Most Read
Image 01 Image 02 Image 03

Pro-Abortion Activist: Mothers Should be Able to Abort Children After Birth

Pro-Abortion Activist: Mothers Should be Able to Abort Children After Birth

“I believe in whatever the woman wants to choose to do. That’s her choice.”

I’m speechless.

Reporter: Do you believe in abortion after birth? Would you support that?

Pro-Abortion activist: I believe in whatever the woman wants to choose to do. That’s her choice.

Reporter: At any point of the child’s life.

Pro-abortion activist: And at a point of the lady’s life, that’s her choice.

Reporter: To kill another person’s body is.

Pro-abortion activist: It’s going to always be her choice.

Reporter: Even after the baby’s born.

Pro-abortion activist: Is always her choice.

Reporter: So if they’re two years old.

Pro-abortion activist: It’s always her choice.

Reporter: I can kill my two year old.

Pro-abortion activist: It’s a woman’s right to choose.

Reporter: To kill their child at any point.

Pro-abortion activist: It’s a woman’s right to choose.

DONATE

Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.

Comments

SeiteiSouther | May 16, 2022 at 10:48 am

What in the High Holy &^%@%! is WRONG with these people?

Kill them at 2 years old? Her choice?

No, that’s murder.

    Whitewall in reply to SeiteiSouther. | May 16, 2022 at 11:20 am

    When God is removed from one’s political life, something must take its place. Man is elevated to the job.

      Mauiobserver in reply to Whitewall. | May 16, 2022 at 2:15 pm

      What is the next step sacrificing infants in the fire to honor their woke religion?

      When only groups not individuals have RIGHTS then a human life means nothing if so determined by the mob.

        Planned parenthood. Next? Is planned parent/hood. Unfortunately, not so novel.

        There are diverse precedents for reproductive… sacrificial rites held for social, redistributive, clinical, and fair weather causes. The Pro-Choice “ethical” religion denies women and men’s dignity and agency, and reduce human life to a negotiable commodity. The Twilight Amendment (emanations from penumbras) has been the source of liberal excess and treachery.

          Peabody in reply to n.n. | May 17, 2022 at 10:17 am

          It’s a misnomer. You don’t go there if you plan to be a parent. They only cater to peple who do not want to be parents and their plan is always the same: kill your baby.

      oldvet50 in reply to Whitewall. | May 17, 2022 at 7:48 am

      Man is never elevated when God is removed, Satan is.

    zennyfan in reply to SeiteiSouther. | May 16, 2022 at 12:11 pm

    Brains dulled by alcohol or drugs and 12 years in government schools, plus a steady diet of reality TV. Forget critical thinking; they’ve lost the ability to think on the most basic level.

      The Gentle Grizzly in reply to zennyfan. | May 16, 2022 at 4:02 pm

      Mini blame the schools for that. Where are the parents?

        Whitewall in reply to The Gentle Grizzly. | May 16, 2022 at 5:05 pm

        If the last 2 decades are any clue, advancing their careers, building bigger houses and more expensive cars and remortgaging their homes to use ‘equity’ to pay for it all while the kids are in school and soccer practice etc.

    The_Mew_Cat in reply to SeiteiSouther. | May 16, 2022 at 1:07 pm

    I think the next frontier in abortion politics will come after Roe is gone – sole leftist states will make some abortions mandatory. If there is no right to an abortion, there is also no right to not have an abortion. If a State makes pregnancy dependent on getting a state license, and someone has an unlicensed pregnancy, then the State has a right to terminate the baby.

      henrybowman in reply to The_Mew_Cat. | May 16, 2022 at 2:22 pm

      The problem with this slippery slope argument is that in any scenario where it comes true, the existence or nonexistence of Roe is immaterial. For example, the Second Amendment shows zero signs of being repealed, and yet a fair number of states already practice analogous outrages upon guns and gun owners, and have for quite a long time.

      Milhouse in reply to The_Mew_Cat. | May 16, 2022 at 8:42 pm

      If there is no right to an abortion, there is also no right to not have an abortion.

      No, it doesn’t work like that. There are limits even to the states’ general police power. States can’t just do whatever they like.

    Milhouse in reply to SeiteiSouther. | May 16, 2022 at 4:47 pm

    What in the High Holy &^%@%! is WRONG with these people?

    Kill them at 2 years old? Her choice?

    No, that’s murder.

    No more so than it is before birth. So at least she’s consistent.

      txvet2 in reply to Milhouse. | May 16, 2022 at 7:36 pm

      You have to admit that that kind of consistency does have it’s charm. For instance, Momma finds out her 15-year-old is a drug dealing gang-banger. One behind the ear, problem solved.

    rscalzo in reply to SeiteiSouther. | May 17, 2022 at 9:11 am

    No one cares I understand be that stupid.

    The Real Truth in reply to SeiteiSouther. | May 17, 2022 at 10:17 am

    This woman is either incredibly stupid, or she is completely out of her mind !
    What she is agreeing to is MURDER, any way that you look at it. She is not an “activist”
    she is an INSANE activist.

NavyMustang | May 16, 2022 at 10:51 am

Sickened by this? Most definitely. Surprised? Not in the least.

Once it’s acceptable to kill the unborn, termination of toddlers is a next step. There are people who would allow old folks to die, soon the ages and criteria for will expand. Low regard for human life causes many problems, some that may not be foreseen.

    nordic_prince in reply to Romey. | May 16, 2022 at 1:34 pm

    Not just unborn, not just babies or toddlers, not just the elderly – look for the elimination of all kinds of “undesirables,” such as Down’s syndrome kids, “religious nuts,” people who question “the system,” political opposition, MAGA deplorables, etc, etc. The list is endless.

      TrickyRicky in reply to nordic_prince. | May 16, 2022 at 2:16 pm

      Bingo ^1,000
      History is very clear on this point.

        divemedic in reply to TrickyRicky. | May 16, 2022 at 5:52 pm

        Which is what makes the Second Amendment so important. It’s much harder to load people into boxcars while they are shooting you in the face.

      The Real Truth in reply to nordic_prince. | May 17, 2022 at 10:21 am

      That is exactly how Hitler felt ! He wanted to get rid of every person that he thought was “Undesirable”, and of course that included the Jewish people among many others.

Jack Klompus | May 16, 2022 at 11:14 am

How. pray tell, is the Democratic Party significantly different from a group we would unhesitatingly call a wackjob cult?

Phillygirl1807 | May 16, 2022 at 11:19 am

These people are sick! The latest sonogram technology provides parents with 3-D pictures of their growing fetus. By 12 weeks, the fetus is fully formed. How ghoulish these pro-abortioners are. They are murdering their babies!!

“Mothers should be able to abort children after birth.”

No need to stop there. Abort people in foster care, nursing homes and homeless shelters.

But whatever you do—-do not stop the flood of illegals crossing the border. Abort your children and we will be able to send more baby formula to the border.

theduchessofkitty | May 16, 2022 at 11:29 am

Is she that stupid? Or is she that evil?

They should have asked whether dad could do the same, since “my body” is no longer applicable.

Note that in some countries infanticide is a separate crime from murder, applicable only to women, with diminished penalties. How’s that male privilege going for you, guys?

Jack Klompus | May 16, 2022 at 11:45 am

Her cult-like responses are typical and unsurprising. Just repeat repeat repeat the scripted, dogmatic answer and dodge the need or desire to think.

I wonder if she would be in favor of altering the equation just slightly regarding choice post birth, since at that point there is a separate person not specifically reliant upon the mother? Shouldn’t her position be altered to reflect that fact by changing the terms? Substitute ‘mother/woman’ for Parents/guardian and ‘child’ for dependent/ward.

Under this change any person that was dependent upon another would be subject to termination at another’s whim. For instance those who accept govt assistance; aka welfare, school lunch subsidies, Sec 8 housing, home heating assistance……anyone who is a ‘burden’ to others in the sole opinion of those others.

I’m pretty sure she hasn’t fully thought through the logical conclusion of her arguments.

    Jack Klompus in reply to CommoChief. | May 16, 2022 at 12:12 pm

    She would respond to those questions with the same robotic, scripted words.

    Dathurtz in reply to CommoChief. | May 16, 2022 at 2:29 pm

    Not only that, but she doesn’t believe in either logic or conclusions.

    She didn’t arrive at her position through reason and therefore cannot be reasoned out of it. She is the definition of unreasonable.

2smartforlibs | May 16, 2022 at 12:13 pm

A kid is not an Amazon delivery. If they really believe this detritus they are one generation late.

Perhaps someone either female or identifying as a birthing person could adopt Brandon, Horizontal Harris and Pelosi then…. 🙂

How ignorant and blind are they, that they think “aborting” a child after birth is anything but murder.

The_Mew_Cat | May 16, 2022 at 1:05 pm

In the old days mothers would put defective or unwanted infants in the forest for the animals to eat. Same as it always was.

So black lives DON’T matter after all?

Blaise MacLean | May 16, 2022 at 1:47 pm

You should not be surprised because they are caught in the logical implications of their own arguments. If you can support the killing of an abortee up until birth, or just after birth (according to Gov. Northam, (then) Sen. Obama, current House Democrats), then what is the logical distinction between one minute before birth and one minute after birth? And between one minute after birth and one hour after birth? And hour after birth and two years?

These are the logical consequences of their arguments. The left is a malignant, anti-life curse on our society.

This is what fanaticism looks like, and hers is a religious fanaticism (just not one for any good religion).

healthguyfsu | May 16, 2022 at 2:24 pm

I guess that’s one way not to quibble over the line of life vs non-life. Let’s just obliterate the need for the distinction by sanctioning infanticide as a “woman’s choice”

Rebellious teenager? No problem! Just abort and you do you!

Could we find her mother and arrange it?

Vile as this is. I don’t think she was really answering the question. What she was doing is repeating a rote phrase in order to avoid answering the question. It is not an uncommon tactic to avoid being drawn into an actual debate to defend a position.

This is what happens when you have no moral foundations in your life.

When a woman elects to have unprotective sex and as a result gets pregnant, they become responsible for that baby’s life! They have no right to murder that child without being arrested for that murder. Some feel there should be exceptions due to rape and a mother’s/baby’s health/medical issues. That warrants a different discussion.

    Subotai Bahadur in reply to jrcowboy49. | May 17, 2022 at 6:59 pm

    What is this “responsible” thing of which you speak? No one of the Left can be held “responsible” for anything they do. It says so in the Leftist playbook.

    Subotai Bahadur

There’s nothing new about this. This was the law in Rome, except that it wasn’t the mother’s right, it was the father’s. It was perfectly legal for a man to kill his own children, no matter how old they were. As Bill Cosby used to say, “I brought you into this world, and I can take you out”. So this woman wants to go back to that, except with the mother in charge. As she says, “at any point in the lady’s life”, not, as the reporter asked, at any point in the child’s life. Because hopefully the child will outlive the mother, and once she’s dead the child will finally be free.

    alaskabob in reply to Milhouse. | May 16, 2022 at 5:02 pm

    This is essentially a matriarchal society with men as peripheral. So, one could see this as solely a “woman’s choice” although that choice goes back to insemination. Uncle Sam has become the non-judgmental family member footing the bills. So, letting the kids out to be feral is HER choice.

I have a list.
Let’s start with Pelosi.
Better late than than never.

Subotai Bahadur | May 16, 2022 at 11:18 pm

TWANLOC

Subotai Bahadur

Can these pro-abortion activists be any more brainless or just flat-out stupid??? These people have only one mission, which is to cause dissension and division where ever they go. They sopot ignorance like this because they believe this tripe or they are saying this feces in order to get paid by Planned Parenthood.

RandomCrank | May 17, 2022 at 9:11 pm

I don’t like abortion, but I’m okay with a 15-week restriction. Not because I favor it, but because I tend to seek the middle ground even in difficult situations.

This? It’s sick, loathsome, disgusting, depraved, and on and on.

opie taylor | May 18, 2022 at 8:35 pm

Someone needs to get that woman’s mother on the phone. She needs to kill her daughter. Now.