Image 01 Image 03

Ketanji Brown Jackson Can’t Define What A Woman Is: “I’m Not A Biologist”

Ketanji Brown Jackson Can’t Define What A Woman Is: “I’m Not A Biologist”

You don’t have to be a biologist to know that XX is female and XY is male.

Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson cannot tell us the definition of a woman. She also would not answer if she agreed with RBG that there are physical differences between a man and a woman.


Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.


Morning Sunshine | March 22, 2022 at 10:31 pm

this is what happens when we source everything to the “experts”

Real American | March 22, 2022 at 10:34 pm

we can’t have SCOTUS justices who don’t know what a woman is. Gotta draw the line somewhere.

But she knows Roe v Wade is settled law.

She needs a biologist to explain it?

    If this person believes what they say, then by using basic scientific deduction, they are directly saying is that ‘biology’ supersedes ‘self-image’.

    Which leads me to quote a modern-day philosopher residing in Ohio who stated recently:
    “To what degree do I have to participate in another person’s self-image?”

      Dimsdale in reply to Philip. | March 27, 2022 at 7:45 pm

      Well, I am a biologist, and it is really pretty simple: XX for female, XY for men. 23rd chromosome.

      If she really was a wise jurist, she would have answered that “a biological female is XX, and a biological male is XY” and been done with it, but she had to be weaselly.

      A follow up question would have been “how do you know you are a woman?” Or, “what definition of woman did Biden use to select you from the pool of “black women?”

      Or, “does ‘I will only nominate a black woman for the position’ meet the requirements of the equal protection clause, or any racial equality standards?”

    We all know she dodged the question. But even her dodge was stupid.

    You would need a biologist to explain what a biological woman is, but that’s not the definition under consideration. You would need a psychologist to explain that if you think you’re a woman, then you’re a woman. Or a sociologist to explain that if you want to claim the benefits of being female you have to say you’re a woman. Or if a politician wants to please their constituents, they must proclaim that men can become women just be saying it.

Antifundamentalist | March 22, 2022 at 10:48 pm

“boys have a penis, girls have a vagina.” To quote Kindergarten Cop. If a 5 year old can get it..

    Yup, but that was then. Now a days, that water is murky because of all the make believe genders. I am going with the ability to bear offspring. Even that is losing some traction..

“Well, when your bladder is full, which salle de bain do you use and why?”

OK, so she’s saying that it’s determined by biology then right?

None of this kabuki matters.

Pierre Delecto, Grahamnesty, and their RINO crew will still vote her in with the full support of Bitch McConnell to ‘vote their conscience’.

Graham has literally never found an insane leftist judge that he doesn’t like enough to vote them out of committee.

As someone recently said so aptly, “I’m not a vet, but I know what a dog is.”

Wow, through thousands of years of human history people understood the differences between men and women. The majority of those people didn’t have medical degrees, or degrees in biology. Most of them couldn’t even read and write. Yet every single one of them understood the difference between men and women without even trying, because it’s just that damn obvious.

She’s a racist black angry stupid American hating woman

Just perfect for the court

Trans/homo? Trans/neo? No, trans/fluid. Why commit? It’s your Choice… uh, choice, past, present, and progressive.

As for the trans/neo in competition… finally, a feminine male breaks the plexiglass ceiling, and women are forced to take a knee, beg, good girl. #NoJudgment #NoLabels #DiversityInequityExclusion #HateLovesAbortion

I would of had a very simple follow up, have you ever spoken to an expert about this, if she said no. My reply would have been, turn around and ask the person sitting behind you, your husband is a medical doctor, I would venture to guess he could tell you.

That non-answer is an evasive answer though. You don’t have to play her word games to understand that. Someone who will recognize those differences will state so, she didn’t, ergo her response is “no”, free are no physical differences between a man and a woman. As stupid as it sounds, this isn’t difficult.

Tucker Carlson made a great point saying that Kentanji Brown Jackson is just another looney white progressive who happens to be black. Yes she has black skin but she espouses the same views and opinions as every crazy blue hair rainbow flag waving white progressive on Tick Tock. It’s Biden’s great Trojan horse. Virtue signal and pretend to be the wokest president ever but his nominee is just more of the same old same old.

Juris Doctor | March 23, 2022 at 2:56 am

Actual moments from KBJ confirmation hearing that you can find on youtube:

“Can you define what a woman is?” KBJ – Gee I don’t know I’m not a biologist.

“Is 7 months a long enough sentence for the crime of rape?” – KBJ – Well there are a multitude of factors for a judge to consider so i really can’t say.

“2021 set a record for the number of murders. Should we be arresting and prosecuting more murders of less murders?” – KBJ – That sounds like a policy question that would not be approriate for a judge to answer.

“Would packing the court to get politically driven outcomes delegitimize the court?” KBJ – The court should have the number of judges that congress decides that it should have. If congress decides there should be 28 judges then 28 is the number.

“During the pandemic there were record numbers of violent crimes and prooperty crimes. Under those circumstances should be have more police or less police” KBJ – That is a policy question that is left to the pruview of congress.

“Did you know that the school where you are a board member teaches CRT to kindergartners and assigns Ibram Kendi X books as reading homework for kids?” KJB – The board members for the school have no idea what curriculum is taught to the students.

What would be incredibly funny is if Bryers or what ever is name decides to hang around for another two years, then Trump comes back and appoints his own SCOTUS nominee to the new vacant SCOTUS seat 🤣🤣

But yes, this is all just theatre. She will be rubber stamped by 52 or 53 votes in favour of appointing this diversity hire who can’t answer simple questions.

    gnome in reply to mailman. | March 23, 2022 at 4:59 am

    Even funnier if the Republicans refuse to vote her out of committee and the vacancy remains unfilled until the next time a President has the Senate majority.

    8 is plenty for the next three years.

      Philip in reply to gnome. | March 23, 2022 at 10:21 am

      So, NOT a constitutional crisis?

      Peabody in reply to gnome. | March 23, 2022 at 2:52 pm

      After what we’ve seen of Brown, Bryer would not be a real man if he does not stay on the court and protect the constitution. I know he won’t, but even an idiot like him has got to have second thoughts.

“I’m Not A Biologist”
Wow. Absolutely not sus in the least
Maybe you should ask her about beer after all.

    Peabody in reply to henrybowman. | March 23, 2022 at 10:45 am

    The reason she was asked the question was to get a feel how she would decide cases which is what this hearing is all about. Her answer is “don’t ask don’t tell.”

    Peabody in reply to henrybowman. | March 23, 2022 at 3:01 pm

    Brown herself is a female, right? Does she take her clothes off when she showers? Has she ever looked in the mirror? Can she decribe herself? She is married to a man, is she not? How is her body different than his? She has two children so she must know something about the birds and the bees in order to pollinate and reproduce.

This Marxist is going to get appointed I’m afraid.

She’s covering herself, because when she’s on the Supreme Court the answer will depend on who is bringing the action.

And when she’s on the Supreme Court her decisions will be predictable in advance, based on who the litigants are rather than on the law. She shouldn’t be confirmed.

    Steven Brizel in reply to gnome. | March 23, 2022 at 6:16 am

    Board members approve allocations of dollars for curriculum and a man is a man not a woman

Ask her about Bidens involvment in the first AA woman nominated to the SC every chance you get.

Steven Brizel | March 23, 2022 at 7:25 am

Anyone who views Derrick Bell the intellectual father of CRT who was a Marxist and anti Semite as her Intellectual influence in law school should not be confirmed as a Federal judge and certainly not to SCOTUS

Steven Brizel | March 23, 2022 at 7:27 am

Only woke liberals can’t define who is a man and a woman

Being willing to take a job because of the color of your skin and your gender sounds like you’re anxious to start destroying faith in fairness.

Maybe someone should ask Joe Biden. After all, he said he was going to nominate a black woman. Evidently he and she agree on what a woman is, yet she can’t define it. Pretty elementary judgement if you’ve lived as long as she has.
What a bunch of low lifes.

    Mich in reply to Mich. | March 23, 2022 at 8:39 am

    I didn’t mean to demean low lifes. I don’t know what the left is anymore except it is looking like not very human.

      Peabody in reply to Mich. | March 23, 2022 at 10:30 am

      It is not looking very human:

      Civilization is just a thin veneer that covers savagery. It comes in different colors and is thinner in some places than others. From time to time it gets pulled back and if you look under it you won’t like what you see.

    henrybowman in reply to Mich. | March 24, 2022 at 12:30 am

    Even better! …have someone ask the nominee:

    Joe Biden promised us he would appoint a black woman to the Supreme Court.
    How do we know you are one?
    For that matter, how do you know you are one?

“I’m not a biologist. I’m a liar, excuse me, a lawyer.” — Ketanji Brown Jackson

Mary Chastain: You don’t have to be a biologist to know that XX is female and XY is male.

That is not always the case. Even with regard to physical sex, someone who is genetically XY, but has androgen insensitivity, for instance, can have some physical traits of a woman, including female genitalia.

Antifundamentalist: boys have a penis, girls have a vagina.

That is not always the case. Some people are born with ambiguous genitalia, or both.

Ironclaw: Wow, through thousands of years of human history people understood the differences between men and women.

The ancient Jews had a word for people who are intersex, “androgynos”. and the rabbinic literature delves into the legal questions concerning people who are intersex. The ancient Greeks posited a continuum. Pliny the Elder of Rome said, “there are even those who are born of both sexes”.

In any case, male and female doesn’t just refer to biological sex, but to gender. The human species is highly diverse in gender expression.

    Mr. Cultural Appropriator (Asians, and now Jews):

    The ancient Jews also had a word – and it’s still around: “schumck”.

    Dimsdale in reply to Zachriel. | March 27, 2022 at 7:58 pm

    Dare I ask what “some” translates to in terms of percentages of the population?

    Is counting people with abnormal hormonal conditions (natural) fair or relevant to the discussion? Why do we need to change the language and the law to accommodate what you declare as “infirm” people?

What does this person have in this person’s high school yearbook that this person wants to hide from this committee? Hummmm?

This person is unqualified for any position of authority and especially the SC. Brandon is a disaster

“Ketanji Brown Jackson cannot tell us the definition of a woman.”

Change “cannot” to “will not”.

Does anyone think for a minute, that once she gets on the court, she will consult with a biologist before rendering a decision?

Ha, ha. ha.

Is anyone going to ask her what it would mean to her to be the first Black “woman” (or something) on the Supreme Court? And how would she define her being a “woman”? So other than being black, what are her other qualifications?

This is where we are. A nominee for a lifetime appointment to SCOTUS pretends not to know the difference between men and women. Instead she states ‘I am not a biologist’ which seems to indicate she is declaring that ‘expert or technocratic’ opinion outweighs basic human knowledge and logic.

For this alone she should be opposed.

The party of “science” openly celebrates intellectual dishonesty.

Midterms are going to be sick.

If she doesn’t know what a woman is, then how can she call herself female? Hundreds of thousands of dollars spent on a Harvard education and she can’t even answer an elementary school question.

Just by that answer alone I think that should disqualify her for the highest court in the US of A. Just sayin’.

A Judge is to make basic decisions on what is given. This woman cannot do that or is afraid in case of being rejected for the position. A Supreme Court Justice should not be afraid of making decisions or giving an opinion. This woman clearly is not the proper person for the job and should not be a Judge at any level.

Not a biologist. Considering that woke leftist have pushed for a non-biological answer to that question, the last answer a lefty would “accept” would be a biological one.

I am not a biologist either but as a male, I know a female when I see one. I also know a creep when I see one. This woman is scary creepy.

Can’t she just follow the science?