Image 01 Image 03

“He shows his genitals in the locker room” – High School Brawl Involving Trans Student Draws National Attention

“He shows his genitals in the locker room” – High School Brawl Involving Trans Student Draws National Attention

“He’s [in the] girls’ locker room, using girls’ restrooms … He spit on my friends that are girls, females.”

The trans student involved here is a biological male and much larger than girls at the school. The student has apparently been removed as a result of this.

FOX 11 in Los Angeles reports:

California high school brawl involving transgender student draws behavioral, safety concerns

Across social media, videos show a brawl breaking out at Riverside’s Martin Luther King High School. What began as two students arguing on campus turned into a brawl involving a student who identifies as transgender.

While fights aren’t uncommon on high school campuses across the country, but families and students at MLK tell FOX 11 that the transgender student from the viral fight video has a history of erratic and uncomfortable behavior.

Parents and students tell FOX 11 that the said student has access to the girls’ locker rooms and bathrooms.

“He’s [in the] girls’ locker room, using girls’ restrooms,” said MLK student Aiden Vermeir said of the transgender student. “He spit on my friends that are girls, females. He shows his genitals in the locker room.”

In a statement released by the Riverside Unified School District, the student at the center of controversy no longer attends MLK.

This young woman spoke out at a school board meeting and got applause.

This video shows the size difference.


Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.


Trans/bi? Trans/femimale? A male and trans/social progress? Politically congruent Acts? One step forward, two steps backward.

Because of incidents such as this, eventually, I think society will revert back to gender at birth for social identity. The burden this new wave of nonsense puts on real women is enormous and has to stop. On the other side, for trans men, there is no burden or pressure at all. The inequity really shows up in sports and is extremely unfair to women/girls.

    As long as a certain political party thinks it gains from pushing the mental illness as “normal”, it will continue.

      Paul in reply to Edward. | April 29, 2023 at 10:45 am

      That is correct. The neo-Marxists are using ‘equity’ and ‘trans’ as cudgels to tear our society down so that it can be re-built in their fever-dreamed utopian vision. At this point, anyone who can’t see this falls into the ‘Useful Idiot’ category as far as I’m concerned.

        ahad haamoratsim in reply to Paul. | April 30, 2023 at 7:16 am

        And when the Marxists gain power, the first people they arrest and execute are the people they exploited to gain power. It has happened in country after country and if the LG+ Americans and other dissidents who let themselves be used this way live to see Marxists take power R”L, they are in for a very unpleasant shock.

      As long as that party think it buys them votes, gets them more power, or allows them to keep the power they have, this will not change.

      Paula in reply to Edward. | April 29, 2023 at 3:13 pm

      When the people in charge are mentally ill, they will give preference to others who are like themselves.

    Eastwood Ravine in reply to inspectorudy. | April 29, 2023 at 11:02 am

    It is because of what’s going on that I think boys and girls should be educated in separate spaces.

    CommoChief in reply to inspectorudy. | April 29, 2023 at 11:10 am

    Eventually yes. In some places it will arrive earlier than others; in some places this was never accepted. The problem for the trans movement is the near daily real world consequences of the misguided indulgence of ideological fantasy being made public.. It’s easy to offer tentative support in an abstract way when there isn’t a specific consequence. When the real world harms begin to accumulate it becomes far less easy to offer that same support.

    The trans movement is linked hand in hand with diminishing or eliminating the ability of Parents to raise.their children. Some State constitutions have provisions that place the Parents in the primary role of decision maker for their minor children very explicitly. The schools or other institutions that seek to evade those provisions will eventually be brought to book.

    txvet2 in reply to inspectorudy. | April 29, 2023 at 1:31 pm

    Nothing is going to “revert back” unless people stop confusing sex and gender.

    Kepha H in reply to inspectorudy. | April 29, 2023 at 2:04 pm


    I sincerely hope you are right. We should never have contenanced the gender confusion business in the first place. We teachers are told that if we don’t affirm a confused kid’s “gendri dentity”, we will be contributing to his later suicide, but it is also the case that we both affirm gender dysphoria AND contribute to suicide. These rapes and assaults on girls should be given more coverage.

      Dimsdale in reply to Kepha H. | April 30, 2023 at 2:41 pm

      AND we’ll get a special meeting with the principal or HR, so we have little choice.

      This trans hysteria should not be pushed on children, period, and the schools should not be supporting “trans affirmation,” especially without parental notification.

      In this case, in loco parentis mean crazy on site “parents.”

    Massinsanity in reply to inspectorudy. | April 30, 2023 at 4:39 pm

    It is good to see young women/girls stand up against this sickness in our society. They need to lead the charge but are too often doing the opposite for social justice credit, particularly on college campi.

It bears repeating — malignant and obnoxious tranny narcissism, tranny misogyny and invasion of women’s sports and private spaces, tranny child-grooming and indoctrination, and, tranny terrorism and threats of violence, and, the trannies’ vile, Dumb-o-crat and corporate enablers and cheerleaders, must collectively be one of the defining issues of the 2024 presidential election contest.

Big fruitcake guy beats up girl.


How brave and stunning.

What do we expect from someone that has been given the microphone with reassurance of the normalcy of their behavior?

Ultimately, this will be decided by biological females.

    DSHornet in reply to Petrushka. | April 29, 2023 at 11:18 am

    If about a half-dozen of the real girls corner him, it’d be fun to watch. Anybody who thinks girls fight fair has never seen a couple of girls have at each other. It’s a free-for-al with teeth, hair, claws, and a lot of noise. Some finger nails tactically applied in a sensitive location might convince him that he should rethink what he’s doing.

    Pass the pop corn.

    Perhaps it will also be decided by the civil courts – as in giant awards for rapes and serious injuries in contact sports, both obviously predictable and no protection to the biological female provided by the school.

      Martin in reply to jb4. | April 30, 2023 at 11:00 am

      If I was an insurance company I would put explicit language in my policies that we will not pay out for injuries caused by biological male participants in Female designated contact sports. I would also deny coverage of females who are injured in male designated contact sports especially football. If you as a school are dumb enough to let males and females to be in contact sports together pay for the predictable injuries that will be sustained.

        Dimsdale in reply to Martin. | April 30, 2023 at 2:56 pm

        I can’t imagine that any respectable insurance company won’t calculate that into their risk tables and raise premiums accordingly. Or drop them completely. It seems to be a no brainer that women will be crushed by these men, and the insurance companies are not keen on paying out more than they take in, kind of like casinos.

        Maybe the schools should take a cue from the casinos and have some burly women “escort” these men from the women’s spaces if they get out of line.

AF_Chief_Master_Sgt | April 29, 2023 at 12:37 pm

Two points:

1. A mentally ill man dressed as a woman, but still can’t control his masculine aggressive impulses prevalent in mentally ill men.

2. Martin Luther King High School. Tells me all I need to know.

    My father said homosexual men like to fight and perform fellatio, and you cannot overpower one as they have superhuman strength. He didn’t use those exact words, though.

Good to see the girl fighting back, but where are the boys, who should be whipping this psycho clown’s ass?

She should have kicked him is his girl nuts…….!

The young men at the school should take this freak out behind the bleachers and “convince” him of the error of his ways.

BierceAmbrose | April 29, 2023 at 2:48 pm

“This video shows the size difference.”

This is exactly why the same coalition backing this nonsense goes after guns. In the end, they want a physical advantage to impose their preference with. They want to pick who gets free reign, and who gets harmed and abused. In this case, without getting their own hands dirty. They get a frisson of overwhelming the helpless, spicing their rightousness-burger. (Nobody ever said mean motives n twisted payoffs don’t taste good.)

There’s a reason Colt’s pistol was called The Equalizer. Gun rights are women’s rights. Also, gay rights, trans rights, and any other group that might be picked out to be picked off, outnumbered and overwhelmed.

Gun rights are civil rights — they’re for everyone.

    AF_Chief_Master_Sgt in reply to BierceAmbrose. | April 29, 2023 at 2:57 pm

    “Gun rights are civil rights — they’re for everyone.”

    Yeah. Especially for Pantyfa and Black Criminals Matter when they carry AK -47s, block streets, and elicit fear from people who want to be left alone.

    Then when one of those “peaceful angels of the left” points one of those weapons at “the everyone” exercising their guns rights and the “mostly peaceful” thug gets lead poisoning, the “peaceful” DA in those bastions of inclusion and tolerance selectively prosecute the ones who are outnumbered by the other.

      henrybowman in reply to AF_Chief_Master_Sgt. | April 29, 2023 at 7:20 pm

      Those peaceful DAs are oathbreaking tyrants, and the Second Amendment is for them, too. Just not the same way.

      BierceAmbrose in reply to AF_Chief_Master_Sgt. | April 30, 2023 at 2:51 pm

      Oh, hijacked enforcement is a different problem.

      Civil rights are for everyone. To be restricted from noone, based on who they are. But, sometimes, must be restricted from individuals based on what they do.

      Here’s an example…

      Shouting “fire” in a crowded movie theater, so often troped into gun rights non-discussions, actually illustrates the right, and the specious arguments. It isn’t wrong to shout “fire” in a crowded movie theater. it’s wrong when there is no fire, and not always, even then. Just as it’s wrong to shoot someone in a crowded movie theater in general, sometimes a whack-job gratuitiously shooting up a movie theater desperately needs to be shot if that’s the least bad way to stop them.

      We do have a lot of weenies weaponizing enforcement of this and that to get their way, from self defense, to banning speech.

      BierceAmbrose in reply to AF_Chief_Master_Sgt. | April 30, 2023 at 2:57 pm

      In re: your purely hypothetical example /sarc…

      I’m pretty much in line with your take, leading to my earlier push-back at our invited gun law expert discussing the hypothetical you suggest.

      I don’t mean to be mean, esp with experts who bring their insight to share BUT, if under the law incitement, threat, assault, and defense are as played out in that case so far, it looks sketchy to me in facts and law.

      These days, I don’t believe any *one* grainy video from an urban, well-publicized event. This isn’t the old days when it’s reasonable to expect that the Zapruter film is all there is.

Still & again: The school is not loco parentising for the saftey of these girls, so where are the fathers of those girls to arrange an ‘accident’ for this sexual deviant attacking their daughters??

    SeiteiSouther in reply to LB1901. | May 1, 2023 at 11:56 am

    That boy would be lucky to walk without a limp if he assaulted my daughter the way that he did.

It won’t be long before one of these violent and misogynistic male trannies eats a righteous and richly-deserved lead sandwich, after pulling this kind of obnoxious and vicious attack, either in public, or, in a woman’s restroom.

Women need to arm themselves against tranny assaults, terrorism and threats.

Considering there is a history of behavioral problems I would not be surprised to find out that the student as an IEP (Individual Education Plan) as required by federal and state law for disabled students. (The disability does not have to be a physical one) This often outlines specific disciplinary measures which would be considered very lenient if used for non-disabled students. So in that way the schools hands are tied.

The other obvious barrier to protecting other students from him is equity/diversity denial of reality policies. Even sending him for an evaluation to determine whether the school is a suitable environment that can meet his needs re any disability would be seen as an attack on transgender community both in and out of the school.

To sum up. Experts have struck, once again.

It’s looking like a sizable percentage of these “Trannies ” are not in it to become “females” but to watch females only.
Proves they are really males in mind and body.

Lucifer Morningstar | April 30, 2023 at 8:41 am

In a statement released by the Riverside Unified School District, the student at the center of controversy no longer attends MLK.

Sure. Mentally ill person causes major problems at one school and the school district removes the kid and places him in another school hoping the ‘controversy” will be quickly forgotten. Lather, rinse, repeat over and over again.