Image 01 Image 03

Pro-Abortion Activists Target Justice Alito’s Home

Pro-Abortion Activists Target Justice Alito’s Home

“Abort the court”

We do not know if Justice Samuel Alito and his family are still at the house. Rumors have circulated that they moved to an undisclosed location.

Can you blame them? All the hate flung at Alito after someone leaked his draft opinion overturning Roe v. Wade would make anyone want to disappear.

The pro-abortion activists made their way to Alito’s home after harassing Justices Kavanaugh and Roberts, pro-life centers, and Catholic churches over the weekend.



Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.


The silence of Biden is deafening.
No moral compass, nothing but vain jangling.
You can do whatever you choose…don’t tread on me.
You haven’t the slightest clue what is coming.

We’re handling these people with kid gloves, why? They’re not protestiing; they’re trying (very hard) to destroy the United States of America.

    scooterjay in reply to paracelsus. | May 10, 2022 at 7:58 am

    Piss on our legs and say it it raining.
    Society needs to stand up and bloody a few noses.

      Jack Klompus in reply to scooterjay. | May 10, 2022 at 8:21 am

      I’ve been wondering for awhile why we continue this Thurston Howell style above the fray posture of class and civility when that’s exactly what they rely on to act like goons. Start throwing punches. Find the biggest loudmouth in the mob, spewing the most ridiculous “radical” rhetoric, making the loudest threats, and beat the ever living shit out of them. There is no reason whatsoever to ignore or continue to behave politely toward this rabble.

        The Gentle Grizzly in reply to Jack Klompus. | May 10, 2022 at 8:29 am

        “Start throwing punches.”

        Even if you were provoked, and there’s witnesses, you are the one going to jail. It’s officer friendly more than happy to do it because like a good little doggie, he’s going to obey orders.

          “you are the one going to jail”


          The SCOTUS will not use their persuasion to stop these people. So, frankly, I don’t give a damn.

          It’s all a show. We have no law as the ones we have are selectively enforced.

          Officer friendly wears a brown shirt.

        scooterjay in reply to Jack Klompus. | May 10, 2022 at 9:58 am

        I’m not going to punch for cause, only for effect in case one threatens me.
        Their day of judgement is coming, it is not my court to rule nor is it theirs.

        Arminius in reply to Jack Klompus. | May 11, 2022 at 5:53 pm

        I’ve boxed maybe 5 times.cive been studying Marciano a lot lately because he’s the onlyb

    Close The Fed in reply to paracelsus. | May 10, 2022 at 8:11 am

    I assume RINOs or dems are in charge of law enforcement in that jurisdiction. When that happens, we all know the lefties aren’t even slapped on the wrist and red-blooded Americans are jailed without bond and tortured for jay walking.

    So, who’s running the government there is all you need to know.

      buck61 in reply to Close The Fed. | May 10, 2022 at 12:07 pm

      There are republican governors in both Maryland and Virginia, Larry Hogan and the recently elected Glen Youngkin. Where is their leadership on this matter?

        CommoChief in reply to buck61. | May 10, 2022 at 12:16 pm

        To do what? Punch the tar baby? Nope. The Justices have a security detail. There are federal statutes and federal LEO responsible. Local LEO augments that. There isn’t much a State role here.

          Pepsi_Freak in reply to CommoChief. | May 11, 2022 at 8:50 am

          My understanding is that there are state statutes in both states (I know there are in Virginia) prohibiting this. Why haven’t they been enforced?

nordic_prince | May 10, 2022 at 7:48 am

Hey Garland:

Here are your REAL domestic terrorists.

Close The Fed | May 10, 2022 at 8:15 am

Something I didn’t think about until today, which is tangential to this post, but still interesting to me, is how artificially long the appellate decision process is.

As a lawyer, that’s one reason appeals are unattractive. They take so long. So in this case, they’ve had a decision since FEBRUARY and won’t announce til June? I could see waiting until March so dissenters could write their response, but that’s it.

They need to visit the real world, where time is money and do everything possible to shorten these appellate decision timelines. It’s embarassingly unprofessional and it costs the country a lot of money and unnecessary anguish, including the parties in the various cases.

    Milhouse in reply to Close The Fed. | May 10, 2022 at 9:43 am

    No, they haven’t had a decision. They had a straw poll and Alito wrote a draft. Then they all have to read it, the dissenters have to write their dissents and they all have to read those, then they have to think about all the arguments and exchange a bunch of comments, and then each decide how to vote. There’s no predicting how the actual decision will come out.

      Peabody in reply to Milhouse. | May 10, 2022 at 9:53 am

      “…they have to think about all the arguments and exchange a bunch of comments, and then each decide how to vote.”

      They could still speed it up if they wanted to—

        Barry in reply to Peabody. | May 10, 2022 at 11:12 am

        “They could still speed it up if they wanted to-”

        Yes. They could. But they are important and you are not.

2smartforlibs | May 10, 2022 at 8:16 am

These useful idiots might want to familiarize themselves with TITLE 18 USC 1507.

    Milhouse in reply to 2smartforlibs. | May 10, 2022 at 9:46 am

    Which is only applicable in cases where it doesn’t conflict with the first amendment. In any case where a conflict arises, the constitution trumps a statute.

      Capsaicin_Addict in reply to Milhouse. | May 10, 2022 at 9:49 am

      The Constitution guarantees the right to peaceably assemble.

      The moment they start throwing hands, it stops being a First Amendment issue.

        Milhouse in reply to Capsaicin_Addict. | May 10, 2022 at 10:52 am

        I didn’t watch all the videos, so maybe I missed something, but I haven’t heard of any “throwing hands” in the demonstrations in front of the justices’ homes.

        2smartforlibs cites a statute that purports to ban any such demonstrations, peaceful or violent. That’s all very well, but that statute is only applicable in those cases where it doesn’t conflict with the constitution. In any case where a conflict arises, it doesn’t apply. So it’s not as simple as simply citing it. The details of the case matter.

          henrybowman in reply to Milhouse. | May 10, 2022 at 3:28 pm

          “that statute is only applicable in those cases where it doesn’t conflict with the constitution”

          In other words, no cases…?

          Capsaicin_Addict in reply to Milhouse. | May 10, 2022 at 3:34 pm

          I’ve seen how lefties like to conflate speech and violence.

          Pepsi_Freak in reply to Milhouse. | May 11, 2022 at 8:56 am

          The courts have long held that the First Amendment rights are subject to reasonable time and place regulation. The statute forbidding protests at a judge’s residence intended to influence the judge (and the use of megaphones in connection therewith) would easily withstand a challenge.

      4rdm2 in reply to Milhouse. | May 11, 2022 at 5:52 am

      How did I know Milhouse would come out in favor of the thuggishness?

        Barry in reply to 4rdm2. | May 11, 2022 at 10:05 am

        To be fair, I think you misread Milhouse. It’s not that he is in favor of “thuggishness”, it’s that he interprets the law in a way that allows for the protests as practiced.

        I think he is wrong on the law. The constitution defines it clearly, but where the line is drawn at peaceable is the question. Disturbing the peace with bullhorns in front of a private residence is over the line and should be treated as such, and would be were the opposite circumstance the case.

    Guardian79 in reply to 2smartforlibs. | May 10, 2022 at 12:35 pm

    I wonder how many of the “protesters” are lawyers and/or government lawyers (DC has the largest concentration of lawyers in the US). Not only are they violating 18 USC 1507, they are also violating the lawyers rules of professional conduct and should be disbarred.

E Howard Hunt | May 10, 2022 at 9:15 am

This does not speak well of the conservative justices. They should have extorted a hard cordoning off of their homes and very heavy 24/7 family protection under threat of holding a joint news conference on how they are being deliberately mistreated. In other words, protect them as well as Hunter Biden.

I have no doubt that the “protesters” have more than one leftist attorney, even though it is against the Rules of Professional Conduct. I have no doubt more than one leftist attorney has violated Rule 8.2. Of course, I doubt they care since left leaning attorneys have no morals or ethics or sense of professionalism.

I guess terrorism is okay when Democrats do it.

Steven Brizel | May 10, 2022 at 10:50 am

This is how the storm troopers of the woke world intimidates with the goal of suppressing dissenting points of view. This is the continuation of the riots of 2020-it is an abject disgrace that Justices of SCOTUS are being forced to live in a witness protection program

Let them rage, and also let them know that if it spills into our life the repercussions will be ugly.
I’ve been longing to see them get their asses handed to them.

    Barry in reply to scooterjay. | May 10, 2022 at 11:23 am

    “I’ve been longing to see them get their asses handed to them.”

    Good luck with that. “They” have the entire DOJ, FBI, and state and local authorities on their side.

The SCOTUS is made up of cowards unwilling to fight back for Americans or theirselves.

The right to protest to peacefully assemble does not require submitting to mob action.

Were this a group of anti baby murdering protesters in front of a baby murdering clinic, they would be treated differently.

The marxists are allowed to riot. The “authorities” actually plan and help them do it.

There is no rule of law. If an LEO does his job properly he/she will be jailed.

Four choices, and self-defense through reconciliation? No, Repro freedom.

For all? Ah, women, girls, and all who identify as female, of course, of course…



#ProgressiveConfusionDysfunctionViability forever!

Planned parent/hood (e.g. Whitmer/Michigan, Cuomo/New York), too?

Pepsi_Freak | May 11, 2022 at 8:46 am

These criminals are engaged in a Federal felony. They should have been arrested and unmasked immediately. (The unmasking would also have the benefit of exposing the paid protestors.)

Steven Brizel | May 11, 2022 at 10:45 am

The following statute is clearly not just being lost in the shuffle but being deliberately violate not just by the radicals subsidizing these protests but by the Democrats:

“Federal law makes it a crime for a person, “with the intent of influencing any judge, juror, witness, or court officer, in the discharge of his duty,” to “picket[] or parade[] … in or near a building or residence occupied or used by such judge.” 18 U.S.C. §1507