 vaccine.
Given the history of DVT and other thromboses, this decedent should have been screened out from receiving the C19 vaccine. Some would consider it medical malpractice and dangerous to her life.
Interestingly the hypertension and atherosclerotic heart disease were listed as the immediate cause of death and the interstitial lung disease was listed as an underlying cause. The C19 vaccine is known to cause
hypertension and heart issues.
Given the way this is written, MIIS and medical charts should be inspected to determine temporal proximity of vaccination to date of onset of symptoms and death.
Other instances of death certificate manipulation include drug overdoses labeled as covid deaths.
The discovery in the case will be fascinating. If the assertions prove to be borne out, and data was manipulated to increase the number of covid cases while minimizing the reporting of vaccine injuries, the CDC will lose even more credibility among Americans.
And it’s not as if the agency has an abundance of credibility left in the wake of its disastrous decisions, questionable campaigns, and silencing of those who had protested the policies based on real science.
As a reminder of what a real, professional, honest public health official would have done in the wake of the covid pandemic, I leave you with Sweden’s Chief Epidemiologist Anders Tegnell in April 2020.
Sweden's Chief Epidemiologist Anders Tegnell, April 2020, explaining why Sweden was following a different COVID-19 mitigation strategy than the rest of the world.
His answer: as a scientist, he was supposed to follow the data.
If only all countries had taken such an approach. pic.twitter.com/49wmQRmejL
— Kevin Bass PhD MS (@kevinnbass) July 13, 2023
Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.