As recent history has shown us, when modern-day “feminists” don’t get their way, absolute foolishness inevitably ensues. And that’s exactly what happened in the aftermath of the decision announced Friday in which a majority of Justices on the Supreme Court agreed that Roe v. Wade must be struck down.
The ruling caused the Usual Suspects on the left including Reps. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) and Maxine Waters (D-Calif.) to use what we’ve been reliably told over the last year and a half is “inciteful” language in calls for people to get “into the streets” and “fight” in “defiance” of the Supreme Court. Biden administration DOJ Attorney General Merrick Garland sounded a little “insurrectiony” in a statement where he declared his department would do whatever they could to minimize the impact of the ruling.
Feminist mobs on Twitter and at some “protests” took a different approach, however, with some calling for a “sex strike” in response to the ruling, believing it was “no longer safe” for women to have sex in America, and thinking sex strikes would be especially effective if women withheld it from male elected officials:
Big Apple abortion protesters were in support of a sex strike Saturday — as “abstinence” started trending on Twitter in the wake of the Supreme Court’s decision to overturn Roe v. Wade.“If you’re a man who won’t get a vasectomy, even though it’s reversible, and you’re not out in the streets fighting for my rights, you do not deserve to have sex with me,” Brianna Campbell, a 24-year-old EMT, told The Post.Caroline Healey, a 22-year-old event coordinator, also questioned why sex was more important than women’s rights.“I think it’s absolutely valid for us to be withholding the Holy Grail that men seem to think is important,” she told The Post at an abortion protest in Manhattan’s Union Square.“Why shouldn’t we withhold it if we’re always worried that they’re not going put a condom on, that they’re going take one off after we ask them to,” she added.
“I suggest a sex strike. It is no longer safe to have sex in America, so therefore you withhold it. Sleep with women. Let’s go for it. Let’s advocate for some false lesbianism,” TikTok user EmilyScott1990 proposed with an air of confidence that indicated she wholeheartedly believed her plan would work:
As they were when far-left actresses like Alyssa Milano and Bette Midler advocated for sex strikes in the past, pro-lifers were quick to point out that these same women have always had this option:
Not only that, but isn’t rejecting destructive casual sex culture actually a good thing?
Plus, it would eliminate the need for abortions in the first place:
As I’ve said before, the only women who would take part in a “sex strike” of this nature would be women who think like Bette Midler, Alyssa Milano and other radical leftists with similarly warped mindsets. With that in mind, I feel confident in saying that most pro-lifers would be completely on board with these types of women abstaining from sex, because it would lessen the likelihood that there would eventually be mini-versions of them who would one day follow in their parents’ pro-abortion footsteps.
That said, it would appear that the “twerking protesters” in Dallas over the weekend did not get the sex strike memo:
Or, in a weird way, maybe they did get the memo – judging by the “performances.” I report, you decide.
— Stacey Matthews has also written under the pseudonym “Sister Toldjah” and can be reached via Twitter. —
CLICK HERE FOR FULL VERSION OF THIS STORY