Image 01 Image 03

NYC Mayor Adams: No Limitation on Abortion, Even Day of Birth

NYC Mayor Adams: No Limitation on Abortion, Even Day of Birth

“No, I do not. Women should have a right to choose”

These people are monsters.


Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.


Jack Klompus | May 16, 2022 at 11:12 am

What a charming political party.

    henrybowman in reply to Jack Klompus. | May 16, 2022 at 2:15 pm

    Maybe he can get together with his peer from Chicago and work out a deal where the babies can take each other out via mutual combat. I bet it would rule pay-per-view in both places.

    livefreeorpie1791 in reply to Jack Klompus. | May 17, 2022 at 7:39 am

    Satan is charming. He is the lord of lies.

filiusdextris | May 16, 2022 at 11:13 am

Once you posit a standard, you have to defend your criteria for determining that standard. They are forced to promote unfettered access to abortion, as their criteria would be nonsensical.

    Jack Klompus in reply to filiusdextris. | May 16, 2022 at 11:17 am

    The average Democrat rarely possesses the intellectual capacity to think their alleged principles all the way through to logical conclusions. They don’t have to. A prepackaged set of cliches and buzzwords combined with obnoxious posturing and stridency is all that’s required to be “in the club”. Zero difference from Scientologists going “up the bridge.”

His mother must be proud of him

When someone is so completely and totally incompetent in their actions and polices that affect so many, there is no need to comment as he is is a disaster for the city that elected him. And as a result NYC has a ____________ future.*

*Fill in the blank.

I would tell him to go to Hell, but at this point that is a given.

So in his world, the most effective legal method for keeping the black population would be enshrined. I guess we can assume that black-on-black killings are also okay. Anyone who disagrees is a white supremecist.


    “… keeping the black population in check would be enshrined.”

    Jack Klompus in reply to Pasadena Phil. | May 16, 2022 at 11:59 am

    As a Philadelphia resident I can confirm that the warehousing of black kids in garbage, third rate schools, disincentivizing any meaningful job growth, and the daily slaughter of at least one young black citizen per day is wholeheartedly accepted by the political leadership of this city. It’s been the brand of the one-party rule this city has suffered under for generations.

      stevewhitemd in reply to Jack Klompus. | May 16, 2022 at 8:04 pm

      You could substitute ‘Chicago’, ‘Detroit’, ‘Saint Louis’, or any other large city for ‘Philadelphia’ in your sentence and it would work.

    Lucifer Morningstar in reply to Pasadena Phil. | May 16, 2022 at 2:04 pm

    Keep ’em on the plantation and voting democrat every election. That’s the democrat way!

    And if any black gets uppity and has the temerity to have their own opinions make sure to accuse them of being Oreos® or an Uncle Tom. Can’t be having these blacks think on their own.

    JackinSilverSpring in reply to Pasadena Phil. | May 16, 2022 at 3:04 pm

    Think of murder as a late term abortion. So, no need to worry about the homicide rate, because abortion is not a crime.

Whatever else Mayor Adams may be, he was certainly very clear in his response.

My biggest question about this is why are we making NY powerful via immigration?

If we lowered immigration enough to prevent NY from replacing parts of the population fleeing NY (They barely lost a total of one seat while millions of people moved out of the state that says a lot) we could dramatically reduce the influence these death cultists actually have.

We don’t need phony arguments about dangers of immigrants; we have good reason to reduce immigration both economic and political.

Reproductive rites held for social, redistributive, clinical, and fair weather causes. Deja vu.

I’m so disgusted I’m speechless. I’m so speechless it’s taken me two sentences to describe just how speechless I am.

    Milhouse in reply to JDmyrm. | May 16, 2022 at 4:39 pm

    i don’t see why. What he’s saying isn’t shocking, it’s the current law in NY, CA, and many other states. And it’s the Democrat Party’s official and long-standing policy to keep it that way, regardless of whether Roe remains in effect or is overturned. It’s horrible, it’s evil, but how can it be shocking when this has been the situation for 50 years and it’s been well known all that time? It’s like saying you’re shocked speechless to hear about the Chicago murder rate, or the crimes of Saddam Hussein. They were shocking the first time you heard about them, but surely not now.

      4rdm2 in reply to Milhouse. | May 16, 2022 at 4:52 pm

      At this point nothing a democrat says is shocking.

      stevewhitemd in reply to Milhouse. | May 16, 2022 at 8:06 pm

      Fair point — one could plausibly argue that Roe was preventing even more abortions in those states. We know that such a thing isn’t quite true as there were certain abortion facilities (I refuse to call them ‘clinics’) that were quite willing to do later abortions, the law be damned.

        Milhouse in reply to stevewhitemd. | May 16, 2022 at 8:38 pm

        How could one argue that? Roe doesn’t limit abortions in any way. It permits states to impose some small and ineffective limits on abortion in the last trimester, but not earlier; but it doesn’t require even that. States like NY that allow abortion right up to the moment of birth are fully in compliance with Roe. And no state is allowed to actually ban abortion, at any time before birth; all a state can do, if it wishes, is put up a few extra hoops for the pregnant woman to jump through, which may inconvenience her for a bit since she’s not feeling very athletic in her 9th month, and may even induce her…

She should have asked him “What about after birth?” and see what he said.

    Peabody in reply to Milhouse. | May 16, 2022 at 6:11 pm

    He no doubt would’ve said he is for it in most cases, with the possible exception of murderers on death row.

If Adams was secretly acting as a front for an insidious white supremacist plot to reduce the black population…what would he saying and doing differently than what he’s saying and doing now?

Then consistent with adams’ view, I see nothing wrong with “post-birth” abortions for his kind, i.e., all who have, would or advocate the murder of the defenseless as well as those who make markets, provide logistics or conduct research involving the “body parts” of the murdered unborn, through the date of death. …

An infant should at least have the same rights as any other undocumented alien in NY.

    Peabody in reply to jolanthe. | May 16, 2022 at 6:26 pm

    Babies should at least have the same odds of making it through the Birth Canal alive as Marines did landing at Guadalcanal.

    Ghost Rider in reply to jolanthe. | May 17, 2022 at 11:07 am

    Babies should have better odds of making it into the country than illegal aliens.

So much for the “clump of cells” theory.

We all should understand that the next step is “abortion at any time.”

Your son is 21 and Conservative? Then, post-birth abortion. No problem. Probably get a medal.

The dull-witted clod is too fucking stupid to understand pregnancy, so he just defaults to “anything goes”.