Most Read
Image 01 Image 02 Image 03

California Doctor Wants to Set Up Abortion Clinic off Alabama Coast

California Doctor Wants to Set Up Abortion Clinic off Alabama Coast

This lady is gross.

Dr. Meg Autry, an OB-GYN in California, hopes to set up an abortion clinic in the Gulf of Mexico off the coast of Alabama.

God forbid states want to save unborn human beings.

Autry wants to raise $20 million for the Protecting Reproductive Rights of Women Endangered by State Statutes (PRROWESS).

What a mouthful.

Autry’s “life’s work” is performing abortions:

“Part of the reason we’re working on this project so hard is because wealthy people in our country are always going to have access [to abortions], so once again it’s a time now where poor, people of color, marginalized individuals, are gonna suffer –and by suffering I mean like lives lost,” Autry said.

She explained that this ship will operate on federal waters — nine miles from the coast of Texas and three from the coast of Alabama, Louisiana and Mississippi — where it can evade those states’ abortion restrictions. PRROWESS will arrange for patients to be transported to the ship, which will vary depending on where they are coming from, once they pass a pre-screening process.

Autry and a team of licensed medical professionals will offer surgical abortions for up to 14 weeks of pregnancy. The PRROWESS team would also offer other point-of-care gynecological services such as testing and treatment for sexually transmitted infections.

“The project is being funded with philanthropy and the patients care is on a needs basis, so most individuals will pay little to nothing for services,” Autry said.

Federal waters begin about nine nautical miles (10.357 miles) from the Texas coast. It begins three nautical miles (3.5 miles) from Alabama, Louisiana, and Mississippi.

Over federal waters, the providers don’t have to abide by the laws of nearby states.

DONATE

Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.

Tags:
,

Comments

Sink it.

    Lonewolf in reply to Barry. | July 12, 2022 at 8:09 am

    Why not prohibit the sales of human body parts on Federal Lands or at least tax it 99.9999999%?

    Dimsdale in reply to Barry. | July 12, 2022 at 10:24 am

    They should name this floating abattoir the SS Kermit Gosnell…

    I am quite disturbed at the though of the chum this slaughterhouse would produce.

“people of color”

Can’t have those darkies reproducing.

    Yup not to mention the other undesirables. Remember Margaret Sanger started this in 1921. At that point Jews were in that category as well… Yup the very same people that, somehow have forgotten and still vote for democrats

healthguyfsu | July 11, 2022 at 1:11 pm

LOL….yes, this is much more affordable than just traveling in the contiguous 48.

Jesus. She looks right out of central casting.

The_Mew_Cat | July 11, 2022 at 1:59 pm

Running abortion ships outside of jurisdictions that ban abortion is legal and was pioneered in the EU. But I have to ask, why is this abortionist doing this on her own? Why isn’t Kamala Harris and Dementia Joe facilitating it at political rallies? KH should be holding big rallies in Texas and giving free abortions and transportation to that ship, courtesy of big money Dem donors. This would far more effective at rallying her base for the Midterms than mouthing word salads.

    Eagle1 in reply to The_Mew_Cat. | July 11, 2022 at 5:16 pm

    And whose state is licensing the doctor to perform the procedure? Last I checked, there wasn’t a federal license, just one’s issued by each state for actions performed in that state.

      Milhouse in reply to Eagle1. | July 11, 2022 at 7:40 pm

      She’s licensed in California. Either that’s good in federal waters, or else no license is needed there. You can’t have it both ways. You can’t say a license is needed but not one from any state.

“Over federal waters, the providers don’t have to abide by the laws of nearby states.”

Yep, but they are likely in for a rude shock the minute their little ship of fools pulls into one of those state ports for fuel, supplies, repairs, whatever. Transporting patients to and from the ship will likely be problematic as well.

Not to mention the risks of performing surgery on a fishing boat at sea. The lawyers and the insurers will love that one.

One suspects this is another publicity stunt.

    henrybowman in reply to Gosport. | July 11, 2022 at 3:34 pm

    Plus, hurricane alley. This will end well.

    One would also expect the patient debarkation facility to be a protest-rich location.

    Milhouse in reply to Gosport. | July 11, 2022 at 7:43 pm

    Why would that be a problem? The ship would not be breaking any laws inside the state’s jurisdiction, so there’s nothing the state could prosecute it for. Transport would not be a problem either; states can’t interfere with the right to travel between them and other states or federal territory.

      Gosport in reply to Milhouse. | July 11, 2022 at 8:29 pm

      One of the mechanisms under which jurisdiction can be claimed over crimes committed in international waters is known as Port State Jurisdiction. If a crime is committed in international waters the next port in which the vessel will dock will have a claim of jurisdiction.

      If you are going to commit an act at sea it behooves you not to make your next port of call in a place where that act is criminal.

      Arminius in reply to Milhouse. | July 11, 2022 at 10:54 pm

      Seriously? You can’t see a problem? A ship conducting storm avoidance runs to the nearest port, where the authorities find evidence of the crew conducting illegal activity per state law.

      Now do human trafficking and drug running. What happens at sea stays at sea?

        Milhouse in reply to Arminius. | July 11, 2022 at 11:46 pm

        Now do casino cruises, and people going into international waters to smoke pot, back before states started legalizing it.

          Arminius in reply to Milhouse. | July 12, 2022 at 2:53 am

          Do the other ships involve dead babies in refrigerators? Perhaps still one woman still laboring through a chemical abortion.

          Difference is, before you hit port everyone can stop gambling on a casino ship.

Camperfixer | July 11, 2022 at 2:03 pm

She personifies that evil rots the soul from the inside out…awful in every aspect. God will judge accordingly.

    Arminius in reply to Camperfixer. | July 12, 2022 at 2:57 am

    I don’t care if you started out as prom king or queen. Eventually you get the face you deserve when the inner ugly rises to the surface.

Why not partnership with Carnival Cruise Lines? Have fun while you have an abortion.

“Enjoy unlimited drinks and abortion options all cruise long”.

    The_Mew_Cat in reply to Peabody. | July 11, 2022 at 4:33 pm

    Carnival cruises are expensive. They need to use a freighter as a chop shop and just ferry the women to the ship. The Democratic Party should run the logistics. It should rally their base by showing they are serious about abortion.

goddessoftheclassroom | July 11, 2022 at 2:21 pm

“Abortion doctor” is a hideous oxymoron. “OB-GYN” is misleading because the doctor isn’t caring for a developing baby; she’s destroying it.
They are abortionists, or AB-GYNs.

PS. In college bio. I had to dissect a fetal pig. Developing babies are fetal humans, not just fetuses.

    Daniel Yaacov in reply to goddessoftheclassroom. | July 11, 2022 at 3:51 pm

    An art exhibition in Santa Fe in 2010 (a dozen or so stages of prenatal development from a couple of weeks to almost to term) made me see the truth of your statement and it changed me profoundly.

    Something like this:
    “A highlight of Your Beginning is the return of Prenatal Development, the Museum’s timeless collection of 24 real human embryos and fetuses. Ranging from 28 days to 38 weeks, this timeline vividly captures the amazing stages of growth and development before birth. Originally donated to the Museum in 1939, the collection has been newly interpreted in a darkened gallery to allow for quiet reflection upon Your Beginning.

    Background on the Exhibit
    Collected in the 1930s by Dr. Helen Button with help from local hospitals, Prenatal Development contains specimens from the difficult times of the Great Depression. To the best of our knowledge, all failed to survive because of accidents or natural causes. Dr. Button obtained the parents’ permission to use these specimens as teaching tools.”

    https://www.msichicago.org/explore/whats-here/exhibits/you-the-experience/the-exhibit/your-beginning/prenatal-development/

    chrisboltssr in reply to goddessoftheclassroom. | July 11, 2022 at 6:07 pm

    Yes, people who just call a baby a “fetus” don’t realize they are helping to dehumanize the baby for purposes of killing him, which was the goal for the abortionists beginning to call an unborn baby a fetus all along. It is not a scientific term, it is a propagandist term. It’s no different than calling slaves “chattel”.

      Arminius in reply to chrisboltssr. | July 11, 2022 at 10:58 pm

      One more time; fetus means child in Latin.

      Try substituting German or Japanese.

      That’s not a child, it’s a kind.

      That’s not a child, it’s a kodomo.

      Milhouse in reply to chrisboltssr. | July 11, 2022 at 11:49 pm

      No, they are not dehumanizing it. They are using the correct term. A baby in the womb, from when it gains a recognizable shape until it is born, is a fœtus. That’s what it is. That is the correct name. Before that it’s an embryo, and after that it’s a newborn. A bit later it’s a toddler, and before you know it it’s a teenager. Are those terms “dehumanizing”?!

        Barry in reply to Milhouse. | July 12, 2022 at 10:33 pm

        “A baby in the womb, from when it gains a recognizable shape…”

        “A baby”

        No further comment required.

Russ from Winterset | July 11, 2022 at 2:33 pm

What a coincidence! I have always wanted to anchor a cargo vessel off the coast of a state like New York, New Jersey or California and sell bump stocks and 30-round AR-15 magazines. Maybe this would be a good time to follow my dream?

Margaret Sanger would be SO PROUD! Was “Dr” Meg named after her?
Sanger advocated “a stern and rigid policy of sterilization and segregation to that grade of population whose progeny is already tainted, or whose inheritance is such that objectionable traits may be transmitted to offspring.” —“A Plan for Peace,” Birth Control Review, April 1932, pages 107-108

And yet, we have millions of women who have lined up to follow her dreams. Unfreaking hard to fathom!

Rupert Smedley Hepplewhite | July 11, 2022 at 2:56 pm

The left just love killing babies. Why doesn’t this murderer just confine “her”self to killing California babies?

I swear, that looks like a man to me.

I know it’s all the rage on the left to look as rumpled, disheveled, and unkempt as possible, but really! If I walked into my doctor’s office and saw that I would turn around and walk out thinking that a homeless person had somehow gained entry.

Either die hard Marxists or baby murderers or its a big business opportunity

Off the Alabama coast? Good timing with peak hurricane season on the way.

stevewhitemd | July 11, 2022 at 3:12 pm

9 miles off shore? Given our current cancel/narc culture, I think an anonymous call to the Coast Guard might be entertaining…

Daniel Yaacov | July 11, 2022 at 3:13 pm

Sealand https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2012/03/sealand-and-havenco/

“Hegel remarks [..] all great, world-historical facts and personages occur, as it were, twice. He has forgotten to add: *the 1st time as tragedy*, the 2nd as farce”
– Marx (1852) “18th Brumaire”

She looks like she washes her face with a dirt bike tire.

I am reminded of high-speed rocket sled tests in the desert southwest when I gaze upon that weatherbeaten visage of gloom.

Safe sanctuaries for operation of abortion chambers. Novel, not.

    Peabody in reply to n.n. | July 11, 2022 at 7:21 pm

    In a sane world a safe sanctuary would be a place where unwanted babies would be cared for instead of throwing them out in the trash.

Standard scam raise $20 million. Keep $19 million. I say go for it. Every dollar extracted from pro-abortion people for useless scams and grandstanding the better.

Sounds more like her life’s work is getting people to give her millions of dollars.

I wonder if she has considered the role that ‘purely random’ maritime safety inspections within State territorial waters may play?

Well, at least she (?) doesn’t look like a servant of Molloch.

CaliforniaJimbo | July 11, 2022 at 4:56 pm

I suspect that being in international waters, the death ship will also skirt laws concerning :
Selling of fetal remains
Income and business taxes
Insurance coverage of out of network providers.
Health and safety aboard ship.
Patient legal rights.
Their ship of death will have more deceased souls than the Arizona memorial in Pearl Harbor.
Sick people.

    Milhouse in reply to CaliforniaJimbo. | July 11, 2022 at 11:50 pm

    It will be in US waters, so federal laws will still apply. I think.

      CommoChief in reply to Milhouse. | July 12, 2022 at 10:14 am

      I believe it would be Maritime law which in US Waters is administered by Federal CT who have authority for it as ‘Admiralty CT’. Could be wrong.

      I doubt this is more than a publicity stunt but if it comes to fruition it will be fascinating to observe the wrangling over jurisdiction and what body of law to apply or exclude and why.

I see she isn’t planning on putting up her own money for this “venture”. That might be a clue as to what is really going on.

The island of Dr. Autry.

E Howard Hunt | July 11, 2022 at 10:21 pm

She is ugly. So ugly she is sublimating her self-hate in baby killing. She knows that if her parents had known how ugly she would be they would have aborted her.

I’ve long been involved in the pro-life activities of my local area… I have never seen a pleasant looking abortionist/abortion nurse. They all have a hardness to them that reflect their soul on the outside.

Off that they always reference the Black communities. Are the trying the Minic Nazi theories of the 30’s and 40’s?

Seems education would be a better method.

Steven Brizel | July 12, 2022 at 8:51 am

It would be fascinating to know the percentages or actual numbers of live children delivered to their parents as opposed to all abortions performed by this ob-gyn in the course of her career

As if it was needed, yet more proof that California should be walled off from the rest of the country, and the border protected by pissed-off, trained, armed Americans that want to keep this debilitating Cali-cancer from spreading.

Capitalist-Dad | July 12, 2022 at 9:25 am

Nothing can stand in the way of the Democrat Marxists’ first sacrament. They are miserable if baby killing can’t occur at any time up to delivery (and even beyond if they can seize on a sophistry that justifies such infanticide). Their constant whining about black and Hispanics losing access to abortion Carrie’s on the founding tradition of Planned Parenthood: eugenics.

ANOTHER lost wingnut from kalyfornia. ALABAMA will not put up with DOLTDICKS like this by their shores.

Cheaper to set up a clinic in the LA airport. Fly them in, do the dastardly deed, fly them out. Save on taxi fare. California will be real lax on inspections and no limits. Bring your preschoolers in if your tired of them, they’ll do the rest. Put it next to the Burger King and the county food inspector can take care of ensuring cleanliness.

Cheaper to set up a clinic in the LA airport. Fly them in, do the dastardly deed, fly them out. Save on taxi fare. California will be real lax on inspections and no limits. Bring your preschoolers in if your tired of them, they’ll do the rest. Put it next to the Burger King and the county food inspector can take care of ensuring cleanliness.