Molotov Cocktail Lawyer Seeks Reduced Sentence Claiming She Was Inebriated
“Tossing the Molotov cocktail was a way of expressing anger at those police officers around the country for whom Black lives did not matter”
Remember these winners? They already got light sentences, but one of them is agitating for even less time.
The Washington Free Beacon reports:
Firebombing Attorney Begs for Light Sentence, Citing Inebriation and ‘Unprocessed Trauma’
A left-wing lawyer who pleaded guilty to firebombing a police cruiser is asking for a commutation of her sentence, pointing to the fact that she was inebriated at the time of the offense and coping with “unprocessed trauma,” according to court filings.
Attorneys for Urooj Rahman argue the self-described human-rights activist was “numb, disassociated, and inebriated” when she threw a Molotov cocktail into a New York City police car during the George Floyd riots in May 2020. Lawyers say Rahman was also reeling from her many “abusive partnership relationships” and processing “early trauma” from being taunted as a Muslim after 9/11.
On the night of May 29, 2020, Rahman “became quite drunk” after drinking vodka on “an empty stomach” with fellow lawyer and later getaway driver Colinford Mattis. Rahman’s attorneys say the pair’s decision to firebomb an NYPD cruiser was an “aberrational” act meant to protect others from future police violence.
“Tossing the Molotov cocktail was a way of expressing anger at those police officers around the country for whom Black lives did not matter,” Rahman’s attorneys wrote in a September memo to U.S. District Judge Brian Cogan. “It was an act of protest intended to avoid exposing others to harm.”
Rahman’s attorneys have requested she be released on “time served,” saying “her conduct that night was a marked deviation from her otherwise exemplary life.”
The request for a special dispensation builds on a sweetheart deal already reached by Justice Department prosecutors in the case. In June, Rahman and Mattis entered into a second plea agreement that broke their potential 10-year sentences down to a maximum of 5 years. Prosecutors want Judge Cogan to go even lower, arguing for just 18 to 24 months based on the “history and personal characteristics of the defendants.”
DONATE
Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.
Comments
Throwing a Molotov cocktail into anywhere is a terrorist act. That behavior didn’t spontaneously happen, drunk or not.
“I was drunk and sad over unprocessed trauma” is not a defense. Hopefully she will have a long time in prison to process all her trauma.
For the police, all lives matter; for black men, not so much.
We all saw this coming, didn’t we?
Marxists never take the blame. It’s always not their fault.
Prosecute her for drunk driving and double her sentence.
She wasn’t driving. The other fellow was, and he isn’t admitting to being drunk.
Anyone calling herself a lawyer knows full well that voluntary inebriation is no excuse for committing a criminal – let alone terrorist – act. She certainly should not be receiving more leniency than someone else who committed those same acts would.
In their own minds, they’re excused
The fact that this perp was a licensed attorney justifies a much harsher sentence than a normal domestic terrorist would receive.
Does she still have her license to practice? If so, why?
I hope she gets sold for a few loosies and a packet of Ramen.
“I only did it because I was drunk.” doesn’t make it better.
Too bad they didn’t drink it up before lighting the Molotov Cocktail