Image 01 Image 03

MSNBC Guest Wants to Have Sex With the SCOTUS Leaker and ‘Joyfully Abort Our Fetus’

MSNBC Guest Wants to Have Sex With the SCOTUS Leaker and ‘Joyfully Abort Our Fetus’

Yes, abortion is so funny. (sarcasm)

An MSNBC panel laughed when supposed comedian Laurie Kilmartin said she wants to make love to the person who leaked Justice Samuel Alito’s draft opinion overturning Roe v Wade.

Oh, she would then abort the baby:

“Here’s the thing. I mean, here’s my feeling about the leaker. I would like to find out who the leaker is so I could make sweet love to that person, because that person is a hero to me. Okay? And if the leaker, a lot of people are saying it could be a conservative, if the leaker is a Republican and if I get pregnant during our lovemaking, I will joyfully abort our fetus and let them know. I don’t know that answered your question. It probably didn’t.”


Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.


The Gentle Grizzly | May 9, 2022 at 7:03 pm

Where do people like this come from? I don’t think this is what the women’s movement was originally about.

    Same place Rosemary got her baby.

      JohnC in reply to Peabody. | May 9, 2022 at 11:52 pm

      I remember a story told by a formerly lefty guy about a party he attended maybe 20 years ago. Typical urban wealthy single liberals doing their weekly thing.

      A lady there was making a big deal about her upcoming abortion by getting hammered and taking every drug available. Everyone there thought it was a hoot! Jokes were made about how many brain cells the baby must be losing.

      Something inside made him feel sick. It was one of the things that changed his outlook on life. He’s pretty conservative nowadays.

        guyjones in reply to JohnC. | May 10, 2022 at 7:26 am

        The guy you describe can hold his head high — what he felt was conscience and moral revulsion — ethical standards that weren’t shared by his fellow partygoers, who in this regard evinced nothing to separate them from common apes.

          Martin in reply to guyjones. | May 10, 2022 at 8:13 am

          A slander on apes. These are humans. Pretty standard issue. They are sacrificing babies to their god and they don’t even know it in their conscious mind. The just know that they have to rebel against anything their parents or grandparents might have believed.


    Not women, monsters

      The Gentle Grizzly in reply to gonzotx. | May 9, 2022 at 8:58 pm

      Gonzo, some of the women I’ve known over the years, they’re hard to tell apart!

    dunce1239 in reply to The Gentle Grizzly. | May 9, 2022 at 9:58 pm

    Herpes alert!!! Herpes alert!!!

    Everyone gets a trophy because they are all…………speshall. Ooooh look at daddy’s little princess. Etc…………

    There is something deeply unsexy about a woman so eager to kill her own child

henrybowman | May 9, 2022 at 7:08 pm

Do today’s comediennes joyfully abort their fetuses before or after decapitating sitting presidents?

Colonel Travis | May 9, 2022 at 7:09 pm

Ladies and gentlemen, please welcome the headliner for tonight’s show, all the way from Oswiecim, Poland: Josef Mengele! Big hand for Herr Mengele.

OMG these people deserve a special place in hell that Mr. Dante wasn’t aware of.

nordic_prince | May 9, 2022 at 7:09 pm

Where do people like this come from?

From the pits of hell.

drednicolson | May 9, 2022 at 7:18 pm

They should have named her Jezebel.

Those people are sick

    Skip in reply to Skip. | May 9, 2022 at 7:21 pm

    If they can want to kill babies that fast. Human life means nothing to them. That’s why Leftists have killed 260,000,000 in the last century.

Tell me again how nobody is for abortion, or against life, and the terms “pro-life” and “anti-abortion” are dishonest propaganda by the anti-choice movement. Tell me again how the “pro-choice” movement’s dearest wish is that abortion be safe, legal, and rare. Tell me again how misogynist it is to imagine that women abort their babies from choice, rather than being compelled to a horrible and distressing decision by circumstances beyond their control. Tell me all these things that the “pro-choice” people have been spouting for 50 years.

    Dathurtz in reply to Milhouse. | May 9, 2022 at 8:17 pm

    Lefties do not now, nor have they ever, meant what they said.

    Old Soldier in reply to Milhouse. | May 10, 2022 at 10:14 am

    Given that distinct, human life begins at conception, conception is a natural result of sexual intercourse, a child so conceived will continue to grow to maturity absent miscarriage, disease, or injury, it is self-evident that a unique, distinct human being is a predictable consequence of sexually mature men and women engaging in such behavior.

    Stripped of pretensions of “choice,” “autonomy,” and so on, abortion on demand is, at its core, the avoidance of responsibility with devastating consequences.

In leftist society that speech is celebrated. In normal society it is considered vulgar. We have different cultures living side by side inside the US.

smalltownoklahoman | May 9, 2022 at 8:29 pm

*facepalm* Good lord, the depths of depravity of these people!

The Gentle Grizzly | May 9, 2022 at 8:30 pm

I wonder if any of these women that are so militant about this have ever actually had an abortion? Two lady friends of mine had to have them. No they weren’t might keep my kids.

One of them, the fœtus had Taye-Sachs markers. She’d already saw a son go through two plus years of agony before dying. She was not putting a being through that much less herself.

The other was gang raped by thugs just off the USC campus.

The decisions to abort were not at all east. Girls I knew in college who got “knocked up” didn’t find the decision easy.

Now for those of you who are rock rib to pro life: tell me that you would compell your daughter to carry a child to term that was conceived by rape. Especially by people that are not as good as you. And yes, I mean that. Don’t tell me you would. Your kid is different, so, exceptions would be made.

For those of you who see children born with things like profound down syndrome spina bifida, tay-Sachs or similar very nasty and agonizing things I do not want to hear the expression God has given you a challenge. Because if that’s the way you picture God I’m very very happy that I’m an atheist. I want no part of the God like that.

I have put on my safety hat. Let the pummeling begin.

    scooterjay in reply to The Gentle Grizzly. | May 9, 2022 at 8:57 pm

    You are certainly allowed to think that way as no one has forced you into worshipping any deity.
    I beg to differ with your atheism, my younger brother was one and Matt felt that when you die, you are just gone.
    I’m pretty sure Matt found otherwise after March of 2018.
    Too many odd little things have happened since he passed away, and I am convinced he has atoned for a bad life.
    I can’t reveal all occurences, but one that stands out is a kitten I rescued a year after he passed away. Matt was a lover of animals and he knows exactly how much I love cats.
    My little Puff appeared inside a piece of production equipment in BMW Plant Spartanburg…there was no Earthy way she could have gotten there.
    It was physically impossible for her to get there and I can only think it supernatural.

      The Gentle Grizzly in reply to scooterjay. | May 9, 2022 at 9:03 pm

      My atheism is not a denial of religion. It’s just the entire God concept never made any sense to me.

      However, I am certainly in no way ever going to oppose somebody’s religious beliefs or their belief in God or gods plural. It’s just that over the years and never made any sense to me.

      As for leading a bad life and paying for it, I’ve actually been a pretty good guy. Religion defines being good as I’m in a certain shaped building on a certain day of the week saying certain words in a particular order and listening to a man in the front of the room who wears a different set of clothing but I do.

      That or crazy rules like male genital mutilation in the case of the Jews so that we can be at one with I forget who it is. None of that kind of thing makes sense to me.

    drednicolson in reply to The Gentle Grizzly. | May 9, 2022 at 9:37 pm

    The fate of one is shared by all. If we allow the value of unborn lives to be arbitrarily appraised, regardless of what they would want (which, granted, we cannot know), we tacitly allow the same standard to be applied to ourselves, regardless of what we would want (which we, at least, have the privilege of being able to communicate).

    “Let the pummeling begin.”

    Explain why a woman should be restricted to killing her baby before birth. Why shouldn’t she be allowed to make the decision 5 minutes after, or 5 months? What’s so special about birth? Certainly if you do not believe in a God there can be no moral distinction.

    “Two lady friends of mine had to have them.”

    No. They didn’t. They chose to have abortions. I grant that for some the decision is heartrending. But they still decide to take a human life. In the case of the first, she could have avoided that decision by making better judgments prior to getting pregnant. In the case of rape it’s a gut wrenching decision, but you still decide on taking a life or not.

    Griz: WRT the rape question.

    In what week are you making that decision? 39? 38? 37?

    Or the second week?

    There’s a difference. One crime against an innocent does not justify the next.

    It’s not in my power to compel anyone. We don’t live in an era when fathers could compel their daughters to do anything. But it makes no difference whose daughter it is, she has no right to murder her baby just because its father was a rapist. Nor has she the right to hire a hit man to do it for her. If she had such a right, why would it disappear the minute the baby was out of her? If her trauma was enough to justify murder, why not after birth? Why not 10 or 20 years later?

    My advice to anyone who was raped and fears an egg might have become fertilized is to get cleaned out immediately, before doing any tests. At that point it’s still just her body, because she has no positive knowledge that it’s anyone else’s. That way she will never know and it need never weigh on her conscience.

    If you know there’s a trespasser on your property you do not have the right to shoot them. But if you don’t know, you have every right to fire a gun on your own property, and if some trespasser who happened to be there without your knowledge gets shot, that’s not your problem.

      Barry in reply to Milhouse. | May 10, 2022 at 9:32 pm

      “…and if some trespasser who happened to be there without your knowledge gets shot, that’s not your problem.”

      While I agree with most of what you said, just so no one gets the wrong idea, you are dead wrong on that one. YOU are responsible for where your bullet goes. And that includes into someone you didn’t expect to be there.

50 shades of Aztec, Socialist (e.g. Nazis), Communist (e.g. Chinese PRC), Progressives (e.g. wicked solution) et al ritual sacrifice for social, redistributive, clinical, and fair weather causes.

Subotai Bahadur | May 9, 2022 at 9:16 pm

Earlier today I saw [and replied to] a piece where the Satanists were talking about establishing abortion clinics and claiming a religious exemption to the law. I suspect that someone should put Laurie Kilmartin and them together as they are a match made . . . somewhere. Just in passing, I never heard of Kilmartin before, and I certainly will avoid anything by her if I should encounter her name in the future. YMMV.

Subotai Bahadur

SCJ John Roberts will be found as the leaker. Anything to distract the Durham investigation involving Hillary Clinton and the 2020 election steal.

The whole point of the leak is to give Democrat Terrorists opportunity to intimidate the majority of Justices – hoping to scare one or more into changing their opinion.

And these bats think the leaker was a Conservative?

Can’t help noticing that there’s never a leak like this on the other side.

Nor would there ever be a point to one: no one on the Right would show up at a Justice’s personal home to Terrorize them and their family.

What if the leaker has the wrong set of chromosomes? Too many XXs can’t reproduce. What’s a gal to do?

The Left is full of those crazies. What POS they are for joking about killing babies. I hope they get their just reward someday.

texansamurai | May 10, 2022 at 9:22 am


assuming we’re talking about women with a conscience, the procedure is still irrevocable–however rationalized/justified, it’s forever–have known several women who’ve made the decision and it has haunted/affected each of them and for a long time–like birth, is a procedure half the population will never experience/comprehend fully–can only hope that women who choose to have the procedure(based on my own observations of those who have and the aftermaths) consider things carefully, both for the now and the later on

the view espoused by this “comedienne” is repulsive not only for its glib arrogance but for how it denigrates women in general–just disgusting

Has anyone else noticed that all pro-choice, i.e., abortionists, were not aborted?

She is 56, so I guess she can really crank those babies out. Wonder if her son was a failed abortion. Ha, their sick humor shows just how low these people really are. They are sicker than they appear to be.

Kilmartin has a son born in 2006.[11] She is a single mother who often jokes about her son and motherhood.

Her mother died from complications of COVID-19 on June 18, 2020.[12]

What if the leaker is a woman? No chance for a fetus there. And no, I don’t care what crazy sh*t lefties believe. You need one of each to create a child.

JackinSilverSpring | May 10, 2022 at 10:01 am

Laurie Kilmartin is certifiably insane. And the name, Kil martin, so apt.

not enough viagra in the world.
HARD pass.
see what I did there???