Most Read
Image 01 Image 02 Image 03

Tulsi Gabbard Jumps All Over Ketanji Brown Jackson “I’m Not A Biologist” Comment

Tulsi Gabbard Jumps All Over Ketanji Brown Jackson “I’m Not A Biologist” Comment

“The hypocrisy and absurdity of this is that she was nominated by President Biden in large part because she is a woman.”

Tulsi Gabbard went off on SCOTUS nominee Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson’s inability to define a “woman.”

Brown Jackson told Sen. Marsha Blackburn (R-TN) that she’s not a biologist so she cannot define a woman.

(1/2) In order to have a Supreme Court committed to protecting the rights of all Americans, including women, every justice needs to understand there is such a thing as a woman, as distinct from a man. Yet when asked to define the word “woman,” Supreme Court nominee …

(2/2) … Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson said, “I don’t know.” The hypocrisy and absurdity of this is that she was nominated by President Biden in large part because she is a woman.

DONATE

Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.

Comments

The Bee will put out no less the 50 jokes on this. All of them are worthy of spitting coffee.

    Exiliado in reply to Andy. | March 24, 2022 at 8:13 pm

    The Bee will soon be out of a job.
    The left has made parody pointless.

      Ironclaw in reply to Exiliado. | March 24, 2022 at 11:10 pm

      The Bee most definitely has one of the most challenging tasks in the history of mankind. I can’t even imagine trying to come up with anything more preposterous than the retarded communists have already cooked up on their own.

      mailman in reply to Exiliado. | March 25, 2022 at 3:02 am

      The left has made parody illegal 🤬

      Stuytown in reply to Exiliado. | March 26, 2022 at 9:34 am

      No, the Bee will simply print news and the other publications will be parodies, which is already the case. That’s why the Bee awarded Rachel Levine its Man of the Year Award. Is that parody?

Women know who they are without expert input.

Women are equal in rights and complementary in Nature/nature.

The “womenfolk” are not a bloc. Diversity [dogma] (i.e. color judgment, class-based judgment) is an archaic concept that is well past its viability date.

There arent many democrats worthy of a vote – but Tulsi at least still functions in the reality zone

Morning Sunshine | March 24, 2022 at 5:21 pm

the point of a judge is to, well, JUDGE – to choose between options and make the best choice for the most people. She does not have to be a pilot to judge if an airline crash was an accident; she does not have to be a chef to judge if food is good; she does not have to be a biologist to know basic genetics. She has to be able to look at facts and make a decision that will be effect the most people in a positive way. If she cannot judge the facts of a basic point of biology and genetics, she should not be a judge at all, much less on the supreme court.

    Another Ed in reply to Morning Sunshine. | March 25, 2022 at 2:07 pm

    It is curious that biologyonline.com does have definitions of “female” and “woman”:

    https://www.biologyonline.com/dictionary/female

    https://www.biologyonline.com/dictionary/woman

    A “woman” would be an adult member of the species homo sapiens that is not a male.

    Having stated that, there are some individuals who have other than “XX” or “XY” chromosomes and others who have had non-normal exposure to hormones while developing in the uterus, They may exhibit physical characteristics attributed to the opposite sex or a combination of both, There are also some who have either “XX” or “XY” chromosomes and have the appropriate corresponding physical characteristics who incorrectly perceive that their gender is incorrect.

    She probalby shouldn’t have been admitted to law school. She was probably carried out.

I would like to hear Jackson define “racism”.

Here is a link about a Seattle Maturity Hospital that has trouble defining a woman also.

https://mynorthwest.com/3400880/maternity-center-gender-inclusive-enough-birthing-people-rantz/

At least she acknowledged that it’s a matter of biology rather than social construction or personal belief.

Oops.

This is the obvious endpoint of credentialism. This rot is endemic in government, where you are promoted based on credentials and time in grade, not job performance. If you don’t have credentials then what you say is by definition wrong.

Her husband is a doctor. I am certain biology is a requirement in becoming a doctor. Maybe he can explain it to her.

I realize it is in the poorest of tastes, and very rude.
KBJ is a dumb jogger.
I am a sinner, and I live with it.

As Tuck put it, this Transgenderism is a con

If this judge doesn’t know what a woman is, how do we know if Slow Joe fulfilled his promise about a nomination of a black female? Does she know what black is?

JackinSilverSpring | March 25, 2022 at 7:53 am

The following would have been the appropriate follow-up questions to Jackson when she said she needed a biologist to define what a woman is: Are you a woman, or are you some being of unknown sex? Also, if you can’t tell what a woman is, how will you adjudicate issues having to do with discrimination against women?

Moon Battery | March 25, 2022 at 9:28 am

If this adult judge can’t define what a “woman” is because she’s “not a biologist”, then why the Hell would we expect a child to know if they are a “girl” or a “boy” and then give them puberty blockers. They aren’t biologists either which means they can’t possibly know.

then shut the fk up.

e pluribus unum | March 28, 2022 at 6:41 pm

To those who claim “trans” women are women I have this test.
You are a regular guy dating some blonde chick on the U. Penn. swim team. You tell your best buddy you can set him up with another swimmer on the team. She’s tall, brunette, pretty good looking. The test is this- does your buddy accept this tall swimmer as a great date? Or does he say, “What were you thinking?-he’s a dude!”